[Bladder tumors in the Hérault department: Results of the Hérault tumor registry registration from1987 to 2019]. / Les tumeurs de la vessie dans le département de l'Hérault : résultats de l'enregistrement du registre des tumeurs de l'Hérault de1987 à 2019.

OBJECTIVES: The Hérault Tumor Registry (RTH) is a general registry qualified by the national committee of registries since 1987. The objective of this study is to present the evolution of the epidemiology of bladder cancer (stage≥T1) in the Hérault department based on data collected by the RTH over a period from 1987 to 2019. MATERIAL AND METHODS: We analyzed trends in bladder cancer incidence in Hérault between 1987 and 2019 by sex, age, and stage, as well as mortality trends between 1987 and 2017. For the years 2018-2019, which are the last two years validated by the registry, we described relative frequencies, sex ratio, mean and median age at diagnosis, cumulative risk, stages at diagnosis, pathology data, and primary treatments. Observed and net survival data are analyzed for those diagnosed between 01/01/2000 and 12/31/2015 with a point date of 06/30/2018. RESULTS: In 2018-2019, bladder cancer was the 7th most common cancer in Hérault (5th in men and 12th in women) with an incidence sex ratio of 3.9 men to one woman. The mean age at diagnosis was 75.3 years for men and 77.8 years for women. The probability of having bladder cancer before the age of 75 years was 1.68% for a man (1/59) and 0.34% for a woman (1/295). Urothelial carcinomas accounted for 90.7% of cancers. Between 1987 and 2019, bladder cancer incidence TSMs (worldwide standardized rates) decreased by 0.8% per year in men and remained stable in women. Mortality TSMs between 1987 and 2017 followed the same trends with a decrease of 2.2% per year in men and stability in women. For the 3304 bladder cancers diagnosed between 01/01/2000 and 12/31/2015, the observed 5-year survival was 38% (34% in women and 38% in men). CONCLUSIONS: Bladder cancer incidence and mortality rates have decreased slightly in men but remain stable in women in the Hérault. Registries collect only a limited number of variables for each patient. In 2018 the Hérault Registry Specialized in Onco-Urology (RHESOU) was created, to have comprehensive data.

Photodynamic cystoscopy for bladder cancer diagnosis and for NMIBC follow-up: An overview of systematic reviews and meta-analyses.

INTRODUCTION: Currently, bladder cancer detection is based on cytology and cystoscopy. White light cystoscopy (WLC) is an invasive procedure and may under-detect flat lesions. Blue light cystoscopy (BLC) and narrow band imaging (NBI) cystoscopy are new modalities that could improve the detection of non-muscle invasive bladder cancer (NMIBC) and its recurrence or progression to muscle invasive bladder cancer. We present a systematic review on BLC and NBI cystoscopy for bladder cancer diagnosis and NMIBC follow-up. MATERIAL AND METHODS: All available systematic reviews and meta-analyses on cystoscopy published in PubMed® between May 2010 and March 2021 were identified and reviewed. The main endpoints were clinical performance for bladder cancer diagnosis and for recurrence or progression detection during NMIBC follow-up, and additional value compared with cytology and/or WLC. RESULTS: Most of the meta-analyses and systematic reviews published suggest a better sensitivity of BLC and NBI cystoscopy compared to WLC, particularly for the detection of flat lesions (CIS). NBI- and BLC-guided TURBT could decrease the recurrence rates. However, their clinical utility to reduce progression rate and increase survival is still unclear. CONCLUSIONS: BLC and NBI cystoscopy are efficient techniques for bladder cancer diagnosis and NMIBC follow-up. However, their clinical benefit remains to be confirmed.

[Which non pharmacological interventions should be offered to patients treated with androgen deprivation therapy for prostate cancer? A systematic review]. / Quelles interventions non médicamenteuses proposer aux patients traités par hormono-suppression pour un cancer de la prostate ? Revue systématique de la littérature.

