Treatment Patterns and Clinical Outcomes in Patients with Hodgkin Lymphoma from Saudi Arabia, Türkiye, and South Africa: Subgroup Analysis from the International, Multi-center, Retrospective BHOLISTIC Study.

Objective: B-HOLISTIC was a real-world, retrospective study of treatment patterns and clinical outcomes in Hodgkin lymphoma (HL) in regions outside Europe and North America. This subgroup analysis reports findings from Saudi Arabia, Türkiye, and South Africa. Materials and methods: Patients aged ≥18 years and diagnosed with stage IIB-IV classical HL receiving frontline chemotherapy (frontline cHL) and/or relapsed/refractory HL (RRHL) from January 2010-December 2013 were assessed. The primary endpoint was progression-free survival (PFS) in patients with RRHL. Results: Overall, 694 patients (RRHL: n=178; frontline cHL: n=653) were enrolled. Among patients with RRHL, >80% received first salvage chemotherapy. The most common first salvage regimens were etoposide, methylprednisolone, cytarabine, cisplatin (ESHAP) in Saudi Arabia (78.3%) and dexamethasone, cytarabine, cisplatin (DHAP) in Türkiye (36.1%) and South Africa (40%). Median PFS (95% confidence interval [CI]) in the RRHL group was 5.1 (3.0-15.9), 19.7 (7.5-not reached), and 5.2 (1.1- 10.1) months in Saudi Arabia, Türkiye, and South Africa, respectively. The 5-year PFS and overall survival (95% CI) rates in patients with RRHL were 33.2% (21.6-45.2) and 78.2% (65.9-86.5) in Saudi Arabia, 42.5% (29.5-54.9) and 79.4% (67.2-87.5) in Türkiye, and 13.1% (4.2-27.0) and 53% (35.5-67.8) in South Africa, respectively. Conclusions: This study showed that the clinical outcomes in Türkiye and Saudi Arabia were generally comparable with Western countries during the study period, although Saudi Arabia had lower PFS rates. Conversely, the clinical outcomes in South Africa were suboptimal, emphasizing the need for novel therapies and improved progression to stem cell transplantation. Additionally, these data may serve as a control group for future studies in these countries and inform clinical decision-making.

Outcomes of Autologous stem cell transplantation in patients with primary refractory Diffuse Large B-cell lymphoma who demonstrate chemosensitivity to salvage chemotherapy.

Rituximab with anthracycline-based combination frontline chemoimmunotherapy can cure 50-60% of patients with diffuse large B-cell lymphoma (DLBCL). However, studies on the outcomes of patients with DLBCL who experience partial response (PR), stable or progressive disease in response to frontline rituximab, cyclophosphamide, doxorubicin, vincristine, and prednisone (RCHOP) therapy are limited, as are data on the outcomes of high-dose chemotherapy (HDC) and autologous stem cell transplantation (ASCT) in patients with primary refractory DLBCL who demonstrate chemosensitivity to salvage chemotherapy (SC). We assessed the latter among 184 patients, 144 of whom started SC, with 84 responding and 72 receiving HDC-ASCT. The 5-year survival rate was 58.9%; the median overall survival (OS) was not reached. The difference in response to SC (partial response versus complete response) was significant, with higher 2- and 5-year OS rates in patients with CR (78.1% and 74.9%, respectively) than in those with PR (55.3% and 47%, respectively). The median OS for the whole group was 15 months and particularly patients who had progressive disease after frontline R-CHOP had dismal outcomes. Our study suggests that in patients with primary refractory DLBCL without initial progressive disease after frontline R-CHOP, the depth of response to SC before HDC-ASCT is predictive of relapse.

Impact of Risk Factors and Long Term Survival Analysis of Patients With Primary Refractory Hodgkin Lymphoma Who Underwent High Dose Chemotherapy and Autologous Stem Cell Transplant.

