Effect of intraovarian platelet-rich plasma injection on IVF outcomes in women with poor ovarian response: the PROVA randomized controlled trial.

STUDY QUESTION: Does intraovarian platelet-rich plasma (PRP) injection increase the number of mature oocytes obtained after controlled ovarian stimulation (COS) in young women with poor ovarian response (POR) undergoing IVF? SUMMARY ANSWER: Intraovarian PRP injection procedure does not improve mature oocyte yield after COS in women less than 38 years old with an established IVF history of POR. WHAT IS KNOWN ALREADY: POR is frequently encountered among the infertile population and the number of women seeking infertility treatment related to POR is increasing. Effective treatment options for this patient population to conceive with autologous oocytes are lacking. Case series and cohort studies suggest that intraovarian PRP injection may improve follicular recruitment in women with premature ovarian insufficiency (POI) and POR, yet robust randomized studies have not been performed to date to determine the clinical utility of this intervention. STUDY DESIGN, SIZE, DURATION: This was a multi-center randomized controlled trial (RCT) conducted at university-affiliated reproductive centers in the USA and Turkey, between January 2020 and November 2022. PARTICIPANTS/MATERIALS, SETTING, METHODS: Patients who met inclusion criteria (<38 years old, two or more prior cycles with <3 oocytes retrieved; and without single gene disorders, prior ovarian surgery, endometriomas, BMI >35 kg/m2, or severe male factor infertility) were randomized to either the PRP or control group. Patients in both groups subsequently underwent COS, oocyte retrieval, ICSI, preimplantation genetic testing for aneuploidy (PGT-A), and single euploid embryo transfer. Number of metaphase II (MII) oocytes obtained was the primary outcome. Secondary outcomes included ovarian reserve tests (antral follicle count [AFC] and anti-Müllerian hormone [AMH]), blastocyst and euploid blastocyst yields, and sustained implantation. The study was powered to detect a difference of one mature oocyte obtained at oocyte retrieval. MAIN RESULTS AND THE ROLE OF CHANCE: In total, 83 patients met inclusion criteria and were randomized to receive autologous intraovarian PRP injection (n = 41) or to no intervention (n = 42). No significant differences were observed in number of MII oocytes retrieved per cycle (2.8 ± 2.4 vs 3.1 ± 3.3 in PRP vs control, respectively; P = 0.9), blastocysts (1.0 ± 1.3 vs 1.3 ± 2.1, P = 0.8), or euploid blastocysts (0.8 ± 1.1 vs 0.9 ± 1.6; P = 0.5). Similarly, no differences were observed in the likelihood of obtaining at least one euploid blastocyst (45% vs 37%, P = 0.4; relative risk [RR], 95% CI = 0.9, 0.6-1.2) or the rate of sustained implantation (31% vs 29%, P = 0.9; RR 1.0, 0.7-1.3). Posttreatment AFC (7.9 ± 4.5 vs 6.8 ± 4.8, P = 0.3) and AMH (0.99 ± 0.98 vs 0.7 ± 0.6, P = 0.2) were also not different between the groups. LIMITATIONS, REASONS FOR CAUTION: Results from this RCT may not be generalizable to other PRP preparations owing to heterogeneity and lack of standardization. The control groups did not undergo a sham ovarian injection, which would have been relevant had the results shown benefit of PRP injection. Only patients with POR were included in this study, and these results may not be generalizable to more severe diminution of ovarian reserve, as seen with POI. WIDER IMPLICATIONS OF THE FINDINGS: The intraovarian PRP injection procedure does not improve mature oocyte yield or other parameters of IVF outcome in women less than 38 years old with an established IVF history of POR. The results from this study do not support the use of intraovarian PRP injection in this population. STUDY FUNDING/COMPETING INTEREST(S): Departmental funds were used and no external funding was requested for this study. ES is a consultant for and receives grant funding from the Foundation for Embryonic Competence. All other authors have no conflict of interest to declare. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER: Clinicaltrials.gov Registry Identifier: NCT04163640. TRIAL REGISTRATION DATE: 15 November 2019. DATE OF FIRST PATIENT'S ENROLMENT: 24 February 2020.

