Role of biopsies in patients with residual rectal cancer following neoadjuvant chemoradiation after downsizing: can they rule out persisting cancer?

AIM: The study aimed to determine the value of postchemoradiation biopsies, performed after significant tumour downsizing following neoadjuvant therapy, in predicting complete tumour regression in patients with distal rectal cancer. METHOD: A retrospective comparative study was performed in patients with rectal cancer who achieved an incomplete clinical response after neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy. Patients with significant tumour downsizing (> 30% of the initial tumour size) were compared with controls (< 30% reduction of the initial tumour size). During flexible proctoscopy carried out postchemoradiation, biopsies were performed using 3-mm biopsy forceps. The biopsy results were compared with the histopathological findings of the resected specimen. UICC (Union for International Cancer Control) ypTNM classification, tumour differentiation and regression grade were evaluated. The main outcome measures were sensitivity and specificity, negative and positive predictive values, and accuracy of a simple forceps biopsy for predicting pathological response after neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy. RESULTS: Of the 172 patients, 112 were considered to have had an incomplete clinical response and were included in the study. Thirty-nine patients achieved significant tumour downsizing and underwent postchemoradiation biopsies. Overall, 53 biopsies were carried out. Of the 39 patients who achieved significant tumour downsizing, the biopsy result was positive in 25 and negative in 14. Only three of the patients with a negative biopsy result were found to have had a complete pathological response (giving a negative predictive value of 21%). Considering all biopsies performed, only three of 28 negative biopsies were true negatives, giving a negative predictive value of 11%. CONCLUSION: In patients with distal rectal cancer undergoing neoadjuvant chemoradiation, post-treatment biopsies are of limited clinical value in ruling out persisting cancer. A negative biopsy result after a near-complete clinical response should not be considered sufficient for avoiding a radical resection.

Distribution of lymph nodes in the mesorectum: how deep is TME necessary?

BACKGROUND: Standardization of total mesorectal excision (TME) had a great impact on decreasing local recurrence rates for the treatment of rectal cancer. However, exact numbers and distribution of lymph nodes (LN) along the mesorectum remains controversial with some studies suggesting that few LNs are present in the distal third of the mesorectum. METHODS: Eighteen fresh cadavers without a history of rectal cancer were studied. The rectum was removed by TME and then was divided into right lateral, posterior and left lateral sides, which were further subdivided into 3 levels (upper, middle and lower). A pathologist determined the number and sizes of the LNs in each of the nine areas, b linded to their anatomical origin. RESULTS: Overall, the mesorectum had a mean of 5.7 LNs (SD=3.7) and on average each LN had a maximum diameter of 3.0 mm (SD=2.7). There was no association between the mean number or size of LNs with gender, BMI, or age. There was a significantly higher prevalence of LNs in the posterior location (2.8 per mesorectum) than in the two lateral locations (0.8 and 1.2 per mesorectum; p=0.02). The distribution of LNs in the three levels of the rectum was not significant. CONCLUSIONS: The distribution of LNs reinforces the fact that TME should always include the distal third of the mesorectum. Care must be taken to not violate the posterior aspect of the mesorectum.

Evaluation of molecular markers in hepatic metastasis of colorectal adenocarcinoma.

BACKGROUND/AIMS: There were 49 patients studied, coming from The Liver Unit at the "Hospital das Clinicas da Faculdade de Medicina da USP (N=41) and from "Prof. Dr. Angelita Habr-Gama and Joaquim Gama-Rodrigues Surgery Institute", SP (N=8); all of which had hepatic metastasis of colorectal adenocarcinoma, with no evidence of concurrent metastasis in any other organs and were submitted to surgical treatment, during the period of 1992 to 2002, with the aim of analyzing the immunoexpression of the p53, ki-67, p16 and molecular markers in order to relate the disease-free period with the prognosis. METHODOLOGY: The patient's clinical data were analyzed retrospectively for verification of information such as age, gender, size of the hepatic metastasis and/or the largest lesion, number of satellite nodules resected and compromised, margin of resection free from neoplasia. RESULTS: The immunoexpression of the p53 was associated with the shortest period of life free from disease (p = 0.04). The proliferation marker ki-67 was not associated with the reduction of the disease-free interval and survival; the immunoexpression of the proliferation marker p16 was not associated with the reduction of disease-free period and survival, however, it was associated with hepatic metastasis synchronism. In patients who received postoperative systemic chemotherapy with 5-FU and leucovorin, the immunoexpression on the hepatic metastasis was not associated with a longer disease-free interval. CONCLUSIONS: Molcular markers may be useful to evaluate hepatic metastasis of colorectal Adenocarcinoma.