Comparative Efficacy of Subcutaneous and Intravenous Infliximab and Vedolizumab for Maintenance Treatment of TNF-naive Adult Patients with Inflammatory Bowel Disease: A Systematic Literature Review and Network Meta-analysis.

BACKGROUND: Infliximab and vedolizumab are widely used to treat Crohn's disease (CD) and ulcerative colitis (UC). AIMS: This systematic review and network meta-analysis evaluated comparative efficacy of various regimens for intravenous or subcutaneous infliximab and vedolizumab during maintenance treatment in CD and UC. METHODS: Parallel-group randomized controlled trials (RCTs) were identified by a systematic literature review (CRD42022383401) and included if they evaluated therapeutics of interest for maintenance treatment of adults with moderate-to-severe luminal CD or UC and assessed clinical remission between Weeks 30 and 60. Clinical remission rates in CD or UC and mucosal healing rates in UC were analyzed in a Bayesian network meta-analysis model. Endoscopic outcomes in CD were synthesized by proportional meta-analysis. RESULTS: Overall, 13 RCTs were included in the analyses. All vedolizumab studies randomized induction responders to maintenance treatment; infliximab studies used a treat-through design. Subcutaneous infliximab 120 mg every 2 weeks had the highest odds ratio (OR) [95% credible interval] versus placebo for clinical remission during the maintenance phase (CD: 5.90 [1.90-18.2]; UC: 5.45 [1.94-15.3]), with surface under the cumulative ranking curve (SUCRA) values of 0.91 and 0.82, respectively. For mucosal healing in UC, subcutaneous infliximab 120 mg every 2 weeks showed the highest OR (4.90 [1.63-14.1]), with SUCRA value of 0.73, followed by intravenous vedolizumab 300 mg every 4 weeks (SUCRA value, 0.70). Endoscopic outcomes in CD were better with subcutaneous infliximab 120 mg every 2 weeks than intravenous infliximab 5 mg/kg every 8 weeks. CONCLUSIONS: Subcutaneous infliximab showed a favorable efficacy profile for achieving clinical remission and endoscopic outcomes during maintenance treatment in CD or UC.

Allogeneic expanded adipose-derived stem cells in the treatment of rectovaginal fistulas in Crohn's disease.

AIM: Crohn's disease (CD)-related rectovaginal fistulas (RVFs) are rare, challenging to treat and associated with a high morbidity. Due to a significant lack of data, we aimed to analyse the safety and feasibility of allogeneic adipose-derived stem cells (ASCs) in the treatment of CD-related RVF. METHOD: Four consecutive patients with CD-related RVF underwent treatment with expanded allogeneic ASCs extracted from a healthy donor in a tertiary referral centre in 2019. None of the patients had an intestinal diversion at the time of the treatment. Follow-up was performed 6 months postoperatively. RESULTS: The median operation time was 45 min with a median hospital stay of 3 days. No intra-operative complications occurred. Three patients (75%) developed recurrent RVF after a median follow-up of 19 days. Two patients required surgical treatment including loose seton drainage due to discharge and pain. One patient developed recurrence of symptoms after 10 days, but refused further surgical therapy. Only one patient (25%) showed healing of the RVF, with re-epithelialization of both the vaginal and rectal opening and absence of clinical symptoms. CONCLUSION: Expanded allogeneic ASC therapy represents a novel safe treatment option for CD-associated RVF. Although efficacy appears limited, further controlled studies are required to draw robust conclusions.

Long-term safety of adalimumab in clinical trials in adult patients with Crohn's disease or ulcerative colitis.

