Cerebrospinal fluid proteomics indicates immune dysregulation and neuronal dysfunction in antibody associated autoimmune encephalitis.

Autoimmune Encephalitis (AE) spans a group of non-infectious inflammatory conditions of the central nervous system due to an imbalanced immune response. Aiming to elucidate the pathophysiological mechanisms of AE, we applied an unsupervised proteomic approach to analyze the cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) protein profile of AE patients with autoantibodies against N-methyl-d-aspartate receptor (NMDAR) (n = 9), leucine-rich glioma-inactivated protein 1 (LGI1) (n = 9), or glutamate decarboxylase 65 (GAD65) (n = 8) compared to 9 patients with relapsing-remitting multiple sclerosis as inflammatory controls, and 10 patients with somatic symptom disorder as non-inflammatory controls. We found a dysregulation of the complement system, a disbalance between pro-inflammatory and anti-inflammatory proteins on the one hand, and dysregulation of proteins involved in synaptic transmission, synaptogenesis, brain connectivity, and neurodegeneration on the other hand to a different extent in all AE subtypes compared to non-inflammatory controls. Furthermore, elevated levels of several proteases and reduction in protease inhibitors could be detected in all AE subtypes compared to non-inflammatory controls. Moreover, the different AE subtypes showed distinct protein profiles compared to each other and inflammatory controls which may facilitate future identification of disease-specific biomarkers. Overall, CSF proteomics provides insights into the complex pathophysiological mechanisms of AE, including immune dysregulation, neuronal dysfunction, neurodegeneration, and altered protease function.

Myositis in Germany: epidemiological insights over 15 years from 2005 to 2019.

BACKGROUND: The medical care of patients with myositis is a great challenge in clinical practice. This is due to the rarity of these disease, the complexity of diagnosis and management as well as the lack of systematic analyses. OBJECTIVES: Therefore, the aim of this project was to obtain an overview of the current care of myositis patients in Germany and to evaluate epidemiological trends in recent years. METHODS: In collaboration with BARMER Insurance, retrospective analysis of outpatient and inpatient data from an average of approximately 8.7 million insured patients between January 2005 and December 2019 was performed using ICD-10 codes for myositis for identification of relevant data. In addition, a comparative analysis was performed between myositis patients and an age-matched comparison group from other populations insured by BARMER. RESULTS: 45,800 BARMER-insured individuals received a diagnosis of myositis during the observation period, with a relatively stable prevalence throughout. With regard to comorbidities, a significantly higher rate of cardiovascular disease as well as neoplasm was observed compared to the control group within the BARMER-insured population. In addition, myositis patients suffer more frequently from psychiatric disorders, such as depression and somatoform disorders. However, the ICD-10 catalogue only includes the specific coding of "dermatomyositis" and "polymyositis" and thus does not allow for a sufficient analysis of all idiopathic inflammatory myopathies subtypes. CONCLUSION: The current data provide a comprehensive epidemiological analysis of myositis in Germany, highlighting the multimorbidity of myositis patients. This underlines the need for multidisciplinary management. However, the ICD-10 codes currently still in use do not allow for specific analysis of the subtypes of myositis. The upcoming ICD-11 coding may improve future analyses in this regard.

Eculizumab versus rituximab in generalised myasthenia gravis.

OBJECTIVE: Myasthenia gravis (MG) is the most common autoimmune disorder affecting the neuromuscular junction. However, evidence shaping treatment decisions, particularly for treatment-refractory cases, is sparse. Both rituximab and eculizumab may be considered as therapeutic options for refractory MG after insufficient symptom control by standard immunosuppressive therapies. METHODS: In this retrospective observational study, we included 57 rituximab-treated and 20 eculizumab-treated patients with MG to compare the efficacy of treatment agents in generalised, therapy-refractory anti-acetylcholine receptor antibody (anti-AChR-ab)-mediated MG with an observation period of 24 months. Change in the quantitative myasthenia gravis (QMG) score was defined as the primary outcome parameter. Differences between groups were determined in an optimal full propensity score matching model. RESULTS: Both groups were comparable in terms of clinical and demographic characteristics. Eculizumab was associated with a better outcome compared with rituximab, as measured by the change of the QMG score at 12 and 24 months of treatment. Minimal manifestation of disease was more frequently achieved in eculizumab-treated patients than rituximab-treated patients at 12 and 24 months after baseline. However, the risk of myasthenic crisis (MC) was not ameliorated in either group. INTERPRETATION: This retrospective, observational study provides the first real-world evidence supporting the use of eculizumab for the treatment of refractory, anti-AChR-ab positive MG. Nonetheless, the risk of MC remained high and prompts the need for intensified monitoring and further research effort aimed at this vulnerable patient cohort.