Patients with primary refractory Hodgkin lymphoma (ref-HL) can still be salvaged with high-dose chemotherapy (HDC) and autologous stem cell transplantation (auto-SCT). Outcomes of patients with ref-HL is poorer than those with relapsed HL, but most studies have included patients with both relapsed and refractory diseases, and separate analyses or studies on patients with ref-HL are limited. This study aimed to evaluate the outcomes of HDC auto-SCT and impact of various prognostic factors in patients with ref-HL at the time of primary treatment failure and subsequent survival at the time of failure post-HDC auto-SCT. This retrospective single-institution cohort analysis using an HDC and auto-SCT database was approved by the Institutional Research Advisory Counsel and Ethics Committee for identifying patients. We used the Fine and Gray competing risk analysis method, a regression model for outcome analysis, and the Kaplan-Meier (KM) method for survival analysis. The study cohort comprised 200 consecutive ref-HL patients who underwent HDC auto-SCT between 1996 and 2019. The median patient age was 22.75 years, and median follow-up was 106 months. Post-auto-SCT disease status was complete remission (CR) in 122 patients (61%), partial remission in 22 (11%), and progressive disease in 47 (23.5%). KM median progression-free survival (PFS) after auto-SCT was 43.9 months (5 years, 49.3%; 10 years, 45.5%). Median overall survival (OS) was 168.6 months (5 years, 61.2%: 10 years, 56.2%). Eighty-five patients (44.5%) died, 69 (34.5%) due to disease. Multivariate analysis identified similar adverse factors for both PFS and OS. For PFS, these adverse factors included stage III-IV at relapse (hazard ratio [HR], 1.65; P = .045), mediastinal involvement (HR, 2.01; P = .009), and absence of CR after salvage chemotherapy (HR, 2.2; P = .001). PFS with 0 or 1 adverse factors (not reached), 2 adverse factors (40.8 months), and 3 adverse factors (5.4 months) was significant (P < .001). For OS, significant adverse factors included stage III-IV at relapse (HR, 1.68; P = .045), mediastinal involvement (HR, 2.52; P = .007), and no CR after salvage chemotherapy (HR, 2.15; P = .004) were significant. OS with 0 or 1 adverse factors (not reached), 2 adverse factors (148.5 months), and 3 adverse factors (34.4 months) was significant (P < .001). The median OS after auto-SCT failure was 23.6 months; patients received post auto-SCT brentuximab/second SCT (not reached), other treatments (22.5 months), and supportive care (8.4 months) (P < .001). OS with 5 risk factors present at HDC auto-SCT failure- stage III-IV, failure at <12 months, tumor >5 cm, B symptoms, and low serum albumin-was 152 months for 0 or 1 risk factors, 30.9 months with 2 risk factors, and 9.45 months with 3 to 5 risk factors (P < .001). Ref-HL patients have encouraging survival after HDC auto-SCT and can even be salvaged after auto-SCT failure. Based on prognostic factors, survival prediction is possible. Patients who fail to respond to HDC auto-SCT may benefit from newer treatments strategies and may qualify for enrollment in clinical trials.

Nodular lymphocyte-predominant Hodgkin lymphoma characteristics, management of primary and relapsed/refractory disease and outcome analysis: the first comprehensive report from the Middle East.

