A programme to spread eGFR graph surveillance for the early identification, support and treatment of people with progressive chronic kidney disease (ASSIST-CKD): protocol for the stepped wedge implementation and evaluation of an intervention to reduce late presentation for renal replacement therapy.

BACKGROUND: Patients who start renal replacement therapy (RRT) for End-Stage Kidney Disease (ESKD) without having had timely access to specialist renal services have poor outcomes. At one NHS Trust in England, a community-wide CKD management system has led to a decline in the incident rate of RRT and the lowest percentage of patients presenting within 90 days of starting RRT in the UK. We describe the protocol for a quality improvement project to scale up and evaluate this innovation. METHODS: The intervention is based upon an off-line database that integrates laboratory results from blood samples taken in all settings stored under different identifying labels relating to the same patient. Graphs of estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR) over time are generated for patients <65 years with an incoming eGFR <50 ml/min/1.73 m2 and patients >65 years with an incoming eGFR <40 ml/min/1.73 m2. Graphs where kidney function is deteriorating are flagged by a laboratory scientist and details sent to the primary care doctor (GP) with a prompt that further action may be needed. We will evaluate the impact of implementing this intervention across a large population served by a number of UK renal centres using a mixed methods approach. We are following a stepped-wedge design. The order of implementation among participating centres will be randomly allocated. Implementation will proceed with unidirectional steps from control group to intervention group until all centres are generating graphs of eGFR over time. The primary outcome for the quantitative evaluation is the proportion of patients referred to specialist renal services within 90 days of commencing RRT, using data collected routinely by the UK Renal Registry. The qualitative evaluation will investigate facilitators and barriers to adoption and spread of the intervention. It will include: semi-structured interviews with laboratory staff, renal centre staff and service commissioners; an online survey of GPs receiving the intervention; and focus groups of primary care staff. DISCUSSION: Late presentation to nephrology for patients with ESKD is a source of potentially avoidable harm. This protocol describes a robust quantitative and qualitative evaluation of a quality improvement intervention to reduce late presentation and improve the outcomes for patients with ESKD.

Laboratory database population surveillance to improve detection of progressive chronic kidney disease.

BACKGROUND: Some patients with chronic kidney disease are still referred late for specialist care despite the evidence that earlier detection and intervention can halt or delay progression to end-stage kidney disease (ESKD). OBJECTIVES: To develop a population surveillance system using existing laboratory data to enable early detection of patients at high risk of ESKD by reviewing cumulative graphs of estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR). METHODS: A database was developed, updated daily with data from the laboratory computer. Cumulative eGFR graphs containing up to five years of data are reviewed by clinical scientists for all primary care patients or out-patients with a low eGFR for their age. For those with a declining trend, a report containing the eGFR graph is sent to the requesting doctor. A retrospective audit was performed using historical data to assess the predictive value of the graphs. RESULTS: In nine months, we reported 370,000 eGFR results, reviewing 12,000 eGFR graphs. On average 60 graphs per week were flagged as 'high' or 'intermediate' risk. Patients with graphs flagged as high risk had a significantly higher mortality after 3.5 years and a significantly greater chance of requiring renal replacement therapy after 4.5 years of follow-up. Five patients (7%) with graphs flagged as high risk had a sustained >25% fall in eGFR without evidence of secondary care referral. Feedback about the service from requesting clinicians was 73% positive. CONCLUSIONS: We have developed a system for laboratory staff to review cumulative eGFR graphs for a large population and identify patients at highest risk of developing ESKD. Further research is needed to measure the impact of this service on patient outcomes.

Enhanced training in vascular access creation predicts arteriovenous fistula placement and patency in hemodialysis patients: results from the Dialysis Outcomes and Practice Patterns Study.

OBJECTIVE: To investigate whether intensity of surgical training influences type of vascular access placed and fistula survival. SUMMARY BACKGROUND DATA: Wide variations in fistula placement and survival occur internationally. Underlying explanations are not well understood. METHODS: Prospective data from 12 countries in the Dialysis Outcomes and Practice Patterns Study were analyzed; outcomes of interest were type of vascular access in use (fistula vs. graft) in hemodialysis patients at study entry and time from placement until primary and secondary access failures, as predicted by surgical training. Logistic and Cox regression models were adjusted for patient characteristics and time on hemodialysis. RESULTS: During training, US surgeons created fewer fistulae (US mean = 16 vs. 39-426 in other countries) and noted less emphasis on vascular access placement compared with surgeons elsewhere. Significant predictors of fistula versus graft placement in hemodialysis patients included number of fistulae placed during training (adjusted odds ratio [AOR] = 2.2 for fistula placement, per 2 times greater number of fistulae placed during training, P < 0.0001) and degree of emphasis on vascular access creation during training (AOR = 2.4 for fistula placement, for much-to-extreme emphasis vs. no emphasis, P = 0.0008). Risk of primary fistula failure was 34% lower (relative risk = 0.66, P = 0.002) when placed by surgeons who created > or = 25 (vs. < 25) fistulae during training. CONCLUSIONS: Surgical training is key to both fistula placement and survival, yet US surgical programs seem to place less emphasis on fistula creation than those in other countries. Enhancing surgical training in fistula creation would help meet targets of the Fistula First Initiative.

Mortality and hospitalization in haemodialysis patients in five European countries: results from the Dialysis Outcomes and Practice Patterns Study (DOPPS).

BACKGROUND: Mortality and hospitalization rates are reported for nationally representative random samples of haemodialysis patients treated at randomly selected dialysis facilities in five European countries participating in the Dialysis Outcomes and Practice Pattern Study (DOPPS) (France, Germany, Italy, Spain and the UK). RESULTS: In the UK, 28.1% of haemodialysis patients received prior peritoneal dialysis treatment compared with 4.2-8.3% in other countries. Kidney transplantation rates ranged from 3.3 (per 100 patient years) in Italy to 11.6 in Spain. The relative risk (RR) of mortality, adjusted for age, sex and diabetes status was significantly higher in the UK (RR = 1.39, P = 0.02) compared with Italy (reference) and increased in association with age (RR = 1.60 for every 10 years older, P <0.001), diabetes as cause of end-stage renal disease (ESRD) (RR = 1.55, P < 0.001), male patients <65 years (RR = 1.29, P = 0.02) and peritoneal dialysis in the 12 months prior to starting haemodialysis (RR = 1.72, P = 0.06). Hospitalization for cardiovascular disease was highest in France and Germany (0.40 and 0.43 hospitalizations per patient year, respectively) and lowest in the UK (0.19), although cardiovascular comorbidity was similar in the UK and France. Hospitalization rates for vascular access-related infection ranged from 0.01 hospitalizations per patient year in Italy to 0.08 in the UK, consistent with the higher dialysis catheter use in the UK (25%) vs Italy (5%). Hospitalization risk was significantly higher in France than in other Euro-DOPPS countries and was significantly (P < 0.05) associated with prior peritoneal dialysis therapy, peripheral vascular disease, gastrointestinal bleeding in the prior 12 months, diabetes, cancer, cardiac disease, psychiatric disease and recent onset of ESRD (within 30 days of study entry). CONCLUSIONS: The large differences in haemodialysis practice and outcomes in the Euro-DOPPS countries suggest opportunities for improvement in patient care.