Therapeutic Inhibition of Acid-Sensing Ion Channel 1a Recovers Heart Function After Ischemia-Reperfusion Injury.

BACKGROUND: Ischemia-reperfusion injury (IRI) is one of the major risk factors implicated in morbidity and mortality associated with cardiovascular disease. During cardiac ischemia, the buildup of acidic metabolites results in decreased intracellular and extracellular pH, which can reach as low as 6.0 to 6.5. The resulting tissue acidosis exacerbates ischemic injury and significantly affects cardiac function. METHODS: We used genetic and pharmacologic methods to investigate the role of acid-sensing ion channel 1a (ASIC1a) in cardiac IRI at the cellular and whole-organ level. Human induced pluripotent stem cell-derived cardiomyocytes as well as ex vivo and in vivo models of IRI were used to test the efficacy of ASIC1a inhibitors as pre- and postconditioning therapeutic agents. RESULTS: Analysis of human complex trait genetics indicates that variants in the ASIC1 genetic locus are significantly associated with cardiac and cerebrovascular ischemic injuries. Using human induced pluripotent stem cell-derived cardiomyocytes in vitro and murine ex vivo heart models, we demonstrate that genetic ablation of ASIC1a improves cardiomyocyte viability after acute IRI. Therapeutic blockade of ASIC1a using specific and potent pharmacologic inhibitors recapitulates this cardioprotective effect. We used an in vivo model of myocardial infarction and 2 models of ex vivo donor heart procurement and storage as clinical models to show that ASIC1a inhibition improves post-IRI cardiac viability. Use of ASIC1a inhibitors as preconditioning or postconditioning agents provided equivalent cardioprotection to benchmark drugs, including the sodium-hydrogen exchange inhibitor zoniporide. At the cellular and whole organ level, we show that acute exposure to ASIC1a inhibitors has no effect on cardiac ion channels regulating baseline electromechanical coupling and physiologic performance. CONCLUSIONS: Our data provide compelling evidence for a novel pharmacologic strategy involving ASIC1a blockade as a cardioprotective therapy to improve the viability of hearts subjected to IRI.

Combined Mesenchymal Stromal Cell Therapy and Extracorporeal Membrane Oxygenation in Acute Respiratory Distress Syndrome. A Randomized Controlled Trial in Sheep.

Rationale: Mesenchymal stromal cell (MSC) therapy is a promising intervention for acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS), although trials to date have not investigated its use alongside extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (ECMO). Recent preclinical studies have suggested that combining these interventions may attenuate the efficacy of ECMO.Objectives: To determine the safety and efficacy of MSC therapy in a model of ARDS and ECMO.Methods: ARDS was induced in 14 sheep, after which they were established on venovenous ECMO. Subsequently, they received either endobronchial induced pluripotent stem cell-derived human MSCs (hMSCs) (n = 7) or cell-free carrier vehicle (vehicle control; n = 7). During ECMO, a low Vt ventilation strategy was employed in addition to protocolized hemodynamic support. Animals were monitored and supported for 24 hours. Lung tissue, bronchoalveolar fluid, and plasma were analyzed, in addition to continuous respiratory and hemodynamic monitoring.Measurements and Main Results: The administration of hMSCs did not improve oxygenation (PaO2/FiO2 mean difference = -146 mm Hg; P = 0.076) or pulmonary function. However, histological evidence of lung injury (lung injury score mean difference = -0.07; P = 0.04) and BAL IL-8 were reduced. In addition, hMSC-treated animals had a significantly lower cumulative requirement for vasopressor. Despite endobronchial administration, animals treated with hMSCs had a significant elevation in transmembrane oxygenator pressure gradients. This was accompanied by more pulmonary artery thromboses and adherent hMSCs found on explanted oxygenator fibers.Conclusions: Endobronchial hMSC therapy in an ovine model of ARDS and ECMO can impair membrane oxygenator function and does not improve oxygenation. These data do not recommend the safe use of hMSCs during venovenous ECMO.

Mesenchymal stem cells may ameliorate inflammation in an ex vivo model of extracorporeal membrane oxygenation.

