Bowel Preparation for Elective Hartmann Operation: Analysis of the National Surgical Quality Improvement Program Database.

Background: Use of pre-operative bowel preparation in colorectal resection has not been examined solely in patients who have had colorectal resection with primary colostomy (Hartmann procedure). We aimed to evaluate the association of bowel preparations with short-term outcomes after non-emergent Hartmann procedure. Patients and Methods: The National Surgical Quality Improvement Program Participant Use File colectomy database was queried for patients who had elective open or laparoscopic Hartmann operation. Patients were grouped by pre-operative bowel preparation: no bowel preparation, oral antibiotic agents, mechanical preparation, or both mechanical and oral antibiotic agent preparation (combined). Propensity analysis was performed, and outcomes were compared by type of pre-operative bowel preparation. The primary outcome was rate of any surgical site infection (SSI). Secondary outcomes included overall complication, re-operation, re-admission, Clostridioides difficile colitis, and length of stay. Results: Of the 4,331 records analyzed, 2,040 (47.1%) patients received no preparation, 251 (4.4%) received oral antibiotic preparation, 1,035 (23.9%) received mechanical bowel preparation, and 1,005 (23.2%) received combined oral antibiotic and mechanical bowel preparation. After propensity adjustment, rates of any SSI, overall complication, and length of hospital stay varied significantly between pre-operative bowel regimens (p < 0.005). The use of combined bowel preparation was associated with decreased rate of SSI, overall complication, and length of stay. No difference in rate of re-operation or post-operative Clostridioides difficile infection was observed based on bowel preparation. Conclusions: Compared with no pre-operative bowel preparation, any bowel preparation was associated with reduced rate of SSI, but not rate of re-operation or post-operative Clostridioides difficile infection.

Safety of Transrectal or Transvaginal Drainage of Pelvic Abscesses / Segurança da drenagem transretal ou transvaginal de abscessos pélvicos

Abstract Objective The literature on the safety and long-term sequelae of transrectal and transvaginal drainage of pelvic abscesses is limited. We evaluated the outcomes and safety of pelvic abscess drainage by interventional radiology at our institution. Methods After obtaining institutional review board approval, we retrospectively evaluated the outcomes of transrectal and transvaginal pelvic abscesses drainage using computed tomography, endorectal ultrasound, and or fluoroscopy. Results The study included 26 patients, with an age range of 24 to 88 years old, out of whom 53.8% were men. A total of 46.1% of the participants were African Americans and 26.9% were Caucasians. The average body mass index was 28.4 (range: 15.6 to 41.9). The most common etiology was penetrating abdominal injury (27%), followed by appendectomy (23%), diverticular disease (11.5%), anastomotic leak (11.5%), and disorders of gynecological causes (11.5%). The mean abscess diameter was 6.3 cm (range: 3.3 to 10.0 cm). Transrectal drainage was performed in all except one patient who had a transvaginal drainage. Transrectal ultrasound was used for drainage in 92.3% cases, and fluoroscopy was used as an additional imaging modality in 75% of the cases. An 8- or 10-Fr pigtail catheter was used in>80% of the patients. Drains were removed between 2 and 7 days in 92.3% of the cases. The average follow-up was 30.4 months (range: 1 to 107 months), and no long-term complications were reported. Only one patient required subsequent operative intervention for an anastomotic leak. Conclusions Pelvic abscess drainage by transrectal route using radiological guidance is a safe and effective procedure.

Resumo Objetivo A literatura sobre a segurança e as sequelas no longo prazo da drenagem transretal e transvaginal do abscesso pélvico é limitada. Avaliamos os resultados e a segurança da drenagem do abscesso pélvico por radiologia intervencionista em nossa instituição. Métodos Após obter a aprovação do conselho de revisão institucional, avaliamos retrospectivamente os resultados da drenagem de abscessos pélvicos transretais e transvaginais por meio de tomografia computadorizada, ultrassom endorretal, e/ou fluoroscopia. Resultados Participaram do estudo 26 pacientes, com faixa etária de 24 a 88 anos, dos quais 53,8% eram homens. Um total de 46,1% eram afro-descendentes, e 26,9% eram brancos. O índice de massa corporal médio foi de 28,4 (gama: 15,6 a 41,9). A etiologia mais comum foi lesão abdominal penetrante (27%), seguida de apendicectomia (23%), doença diverticular (11,5%), fístula anastomótica (11,5%) e distúrbios de causas ginecológicas (11,5%). O diâmetro médio do abscesso foi de 6,3 cm(gama: 3,3 a 10,0 cm). A drenagem transretal foi realizada em todos os pacientes, com exceção de uma, que foi submetida a uma drenagem transvaginal. A ultrassonografia transretal foi utilizada para drenagem em 92,3% dos casos, e a fluoroscopia como modalidade adicional de imagem, em 75% dos casos. Um catéter duplo J de 8 ou 10 Fr foi usado em>80% dos pacientes. Os drenos foram retirados entre 2 e 7 dias em 92,3% dos casos. O acompanhamentomédio foi de 30,4meses (gama: 1 a 107 meses), e nenhuma complicação de longo prazo foi relatada. Apenas um paciente necessitou de intervenção cirúrgica subsequente para um vazamento anastomótico. Conclusão A drenagem do abscesso pélvico por via transretal com orientação radiológica é um procedimento seguro e eficaz.

