Management of an iatrogenic duodenal perforation with a helical tack system in a patient with pancreatic cancer complicated by gastric outlet obstruction.

Video 1Closure of an iatrogenic perforation with helical tack system and subsequent EUS-guided choledochoduodenostomy.

Identification of patients with malignant biliary strictures using a cholangioscopy-based deep learning artificial intelligence (with video).

BACKGROUND AND AIMS: Accurately diagnosing malignant biliary strictures (MBSs) as benign or malignant remains challenging. It has been suggested that direct visualization and interpretation of cholangioscopy images provide greater accuracy for stricture classification than current sampling techniques (ie, brush cytology and forceps biopsy sampling) using ERCP. We aimed to develop a convolutional neural network (CNN) model capable of accurate stricture classification and real-time evaluation based solely on cholangioscopy image analysis. METHODS: Consecutive patients with cholangioscopy examinations from 2012 to 2021 were reviewed. A CNN was developed and tested using cholangioscopy images with direct expert annotations. The CNN was then applied to a multicenter, reserved test set of cholangioscopy videos. CNN performance was then directly compared with that of ERCP sampling techniques. Occlusion block heatmap analyses were used to evaluate and rank cholangioscopy features associated with MBSs. RESULTS: One hundred fifty-four patients with available cholangioscopy examinations were included in the study. The final image database comprised 2,388,439 still images. The CNN demonstrated good performance when tasked with mimicking expert annotations of high-quality malignant images (area under the receiver-operating characteristic curve, .941). Overall accuracy of CNN-based video analysis (.906) was significantly greater than that of brush cytology (.625, P = .04) or forceps biopsy sampling (.609, P = .03). Occlusion block heatmap analysis demonstrated that the most frequent image feature for an MBS was the presence of frond-like mucosa/papillary projections. CONCLUSIONS: This study demonstrates that a CNN developed using cholangioscopy data alone has greater accuracy for biliary stricture classification than traditional ERCP-based sampling techniques.

Initial multicenter experience using a novel endoscopic tack and suture system for challenging GI defect closure and stent fixation (with video).

BACKGROUND AND AIMS: Closure of endoscopic resection defects can be achieved with through-the-scope clips, over-the-scope clips, or endoscopic suturing. However, these devices are often limited by their inability to close large, irregular, and difficult-to-reach defects. Thus, we aimed to assess the feasibility and safety of a novel through-the-scope, suture-based closure system developed to overcome these limitations. METHODS: This was a retrospective multicenter study involving 8 centers in the United States. Primary outcomes were feasibility and safety of early use of the device. Secondary outcomes were assessment of need for additional closure devices, prolonged procedure time, and technical feasibility of performing the procedure with an alternative device(s). RESULTS: Ninety-three patients (48.4% women) with mean age 63.6 ± 13.1 years were included. Technical success was achieved in 83 patients (89.2%), and supplemental closure was required in 24.7% of patients (n = 23) with a mean defect size of 41.6 ± 19.4 mm. Closure with an alternative device was determined to be impossible in 24.7% of patients because of location, size, or shape of the defect. The use of the tack and suture device prolonged the procedure in 8.6% of cases but was considered acceptable. Adverse events occurred in 2 patients (2.2%) over a duration of follow-up of 34 days (interquartile range, 13-93.5) and were mild and moderate in severity. No serious adverse events or procedure-related deaths occurred. CONCLUSIONS: The novel endoscopic through-the-scope tack and suture system is safe, efficient, and permits closure of large and irregularly shaped defects that were not possible with established devices.

Assessment of Video Capsule Endoscopy in the Management of Acute Gastrointestinal Bleeding During the COVID-19 Pandemic.

Importance: Evaluation of acute gastrointestinal (GI) bleeding using invasive endoscopic procedures comprising the standard of care (SOC)-upper endoscopy and colonoscopy-can expose the endoscopy staff to SARS-CoV-2. Video capsule endoscopy (VCE) does not generate aerosols and only requires 1 person to manage the procedure. Objective: To examine the safety of VCE for the initial evaluation of GI bleeding at the peak of the COVID-19 pandemic to identify signs of active bleeding while minimizing patient and personnel exposure, saving personal protective equipment, and avoiding invasive or unnecessary procedures. Design, Setting, and Participants: A multicenter (UMass Memorial Medical Center and Louisiana State University Health Sciences Center) retrospective cohort study including 146 patients with COVID-19 who received VCE as the first-line diagnostic modality was conducted from March 15 to June 15, 2020, compared with SOC in January 2020 for evaluation of GI bleeding. The association between treatment and outcomes was estimated using multivariable regression adjusting for potential confounders. Propensity score matching was used to verify the results. Main Outcomes and Measures: The primary end point was detection of active bleeding or stigmata of recent bleeding. Secondary end points included the number of patients requiring any invasive procedures, number of additional procedures, rates of rebleeding and rehospitalization, transfusion requirements, and mortality. Results: Among 146 patients, 92 (63.0%) were men; mean (SD) age was 64.93 (14.13) years in the COVID-19 group and 61.33 (13.39) years in the SOC group. Active bleeding or stigmata of recent bleeding was observed in 44 (59.5%) patients in the COVID-19 group compared with 18 (25.0%) in the SOC group (adjusted odds ratio, 5.23; 95% CI, 2.23 to 12.27). Only 36 patients (48.7%) in the COVID-19 group required any invasive procedure during the hospitalization compared with 70 (97.2%) in the SOC group (adjusted odds ratio, 0.01; 95% CI, 0.001 to 0.08). The mean (SD) number of invasive procedures was 0.59 (0.77) per patient in the COVID-19 group compared with 1.18 (0.48) per patient in the SOC group (adjusted difference, -0.54; 95% CI, -0.77 to -0.31). Both approaches appeared to be safe and there was no significant difference in transfusion requirements, rebleeding, rehospitalization, or in-hospital mortality. No mortality was attributed to GI bleeding in either group. Conclusions and Relevance: In this cohort study, first-line diagnostic evaluation of acute GI bleeding using VCE appeared to be a safe and useful alternative to the traditional approach of upper endoscopy and colonoscopy. Use of VCE was associated with increased detection of active bleeding and a reduced number of invasive procedures and unnecessary exposure of personnel to SARS-CoV-2 and use of personal protective equipment.