RESUMO
Introduction: New procedures and diagnostic tests in hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (HSCT) are associated with a significant increase in costs. The last cost estimate of allogeneic HSCT done in Tunisia was in 1996 and concerned only direct medical costs. Therefore, an updated cost analysis is needed. Objective: Analysis of direct costs during the first-year post-allogeneic HSCT in two groups of patients: Bone Marrow Transplant (Allo-BMT) and Peripheral Blood Stem Cell Transplant (Allo-PBSCT) and identification of factors leading to interindividual variations in costs in order to compare these costs with the budget allocated by the payer (CNAM). Methods: Pharmacoeconomic retrospective study, concerning patients who underwent allogeneic HSCT in 2013. Clinical and unit cost data were obtained from medical and administration records. Results:This study showed that the average direct cost of allogeneic HSCT in the population during the first year reached 56 638. The average cost of Allo-BMT was 63 612, and Allo-PBSCT was 45 966 (p > 0.05). The initial hospitalization counted for 88% of total direct cost with an average cost of 41 441 in Allo-BMT and 24 672 in Allo-PBSCT (p < 0.05). Direct medical costs represented more than 70% of total direct costs, drugs, and laboratory tests occupied the largest share. Antifungals, antitumors, and antiviral drugs were the most expensive pharmaceutical classes with a mean cost, respectively, of 4 526; 3 737 and 3 268. Some clinical criteria were significantly related to total direct costs like length of aplasia (p < 0.01) and GVHD (p < 0.05). However, the type of blood disease, its risk, length of mucositis, and the treatment protocol have no effect on the costs for all allogeneic patients. Conclusion: Our results showed that the costs of Allo HSCT have exceeded by far the budget allocated by the CNAM to the center, since the 90s to this day. That's why the total reimbursement mechanism should be revised.
RESUMO
BACKGROUND: The mass vaccination campaign against SARS-CoV-2 was started in Tunisia on 13 March 2021 by using progressively seven different vaccines approved for emergency use. Herein, we aimed to evaluate the humoral and cellular immunity in subjects aged 40 years and over who received one of the following two-dose regimen vaccines against SARS-CoV-2, namely mRNA-1273 or Spikevax (Moderna), BNT162B2 or Comirnaty (Pfizer-BioNTech), Gam-COVID-Vac or Sputnik V (Gamaleya Research Institute), ChAdOx1-S or Vaxzevria (AstraZeneca), BIBP (Sinopharm), and Coronavac (Sinovac). MATERIAL AND METHODS: For each type of vaccine, a sample of subjects aged 40 and over was randomly selected from the national platform for monitoring COVID-19 vaccination and contacted to participate to this study. All consenting participants were sampled for peripheral blood at 3-7 weeks after the second vaccine dose to perform anti-S and anti-N serology by the Elecsys® (Lenexa, KS, USA) anti-SARS-CoV-2 assays (Roche® Basel, Switzerland). The CD4 and CD8 T cell responses were evaluated by the QuantiFERON® SARS-CoV-2 (Qiagen® Basel, Switzerland) for a randomly selected sub-group. RESULTS: A total of 501 people consented to the study and, of them, 133 were included for the cellular response investigations. Both humoral and cellular immune responses against SARS-CoV-2 antigens differed significantly between all tested groups. RNA vaccines induced the highest levels of humoral and cellular anti-S responses followed by adenovirus vaccines and then by inactivated vaccines. Vaccines from the same platform induced similar levels of specific anti-S immune responses except in the case of the Sputnik V and the AstraZeneca vaccine, which exhibited contrasting effects on humoral and cellular responses. When analyses were performed in subjects with negative anti-N antibodies, results were similar to those obtained within the total cohort, except for the Moderna vaccine, which gave a better cellular immune response than the Pfizer vaccine and RNA vaccines, which induced similar cellular immune responses to those of adenovirus vaccines. CONCLUSION: Collectively, our data confirmed the superiority of the RNA-based COVID-19 vaccines, in particular that of Moderna, for both humoral and cellular immunogenicity. Our results comparing between different vaccine platforms in a similar population are of great importance since they may help decision makers to adopt the best strategy for further national vaccination programs.
RESUMO
BACKGROUND: Parenteral nutrition (PN) seems to be a practical solution to face the negative nutritional effects of bone marrow transplantation. OBJECTIVE: Report and describe all observed PN-related complications in children undergoing allogenic bone marrow transplantation in a tertiary center and determine the possible risk factors. MATERIALS AND METHODS: This was a retrospective and observational study including 51 allografted children 2 to 17 years of age. We collected from medical patient records any noticed PN-related complications using an assessment causality method. The independent risk factors for complications were investigated by multivariate analysis. RESULTS: A total of 92% of patients (n=47) developed a total of 136 complications attributable to PN. The incidence rate of complications was 5 for 100 patient days of PN. Infectious complications (32.3%) and electrolytic disorders (27.9%) were the most common conditions identified during our study. Multivariate analysis showed that the duration of PN exposure, age, and hyperglycemia were the risk factors for the onset of these complications. CONCLUSIONS: Although we have noticed multiple complications attributable to PN, a certain causal link is difficult to establish in this particular context. Emphasizing enteral nutrition in bone marrow graft protocols would be the best way to avoid these complications.
Assuntos
Transplante de Medula Óssea , Nutrição Parenteral/efeitos adversos , Adolescente , Criança , Pré-Escolar , Feminino , Humanos , Masculino , Estudos RetrospectivosRESUMO
Background: Hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (HSCT) is a medically complicated therapy with a long recovery time. In Tunisia, the National Health Insurance Fund (CNAM) covers only the first year post-transplantation, after which the costs are borne by the hospital. Objective: Describe complications that can occur during the second year post-allogeneic HSCT and calculate direct costs in different groups of patients. Methods: In this pharmacoeconomic study, medical records of the second year post-allogeneic HSCT were collected. Studied variables included frequent observed complications and medical and non-medical direct costs. Results: The average total direct cost in the population during the second year post-transplantation was $11,571, 97% of which represents direct medical costs Drugs accounted for the largest share (80%) of total direct costs, dominated by the cost of antifungals (52%) and antivirals (26%) drug . Cytomegalovirus status was seen in 9.3% of patients and was associated with a seven-fold increase in direct costs (p < 0.001).ââIn patients who developed chronic GVHD, the average direct cost was three times higher than for those who did not (p = 0.032). Conclusion: Given the importance of direct costs in the post-transplantation period a review of the hospital financing mechanism and a new convention with the CNAM is crucial.ââ.