All India Ophthalmological Society (AIOS) Task Force guidelines to prevent intraocular infections and cluster outbreaks after cataract surgery.

Infectious endophthalmitis is a serious and vision-threatening complication of commonly performed intraocular surgeries such as cataract surgery. The occurrence of endophthalmitis can result in severe damage to the uveal and other ocular tissues even among patients undergoing an uncomplicated surgical procedure. If the infections result from common factors such as surgical supplies, operative or operation theater-related risks, there can be a cluster outbreak of toxic anterior segment syndrome (TASS) or infectious endophthalmitis, leading to several patients having an undesirable outcome. Since prevention of intraocular infections is of paramount importance to ophthalmic surgeons, the All India Ophthalmological Society (AIOS) has taken the lead in the formation of a National Task Force to help ophthalmic surgeons apply certain universal precautions in their clinical practice. The Task Force has prepared a handy checklist and evidence-based guidelines to minimize the risk of infectious endophthalmitis following cataract surgery.

Development of a rapid point-of-care patient reported outcome measure for cataract surgery in India.

BACKGROUND: For patient undergoing cataract surgery in India, existing patient-reported outcome (PRO) measures are either not culturally relevant, have not been adequately validated, or are too long to be used in a busy clinical setting. We sought to develop and validate a brief and culturally relevant point-of-care PRO measure to address this need. METHODS: Twelve items from the Indian Visual Functioning Questionnaire (IND-VFQ) were selected based on preliminary data. Patients 18 years and older were prospectively recruited at Aravind Eye Care System in Madurai, India. Clinical and sociodemographic data were collected and the 12-item short-form IND-VFQ (SF-IND-VFQ) was administered pre- and post-operatively to 225 patients; Factor analysis and Rasch modeling was performed to assess its psychometric properties. RESULTS: One item that did not fit a unidimensional scale and had poor fit with the Rasch model was eliminated from the questionnaire. The remaining 11 items represented a single construct (no residual correlations> 0.1) and were largely unaffected by differential item functioning. Five items had disordered thresholds resolved by collapsing the response scale from four to three categories. The survey had adequate reliability (0.80) and good construct (infit range, 0.77-1.29; outfit range, 0.56-1.30) and content (item separation index, 5.87 logits) validity. Measurement precision was fair (person separation index, 1.97). There was evidence that items were not optimally targeted to patients' visual ability (preoperatively, - 1.92 logits; overall, - 3.41 logits), though the survey measured a very large effect (Cohen's d 1.80). In a subset of patients, the average time to complete the questionnaire was 2 min 6.3 s. CONCLUSIONS: The SF-IND-VFQ is a valid, reliable, sensitive, and rapidly administered point-of-care PRO measure to assess changes in visual functioning in patients undergoing cataract surgery in India.

Cataract surgery and environmental sustainability: Waste and lifecycle assessment of phacoemulsification at a private healthcare facility.

PURPOSE: To measure the waste generation and lifecycle environmental emissions from cataract surgery via phacoemulsification in a recognized resource-efficient setting. SETTING: Two tertiary care centers of the Aravind Eye Care System in southern India. DESIGN: Observational case series. METHODS: Manual waste audits, purchasing data, and interviews with Aravind staff were used in a hybrid environmental lifecycle assessment framework to quantify the environmental emissions associated with cataract surgery. Kilograms of solid waste generated and midpoint emissions in a variety of impact categories (eg, kilograms of carbon dioxide equivalents). RESULTS: Aravind generates 250 grams of waste per phacoemulsification and nearly 6 kilograms of carbon dioxide-equivalents in greenhouse gases. This is approximately 5% of the United Kingdom's phaco carbon footprint with comparable outcomes. A majority of Aravind's lifecycle environmental emissions occur in the sterilization process of reusable instruments because their surgical system uses largely reusable instruments and materials. Electricity use in the operating room and the Central Sterile Services Department (CSSD) accounts for 10% to 25% of most environmental emissions. CONCLUSIONS: Surgical systems in most developed countries and, in particular their use of materials, are unsustainable. Results show that ophthalmologists and other medical specialists can reduce material use and emissions in medical procedures using the system described here.

A Sustainable Model For Delivering High-Quality, Efficient Cataract Surgery In Southern India.