AIM: Prostate cancer is a frequent disease and one of the main treatments used is androgen deprivation therapy, which is a therapy with disabling side effects. Non-pharmacological interventions (NPIs) are evidenced based, non-invasive interventions on human health. They are classified into five categories (physical, psychological, nutritional, digital, elemental). The NPIs sphere is booming and still remains underused in this context. METHODS: A systematic review concerning randomized controlled trials was executed according to the PRISMA guidelines (Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses). We used the "Medline" and "Kalya Research" databases. After searching and selecting eligible publications, we included 37 randomized controlled trials. RESULTS: The majority of articles concerned physical NPIs with 30 clinical studies, 3 publications dealt with nutritional NPIs, 2 with psychological NPIs and 2 articles concerned elemental NPIs. No publication about digital NPI was found. All of the studies aimed to manage and improve the side effects of treatment. No elemental NPI has demonstrated benefit. Only one psychological NPI and one nutritional NPI were effective. Five types of physical NPI protocols have shown efficacy. The main benefits related to physical abilities, body composition, osteoporosis, quality of life, fatigue, reduced cardiovascular risk and finally anxiety and depression. CONCLUSION: Non-pharmacological interventions, especially physical ones, are effective in managing and reducing the side effects associated with androgen deprivation therapy and should be offered to patients in this context.

[Adhesion of urologists to the recommendations of the French Urological Association Cancer Committee (CCAFU) in the imaging work-up of localized prostate cancer]. / L'adhésion des urologues aux recommandations du comité de cancérologie de l'association Française d'urologie (CCAFU) dans le bilan d'imagerie du cancer localisé de la prostate.

OBJECTIVES: The literature review shows a low adhesion of urologists to the recommendations of learned societies in the imaging work-up of localized prostate cancer (CaP), especially for low and intermediate risks of the D'Amico classification. We analyzed the adhesion of urologists in the Hérault region (France) to the CCAFU 2016/2018, 2018/2020 recommendations. MATERIAL AND METHODS: From the Hérault Onco Urology Registry (RHESOU) database, we identified localized CaP diagnosed between 01/01/2017 and 31/12/2019, and then classified them into 3 distinct risk groups according to the D'Amico classification. We compared the imaging workup performed by each patient to the CCAFU 2016/2018, 2018/2020 recommendations, according to the risk group. RESULTS: Of the 2,049 localized CaPs included in our study, 591 belonged to the low-risk group, 1059 to the intermediate-risk group, and 399 to the high-risk group. In the low-risk group 45.2% of the cases did not follow the CCAFU 2016/2018, 2018/2020 recommendations in the imaging workup, 77.3% in the intermediate-risk group and 80.9% in the high-risk group. For our entire study, 1,408 patients (68.7%) had an imaging workup that did not follow the CCAFU recommendations. CONCLUSION: Our results show a low adhesion of urologists to the CCAFU recommendations in the imaging assessment of localized CaP. The causes of this non-adhesion are multifactorial and difficult to analyze.

[De novo or secondary metastatic prostate cancer management in France: Observational study from "sentinel multidisciplinary meeting" of the French Association of Urology]. / Prise en charge des cancers de la prostate métastatiques synchrones et métachrones en France : étude observationnelle à partir des « RCP sentinelles ¼ de l'AFU.

INTRODUCTION: Metastatic prostate cancer (mPCa) is an heterogeneous disease. Metachronous mPCa (MM) seems to have a better prognosis than synchronous mPCa (SM). However, it is difficult to analyze their specificities from national registries. Data from the so-called "sentinel multidisciplinary meeting" (SMDM) would represent a "real life" data collection. The objective of this national pilot study was to evaluate the concept of SMDM through the description and comparison of the diagnosis, management and follow-up of patients with synchronous or metachronous mPCa in 2018. METHODS: A survey covering clinical, biological, radiological data as well as treatment initiated and follow-up at 3 and 6 months was sent to the SMDM. All patients diagnosed with metastatic disease (SM or MM) between 01/01/2018 and 11/30/2018 were included. RESULTS: In total, 780 patients from 39 centers were included, 408 SM and 372 MM. SM were more symptomatic and had a higher metastatic burden than MM. PET were mostly performed in MM without a prior standard staging. SM patients received more chemotherapy than MM patients whereas new generation androgen deprivation therapy was mostly given to MM patients. At 6 months, there were no more significant difference in clinical presentation between the two groups. CONCLUSION: Specificities of SM and MM patients in terms of clinical presentation, metastatic burden and management were described, validating the concept of SMDM as a source of reliable informations.

