Markers of ovarian antral follicular development in sheep: comparison of follicles destined to ovulate from the final or penultimate follicular wave of the estrous cycle.

Treatment of non-prolific western white-faced ewes with prostaglandin F(2α) (PGF(2α)) and medroxyprogesterone acetate (MAP) increases the ovulation rate as a result of ovulations from the penultimate wave in addition to the final wave of the cycle. The objective of the current study was to evaluate the expression of markers of vascularization/angiogenesis, a marker of intercellular communication, and cellular proliferation and apoptosis in follicles from the penultimate and final waves. On day 8 of the estrous cycle, 15 ewes were administered a single injection of PGF(2α) and an intravaginal MAP sponge, which remained in place for 6 days. Two days after sponge removal, ovaries which contained follicles from the penultimate and final waves were collected and processed for immunohistochemistry followed by image analysis, and for quantitative real-time RT-PCR. Expression of factor VIII (marker of vascularization), proliferating cell nuclear antigen, and GJA1 (Cx43; marker of gap junctional communication) was greater (P<0.05) in follicles from the final wave compared with follicles from the penultimate wave. For theca cells, mRNA expression for vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF) was greater (P<0.05) and tended to be greater (P≤0.1 and ≥0.05) for GJA1 and endothelial nitric oxide synthase in follicles from the final wave compared with follicles from the penultimate wave. For granulosa cells, the mRNA expression for GJA1 was greater (P<0.05) and tended to be greater (P≤0.1 and ≥0.05) for VEGF in follicles from the final wave compared with follicles from the penultimate wave. In conclusion, extension of the lifespan of follicles in the penultimate wave reduces follicular viability in the ewe.

Effects of the rate and duration of physiological increases in serum FSH concentrations on emergence of follicular waves in cyclic ewes.

Large antral follicles grow in waves in the ewe, with each wave triggered by a peak in serum FSH concentrations. In this study, our objectives were to determine if the slope of the rise in the FSH peak affects the ability of the peak to trigger wave emergence (experiment 1), and whether increasing serum FSH concentrations and holding them at peak concentrations would provide a stimulus for constant emergence of large antral follicles (experiment 2). In experiment 1, cyclic ewes received ovine FSH (n = 6; 0.1 µg/kg, s.c.) or vehicle (n = 6; control) every 6 h for 42 h. This treatment created a peak in serum FSH concentrations (P < 0.05) during the early growth phase of the first follicular wave of the interovulatory interval and enhanced the growth of follicles in that wave (P < 0.05), but did not trigger emergence of a follicular wave. In experiment 2, cyclic ewes were infused constantly with oFSH (1.98 µg/h; n = 6) or vehicle (control; n = 6) for 60 h starting at the time of the second endogenously driven FSH peak of the interovulatory interval. Infusion of oFSH resulted in a super-stimulatory effect, with a peak in the mean number of large follicles (≥5 mm) on Day 2 after the start of FSH infusion (13 ± 1.2 large follicles per ewe, 1.8 ± 0.2 in control ewes; P < 0.001). In conclusion, exposing early growing antral follicles in a wave to a gradual increase in serum concentrations of FSH enhanced their growth, but did not trigger the expected new follicular wave, and infusion of a dose of oFSH within the physiological range caused a super-ovulatory response in cyclic ewes.

Pulsatile LH secretion and ovarian follicular wave emergence and growth in anestrous ewes.

The objective of this study was to determine if pulsatile LH secretion was needed for ovarian follicular wave emergence and growth in the anestrous ewe. In Experiment 1, ewes were either large or small (10 x 0.47 or 5 x 0.47 cm, respectively; n = 5/group) sc implants releasing estradiol-17 beta for 10 d (Day 0 = day of implant insertion), to suppress pulsed LH secretion, but not FSH secretion. Five sham-operated control ewes received no implants. In Experiment 2, 12 ewes received large estradiol-releasing implants for 12 d (Day 0 = day of implant insertion); six were given GnRH (200 ng IV) every 4 h for the last 6 d that the implants were in place (to reinitiate pulsed LH secretion) whereas six Control ewes were given saline. Ovarian ultrasonography and blood sampling were done daily; blood samples were also taken every 12 min for 6 h on Days 5 and 9, and on Days 6 and 12 of the treatment period in Experiments 1 and 2, respectively. Treatment with estradiol blocked pulsatile LH secretion (P < 0.001). In Experiment 1, implant treatment halted follicular wave emergence between Days 2 and 10. In Experiment 2, follicular waves were suppressed during treatment with estradiol, but resumed following GnRH treatment. In both experiments, the range of peaks in serum FSH concentrations that preceded and triggered follicular wave emergence was almost the same as control ewes and those given estradiol implants alone or with GnRH; mean concentrations did not differ (P < 0.05). We concluded that some level of pulsatile LH secretion was required for the emergence of follicular waves that were triggered by peaks in serum FSH concentrations in the anestrous ewe.