Emerging follicular activation strategies to treat women with poor ovarian response and primary ovarian insufficiency.

PURPOSE OF THE REVIEW: Female reproductive aging remains one of the key unsolved challenges in the field of reproductive medicine. This article reviews three of the most recent and cutting-edge strategies that are currently being investigated to address the issues of poor ovarian response (POR) and primary ovarian insufficiency (POI). RECENT FINDINGS: Publications revealing the mechanism of mechanical disruption of the Hippo signaling pathway paved the way to studies on its potential application for fertility treatments. This, in combination with Akt stimulation, resulted in live births and ongoing pregnancies in women with POI. Building on previous reports on the effects of bone marrow transplants on fertility after chemotherapy, another approach involved autologous stem cell ovarian transplantation (ASCOT). The method proved effective in achieving live births in women previously diagnosed with POR. A third approach, intraovarian injection of autologous platelet-rich plasma, resulted in live births and ongoing pregnancies both spontaneously and via in vitro fertilization (IVF) in women with POI and POR. SUMMARY: New paths are being charted to address the issues of POI and POR. Although these are preliminary studies that should be interpreted with caution, they represent great promise for the women affected by these conditions and the physicians treating them.

Uterine Cells Improved Ovarian Function in a Murine Model of Ovarian Insufficiency.

Primary ovarian insufficiency (POI) is defined as ovarian dysfunction in women younger than 40 years. It affects 1% of the women in this age-group and can occur iatrogenically after chemotherapy. Stem cells have been used in attempt to restore ovarian function in POI. In particular, endometrial mesenchymal stem cells (eMSCs) are easily obtainable in humans and have shown great potential for regenerative medicine. Here, we studied the potential for uterine cell (UC) suspensions containing eMSCs to improve ovarian function in a murine model of chemotherapy-induced POI. Green fluorescent protein (GFP)-labeled UC or phosphate-buffered solution (PBS) was delivered intravenously after chemotherapy. There was a significant increase in oocytes production and serum anti-Müllerian hormone concentrations after 6 weeks, as well as a 19% higher body mass in UC-treated mice. Similarly, we observed an increased number of pups in mice treated with UC than in mice treated with PBS. None of the oocytes or pups incorporated GFP, suggesting that there was no contribution of these stem cells to the oocyte pool. We conclude that treatment with UC indirectly improved ovarian function in mice with chemotherapy-induced POI. Furthermore, our study suggests that endometrial stem cell therapy may be beneficial to young women who undergo ovotoxic chemotherapy.

The association between assisted reproductive technologies and low birth weight.

PURPOSE OF REVIEW: To examine the existing literature in regards to the relationship between assisted reproductive technologies (ART) and low birth weight (LBW). RECENT FINDINGS: In 2017, Martin et al. reported on the incidence of low birth weight in relation to the number of embryos transferred, and showed that incidence of low birth weight in singletons correlates with number of embryos transferred. Meanwhile, several studies have shown increased weight of singletons born after frozen embryo transfers compared with fresh embryo transfers. A recent study published by Sekhon et al., among others, disputes these findings, and claims that frozen and fresh embryo transfers result in comparable birth weights. It is also noteworthy that Mass et al., in 2016, analyzed how birth weight as a result of assisted reproductive technologies has evolved over the years, and concluded that birth weight has not changed significantly over a long period of time. SUMMARY: Newborns conceived via assisted reproductive technologies are three times more likely to have low birth weight. Although multiple gestation and its associated prematurity are the main risk factors for low birth weight in ART-conceived pregnancies, some of the other processes specific to assisted reproduction also impact perinatal outcomes. Options, such as fresh or frozen embryo transfers, the number of embryos transferred, or endometrial preparation may all importantly affect birth weight and prematurity of ART-conceived newborns.