Extraperineal enterocele in male: A case report and literature review.

INTRODUCTION: Enterocele is a herniation of the small bowel through the cul-de-sac. It is uncommon and most often seen in elder females. Large enterocele manifesting as rectal prolapse is exceedingly rare and only few cases are reported previously. Due to it rarity, the best surgical treatment is not yet established especially in male patients. We present a case of enterocele causing rectal prolapse in a male patient that was treated surgically. PRESENTATION OF CASE: A 47-year-old African American male with chronic constipation and straining presented with manually reducible rectal prolapse. A defecography revealed a large enterocele prolapsing through the anterior rectal wall. The patient underwent an open posterior suture rectopexy with peritoneoplasty. His symptoms completely resolved after surgery, and repeat defecography three months after the procedure showed no sign of recurrence. DISCUSSION & CONCLUSION: Extraperineal enterocele in male is a rare disease. Rectopexy with peritoneoplasty can provide a great symptom relieve and improvement on defecography. Long-term outcome should be evaluated.

Medical Management of Diverticular Disease.

This article reviews the current literature supporting the non-surgical options for treatment in acute uncomplicated diverticulitis, complicated diverticulitis, and options for prevention of recurrent diverticulitis.

Clostridium difficile of the ileum following total abdominal colectomy, with or without proctectomy: who is at risk?

BACKGROUND: Clostridium difficile enteritis is considered a rare entity, although recent data suggest a significant increase in prevalence and incidence. There is paucity of data evaluating risk factors of C difficile enteritis following total colectomy. OBJECTIVE: The aim of this study was to determine the incidence and risk factors of C difficile enteritis for patients who had undergone total abdominal colectomy with or without proctectomy. DESIGN: This study involves a retrospective chart review of 310 patients. Univariate analysis was performed on potential risk factors (p ≤ 0.05) with the use of a logistic regression model, and a Fisher exact test was used for variables that had no occurrences of C difficile. These groups of variables were then examined in a multiple variate setting with stepwise logistic regression analysis. SETTINGS: This study was conducted at a tertiary referral center. PATIENTS: A data analysis was performed on patients who had undergone total abdominal colectomy with or without proctectomy who were tested for C difficile of the ileum. RESULTS: Twenty-two of 137 patients that were tested (16%) were positive for C difficile of the ileum. Univariate analysis of known risk factors for C difficile demonstrated that black race was a protective factor against C difficile (p = 0.016). The multivariate analysis demonstrated that emergency surgery (p = 0.035), race (p = 0.003), and increasing age by decade (p = 0.033) were risk factors for C difficile. LIMITATIONS: This study was limited by the small patient sample, and it was not a randomized trial. CONCLUSIONS: Black race is protective, and whites are 4 times more likely to acquire C difficile of the ileum after undergoing a total abdominal colectomy with or without proctectomy. The data also demonstrated that an increased age by a decade and emergency surgery are risk factors for C difficile enteritis, whereas the described risk factors of C difficile of the colon and type of colon surgery do not appear to influence the risk of C difficile of the ileum.

Laparoscopic colectomy significantly decreases length of stay compared with open operation.

INTRODUCTION: Current literature tends not to adjust for biases in patient selection attributable to comorbidities that could provide alternate explanations for length of stay differences in laparoscopic versus open colectomy. We hypothesized that utilizing the National Surgical Quality Improvement Program (NSQIP) dataset and acuity adjustment methods would demonstrate an independent improvement in length of stay for laparoscopic colectomy. METHODS: We used CPT coding to select all colectomies in NSQIP public use files from 2005-2009. Outlier status for surgical length of stay (SLOS) was defined as >75th percentile. Logistic regression analysis was used to predict this outlier status and linear regression to directly predict SLOS. Acuity adjustment was performed by using the most prevalent variables from multiple NSQIP annual reports. This work was done under the approval of our institutional review board and the data use agreement of the American College of Surgeons. Data were analyzed by using SPSS(®). RESULTS: A total of 45,645 colectomies were reviewed, of which 12,455 (27.3%) were laparoscopic. The 75th percentile for SLOS was 11 days. This implied that 9,249 (27.9%) of the open colectomies were outliers, whereas only 1,152 (9.2%) of laparoscopic colectomies were outliers (p < 0.001). When optimizing a simple linear regression to predict SLOS, using common acuity adjustors (i.e., age, functional status, wound category, etc.), the variable marking open procedures consistently had a coefficient of 1.8, implying that open procedures increased SLOS by 1.8 days (p < 0.001). Utilizing logistic regression to predict outlier status, open colectomies were associated with an odds ratio of 3.79 for outlier status (p < 0.001), thus implying an independent effect on SLOS. CONCLUSIONS: These results indicate that laparoscopic colectomy independently decreases SLOS compared with open colectomy. This study is unique in using statistical methods to control for selection bias of patients who might be more "surgically fit."