Pulsed GnRH secretion and the FSH secretory peaks that initiate ovarian antral follicular wave emergence in anestrous ewes.

In ewes, immunization against GnRH blocks LH pulses but mean serum FSH concentrations are only partly reduced; the fate of the FSH peaks that precede ovarian follicular waves has not been studied. In this study, we used immunization against GnRH to examine the need for pulsed GnRH secretion in the genesis of FSH peaks in the anestrous ewe. Six anestrous ewes were given a GnRH immunogen on Day 0 and a booster injection on Day 28. Control ewes (n=6) received adjuvant only. Transrectal ultrasonography was performed daily for 2 days prior to and 10 days following both the primary (Days -2 to 10) and booster (Days 26-38) injections and for a 13-day period beginning 26 days after booster injection (Days 54-66). Blood samples were collected daily. Intensive bleeding (every 12min for 7h) was performed on Days 9, 37, and 65 of the experimental period to characterize the pulsatile pattern of LH secretion. GnRH antibody titers were increased and LH pulses were abolished immediately after booster immunization (P<0.05). The number of FSH peaks, FSH peak concentration and amplitude and basal FSH concentrations were only decreased in immunized ewes in the period of observations starting 26 days after booster immunization (P<0.05); however, some peaks were still seen. The number of follicular waves was decreased in the period around booster immunization and no follicular waves were seen during the period starting 26 days after booster immunization in immunized ewes (P<0.05). In summary, in anestrous ewes, when pulsed LH secretion was abolished by immunization against GnRH, the peaks in serum concentrations of FSH that trigger ovarian follicular waves continued for a period of time. We concluded that although blocking the effects of GnRH gradually causes a diminution of FSH secretion, there is no acute requirement for GnRH in the regulation of FSH peaks. The existence of FSH peaks in the absence of follicular waves, and pulsed LH secretion, suggests that some endogenous rhythm may drive the occurrence of FSH peaks, independent of both changes in negative feedback by secretory products from ovarian antral follicles and GnRH.

Ovarian follicular dominance and the induction of daily follicular waves in the ewe.

Large antral follicles grow in waves in the ewe, and each wave is triggered by a peak in serum concentrations of FSH. The existence of follicular dominance in the ewe is unclear. The objective of experiment 1 was to determine if an endogenously driven follicular wave could emerge during the growth phase of a wave induced by injection of ovine FSH (oFSH). Cyclic ewes (n = 7) were given oFSH (two injections of 0.5 microg/kg; s.c.; 8 h apart) on 2 separate days equally spaced in the interval between the first two endogenously driven follicular waves of an estrous cycle. Injection of oFSH induced two follicular waves in the interval between the first two endogenously driven waves of the cycle. The second endogenously driven wave of the estrous cycle emerged in the midgrowth phase of a follicular wave induced by injection of oFSH and its day of emergence, and growth pattern did not differ from that of the equivalent wave in control ewes (emerging 5.4 +/- 0.2 and 4.8 +/- 0.5 days after ovulation, respectively; P > 0.05). Experiment 2 was designed to determine if emergence of follicular waves could be induced on a daily basis. Six anestrus ewes were given oFSH (two injections of 0.35 microg/kg; s.c.; 8 h apart) on each of 4 days, starting 24 h after the expected time of an endogenously driven FSH peak. Each injection of oFSH resulted in a discrete peak in serum FSH concentrations and the emergence of a new follicular wave. The present findings provide evidence for the lack of follicular dominance in the ewe.

LH pulse frequency and the emergence and growth of ovarian antral follicular waves in the ewe during the luteal phase of the estrous cycle.

