Do Surgeons Anticipate Women's Hopes and Fears Associated with Prolapse Repair? A Qualitative Analysis in the PROSPERE Trial.

Women's preoperative perceptions of pelvic-floor disorders may differ from those of their physicians. Our objective was to specify women's hopes and fears before cystocele repair, and to compare them to those that surgeons anticipate. We performed a secondary qualitative analysis of data from the PROSPERE trial. Among the 265 women included, 98% reported at least one hope and 86% one fear before surgery. Sixteen surgeons also completed the free expectations-questionnaire as a typical patient would. Women's hopes covered seven themes, and women's fears eleven. Women's hopes were concerning prolapse repair (60%), improvement of urinary function (39%), capacity for physical activities (28%), sexual function (27%), well-being (25%), and end of pain or heaviness (19%). Women's fears were concerning prolapse relapse (38%), perioperative concerns (28%), urinary disorders (26%), pain (19%), sexual problems (10%), and physical impairment (6%). Surgeons anticipated typical hopes and fears which were very similar to those the majority of women reported. However, only 60% of the women reported prolapse repair as an expectation. Women's expectations appear reasonable and consistent with the scientific literature on the improvement and the risk of relapse or complication related to cystocele repair. Our analysis encourages surgeons to consider individual woman's expectations before pelvic-floor repair.

Safety of Vaginal Mesh Surgery Versus Laparoscopic Mesh Sacropexy for Cystocele Repair: Results of the Prosthetic Pelvic Floor Repair Randomized Controlled Trial.

BACKGROUND: Laparoscopic mesh sacropexy (LS) or transvaginal mesh repair (TVM) are surgical techniques used to treat cystoceles. Health authorities have highlighted the need for comparative studies to evaluate the safety of surgeries with meshes. OBJECTIVE: To compare the rate of complications, and functional and anatomical outcomes between LS and TVM. DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS: Multicenter randomized controlled trial from October 2012 to April 2014 in 11 French public hospitals. Women with cystocele stage ≥2 (pelvic organ prolapse quantification), aged 45-75 yr, without previous prolapse surgery. INTERVENTION: Synthetic nonabsorbable mesh placed in the vesicovaginal space, sutured to the promontory (LS) or maintained by arms through pelvic ligaments (TVM). OUTCOME MEASUREMENTS AND STATISTICAL ANALYSIS: Rate of surgical complications ≥grade II according to the modified Clavien-Dindo classification at 1 yr. Secondary outcomes were reintervention rate, and functional and anatomical results. RESULTS AND LIMITATIONS: A total of 130 women were randomized in LS and 132 in TVM; five women withdrew before intervention, leaving 129 in LS and 128 in TVM. The rate of complications ≥grade II was lower after LS than after TVM, but did not meet statistical significance (17% vs 26%, treatment difference 8.6% [95% confidence interval, CI -1.5 to 18]; p=0.088). The rate of complications of grade III or higher was nonetheless significantly lower after LS (LS=0.8%, TVM=9.4%, treatment difference 8.6% [95% CI 3.4%; 15%]; p=0.001). LS was converted to TVM in 6.3%. The total reoperation rate was lower after LS but did not meet statistical significance (LS=4.7%, TVM=10.9%, treatment difference 6.3% [95% CI -0.4 to 13.3]; p=0.060). There was no difference in symptoms, quality of life, improvement, composite definition of success, anatomical results rates between groups except for the vaginal apex and length, and dyspareunia (in favor of LS). CONCLUSIONS: LS is a valuable option for primary repair of cystocele in sexually active patients. LS is safer than TVM, but may not be feasible in all cases. Both techniques offer same functional outcomes, success rates, and anatomical outcomes, but sexual function is better preserved by LS. PATIENT SUMMARY: Our study demonstrates that laparoscopic sacropexy (LS) is a valuable option for primary repair of cystocele. LS offers equivalent success rates to vaginal mesh procedures, but is safer with a lower rate of complications and reoperations, and sexual function is better preserved.

Do Urinary Leakage Circumstances in Women With Urinary Incontinence Correlate With Physician Diagnosis and Urodynamic Results? A Questionnaire Validation Study.

OBJECTIVE: To investigate if leakage circumstances collected using the Urinary Leakage Circumstances Questionnaire (ULCQ) are correlated with physician diagnosis and urodynamic results and resolve after surgery. MATERIALS AND METHODS: The ULCQ was developed to investigate leakage circumstances encountered by women with incontinence. Women completed both the ULCQ and the International Consultation on Incontinence Questionnaire-Urinary Incontinence Short Form before clinical and urodynamic examination. Those who underwent a suburethral sling procedure completed both questionnaires postoperatively. We performed a principal component analysis and evaluated the questionnaire's external properties including construct validity and responsiveness. RESULTS: One hundred and eighty-six women were included in the validation phase, and 168 underwent suburethral sling procedure. Mean postoperative follow-up was 51 months. Principal component analysis identified 4 dimensions from the 23 leakage circumstances listed in the ULCQ: effort, stimulation, postural, and intercourse; the internal consistency of each dimension was excellent (Cronbach alpha: 0.87, 0.86, 0.82, and 0.79, respectively). Effort (+0.39), stimulation (+0.24), and postural (+0.47) dimensions were correlated with the International Consultation on Incontinence Questionnaire-Urinary Incontinence Short Form score; the effort dimension was correlated with greater stress incontinence severity assessed by the physician; the stimulation dimension with urgency and urge incontinence severity assessed by the physician, and with lower volumes during cystometry; and the postural dimension with higher age and lower urethral closure pressure. Each dimension recorded a significant improvement after surgery, with the largest effect size for effort dimension (2.29 [confidence interval 95%: 1.96-2.62]). CONCLUSION: The ULCQ is a useful tool for investigating female urinary incontinence and detecting changes after surgery.