BACKGROUND: Adalimumab is used to treat moderate to severe Crohn's disease (CD) and ulcerative colitis (UC) when conventional therapies fail. AIM: To update long-term adalimumab safety from CD and UC trials; the previous report was CD only, 3160 patients/3402 patient-years (PYs). METHODS: Treatment-emergent adverse events (AEs; first dose to 70 days after last dose/December 31, 2015) in adults in phase 2/3 and 3/3b trials and open-label extensions were coded using Medical Dictionary for Regulatory Activities (MedDRA-v18.1). Rates were assessed as events/100 (E/100 PYs). RESULTS: The database (16 trials; CD, N = 3606; UC, N = 1739) represented 4145 and 3397 PYs of exposure, respectively. For CD, incidences of any AEs with adalimumab were 60.8%-65.1%, depending on dose, and 71.5% with placebo; for UC, the incidences were 53.5%-54.8% and 56.1%, respectively. Rates of any AEs (CD, 605 E/100 PYs; UC, 361 E/100 PYs), serious AEs (CD, 36.1 E/100 PYs; UC, 18.9 E/100 PYs), and malignancies (CD, 1.2 E/100 PYs; UC, 1.0 E/100 PYs) were similar between current and prior analyses. Apparent rate of opportunistic infections was lowered to 0.3 and 0.2 E/100 PYs for CD and UC, respectively, by recent MedDRA changes excluding oral candidiasis and tuberculosis. Standardised incidence ratios for malignancies were similar to the general population (CD, 1.45 [95% CI, 0.90-2.22]; UC, 1.36 [95% CI, 0.84-2.07]). Demyelinating disorders were uncommon (CD, 0.1 E/100 PYs; UC, <0.1 E/100 PYs). CONCLUSIONS: Patients with moderately to severely active Crohn's disease or ulcerative colitis continued to experience acceptable safety with adalimumab, without new safety signals.

An index with improved diagnostic accuracy for the diagnosis of Crohn's disease derived from the Lennard-Jones criteria.

BACKGROUND: The Lennard-Jones criteria are considered the gold standard for diagnosing Crohn's disease (CD) and include the items granuloma, macroscopic discontinuity, transmural inflammation, fibrosis, lymphoid aggregates and discontinuous inflammation on histology. The criteria have never been subjected to a formal validation process. AIM: To develop a validated and improved diagnostic index based on the items of Lennard-Jones criteria. METHODS: Included were 328 adult patients with long-standing CD (median disease duration 10 years) from three centres and classified as 'established', 'probable' or 'non-CD' by Lennard-Jones criteria at time of diagnosis. Controls were patients with ulcerative colitis (n = 170). The performance of each of the six diagnostic items of Lennard-Jones criteria was modelled by logistic regression and a new index based on stepwise backward selection and cut-offs was developed. The diagnostic value of the new index was analysed by comparing sensitivity, specificity and accuracy vs. Lennard-Jones criteria. RESULTS: By Lennard-Jones criteria 49% (n = 162) of CD patients would have been diagnosed as 'non-CD' at time of diagnosis (sensitivity/specificity/accuracy, 'established' CD: 0.34/0.99/0.67; 'probable' CD: 0.51/0.95/0.73). A new index was derived from granuloma, fibrosis, transmural inflammation and macroscopic discontinuity, but excluded lymphoid aggregates and discontinuous inflammation on histology. Our index provided improved diagnostic accuracy for 'established' and 'probable' CD (sensitivity/specificity/accuracy, 'established' CD: 0.45/1/0.72; 'probable' CD: 0.8/0.85/0.82), including the subgroup isolated colonic CD ('probable' CD, new index: 0.73/0.85/0.79; Lennard-Jones criteria: 0.43/0.95/0.69). CONCLUSION: We developed an index based on items of Lennard-Jones criteria providing improved diagnostic accuracy for the differential diagnosis between CD and UC.

The efficacy and safety of either infliximab or adalimumab in 362 patients with anti-TNF-α naïve Crohn's disease.