BACKGROUND: In the ewe, ovarian antral follicles emerge or grow from a pool of 2-3 mm follicles in a wave like pattern, reaching greater than or equal to 5 mm in diameter before regression or ovulation. There are 3 or 4 such follicular waves during each estrous cycle. Each wave is preceded by a peak in serum FSH concentrations. The role of pulsatile LH in ovarian antral follicular emergence and growth is unclear; therefore, the purpose of the present study was to further define this role. METHODS: Ewes (n = 7) were given 200 ng of GnRH (IV) every hour for 96 h from Day 7 of the estrous cycle, to increase LH pulse frequency. Controls (n = 6) received saline. In a second study, ewes (n = 6) received subcutaneous progesterone-releasing implants for 10 days starting on Day 4 of the cycle, to decrease LH pulse frequency. Controls (n = 6) underwent sham surgery. Daily transrectal ovarian ultrasonography and blood sampling was performed on all ewes from the day of estrus to the day of ovulation at the end of the cycle of the study. At appropriate times, additional blood samples were taken every 12 minutes for 6 h and 36 min or 6 h in studies 1 and 2 respectively. RESULTS: The largest follicle of the follicular wave growing when GnRH treatment started, grew to a larger diameter than the equivalent wave in control ewes (P < 0.05). Mean serum estradiol and progesterone concentrations were higher but mean serum FSH concentrations were lower during GnRH treatment compared to control ewes (P < 0.05). The increased serum concentrations of estradiol and progesterone, in GnRH treated ewes, suppressed a peak in serum concentrations of FSH, causing a follicular wave to be missed. Treatment with progesterone decreased the frequency of LH pulses but did not have any influence on serum FSH concentrations or follicular waves. CONCLUSION: We concluded that waves of ovarian follicular growth can occur at LH pulse frequencies lower than those seen in the luteal phase of the estrous cycle but frequencies seen in the follicular phase, when applied during the mid-luteal phase, in the presence of progesterone, do enhance follicular growth to resemble an ovulatory follicle, blocking the emergence of the next wave.

Differential effects of various estradiol-17beta treatments on follicle-stimulating hormone peaks, luteinizing hormone pulses, basal gonadotropin concentrations, and antral follicle and luteal development in cyclic ewes.

In a previous study, 10-day estradiol implant treatment truncated the FSH peaks that precede follicular waves in sheep, but subsequent ovine FSH (oFSH) injection reinitiated wave emergence. The present study's objectives were to examine the effects of a 20-day estradiol and progesterone treatment on FSH peaks, follicle waves, and responsiveness to oFSH injection. Also, different estradiol doses were given to see whether a model that differentially suppressed FSH peaks, LH pulses, or basal gonadotropin secretion could be produced in order to study effects of these changes on follicular dynamics. Mean estradiol concentrations were 11.8 +/- 0.4 pg/ml, FSH peaks were truncated, wave emergence was halted, and the number of small follicles (2-3 mm in diameter) was reduced (P < 0.05) in cyclic ewes given estradiol and progesterone implants (experiment 1). On Day 15 of treatment, oFSH injection failed to induce wave emergence. With three different estradiol implant sizes (experiment 2), estradiol concentrations were 5.2, 19.0, 27.5, and 34.8 (+/-4.6) pg/ml in control and treated ewes, respectively. All estradiol treatments truncated FSH peaks, except those that created the highest estradiol concentrations. Experiment 2-treated ewes had significantly reduced mean and basal FSH concentrations and LH pulse amplitude and frequency. We concluded that 20-day estradiol treatment truncated FSH peaks, blocking wave emergence, and reduced the small-follicle pool, rendering the ovary unresponsive to oFSH injection in terms of wave emergence. Varying the steroid treatment created differential FSH peak regulation compared with other gonadotropin secretory parameters. This provides a useful model for future studies of the endocrine regulation of ovine antral follicular dynamics.

Suppression of follicle wave emergence in cyclic ewes by supraphysiologic concentrations of estradiol-17beta and induction with a physiologic dose of exogenous ovine follicle-stimulating hormone.

Follicle waves are preceded by follicle-stimulating hormone (FSH) peaks in ewes. The purpose of the present study was to see whether estradiol implant treatment would block FSH peaks to create a model in which the effect of the timing and mode of FSH peaks could be studied by ovine FSH (oFSH) injection. In Experiment 1, 10 ewes received estradiol-17beta implants on Day 4 after ovulation (Day 0, day of ovulation); five ewes received large implants, and five ewes received small implants. Five control ewes received empty implants. In Experiment 2, 12 ewes received large implants on Day 4. On Day 9, six ewes received oFSH twice, 8 h apart (0.5 microg/kg; s.c.). Implants were left in place for 10 days in both experiments. In both studies, ovarian ultrasonography and blood sampling was done daily. In Experiment 1, estradiol concentrations were significantly higher in ewes with large implants (10.4 +/- 0.7 pg/ml) compared with controls (3.9 +/- 0.7 pg/ml) and ewes with small implants (5.4 +/- 0.7 pg/ml; P < 0.001). A significant reduction was found in mean FSH peak concentration (31%; P < 0.05) and FSH peak amplitude (45%; P < 0.05) in ewes with large implants compared with controls. Mean and basal FSH concentrations were unaffected by the large implants. The large implants halted follicle-wave emergence between Day 0 and 8 after implant insertion. The small follicle pool (2-3 mm in diameter) was unaffected by the large implants. When oFSH was injected into ewes with large implants, a follicle wave emerged 1.5 +/- 0.5 days after injection; however, in ewes given saline alone, a follicle wave emerged 4.8 +/- 0.8 days after injection (P < 0.01). We concluded that truncation of FSH peaks by estradiol implants prevented follicle-wave emergence, but injection of physiologic concentrations of oFSH reinitiated follicle-wave emergence.