BACKGROUND: Nodular lymphocyte-predominant Hodgkin lymphoma (NLPHL) is an uncommon variant of Hodgkin lymphoma. There is limited data on treatment, management of refractory and relapsed disease, and long-term outcome. Many registries or country-wide data reports are unable to provide detailed primary and subsequent management. We are reporting our observation on patient's characteristics, management, and outcome. METHODS: This single-institution retrospective cohort analysis includes NLPHL patients seen from 1998 to July 2019. We used Fisher's exact test, chi-square, and Kaplan-Meier (KM) method for various analyses. RESULTS: Two hundred patients were identified, (6.34% of all the HL). Male:female was 3:1. The median age at diagnosis was 22 years (4-79 years). Stage I-II in 145 (72.5%) cases. One hundred patients (50%) received chemotherapy, 68 (34%) chemotherapy + radiation therapy (RT); 87% of all chemotherapy was ABVD (adriamycin, bleomycin, vinblastine, dacarbazine). Thirteen patients (6.5%) received RT alone and 16 (8%) had surgery alone. Complete response in 82%, partial response in 5.5% and progressive disease in 10.5%. The median follow is 60 months (5-246). Median 5 and 10 years overall survival (OS) is 94.8 and 92.4% (stages I-II, 97.7 and 97.7%, stage III-IV, 94.8 and 92.4%). Median event-free survival (EFS) is 62.3 and 54% respectively (stage I-II, 72 and 64%, stage III-IV, 36.4 and 18.2%). Stage I-II vs III-IV OS (p = < 0.001) and EFS (p = < 0.001) were significant. For stage I-II, 5 year EFS of chemotherapy + RT (83.3%) was superior to chemotherapy alone (60%, p = 0.008). Five year EFS for early favorable (80%), early unfavorable (60%), and advanced (36.4%) was significant (p = < 0.001). Eleven patients (5.5%) had high-grade transformation. Twenty-nine patients underwent HDC auto-SCT, all are alive (28 in remission). 25% of patients had pathologically proved nodal hyperplasia at some point in time. CONCLUSION: OS of NLPHL is excellent and independent of treatment type. EFS is better for chemotherapy + RT than chemotherapy alone. Stem cell transplant in refractory / multiple relapses resulted in excellent disease control. There is a need to identify optimal treatment strategies accordingly to the risk stratification.

Comparison of 18F-labelled fluoro-2-deoxyglucose-PET with conventional computed tomography for staging and response assessment in paediatric and adult patients with nodular lymphocyte-predominant Hodgkin's lymphoma.

BACKGROUND: Nodular lymphocyte-predominant Hodgkin lymphoma (NLPHL) is an uncommon subtype of Hodgkin lymphoma. Data are limited regarding 18F-labelled fluoro-2-deoxyglucose (FDG)-PET use in NLPHL. We are reporting our experience with FDG-PET utility in staging and response assessment NLPHL patients. METHODS: We retrospectively studied a population of all newly diagnosed or relapsed/refractory patients who underwent both pre-treatment contrast-enhanced computed tomography (CeCT) and an FDG-PET and also at the end of planned treatment. RESULTS: We identified 68 patients found to have in total 312 scans, 78 paired pre-therapeutic and post-treatment CeCT and FDG-PET scans. Among them, 55 were male, with a median follow-up was 48 months. Median SUV-max was 8.3 (2.0-21.0). FDG-PET and CeCT were concordant in 80% (62/78) of staging scans. In 20% (16/78) of patients in whom a discordance was observed, FDG-PET resulted in upstaging in 13 scans and downstaging in 3 scans. The sensitivity of CeCT was 92% for nodal staging and 42% for extralymphatic staging when compared to FDG-PET. The specificity of CeCT was 98% as compared to FDG-PET. For response assessment, there was poor agreement between the CeCT and FDG-PET in assigning complete remission of disease scores as FDG-PET was able to identify the absence of disease despite the presence of a radiologically evident residual mass on CeCT. The sensitivity for CeCT compared to FDG-PET was 100% while the specificity was 43% for detection of post-treatment response. CONCLUSION: For NLPHL, pre-therapeutic FDG-PET scan is better than CeCT staging. FDG-PET has much better specificity for response assessment than CeCT.

Risk of hematological malignancies in the families of patients treated for nodular lymphocyte-predominant Hodgkin lymphoma.