[Cancers of the external genital organs of male in Hérault: Results from the Hérault tumor register (RTH) over a period of 30 years (1987-2016)]. / Le cancer des organes génitaux externes de l'homme dans le département de l'Hérault: résultats de 30 ans d'enregistrement du registre des tumeurs de l'Hérault (1987­2016).

AIM: The objective of this study is to present the history of cancers of the external genital organs of male in Hérault using data from the Hérault tumor register (RTH) over a period of 30 years. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Using the RTH database, we studied the development of testicular germ cell tumors (TGCT) and penile cancer (PC) over 30 years, from 1987 to 2016. We analyzed the incidence and mortality data for these tumors. We compared these results to French, European and global data. RESULTS: In 30 years of registration we have recorded 725 cases of TGCT and 175 cases of PC. The age standardized incidence rate (ASR) of TGCT has doubled between 1987 and 2016 (4.2 per 100,000 in 1987 and 9.3 per 100,000 in 2016). It was multiplied by 2.63 in the population of patients aged 30 to 44. There is a decrease of the mortality rate with a ASR of 0.8 deaths per 100,000 in 1987, and 0.4/100 000 in 2016. The PC incidence ASR was stable between 1987 and 2016 (0.4-0.9/100,000). Mortality is stable with a ASR between 0.1 and 0.3 deaths per 100,000 between 1987 and 2016. CONCLUSION: The incidence of TGCT has increased sharply in the Hérault over the past 30 years, while a decrease in mortality has been observed. The proportion of seminomas is increasing; it has gone from 53 % to 60 % in 30 years in the Hérault. The incidence and mortality of PC shows a stability in the Hérault over the past 30 years.

[Renal cell carcinoma in the department of Hérault: Results over a 30 year period]. / Le cancer du rein dans le département de L'Hérault : résultats de 30 ans d'enregistrement.

OBJECTIVE: The objective of the study was to determine the specificities of renal cell carcinoma (RCC) in the department of Herault using the Herault Tumor Registry over 30 years. METHODS: Data of this study were obtained from the Herault cancer database. We analysed the evolution of RCC from 1987 to 2016, including the incidence, mortality, cancer pathology and staging at the moment of diagnosis. We compared our results with national and international data. RESULTS: We identified 3769 newly diagnosed RCC: 2628 in men (69,7%) and 1141 in women (30,3%). In 2016, RCC was the 8th most frequent cancer, both genders combined, the 7th most frequent cancer in men and the 11th in women. New cases of RCC increased by 4.2 in men and 3.3 in women over the study period. The number of localised forms increased by 9% over 20 years. In 2016, the probability of having a RCC before the age of 75 was of 2.11% for a man and of 0.62% for a woman. CONCLUSION: Over 30 years, the incidence rate of RCC increased in the department of Herault; however, mortality decreased over the same period. This analytical data should be improved by the development of the Registry of Herault Specialised in Onco-Urology (RHESOU). LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: 3.

[French ccAFU guidelines - update 2020-2022: prostate cancer]. / Recommandations françaises du Comité de cancérologie de l'AFU ­ actualisation 2020­2022 : cancer de la prostate.

OBJECTIVE: - The purpose of the guidelines national committee ccAFU was to propose updated french guidelines for prostate cancer. METHODS: - A Medline search was achieved between 2018 and 2020, as regards diagnosis, options of treatment and follow-up of prostate cancer (PCA), and to evaluate the different references specifying their levels of evidence. RESULTS: - The guidelines outline the genetics, epidemiology and diagnosis of prostate cancer, as well as the concepts of screening and early detection. MRI, the gold standard imaging test for localized cancer, is indicated before prostate biopsies are performed. The therapeutic methods are detailed and indicated according to the clinical situation. Active surveillance is a reference therapeutic option for low-risk tumours with a low evolutionary risk. Early salvage radiotherapy is indicated in case of biological recurrence after radical prostatectomy. Androgen deprivation therapy (ADT) remains the backbone therapy in the metastatic stage. Docetaxel in combination with ADT improves overall first-line survival in synchronous metastatic prostate cancer. In this situation, the combination of ADT with abiraterone is also a standard of care regardless of tumor volume. Recent data indicate that ADT should be indicated with a new generation of hormone therapy (Apalutamide or Enzalutamide) in metastatic synchronous or metachronous patients, regardless of tumour volume. Local treatment of prostate cancer with radiotherapy improves survival in synchronous oligometastatic patients. Targeted treatment of metastases is being evaluated. In patients with castration-resistant prostate cancer (CRPC), new therapies that have emerged in recent years help to better control tumor progression and improve survival. CONCLUSION: - These updated french guidelines will contribute to increase the level of urological care for the diagnosis and treatment for prostate cancer.

