Navigating High-Risk and Ultrahigh-Risk Multiple Myeloma: Challenges and Emerging Strategies.

Despite significant improvement in the outcomes of patients with newly diagnosed multiple myeloma (NDMM) with novel therapies, there is still an underserved high-risk (HR) population that experiences early disease progression and death. With the median survival crossing 10 years, we defined ultrahigh-risk (uHR)MM as MM leading to death within 24-36 months of diagnosis and HRMM as MM leading to death within 36-60 months. Several features have emerged as markers of uHRMM: the co-occurrence of two or more high-risk cytogenetic abnormalities, extramedullary disease, plasma cell leukemia and a high-risk gene expression profiling signature. The heterogeneous risk definition across trials, the few trials available designed for HR patients, and the small HR subgroups in all-comers trials make it difficult to generate recommendations with high levels of evidence. Nevertheless, regardless of treatment administered, several studies consistently showed that achieving and maintaining measurable residual disease negativity is now considered the main factor able to mitigate the adverse prognosis related to baseline features. For fit patients with HR transplant-eligible (TE) NDMM, quadruplet induction/consolidation treatment with anti-CD38 monoclonal antibodies, immunomodulatory agents, proteasome inhibitors and dexamethasone, and autologous stem-cell transplant and maintenance with, if available, at least a doublet combination could be considered the option of choice. For non-TE NDMM, considering the recent data generated and carefully reviewing those upcoming, quadruplet treatment consisting of anti-CD38 monoclonal antibodies, immunomodulatory agents, proteasome inhibitors, and dexamethasone should also be considered. Future trials integrating BCMA-directed novel generation immunotherapies hold great potential for further advancing the treatment landscape in all NDMM patients with HR disease.

High-risk multiple myeloma: Redefining genetic, clinical, and functional high-risk disease in the era of molecular medicine and immunotherapy.

Multiple myeloma (MM) exhibits significant heterogeneity in its presentation, genetics, and treatment response. Despite therapeutic advances, some patients continue to relapse early (ER, <18-months) and rapidly cycle through therapies. Myriad prognostic factors have been identified and incorporated into risk stratification models; however, these produce discordant, often three-tiered outputs that fail to identify many patients destined for ER. Treatment strategies are increasingly focused on disease biology and trials enriched for high-risk (HR)MM, but consensus on the minimum required testing and a succinct, specific, and clinically meaningful definition for HRMM remains elusive. We review the risk-factors, definitions, and future directions for HRMM.

Non-viral pathogens of infectious diarrhoea post-allogeneic stem cell transplantation are associated with graft-versus-host disease.

Infectious diarrhoea is common post-allogeneic haematopoietic stem-cell transplantation (alloHSCT). While the epidemiology of Clostridioides difficile infection (CDI) post-alloHSCT has been described, the impact of other diarrhoeal pathogens is uncertain. We reviewed all alloHSCT between 2017 and 2022 at a single large transplant centre; 374 patients were identified and included. The 1-year incidence of infectious diarrhoea was 23%, divided into viral (13/374, 3%), CDI (65/374, 17%) and other bacterial infections (16/374, 4%). There was a significant association between infectious diarrhoea within 1 year post-transplant and the occurrence of severe acute lower gastrointestinal graft-versus-host disease (GVHD, OR = 4.64, 95% CI 2.57-8.38, p < 0.001) and inferior GVHD-free, relapse-free survival on analysis adjusted for age, donor type, stem cell source and T-cell depletion (aHR = 1.64, 95% CI = 1.18-2.27, p = 0.003). When the classes of infectious diarrhoea were compared to no infection, bacterial (OR = 6.38, 95% CI 1.90-21.40, p = 0.003), CDI (OR = 3.80, 95% CI 1.91-7.53, p < 0.001) and multiple infections (OR = 11.16, 95% CI 2.84-43.92, p < 0.001) were all independently associated with a higher risk of severe GI GVHD. Conversely, viral infections were not (OR = 2.98, 95% CI 0.57-15.43, p = 0.20). Non-viral infectious diarrhoea is significantly associated with the development of GVHD. Research to examine whether the prevention of infectious diarrhoea via infection control measures or modulation of the microbiome reduces the incidence of GVHD is needed.

Targeting the BRAF pathway in haematological diseases.

Since the recognition of BRAF V600E mutations in the majority of cases of hairy cell leukaemia, Erdheim-Chester disease and Langerhans cell histiocytosis, the targeted oral kinase inhibitors dabrafenib and vemurafenib have been adapted for their treatment. Like other targeted agents, these drugs produce high response rates and predictable but unique side effects. Physician familiarity is essential for the effective use of these agents. We review the Australian experience of BRAF/MEK inhibitor therapy in these rare haematological cancers.

