Enhancing Diagnostic Accuracy Through Neuroimaging Revisions in Pediatric Pseudotumor Cerebri Syndrome: A Cross-Sectional Study.

BACKGROUND: This cross-sectional study aimed to report all neuroimaging findings suggestive of raised intracranial pressure in children with pseudotumor cerebri syndrome (PTCS), before and after re-review by two neuroradiologists. METHODS: We included 48 children aged <18 years diagnosed with PTCS between 2016 and 2021. Clinical and radiological data were obtained from their medical files. Two neuroradiologists independently re-reviewed all neuroimages, and the average of their assessments was compared with the initial neuroimaging reports; an additional review was done to analyze inter- and intraclass correlation. RESULTS: The initial neuroimaging reports showed under-reporting of findings, with only 26 of 48 (54.1%) patients identified with abnormal reports. After revision, the proportion of the reported findings increased to 44 of 48 (91.6%). Distention of the perioptic space was the most commonly reported finding after revision (36.5 of 48; 76%). Flattening of the posterior globe and empty sella were initially under-reported but improved after revision. Moreover, several findings suggestive of increased intracranial pressure not mandated by Friedman criteria were identified, such as narrowing of the Meckel cave, posterior displacement of the pituitary stalk, and narrowing of the cavernous sinus. Analysis of associations between neuroimaging findings and demographic and clinical characteristics yielded no statistically significant results. The inter- and intraclass correlation results demonstrated a significant agreement between raters and within each rater's assessment (P < 0.05). CONCLUSIONS: This study highlights the impact of image revision in enhancing PTCS diagnosis. Intra- and interclass correlations underscore the reliability of the review process, emphasizing the importance of meticulous image analysis in clinical practice.

Use of subjective minimizing language at hematology and oncology conferences: A systematic review.

BACKGROUND: Subjective minimizing language in oncology conferences may undermine patient-centered care and hinder comprehensive treatment strategies. Subjective terms like "safe," "tolerable," and "well-tolerated" can vary in interpretation among individuals, making it difficult to compare results across trials and potentially downplaying significant risks and limitations associated with treatments. METHODS: This study evaluates subjective minimizing language in major oncology conferences and its use in adverse event reporting. We conducted a search of three electronic databases, ASCO, ASH, and ESMO, for published abstracts from January 1, 2019, to December 31, 2021. This study included prospective cohort studies or clinical trials in humans that used safety terms like "safe," "well-tolerated," "tolerable," "no new safety signal," or "no new safety concern" in the abstract text. RESULTS: Out of 34,975 reviewed records, 5299 (15.2%) abstracts used subjective minimizing language terms. The analysis included 2797 (52.8%) abstracts meeting the inclusion criteria. The majority of studies were Phase 1 trials (45.5%), followed by Phase 2 (29.6%) and Phase 3 trials (7.4%). Solid tumors accounted for the most common disease category (56.5%), followed by malignant hematology following (37.1%). Subjective minimizing terms like "safe" (69.2%), "well-tolerated" (53.2%), "tolerable" (25.6%), and "no new safety signal/concerns" (10%) were used frequently. Of the abstracts using subjective minimizing language (n = 2797), 81.9% reported data on any grade adverse events (AEs). Grade I/II AEs were reported in 62.6% of abstracts, Grade III/IV AEs in 78%, and Grade V AEs (death related to AEs) in 8.8%. Discontinuation due to AEs occurred in 11.4% (SD 9.5%) of studies using subjective minimizing language terms. CONCLUSIONS: Frequent use of subjective minimizing language in major oncology conferences' abstracts may obscure interpretation of study results and the safety of novel treatments. Researchers and clinicians should provide precise and standardized information to avoid overstatement of benefits and understand the true impact of interventions on patients' safety and well-being.

Pseudotumor cerebri syndrome in children: Clinical characteristic and re-classification.

AIM: To describe the clinical characteristics of children with pseudotumor cerebri syndrome (PTCS) who were diagnosed according to the modified Dandy criteria and to reclassify them according to the newly proposed diagnostic criteria by Freidman. METHODOLOGY: This retrospective study included the period from January 2016-to July 2021. RESULTS: 50 patients were included; 34 males and 16 females with a male to female ratio of 2.1:1. The average age at onset of symptoms was 8 years. Obesity was noticed in 6 (12%) patients; 34 (68%) had symptoms upon presentation. The most common presenting symptom was headache (28 patients; 56%), papilledema was present in 33 (66%) patients. Most patients (37; 74%) had an initial cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) pressure ≥280 mmH2O. At last follow-up, papilledema resolved in 11/32 (34.3%) patients, and headache resolved in 17/23 (74%) patients. 22/50 (44%) patients fulfilled the definite criteria proposed by Freidman, 11/50 (22%) fulfilled the probable, 10/50 (20%) were categorized as possible, and 7 (14%) patients were categorized as unmet. CONCLUSION: PTCS is a chronic condition. Managing patients who do not have papilledema or who do not meet the newly proposed higher CSF pressure is challenging. Although, applying the newly proposed criteria captured most of our patients, however, around one quarter were managed based on clinical experience. This study indicates a strong need for future guidelines tailored specifically for children, taking into consideration that the cut-off point of CSF pressure might not be similar for all populations.