[RHESOU (Registry in HErault Specialized in Onco-Urology) : the first French Registry specialized in Onco-Urology. One-year experience]. / RHESOU (Registre de l'Hérault spécialisé en onco-urologie) : le premier registre français spécialisé en onco-urologie. Un outil méthodologique de recueil de données en onco-urologie. Bilan de faisabilité sur un an d'expérience.

PURPOSE: In 2016, the Herault tumor registry collected 1961cancers in urology (21.4 % from all Herault cancers this year). RHESOU was created to complete RTH' data with specific parameters in onco-urology. The aim of this study is to describe RHESOU and to give some examples with our first results. MATERIAL AND METHODS: In November 2018, RHESOU (Registry HErault Specialised in Onco-Urology) was founded with the same registry recommendations. It collects specific oncologic parameters and also complete RTH's data. For each urological cancer, a specific survey with different choices was performed to collect a maximum of data which could be present in patients' file. These surveys were used for urological cancers cases that live in Herault in 2017. RESULTS: In 2017, we collected 970 prostate cancers, 581 bladder cancers, 212 kidney cancers, 51 upper excretory tract cancers, 28 testicle cancers and 9 penil cancers. Our urological data collection gives many possibilities to create many requests for detailed analysis in urological cancers. In this article, we reported data from kidney, bladder and prostate cancers. CONCLUSIONS: RHESOU is a new tool opened to the different urologic corporations (urologists, pathologists, oncologists, radiotherapists, radiologists) that permits an overview in urological cancers in Herault. Finally, one important aim is that this tool will be adapted when new treatments or new important parameters appear in the years ahead. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: 3.

[Radical prostatectomy for prostate cancer, perioperative management by French urologists in 2018]. / Évaluation de la gestion per- et périopératoire d'une prostatectomie totale pour cancer de la prostate par les urologues français en 2018.

INTRODUCTION: Prostatectomy (PT) is a common procedure performed by many urologists. In 2018, 20,207 prostatectomies were performed in France, and few studies evaluated the perioperative habits of urologists. As part of writing guidelines for enhanced recovery after surgery (ERAS) we wished to evaluate practice of urologists in their hospital management of a prostatectomy. MATERIEL AND METHODS: A questionnaire was sent by Survey Monkey in June and July 2018 to all urologists who are members of the French Association of Urology. RESULTS: One hundred and sixty seven urologists (14%) answered the questionnaire, 62% have private practice. The average number of operators per center performing PT was 4, with a median number of 70 interventions (0 to 486) per center in 2018. Open surgery is still gold standard (39.13%), followed by the robot-assisted transperitoneal laparoscopic (34.78%) and standard laparoscopic (24.22%). Alimentation, like first stand-up, was re-established on the first post-operative day, and the average hospital stay was 4±2 nights. The removal of the bladder catheter was most often performed at home by nurse (49.06%), one week after surgery. Only 10.06% of urologists systematically perform a cystography before removal urinary catheter. CONCLUSION: The perioperative management of prostatectomy in France is relatively homogeneous, between urologists. The length of hospital stay remains important and could be reduced by proposing an ERAS protocol as has been obtained for cystectomy. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: III.

[Recommendations CCAFU on the management of cancers of the urogenital system during an epidemic with Coronavirus COVID-19]. / Recommandations CCAFU sur la prise en charge des cancers de l'appareil urogénital en période d'épidémie au Coronavirus COVID-19.