BACKGROUND: Familial clustering of lymphoid and/or hematological malignancies (FHM) provides an opportunity to study the responsible genes. The data is limited in patients with lymphoid and hematological malignancies. METHODS: The lymphoma database was used to identify patients seen in our institution from 1998 to 2019 with nodular lymphocyte-predominant Hodgkin lymphoma (NLPHL). We studied FHM by collecting detailed history of any malignancy in the family (FM). RESULTS: Two hundred NLPHL patients were identified. Contacting was not possible in 30 patients due to no response to the phone calls (22) and death [1]. 170/200 patients were interviewed; represented 167 families (3 patients with a family member with NLPHL). These 170 patients provided information about 8225 family members. These 167 families had a total of 329 family members with 334 malignancies (including 167 NLPHL patients and 5 members with 2 malignancies each). Of these 167 patients, 77 (46.1%) had no FM while 90 (53.9%) patients had a positive FM; 162 family members with 167 malignancies. Among these 167 families, 31 families (18.6%) had members with FHM +/- solid cancers. These 31 families had 35 family members (25 males:10 females) with 16 lymphomas: diffuse large B cell lymphoma [2], follicular center cell lymphoma [3], chronic lymphocytic leukemia/small lymphocytic lymphoma [3], non-Hodgkin lymphoma [2], classical HL [2], and NLPHL [4]. Total of 8 leukemia: acute lymphoblastic leukemia [4], acute myeloid leukemia [3], and leukemia - no subtyping [5]. These 35 FHM members are 1st [6], 2nd (16), and 3rd [7] degree relatives of 31 NLPHL patients. There are 4 families with NLPHL in family members; all these 8 NLPHL patients are male and are alive. The median total number of 1st + 2nd +3rd degree members are 81. The decrease in the age of diagnosis from 1st generation to the 2nd generation (anticipation) was noted in 13/17 patients; 2nd generation median age at diagnosis was 29.7 years vs 1st generation age 53 years (developed malignancy 23.3 years earlier). CONCLUSION: FHM is frequent in NLPHL. This study provided us many important insights for planning future studies in terms of interviewing technique, time, and resource allocation and genetic testing.

Hodgkin lymphoma involving extranodal sites in head and neck: report of twenty-nine cases and review of three-hundred and fifty-seven cases.

INTRODUCTION: Hodgkin lymphoma (HL) involving the Waldeyer's ring (WR) and other extranodal head and neck sites are rare. We report our experience and PubMed literature review. METHODS: Retrospective single institution cohort study using lymphoma data base and PubMed literature search using twenty-six various search terms. RESULTS: Twenty-nine patients were treated in our institution (1975-2018). Male:Female 22:7, median age at diagnosis 33 years (15-64), stages I-II:III-IV 25:4. Sites were nasopharynx (10), tonsil (9), parotid (5), mandible (2) and others (3). 20/29 patients received radiation therapy, 22/29 received chemotherapy. Ten years overall-survival and progression-free survival are 92% and 66% respectively. PubMed search showed 8766 citations and identified 357 patients including our patients. Male:Female 199:131, median age 45 years (5-89). Stages I-II in 286 (80%). Involvement was nasopharynx 109 (30.5%), tonsil 67 (18.8%), parotid 58 (16.2%), thyroid 45 (12.6%), adenoid 10 (2.8%), mandible 10 (2.8%) and others in 58 (16.2%). Pathology: mixed cellularity 99 (27.7%), nodular sclerosis 88 (24.6%), nodular lymphocyte-predominant 56 (15.7%), lymphocyte rich 25 (7%), classical-HL-not otherwise specified 16 (4.5%) and lymphocyte depleted 7 (2%) patients. Treatment details are available for 233 patients; 165 (46%) received radiation therapy, 137 (38%) chemotherapy. Complete remission in 208 (58%), progressive disease 14 (4%), no information 135 (38%). Overall, treatment failure in 54 (15%). Thirty (8.4%) have died; 21 disease related. KM overall-survival at 5 and 10 years was 88.5% and 77.6% respectively. CONCLUSION: This largest report showed that HL involving extranodal head and neck sites is not very uncommon and has excellent prognosis.

Survival benefit of surgical resection after first-line triplet chemotherapy and bevacizumab in patients with initially unresectable metastatic colorectal cancer.

