More than Mycobacterium tuberculosis: site-of-disease microbial communities, and their functional and clinical profiles in tuberculous lymphadenitis.

BACKGROUND: Lymphadenitis is the most common extrapulmonary tuberculosis (EPTB) manifestation. The microbiome is important to human health but uninvestigated in EPTB. We profiled the site-of-disease lymph node microbiome in tuberculosis lymphadenitis (TBL). METHODS: Fine-needle aspiration biopsies were collected from 158 pretreatment presumptive TBL patients in Cape Town, South Africa. 16S Illumina MiSeq rRNA gene sequencing was done. RESULTS: We analysed 89 definite TBLs (dTBLs) and 61 non-TBLs (nTBLs), which had similar α- but different ß-diversities (p=0.001). Clustering identified five lymphotypes prior to TB status stratification: Mycobacterium-dominant, Prevotella-dominant and Streptococcus-dominant lymphotypes were more frequent in dTBLs whereas a Corynebacterium-dominant lymphotype and a fifth lymphotype (no dominant taxon) were more frequent in nTBLs. When restricted to dTBLs, clustering identified a Mycobacterium-dominant lymphotype with low α-diversity and non-Mycobacterium-dominated lymphotypes (termed Prevotella-Corynebacterium, Prevotella-Streptococcus). The Mycobacterium dTBL lymphotype was associated with HIV-positivity and features characteristic of severe lymphadenitis (eg, larger nodes). dTBL microbial communities were enriched with potentially proinflammatory microbial short-chain fatty acid metabolic pathways (propanoate, butanoate) vs nTBLs. 11% (7/61) of nTBLs had Mycobacterium reads BLAST-confirmed as Mycobacterium tuberculosis complex. CONCLUSIONS: TBL at the site-of-disease is not microbially homogeneous. Distinct microbial community clusters exist that, in our setting, are associated with different clinical characteristics, and immunomodulatory potentials. Non-Mycobacterium-dominated dTBL lymphotypes, which contain taxa potentially targeted by TB treatment, were associated with milder, potentially earlier stage disease. These investigations lay foundations for studying the microbiome's role in lymphatic TB. The long-term clinical significance of these lymphotypes requires prospective validation.

Xpert MTB/RIF Ultra Is Highly Sensitive for the Diagnosis of Tuberculosis Lymphadenitis in a High-HIV Setting.

Tuberculosis lymphadenitis (TBL) is the most common extrapulmonary tuberculosis (EPTB) manifestation. Xpert MTB/RIF Ultra (Ultra) is a World Health Organization-endorsed diagnostic test, but performance data for TBL, including on noninvasive specimens, are limited. Fine-needle aspiration biopsy specimens (FNABs) from outpatients (≥18 years) with presumptive TBL (n = 135) underwent (i) routine Xpert MTB/RIF testing (later with Ultra once programmatically available), (ii) MGIT 960 culture (if Xpert or Ultra negative or rifampicin resistant), and (iii) study Ultra testing. Concentrated paired urine specimens underwent Ultra testing. Primary analyses used a microbiological reference standard (MRS). In a head-to-head comparison (n = 92) of an FNAB study Ultra and Xpert, Ultra had increased sensitivity (91% [95% confidence interval: 79, 98] versus 72% [57, 84]; P = 0.016) and decreased specificity (76% [61, 87] versus 93% [82, 99]; P = 0.020) and diagnosed patients not on treatment. Neither HIV nor alternative reference standards affected sensitivity and specificity. In patients with both routine and study Ultra tests, the latter detected more cases (+20% [0, 42]; P = 0.034), and false-negative study Ultra results were more inhibited than true-positive results. Study Ultra false positives had less mycobacterial DNA than true positives (trace-positive proportions, 59% [13/22] versus 12% [5/51]; P < 0.001). "Trace" exclusion or recategorization removed potential benefits offered over Xpert. Urine Ultra tests had low sensitivity (18% [7, 35]). Ultra testing on FNABs is highly sensitive and detects more TBL than Xpert (Ultra still missed some cases due in part to inhibition). Patients with FNAB Ultra-positive "trace" results, most of whom will be culture negative, may require additional clinical investigation. Urine Ultra testing could reduce the number of patients needing invasive sampling.