Ovarian and endocrine responses to prostaglandin F2alpha (PGF2alpha) given at the expected time of the endogenous FSH peak at mid-cycle in ewes.

In the ewe, a rise in circulating concentrations of FSH preceding follicular wave emergence begins in the presence of growing follicles from a previous wave. We hypothesized that prostaglandin F(2alpha) (PGF(2alpha)) given at the time of an endogenous FSH peak in cyclic ewes would result in synchronous ovulation of follicles from two consecutive waves, increasing ovulation rate. Twelve Western White Face (WWF) ewes received a single i.m. injection of PGF(2alpha) (15 mg/ewe) at the expected time of a peak in FSH secretion, from Days 9 to 12 after ovulation. The mean ovulation rate after PGF(2alpha) treatment (2.3+/-0.3) did not differ (P>0.05) from the pre-treatment ovulation rate (1.7+/-0.1). Five ewes ovulated follicles from follicular waves emerging before and after PGF(2alpha) injection (3.0+/-0.6 ovulations/ewe) and seven ewes ovulated follicles only from a wave(s) emerging before PGF(2alpha) treatment (2.0+/-0.3 ovulations/ewe; P>0.05). The mean interval from PGF(2alpha) to emergence of the next follicular wave (1.0+/-0.4 and 4.0+/-0.0 d, respectively; P<0.001) and the interval from PGF(2alpha) treatment to the next FSH peak (0 and 3.5+/-0.4d, respectively; P<0.05) differed between the two groups. Six ewes ovulated after the onset of behavioral estrus, with a mean ovulation rate of 1.7+/-0.2, and six ewes ovulated both before and after the onset of estrus (3.0+/-0.5 ovulations/ewe; P<0.05). None of the ovulations that occurred before estrus resulted in corpora lutea (CL) with a full life span. At 24h before ovulation, follicles ovulating before or after the onset of estrus differed in size (4.1+/-0.3 or 5.5+/-0.4mm, respectively; P<0.05) and had distinctive echotextural characteristics. In conclusion, the administration of PGF(2alpha) at the expected time of an FSH peak at mid-cycle in ewes may alter the endogenous rhythm of FSH secretion and was not consistently followed by ovulation of follicles from two follicular waves. In non-prolific WWF ewes, PGF(2alpha)-induced luteolysis disrupted the normal distribution of the source of ovulatory follicles and may be associated with untimely follicular rupture and luteal inadequacy.

The temporal relationship between patterns of LH and FSH secretion, and development of ovulatory-sized follicles during the mid- to late-luteal phase of sheep.

The aim of the present study was to investigate the temporal relationship between the secretory pattern of serum LH and FSH concentrations and waves of ovarian antral follicles during the luteal phase of the estrous cycle in sheep. The growth pattern of ovarian antral follicles and CL were monitored by transrectal ultrasonography and gonadotropin concentrations were measured in blood samples collected every 12 min for 6 h/d from 7 to 14 d after ovulation. There were two follicular waves (penultimate and final waves of the cycle) emerging and growing during the period of intensive blood sampling. Mean and basal LH concentrations and LH pulse frequency increased (P < 0.001) with decreasing progesterone concentration at the end of the cycle. Mean and basal FSH concentrations reached a peak (P < 0.01) on the day of follicular wave emergence before declining to a nadir by 2 d after emergence. None of the parameters of pulsatile LH secretion varied significantly with either the emergence of the final follicular wave or with the end of the growth phase of the largest follicle of the penultimate wave of the cycle. However, mean and basal LH concentrations did increase (P < 0.05) after the end of the growth phase of the largest follicle of the final follicular wave of the cycle. Furthermore, the end of the growth phase of the largest follicle of the final wave coincided with functional luteolysis. In summary, there was no abrupt or short-term change in pulsatile LH secretion in association with the emergence or growth of the largest follicle of a wave. We concluded that the emergence and growth of ovarian antral follicles in follicular waves do not require changes in LH secretion, but may involve changes in sensitivity of ovarian follicles to serum LH concentrations.