BACKGROUND: Surgical resection of metastatic disease in patients with initially non-resectable colorectal cancer (CRC) has improved overall survival. Intensified chemotherapy regimens have increased the probability of converting unresectable metastasis to resectable. Here, we report the result of combining intensive chemotherapy (triplet) and surgical resection of metastatic lesions in patients with metastatic CRC. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Patients with unresectable metastatic CRC were enrolled in phase I/II trial of triplet chemotherapy consisting of capecitabine, oxaliplatin, irinotecan, and bevacizumab. Patients were given 5-8 cycles induction chemotherapy of the above regimen followed by maintenance capecitabine and bevacizumab until disease progression, unacceptable toxicity, or patient request. All patients were assessed at a multidisciplinary conference for possible surgical resection of their metastatic disease at the time of inclusion in the trial and 2 monthly intervals thereafter. Patients who underwent R0 resection of their metastatic disease received adjuvant oxaliplatin and capecitabine to complete a total of 6 months of chemotherapy. RESULTS: Fifty-three patients were enrolled. The median age was 52 years (range 23-74), 29 (55%) were males, ECOG PS 0-1 was 13 (66%), 11 (42%) had a right-sided tumor, 29 (55%) had resection of their primary tumor, 22 (42%) had a single metastatic site, and 8 (15.1%) had a liver-limited disease. Thirteen patients (24.5%) underwent surgical resection of residual metastatic disease +/- the primary tumor with 10 (18.9%) of them were R0. The surgical group had a higher incidence of males compared to the non-surgical group (69.3% vs 47.2%, p = 0.2), equal performance status, lower median number of metastatic sites (1 vs 2, p = 0.09), higher mutant Kras (53.8% vs 34.2%, p = 0.3), and higher response rate (84.6% vs 56.2%, p = 0.3). With a median follow-up duration of 89 months, the median PFS for the whole group was 16.1 months [95% confidence interval (CI) 9.1-20] and the median OS was 28.2 months (95% CI 22.5-53.3). The median PFS for the surgery group was 18.9 months (95% CI 12.6-not reached) compared to 9.6 months (95% CI 7.0-18.3) for the non-surgical group, log-rank p = 0.0165. The median OS for both groups was not reached (95% CI 53.3-not reached) and 23.2 months (95% CI 17.0-28.4) respectively, log-rank p = 0.0006. Five-year PFS and OS for the surgery group were 46.2% and 67.6% respectively. CONCLUSIONS: Patients with unresectable metastatic CRC and fit for triplet chemotherapy should have the benefit of combining this intensified regimen and surgical resection of their metastatic disease if possible. TRIAL REGISTRATION: Clinicaltrials.gov , NCT01311050 , registered March 6, 2011, retrospectively registered.

Stage I-II nodular lymphocyte-predominant Hodgkin lymphoma: a multi-institutional study of adult patients by ILROG.

Nodular lymphocyte-predominant Hodgkin lymphoma (NLPHL) is an uncommon histologic variant, and the optimal treatment of stage I-II NLPHL is undefined. We conducted a multicenter retrospective study including patients ≥16 years of age with stage I-II NLPHL diagnosed from 1995 through 2018 who underwent all forms of management, including radiotherapy (RT), combined modality therapy (CMT; RT+chemotherapy [CT]), CT, observation after excision, rituximab and RT, and single-agent rituximab. End points were progression-free survival (PFS), freedom from transformation, and overall survival (OS) without statistical comparison between management groups. We identified 559 patients with median age of 39 years: 72.3% were men, and 54.9% had stage I disease. Median follow-up was 5.5 years (interquartile range, 3.1-10.1). Five-year PFS and OS in the entire cohort were 87.1% and 98.3%, respectively. Primary management was RT alone (n = 257; 46.0%), CMT (n = 184; 32.9%), CT alone (n = 47; 8.4%), observation (n = 37; 6.6%), rituximab and RT (n = 19; 3.4%), and rituximab alone (n = 15; 2.7%). The 5-year PFS rates were 91.1% after RT, 90.5% after CMT, 77.8% after CT, 73.5% after observation, 80.8% after rituximab and RT, and 38.5% after rituximab alone. In the RT cohort, but not the CMT cohort, variant immunoarchitectural pattern and number of sites >2 were associated with worse PFS (P < .05). Overall, 21 patients (3.8%) developed large-cell transformation, with a significantly higher transformation rate in those with variant immunoarchitectural pattern (P = .049) and number of involved sites >2 (P = .0006). OS for patients with stage I-II NLPHL was excellent after all treatments.