INTRODUCTION: Mesenchymal stem cells exhibit immunomodulatory properties which are currently being investigated as a novel treatment option for Acute Respiratory Distress Syndrome. However, the feasibility and efficacy of mesenchymal stem cell therapy in the setting of extracorporeal membrane oxygenation is poorly understood. This study aimed to characterise markers of innate immune activation in response to mesenchymal stem cells during an ex vivo simulation of extracorporeal membrane oxygenation. METHODS: Ex vivo extracorporeal membrane oxygenation simulations (n = 10) were conducted using a commercial extracorporeal circuit with a CO2-enhanced fresh gas supply and donor human whole blood. Heparinised circuits (n = 4) were injected with 40 × 106-induced pluripotent stem cell-derived human mesenchymal stem cells, while the remainder (n = 6) acted as controls. Simulations were maintained, under physiological conditions, for 240 minutes. Circuits were sampled at 15, 30, 60, 120 and 240 minutes and assessed for levels of interleukin-1ß, interleukin-6, interleukin-8, interleukin-10, tumour necrosis factor-α, transforming growth factor-ß1, myeloperoxidase and α-Defensin-1. In addition, haemoglobin, platelet and leukocyte counts were performed. RESULTS: There was a trend towards reduced levels of pro-inflammatory cytokines in mesenchymal stem cell-treated circuits and a significant increase in transforming growth factor-ß1. Blood cells and markers of neutrophil activation were reduced in mesenchymal stem cell circuits during the length of the simulation. As previously reported, the addition of mesenchymal stem cells resulted in a reduction of flow and increased trans-oxygenator pressures in comparison to controls. CONCLUSIONS: The addition of mesenchymal stem cells during extracorporeal membrane oxygenation may cause an increase in transforming growth factor-ß1. This is despite their ability to adhere to the membrane oxygenator. Further studies are required to confirm these findings.

Administration of mesenchymal stem cells during ECMO results in a rapid decline in oxygenator performance.

Mesenchymal stem cells (MSCs) have attracted attention as a potential therapy for Acute Respiratory Distress Syndrome (ARDS). At the same time, the use of extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (ECMO) has increased among patients with severe ARDS. To date, early clinical trials of MSCs in ARDS have excluded patients supported by ECMO. Here we provide evidence from an ex-vivo model of ECMO to suggest that the intravascular administration of MSCs during ECMO may adversely impact the function of a membrane oxygenator. The addition of clinical grade MSCs resulted in a reduction of flow through the circuit in comparison to controls (0.6 ±0.35 L min-1vs 4.12 ± 0.03 L min-1, at 240 minutes) and an increase in the transoygenator pressure gradient (101±9 mmHg vs 21±4 mmHg, at 240 minutes). Subsequent immunohistochemistry analysis demonstrated quantities of MSCs highly adherent to membrane oxygenator fibres. This study highlights the potential harm associated with MSC therapy during ECMO and suggests further areas of research required to advance the translation of cell therapy in this population.

Engineering a multicellular vascular niche to model hematopoietic cell trafficking.

BACKGROUND: The marrow microenvironment and vasculature plays a critical role in regulating hematopoietic cell recruitment, residence, and maturation. Extensive in vitro and in vivo studies have aimed to understand the marrow cell types that contribute to hematopoiesis and the stem cell environment. Nonetheless, in vitro models are limited by a lack of complex multicellular interactions, and cellular interactions are not easily manipulated in vivo. Here, we develop an engineered human vascular marrow niche to examine the three-dimensional cell interactions that direct hematopoietic cell trafficking. METHODS: Using soft lithography and injection molding techniques, fully endothelialized vascular networks were fabricated in type I collagen matrix, and co-cultured under flow with embedded marrow fibroblast cells in the matrix. Marrow fibroblast (mesenchymal stem cells (MSCs), HS27a, or HS5) interactions with the endothelium were imaged via confocal microscopy and altered endothelial gene expression was analyzed with RT-PCR. Monocytes, hematopoietic progenitor cells, and leukemic cells were perfused through the network and their adhesion and migration was evaluated. RESULTS: HS27a cells and MSCs interact directly with the vessel wall more than HS5 cells, which are not seen to make contact with the endothelial cells. In both HS27a and HS5 co-cultures, endothelial expression of junctional markers was reduced. HS27a co-cultures promote perfused monocytes to adhere and migrate within the vessel network. Hematopoietic progenitors rely on monocyte-fibroblast crosstalk to facilitate preferential recruitment within HS27a co-cultured vessels. In contrast, leukemic cells sense fibroblast differences and are recruited preferentially to HS5 and HS27a co-cultures, but monocytes are able to block this sensitivity. CONCLUSIONS: We demonstrate the use of a microvascular platform that incorporates a tunable, multicellular composition to examine differences in hematopoietic cell trafficking. Differential recruitment of hematopoietic cell types to distinct fibroblast microenvironments highlights the complexity of cell-cell interactions within the marrow. This system allows for step-wise incorporation of cellular components to reveal the dynamic spatial and temporal interactions between endothelial cells, marrow-derived fibroblasts, and hematopoietic cells that comprise the marrow vascular niche. Furthermore, this platform has potential for use in testing therapeutics and personalized medicine in both normal and disease contexts.