AIM: The French population is facing the COVID-19 pandemic and the health system have been reoriented in emergency for the care of patients with coronavirus. The management of cancers of the urinary and male genital tracts must be adapted to this context. MATERIAL AND METHOD: An expert opinion documented by a literature review was formulated by the Cancerology Committee of the French Association of Urology (CCAFU). RESULTS: The medical and surgical management of patients with any cancers of the urinary and male genital tracts must be adapted by modifying the consultation methods, by prioritizing interventions according to the intrinsic prognosis of cancers, taking into account the patient's comorbidities. The protection of urologists from COVID-19 must be considered. CONCLUSION: The CCAFU issues an expert opinion on the measure to be taken to adapt the management of cancers of the male urinary and genital tract to the context of pandemic by COVID-19.

Contamination in control group led to no effect of PSA-based screening on prostate cancer mortality at 9 years follow-up: Results of the French section of European Randomized Study of Screening for Prostate Cancer (ERSPC).

INTRODUCTION: European Randomized Study of Screening for Prostate Cancer (ERSPC) mortality results were reported for 7 European countries (excluding France) and showed a significant reduction in Prostate cancer (PCa) mortality. As those results have not been part of the global ERSPC results, it is of interest to report PCa mortality at a median follow-up of 9 years for French section of ERSPC. MATERIAL AND METHODS: Two administrative departments were involved in the study. Only men after randomization in the screening group were invited by mail to be screened by PSA testing with two rounds at 4-6 year intervals. Biopsy was recommended if PSA>=3.0 ng/mL. No information other that the French Association of Urology recommandations on the use of PSA was offered to the control group (own decision of physicians and patients). Follow up was based on cancer registry database. Contamination defined as the receipt of PSA testing in control arm was measured. Poisson regression models were used to estimate the Rate Ratio (RR) of PCa mortality and incidence in the screening vs. control arm. RESULTS: Starting from 2003, 80,696 men aged 55-69 years were included. The percentage of men in the screening arm with at least one PSA test (compliance) was 31%. Compared to the control arm, PCa incidence increased by 10% in the screening arm (RR=1.10; 95% CI=[1.04-1.16], P=0.001), but PCa mortality did not differ (0.222 and 0.215 deaths/1000 person-years; RR=1.03[0.75-1.42], P=0.9). DISCUSSION: Limitations include low participation rate. PSA testing in the control arm was observed in 32% of men (contamination). CONCLUSIONS: Contamination in control group led to no effect of PSA-based screening on prostate cancer mortality at 9 years follow-up. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: 3.

Health care utilization by men with prostate cancer during the year before their death: A 2015 population-based study.

INTRODUCTION: To study the characteristics and health care utilization of men with prostate cancer (PCa) during their last year and last month of life, as these data have been rarely reported to date. SUBJECTS AND METHOD: Men covered by the national health Insurance general scheme (77% of the French population) treated for PCa (2014-2015), who died in 2015 were identified in the national health data system, including reimbursed hospital and outpatient care, and their causes of death. RESULTS: A total of 11,193 men (mean age: 81 years, SD: 9.6) were included. Almost 58% of these men died in a short-stay hospital (SSH), 4% died in hospital-at-home, 9% died in Rehab, 9% died in skilled nursing homes and 21% died at home. During the last year of life, almost all men were hospitalised at least once in SSH and 47% received hospital palliative care (HPC), immediately prior to death in 8% of cases. During the last month of life, 76% of men were hospitalised at least once in SSH, 43% attended an emergency department and 14% were admitted to intensive care, 7% received a chemotherapy session, and 24% received an antineoplastic agent dispensed by a retail pharmacy. Cancer was the main cause of death for 63% of men, corresponding to PCa in 40% of cases, and cardiovascular disease was the main cause of death for 13% of men with marked variations according to age, place of death, and use of HPC. The mean cost reimbursed per man during the last year of life was €38,750 (€48,601 including HPC). CONCLUSIONS: In France, end-of-life management of men with PCa, regardless of the cause of death, is centered on SSH and HPC, essentially at the time of death. Certain indicators of end-of-life management were particular high. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: 4.

[Short version of recommendations for enhanced recovery program (ERP) for cystectomy: Technical measures]. / Version courte des recommandations de la récupération ameliorée après chirurgie (RAAC) pour la cystectomie : mesures techniques.