Cataracts are a leading cause of reversible blindness in India, where millions of people can be effectively treated for this condition with surgery. The Aravind Eye Care System in southern India developed an efficient system for delivering high-quality and low-cost cataract surgery. We provide a detailed accounting of costs of cataract surgery at the system and a cost-utility analysis. Total costs per operation were US$120, or $195 per quality-adjusted life-year gained. Using these data and population-based estimates of cataract prevalence, we calculate that eliminating cataract-related blindness and low vision in India would cost $2.6 billion and would yield a net societal benefit of $13.5 billion. Factors contributing to the highly cost-effective care at the Aravind Eye Care System include the domestic manufacturing of supplies, the use of a specialized workforce and standardized protocols, and the presence of few regulatory hurdles. Lessons learned from the system can help improve the delivery of cataract surgery and other ambulatory care surgeries in India and abroad.

Safety and efficacy of manual small incision cataract surgery for brunescent and black cataracts.

AIMS: To evaluate the safety, visual outcome and complications of manual small incision cataract surgery (MSICS) in the treatment of patients with brunescent and black cataract (BBC). METHODS: In a non-randomised interventional case series, 102 consecutive patients with BBC underwent cataract extraction by MSICS, with staining of the anterior capsule by trypan blue. RESULTS: Of the 102 eyes with BBC, MSICS was performed through superior scleral tunnel (SST) in 31 eyes (30.4%) and through temporal scleral tunnel (TST) in 71 eyes (69.6%). The main intraoperative complication was posterior capsule rupture in two patients (2.0%). Postoperatively, 20 eyes (19.6%) developed corneal oedema. Mild iritis was seen in six eyes (5.9%) and moderate iritis with fibrin membrane formation occurred in three eyes (2.9%). On the 40th postoperative day, 80 patients (78.4%) achieved uncorrected visual acuity of 6/18 or better, and 99 (97.1%) had best-corrected visual acuity of 6/18 or better. Patients in the SST group had significantly higher postoperative astigmatism compared to those in the TST group (-1.08 D vs -0.72 D, P=0.017). CONCLUSION: MSICS with trypan blue staining of the anterior capsule is a safe and effective method of cataract extraction for patients with BBC.

High-volume intraocular lens surgery in a rural eye camp in India.

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVE: The appropriate surgical treatment for the enormous number of patients in developing nations who are blind due to cataract is a hotly debated issue. The authors objective is to demonstrate that modern surgical techniques (extracapsular cataract extraction and intraocular lens implantation, phacoemulsification and intraocular lens implantation) can be performed in a high-volume, cost effective manner, even in temporary settings. The authors believe that the approach to cataract blindness is not simple intracapsular cataract extraction, but rather the challenge of (1) training all ophthalmic personnel in modern techniques (microsurgery, biometry), (2) training managers in higher levels of organizational skill, and (3) doing these things in the face of limited resources. PATIENTS AND METHODS: A total of 1298 surgeries were performed in a public eye camp in Ganeshpuri, India (50 miles north of Bombay). Of these, 1214 (93.5%) of the patients received intraocular lens (IOL) implants. Ninety-three percent (1032/1108) of the patients who underwent extracapsular cataract extraction (ECCE) and IOL implantation and 89% (83/93) of the patients who underwent phacoemulsification and IOL implantation returned for follow-up. RESULTS: Postoperatively, 48% (498/1032) of the patients who underwent ECCE and IOL implantation achieved corrected vision of 6/12 or better and 65% (671/1032) attained corrected vision of 6/18 or better. Of the patients who underwent phacoemulsification and IOL implantation, 59 of 83 (71%) attained vision of 6/12 or better with correction and 68 of 83 (79%) achieved vision of 6/18 or better with correction. These results are almost identical to those obtained by the authors in their Ganeshpuri 1991 camp. Surgical complication rates were comparable to those reported in hospital-based studies. CONCLUSION: For this type of camp to operate efficiently, there must be standardization of skills among ophthalmic personnel, costs must be contained, and the organizational skills necessary to ensure smooth functioning of the camp must exist. However, on the basis of their data, these authors believe that with suitable organizational and surgical facilities, IOL implantation can be successfully performed in high-volume surgical eye camps.

Analysis of complications in 1000 cases of posterior chamber intra ocular lens implantation.

Analysis of complications in 1000 cases of primary posterior chamber intraocular lens implantation done, during a period of one year was undertaken for the study. The cases included uncomplicated as well as those with various associated conditions like diabetes, traumatic cataracts, complicated cataracts, myopia and developmental cataracts. The important postoperative complications were uveitis (9%), endophthalmitis (0.5%), malposition of IOL (2.8%) and cystoid macular edema (0.3%). Posterior capsule opacification was seen in 11.5% of cases and was treated by YAG laser capsulotomy. More than 80% cases had 6/6-6/12 vision. In our experience posterior chamber IOL implantation has become an extremely successful and satisfying procedure along with the availability of YAG laser facility to manage posterior capsule opacification.