Patterns of antral follicular wave dynamics and accompanying endocrine changes in cyclic and seasonally anestrous ewes treated with exogenous ovine follicle-stimulating hormone during the inter-wave interval.

In the ewe, ovarian follicular waves emerge every 4 to 5 days and are preceded by a peak in FSH secretion. It is unclear whether large antral follicle(s) in a wave suppress the growth of other smaller follicles during the inter-wave interval, as is seen in cattle. In this study, anestrous (n = 6; experiment 1) and cyclic (n = 5; experiment 2) Western white face ewes were given ovine FSH (oFSH) (0.5 microg/kg; two s.c. injections, 8 h apart) during the growth phase (based on ultrasonography) of a follicular wave (wave 1). Control ewes (n = 5 and 6, respectively) received vehicle. In oFSH-treated ewes, serum FSH concentrations reached a peak (P < 0.05) by 12 h after oFSH treatment, and this induced FSH peak did not differ (P > 0.05) from the endogenous FSH peaks. In all ewes, emergence of follicular waves 1 and 2 was seen (P > 0.05). However, in oFSH-treated ewes, an additional follicular wave emerged approximately 0.5 days after treatment: during the interwave interval of waves 1 and 2 without delaying the emergence of wave 2. The growth characteristics and serum estradiol concentrations did not differ (P > 0.05) between oFSH-induced waves and waves induced by endogenous FSH peaks. We concluded that, unlike in cattle, the largest follicle of a wave in sheep has limited direct effect on the growth of other follicles induced by exogenous oFSH. In addition, the largest follicle of a wave may possibly not influence the rhythmicity of follicular wave emergence, as it does in cattle.

Effects of a 6-day treatment with medroxyprogesterone acetate after prostaglandin F2 alpha-induced luteolysis at midcycle on antral follicular development and ovulation rate in nonprolific Western white-faced ewes.

Medroxyprogesterone acetate (MAP) from intravaginal sponges prolongs the lifespan of large ovarian follicles when administered after prostaglandin F2alpha (PGF2alpha)-induced luteolysis early in the luteal phase of ewes. The present study was designed to determine whether a PGF2alpha/MAP treatment applied at midcycle would alter the pattern of antral follicle growth and increase ovulation rate in nonprolific ewes. A single injection of PGF2alpha (15 mg, i.m.) was given, and an intravaginal MAP (60 mg) sponge was inserted for 6 days, on approximately Day 8 after ovulation, in 7 (experiment 1), 8 (experiment 2) or 11 (experiment 3) ultrasonographically monitored, cycling Western white-faced ewes; seven ewes (experiment 1) served as untreated controls. Blood samples were collected each day and also every 12 min for 6 h, halfway through the period of treatment with MAP (experiment 1), or every 4 h, from 1 day before to 1 day after sponging (experiment 2). Seventeen of 26 treated ewes (experiment 1, n = 6; experiment 2, n = 5; experiment 3, n = 6) ovulated 1 to 6 days after PGF2alpha, but this did not affect the emergence of ensuing follicular waves (experiments 1 and 2). These ovulations, confirmed by laparotomy and histological examinations of the ovaries (experiment 3), were not preceded by an increase in LH/FSH secretion and did not result in corpora lutea, as evidenced by transrectal ultrasonography and RIA of serum progesterone (experiments 1 and 2). Following the removal of MAP sponges, the mean ovulation rate was 3.1 +/- 0.4 in treated ewes and 2.0 +/- 0.3 in control ewes (experiment 1; P < 0.05). In experiments 1 and 2, the ovulation rate after treatment (3.1 +/- 0.4 and 2.8 +/- 0.4) was also greater than the pretreatment rate (1.9 +/- 0.3 and 1.9 +/- 0.1, respectively). Ovulations of follicles from two consecutive waves before ovulation were seen in five treated but only in two control ewes (experiment 1), and in seven ewes in experiment 2. There were no significant differences between the MAP-treated and control ewes in mean daily serum concentrations of FSH and estradiol, and no differences in the parameters of LH/FSH secretion, based on frequent blood sampling. Treatment of nonprolific Western white-faced ewes with PGF2alpha and MAP at midcycle changed follicular dynamics and increased ovulation rate by approximately 50%. These effects of MAP, in the absence of luteal progesterone, may not be mediated by changes in gonadotropin secretion.