INTRODUCTION: The enhanced recovery program (ERP) is a management mode whose objective is to reduce the risk of complications and allow the patient to recover more quickly all its functional capacities and to reintegrate at most quickly and safely in his usual environment. This intentionally synthetic document aims to disseminate in the urological community the main points of the ERP recommendations for cystectomy. This work, coordinated by AFU, involves several other partners. The full document is available on the "Urofrance" website. Another article will follow on organizational measures. METHOD: The development of the recommendations is based on the method "formalized consensus of experts" proposed by the HAS. The report is based on a systematic review of the literature (January 2006-May 2017), two rounds of iterative quotations and a national proofreading. Levels of proof of conclusions and gradation of recommendations are based on the HAS grid. RESULTS: The bibliographic strategy made it possible to retain 298 articles. Only the recommendations that obtained a strong agreement after the two rounds of iterative listing were retained. The recommendations presented here are in chronological form (before, during, after hospitalization). Twenty-six key points on the technical and organizational measures of ERP have been identified. CONCLUSION: The result of the literature review, supplemented by expert opinion, suggests a significant clinical interest in the application and dissemination of ERP for cystectomy, despite the limited data available for this indication.

RETRACTED: Recommandations françaises du Comité de Cancérologie de l'AFU ­ Actualisation 2018­2020 : cancer de la prostate French ccAFU guidelines ­ Update 2018­2020: Prostate cancer / Recommandations françaises du Comité de Cancérologie de l'AFU ­ Actualisation 2018­2020 : cancer de la prostate.

This article has been retracted: please see Elsevier Policy on Article Withdrawal (http://www.elsevier.com/locate/withdrawalpolicy). Cet article est retiré de la publication à la demande des auteurs car ils ont apporté des modifications significatives sur des points scientifiques après la publication de la première version des recommandations. Le nouvel article est disponible à cette adresse: DOI:10.1016/j.purol.2019.01.007. C'est cette nouvelle version qui doit être utilisée pour citer l'article. This article has been retracted at the request of the authors, as it is not based on the definitive version of the text because some scientific data has been corrected since the first issue was published. The replacement has been published at the DOI:10.1016/j.purol.2019.01.007. That newer version of the text should be used when citing the article.

[Place of partial nephrectomy assisted by robot: Review of the literature at the time of a request for a specific nomenclature]. / Place de la néphrectomie partielle assistée par robot : revue de la littérature à l'heure d'une demande de nomenclature spécifique.

INTRODUCTION: Robot-assisted surgery is practiced more and more frequently in urology. Besides its place in prostatectomy for cancer, it also concerns partial nephrectomy (NP), in the treatment of renal tumors. The objective of this review is to compare the robot-assisted approach with laparoscopic or open approaches in partial nephrectomy in terms of functional or oncological outcomes and per- and postoperative complications. MATERIAL AND METHODS: A systematic review of the literature published from 2009 was carried out on PubMed. Clinical studies or meta-analyzes comparing robot-assisted surgery versus laparoscopic or open surgery in the NP domain were used. RESULTS: The clinical data presented in this review of the literature are based mainly on meta-analyzes of comparative studies. Patients operated with robotic assistance (NPAR) had significantly fewer postoperative complications than patients operated by open (RR 0.61; P=0.0002) or laparoscopic surgery (RR 0.84; P=0.007). Positive margins, at equivalent pathological stages, are comparable to the open and appear to be lower than the laparoscopic surgery (RR 0.53; P<0.001). After NP, the change in postoperative glomerular filtration rate (GFR) appears to be identical between the 3 pathways. Hot ischemia time is significantly shorter for NPAR compared to NPL. Finally, the estimated blood loss and length of stay are less severe in patients operated by NPAR compared to those operated by open surgery. CONCLUSION: Robot-assisted surgery offers the same oncological results (in the short and medium term) and appears to improve functional outcomes and morbidity. However, these findings need to be carefully analyzed, due to the low level of evidence from the studies presented and included in the meta-analyzes, and the lack of randomized clinical studies.

[Postoperative C-reactive protein is a reliable marker to detect complications after radical cystectomy]. / La protéine C-réactive à j4 postopératoire, un marqueur fiable du risque de complications après cystectomie.