The association of mobilising regimen on immune reconstitution and survival in myeloma patients treated with bortezomib, cyclophosphamide and dexamethasone induction followed by a melphalan autograft.

G-CSF only mobilisation has been shown to enhance immune reconstitution early post-transplant, but its impact on survival remains uncertain. We undertook a retrospective review of 12 transplant centres to examine overall survival (OS) and time to next treatment (TTNT) following melphalan autograft according to mobilisation method (G-CSF only vs. G-CSF and cyclophosphamide [CY]) in myeloma patients uniformly treated with bortezomib, cyclophosphamide and dexamethasone induction. Six centres had a policy to use G-CSF alone and six to use G-CSF + CY. Patients failing G-CSF only mobilisation were excluded. 601 patients were included: 328: G-CSF + CY, 273: G-CSF only. Mobilisation arms were comparable in terms of age, Revised International Staging System (R-ISS) groups and post-transplant maintenance therapy. G-CSF + CY mobilisation generated higher median CD34 + yields (8.6 vs. 5.5 × 106/kg, p < 0.001). G-CSF only mobilisation was associated with a significantly higher lymphocyte count at day 15 post-infusion (p < 0.001). G-CSF only mobilisation was associated with significantly improved OS (aHR = 0.60, 95%CI 0.39-0.92, p = 0.018) and TTNT (aHR = 0.77, 95%CI 0.60-0.97, p = 0.027), when adjusting for R-ISS, disease-response pre-transplant, age and post-transplant maintenance therapy. This survival benefit may reflect selection bias in excluding patients with unsuccessful G-CSF only mobilisation or may be due to enhanced autograft immune cell content and improved early immune reconstitution.

Paraneoplastic systemic lupus erythematosus associated with colorectal cancer.

A 64-year-old gentleman initially presented with nephrotic syndrome and membranous nephropathy with positive staining for C1q, which was suspicious for lupus membranous nephritis. Investigation led to the simultaneous diagnosis of colorectal cancer (CRC). The CRC was surgically excised and the patient's nephrotic syndrome resolved. The patient subsequently presented with classic systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE) including positive serological markers, mouth-ulcers and a photosensitive maculopapular rash. Two months later the patient represented with an SLE flare encompassing the full-hand of renal-pulmonary syndrome and vasculitic-neuropathy, importantly at this presentation occult recurrence of CRC was proven with tissue biopsy. Major histocompatibility class II haplotyping demonstrated HLA-DRB1*03, a known predisposition for SLE. This case depicts the scenario of tumour transformation triggering SLE development in a predisposed individual after an initial paraneoplastic manifestation in the form of membranous nephropathy (plus C1q). This supports the potential role of tumourgenesis in the development of SLE in a primed individual.

Melanoma in the very elderly, management in patients 85years of age and over.

OBJECTIVES: Melanoma treatment in the elderly can entail complex decision making. This study characterizes the presentation, management, and outcome of melanoma in the very elderly. METHOD: Retrospective review of all patients in their 85th year or older presenting to a tertiary referral cancer centre between 2000 and 2012 with American Joint Committee on Cancer stages 0-II cutaneous melanoma. RESULTS: 127 patients, 26 with in-situ disease and 101 with stages I-II disease, were included. For invasive primary disease, the median age was 87years (IRQ=86-89). Most patients had melanomas with poor prognoses at diagnosis: 49.5% were ulcerated, 68.3% mitotically active (mitotic rate≥1), and the median tumor thickness was 3.7mm (IQR=1.7-5.8). Nodular melanomas were the most frequent subtype (31.7%, 32/101). Only 66.3% received an excision margin≥10mm. Suboptimal excision margins were associated with increased risk of local recurrence (HR=6.87, 95% CI=5.53-8.20, p=0.0045) but not poorer disease specific survival (DSS, p=0.37) or overall survival (OS, p=0.19). Sentinel node biopsy (SNB) did not influence survival (DSS, p=0.39, OS, p=0.78). Median OS was 33months. Overall, one-third (34.7%) of patients died from causes other than melanoma during the follow up period. In patients aged ≥90 only 1 patient (4.3%) died from melanoma, while 10 patients (43.5%) died of other causes. CONCLUSIONS: Older patients have thick, mitotically active and frequently ulcerated melanomas. An excision margin≥10mm should be considered to reduce risk of local recurrence. SNB did not impact on survival. With increasing age, patients will more commonly die of causes other than melanoma regardless of the extent of surgical care.