Developing a scoring rubric for resident research presentations: a pilot study.

BACKGROUND: A requirement for all Accreditation Council for Graduate Medical Education (ACGME) approved residencies is the provision of "an opportunity for residents to participate in research." To comply with this requirement, most training programs encourage their residents to conduct research and to report their results. Few guidelines exist, however, for assessing the efficacy of the presentations. The goal of this pilot study was to develop a valid, one-page scoring rubric to be used during oral resident research presentations. Such a scoring rubric will facilitate acceptable agreement among faculty raters. METHODS: Content validity was addressed by adhering to the Standards for Educational and Psychological Testing. A one-page, five-domain, behaviorally worded scoring rubric was developed. Inter-rater reliability was derived and three ACGME General Competencies were also addressed within the rubric. RESULTS: The initial scoring rubric was tested with 11 resident oral presentations. The inter-rater reliability was 0.56 using Cronbach's alpha. The rubric was modified and the scale restricted to a 3-point scale. It was then tested with 17 additional presentations, which were independently rated by two general surgery faculty members. Cronbach's Alpha increased to 0.61. CONCLUSIONS: An objective method to evaluate a resident's oral research presentation has been successfully piloted. This content valid rubric possesses good inter-rater reliability according to established guidelines. Clearly defined behaviors have been outlined within the rubric. Program directors will have psychometrically sound evidence for the ACGME. Future research will address generalizability and concurrent validity using other types of resident assessment data.

Local recurrence, distant recurrence and survival of rectal cancer.

PURPOSE: To assess our institution's ability to minimize local and distant recurrence with a preference for sphincter preserving surgery in the management of rectal cancer. METHODS: A retrospective analysis of all patients treated between 1982 and 1998. Patients with Stage 0 (AJCC) disease and those treated for palliation were not included. Clinical and pathologic stage, operation type, adjuvant therapy, recurrence, and survival were compared. Kaplan-Meier analysis was also performed. RESULTS: Rectal cancer was identified in 332 patients (mean follow-up: 5.5 years). One hundred and seventy-three patients (52.1%) underwent low anterior resection, while 107 patients (32.2%) required abdominoperineal resection, 6 patients (1.8%) required exenteration to control disease, and 46 (13.9%) patients were treated with local excision. Of the 332 patients, 63 (19.0%) received adjuvant radiotherapy alone, 85 (25.6%) received combination chemoradiotherapy, and 4 (1.2%) received chemotherapy. Sphincter preserving procedures were used more frequently in the later half of the experience. Local/regional recurrences occurred in 5 patients (3.3%) treated with adjuvant therapy, and in 16 patients (8.9% of total) who did not receive adjuvant therapy (p=0.02, Chi-square test) although the total risk of recurrence (local and/or distant) was not different (30.2% vs. 27.7%, p=0.54). The actuarial rate of local recurrence (regardless of adjuvant therapy) for all stages was 7% at 5 years, and the risk of any recurrence (local or distant) was 21.1% at 5 years. Cancer specific 5-year survival was 77% overall. CONCLUSIONS: In rectal cancer, the therapeutic objectives are to control disease, limit recurrence, and preserve sphincter function; these goals were met for many patients at this institution. These data compare favorably with the current literature. Careful surgical technique and adjuvant therapy can allow successful treatment, even of advanced rectal cancers.

Functional anorectal disorders.

Functional anorectal disorders include solitary rectal ulcer syndrome, rectocele, nonrelaxing puborectalis syndrome, and descending perineal syndrome. Patients usually present with "constipation," but the clinical picture of these disorders includes rectal pain and bleeding, digitalization, incomplete evacuation, and a feeling of obstruction. Diagnosis is difficult because many findings can be seen in normal patients as well. The diagnosis is made by using a combination of clinical picture, defecography, pathology, and occasionally anometry and pudendal terminal motor nerve latency. These disorders are generally treated medically with dietary changes and biofeedback. Surgical intervention is reserved for patients with intractable symptoms and has not been universally successful.