PURPOSE: Postoperative serum C-reactive protein (CRP) can be measured after major abdominal surgery to predict of complications at postoperative day (POD) 4. However, in urology, no studies have been conduced to analyze the role of CRP after radical cystectomy. The present study aims to analyze the relationship between a high postoperative level of CRP and the presence of complications after radical cystectomy for cancer. MATERIALS AND METHODS: This multicenter retrospective study included 313 patients treated with radical cystectomy for cancer between January 2013 and July 2016. Among the patients, 57.5% of patients received urinary diversion using a Bricker ileal conduit, 30.5% an orthotropic ileal neobladder, and 11.5% had an ureterocutaneostomy. RESULTS: Three hundred and thirteen patients were included (mean age 68.1±9.2 years). Among the patients, 26.5% had grade≥2 complications, according to the Clavien-Dindo classification. In multivariate analysis, only CRP level at POD 4 predicted the risk of a complication (P<0.001). CRP>150mg/L at POD 4 was strongly associated with a risk of a postoperative complication after a cystectomy (OR=81.42, 95% CI [25.6-258.3], P<0.001). CRP assessed on POD4 was reliable at ruling out the existence of an infectious complications with a negative predictive value of 0.94. The main limitation of our study was it observational design. CONCLUSIONS: CRP at POD4 with a threshold of 150mg/L would reliably predict the risk of postoperative complications after cystectomy. Monitoring postoperative CRP could help adapt rehabilitation protocols after radical cystectomy and also the early management of complications.

[French ccAFU guidelines - Update 2018-2020: Prostate cancer]. / Recommandations françaises du Comité de Cancérologie de l'AFU ­ Actualisation 2018­2020 : cancer de la prostate.

OBJECTIVE: The purpose of the guidelines national committee ccAFU was to propose updated French guidelines for prostate cancer. METHODS: A Medline search was achieved between 2016 and 2018, as regards diagnosis, options of treatment and follow-up of prostate cancer, and to evaluate the different references specifying their levels of evidence. RESULTS: Epidemiology, classification, staging systems, diagnostic evaluation of prostate cancer are reported. Disease management options are detailed. Recommandations are reported according to the different clinical situations. Active surveillance is a major option in low risk PCa. Radical prostatectomy remains a standard of care of localized PCa. The three-dimensional conformal radiotherapy is the technical standard. A dose of≥76Gy is recommended. Moderate hypofractionation provides short-term biochemical control comparable to conventional fractionation. In case of intermediate risk PCa, radiotherapy can be combined with short-term androgen deprivation therapy (ADT). In case of high-risk disease, long-term ADT remains the standard of care. ADT is the backbone therapy of metastatic disease. In men with metastases at first presentation, upfront chemotherapy combined with ADT should be considered as a standard. In this situation, the combination of ADT and abiraterone acetate also becomes a new standard. In case of metastatic castration-resistant PCa (mCRPC), new hormonal treatments and chemotherapy provide a better control of tumor progression and increase survival. CONCLUSION: These updated French guidelines will contribute to increase the level of urological care for the diagnosis and treatment for prostate cancer.

[Robot assisted radical prostatectomy: What are the evidences at the time of a specific funding?] / Prostatectomie radicale laparoscopique robot-assistée : quelles sont les preuves à l'heure d'une demande de nomenclature spécifique ?

INTRODUCTION: Despite a decreasing number of radical prostatectomies in France, the number of robot-assisted surgeries increases. The objective of this work is to assess the interest of robotic prostatectomy before asking a specific funding from health authorities. MATERIAL AND METHODS: A systematic review of the literature on PubMed was performed. Prospective studies and meta-analyses comparing robot-assisted radical prostatectomy (RARP), laparoscopic (LRP) and open surgery (OP) were selected. RESULTS: There are only two randomized clinical trials comparing RARP and LRP. Erectile function was significantly better after RARP than after LRP. Compared to OP, sexuality evaluation, based on meta-analyses, was significantly better at 12 months and the absolute risk of erectile dysfunction significantly decreased. Continence after RARP was significantly better than LRP 3 months after surgery. Compared to OP, continence results were discordant, sometimes significantly in favor of RARP, sometimes similar. The rate of positive margins was similar whatever the technique. The long-term oncological outcomes were similar. In terms of perioperative complications, no significant difference was observed between RARP and LRP or OP. CONCLUSION: RARP provides same oncological outcomes as the open and laparoscopic approach. Continence and sexuality are better after RARP than after laparoscopic or open surgery. However, no randomized study comparing RARP and OP is available.