Investigation of convolutional neural networks using multiple computed tomography perfusion maps to identify infarct core in acute ischemic stroke patients.

Purpose: To assess acute ischemic stroke (AIS) severity, infarct is segmented using computed tomography perfusion (CTP) software, such as RAPID, Sphere, and Vitrea, relying on contralateral hemisphere thresholds. Since this approach is potentially patient dependent, we investigated whether convolutional neural networks (CNNs) could achieve better performances without the need for contralateral hemisphere thresholds. Approach: CTP and diffusion-weighted imaging (DWI) data were retrospectively collected for 63 AIS patients. Cerebral blood flow (CBF), cerebral blood volume (CBV), time-to-peak, mean-transit-time (MTT), and delay time maps were generated using Vitrea CTP software. U-net shaped CNNs were developed, trained, and tested for 26 different input CTP parameter combinations. Infarct labels were segmented from DWI volumes registered with CTP volumes. Infarct volumes were reconstructed from two-dimensional CTP infarct segmentations. To remove erroneous segmentations, conditional random field (CRF) postprocessing was applied and compared with prior results. Spatial and volumetric infarct agreement was assessed between DWI and CTP (CNNs and commercial software) using median infarct difference, median absolute error, dice coefficient, positive predictive value. Results: The most accurate combination of parameters for CNN segmenting infarct using CRF postprocessing was CBF, CBV, and MTT (4.83 mL, 10.14 mL, 0.66, 0.73). Commercial software results are: RAPID = (2.25 mL, 21.48 mL, 0.63, 0.70), Sphere = (7.57 mL, 17.74 mL, 0.64, 0.70), Vitrea = (6.79 mL, 15.28 mL, 0.63, 0.72). Conclusions: Use of CNNs with multiple input perfusion parameters has shown to be accurate in segmenting infarcts and has the ability to improve clinical workflow by eliminating the need for contralateral hemisphere comparisons.

Assessment of computed tomography perfusion software in predicting spatial location and volume of infarct in acute ischemic stroke patients: a comparison of Sphere, Vitrea, and RAPID.

BACKGROUND: CT perfusion (CTP) infarct and penumbra estimations determine the eligibility of patients with acute ischemic stroke (AIS) for endovascular intervention. This study aimed to determine volumetric and spatial agreement of predicted RAPID, Vitrea, and Sphere CTP infarct with follow-up fluid attenuation inversion recovery (FLAIR) MRI infarct. METHODS: 108 consecutive patients with AIS and large vessel occlusion were included in the study between April 2019 and January 2020 . Patients were divided into two groups: endovascular intervention (n=58) and conservative treatment (n=50). Intervention patients were treated with mechanical thrombectomy and achieved successful reperfusion (Thrombolysis in Cerebral Infarction 2b/2 c/3) while patients in the conservative treatment group did not receive mechanical thrombectomy or intravenous thrombolysis. Intervention and conservative treatment patients were included to assess infarct and penumbra estimations, respectively. It was assumed that in all patients treated conservatively, penumbra converted to infarct. CTP infarct and penumbra volumes were segmented from RAPID, Vitrea, and Sphere to assess volumetric and spatial agreement with follow-up FLAIR MRI. RESULTS: Mean infarct differences (95% CIs) between each CTP software and FLAIR MRI for each cohort were: intervention cohort: RAPID=9.0±7.7 mL, Sphere=-0.2±8.7 mL, Vitrea=-7.9±8.9 mL; conservative treatment cohort: RAPID=-31.9±21.6 mL, Sphere=-26.8±17.4 mL, Vitrea=-15.3±13.7 mL. Overlap and Dice coefficients for predicted infarct were (overlap, Dice): intervention cohort: RAPID=(0.57, 0.44), Sphere=(0.68, 0.60), Vitrea=(0.70, 0.60); conservative treatment cohort: RAPID=(0.71, 0.56), Sphere=(0.73, 0.60), Vitrea=(0.72, 0.64). CONCLUSIONS: Sphere proved the most accurate in patients who had intervention infarct assessment as Vitrea and RAPID overestimated and underestimated infarct, respectively. Vitrea proved the most accurate in penumbra assessment for patients treated conservatively although all software overestimated penumbra.

Automatic radiomic feature extraction using deep learning for angiographic parametric imaging of intracranial aneurysms.

BACKGROUND: Angiographic parametric imaging (API) is an imaging method that uses digital subtraction angiography (DSA) to characterize contrast media dynamics throughout the vasculature. This requires manual placement of a region of interest over a lesion (eg, an aneurysm sac) by an operator. OBJECTIVE: The purpose of our work was to determine if a convolutional neural network (CNN) was able to identify and segment the intracranial aneurysm (IA) sac in a DSA and extract API radiomic features with minimal errors compared with human user results. METHODS: Three hundred and fifty angiographic images of IAs were retrospectively collected. The IAs and surrounding vasculature were manually contoured and the masks put to a CNN tasked with semantic segmentation. The CNN segmentations were assessed for accuracy using the Dice similarity coefficient (DSC) and Jaccard index (JI). Area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUROC) was computed. API features based on the CNN segmentation were compared with the human user results. RESULTS: The mean JI was 0.823 (95% CI 0.783 to 0.863) for the IA and 0.737 (95% CI 0.682 to 0.792) for the vasculature. The mean DSC was 0.903 (95% CI 0.867 to 0.937) for the IA and 0.849 (95% CI 0.811 to 0.887) for the vasculature. The mean AUROC was 0.791 (95% CI 0.740 to 0.817) for the IA and 0.715 (95% CI 0.678 to 0.733) for the vasculature. All five API features measured inside the predicted masks were within 18% of those measured inside manually contoured masks. CONCLUSIONS: CNN segmentation of IAs and surrounding vasculature from DSA images is non-inferior to manual contours of aneurysms and can be used in parametric imaging procedures.