BACKGROUND: TNFα antagonists, including infliximab (IFX) and adalimumab (ADA), have revolutionised treatment for Crohn's disease. Studies comparing efficacy in patients with Crohn's disease naïve to TNFα antagonists are lacking. METHODS: Consecutive TNFα antagonist-naïve patients with luminal or perianal Crohn's disease from four tertiary centres in Austria were assessed prospectively for induction and maintenance efficacy, and safety, of either IFX or ADA. RESULTS: In a total of 362 patients, 251 (69.3%) started IFX and 111 (30.7%) started ADA. At baseline, the median Harvey-Bradshaw Index (HBI) score was 8 (range 5-29) and 8 (5-36), and the median C-reactive protein (CRP) was 1.07 (interquartile range (IQR) 1.36) mg/dL and 1.16 (IQR 1.23) mg/dL for IFX and ADA, respectively. At week 12, there was no difference between IFX and ADA among patients with luminal Crohn's disease in clinical remission (IFX 128/204; 62.7% vs. ADA 68/107; 63.6%, P = 0.47), clinical response (IFX 154/204; 75.5% vs. ADA 82/107; 76.6%, P = 0.82) and steroid-free remission (IFX 110/204; 53.9% vs. ADA 61/107; 57%, P = 0.60). At 12 months, there were similar numbers of patients treated with IFX and ADA who maintained clinical remission (IFX 77/154; 50.4% vs. ADA 47/82; 57.3%, P = 0.48) and steroid-free remission (IFX 68/154; 44.3% vs. ADA 44/82; 53.7%, P = 0.16). Baseline CRP >0.7 mg/dL (OR 0.24; 95% CI 0.07-0.77, P = 0.01) was the only predictor of clinical remission at 12 months in patients who did not have escalation of anti-TNFα therapy. CONCLUSION: IFX and ADA appear comparable in clinical outcomes for patients with Crohn's disease who are naïve to TNFα antagonists.

Review article: the histological assessment of disease activity in ulcerative colitis.

BACKGROUND: In patients with ulcerative colitis (UC), mucosal healing has emerged as a major therapeutic goal, and is usually assessed endoscopically. Histological healing does not correlate very well with endoscopic mucosal healing in UC and persistent histological inflammation might be a better predictor of future clinical relapse than the endoscopic appearance alone. AIM: To define how histological assessment of disease activity should be best done in UC. METHODS: Electronic (PubMed/Embase) and manual search. RESULTS: At least 18 histological indices to assess disease activity in UC have been described, though none are fully validated. However, histological assessment is increasingly used as a secondary endpoint in clinical trials in UC. After reviewing and discussing existing histological scoring systems for UC activity, we describe features of histological response and define three grades of activity: (i) histological healing - complete resolution of abnormalities; (ii) quiescent disease, - lack of mucosal neutrophils but chronic inflammation may remain; (iii) active disease - presence of neutrophils plus possible epithelial damage. It is recommended that two biopsies are taken from each colonic segment which should include always biopsy of the rectum and the most affected segments. There is to date no agreed preferable scoring system but the Geboes Index is the best validated (kappa for interobserver variation 0.59-0.70). CONCLUSION: Histological assessment of disease activity in UC is increasingly used, but needs to be carefully defined.

Randomised clinical trial: a placebo-controlled study of intravenous golimumab induction therapy for ulcerative colitis.

BACKGROUND: Tumour necrosis factor alpha (TNFα)-antagonism effectively treats ulcerative colitis (UC). The golimumab clinical programme evaluated subcutaneous (SC) and intravenous (IV) induction, and SC maintenance regimens, in TNFα-antagonist-naïve patients with moderate-to-severe active UC despite conventional treatment. AIM: To evaluate dose-response relationship, select IV golimumab induction doses for continued development, and evaluate the safety and efficacy of selected doses. METHODS: Adults with Mayo scores of 6-12 and endoscopic subscores ≥2 were enrolled into this multicentre, randomised, double-blind, placebo-controlled, integrated Phase 2/3 dose-finding/dose-confirming study. In Phase 2, 176 patients were randomised (1:1:1:1) to a single IV infusion of placebo, 1-, 2- or 4-mg/kg golimumab. While Phase 2 data were analysed to select doses for continued development, 71 additional patients were randomised. Phase 3 enrolment stopped after 44 additional patients were randomised (1:1:1) to placebo, 2- or 4-mg/kg golimumab. Due to insufficient power for the Phase 3 primary endpoint analysis (clinical response at week 6), efficacy analyses are considered exploratory and include all randomised patients. RESULTS: No dose-response was observed in Phase 2; however, higher serum golimumab exposure was associated with greater proportions of patients achieving more favourable clinical outcomes, clinical response and greater improvement in Mayo scores compared with placebo-treated patients and those with lower serum concentrations. Among all randomised patients, numerically greater proportions were in clinical response at week 6 in the 2- and 4-mg/kg golimumab groups compared with placebo [44.0% (33/75) and 41.6% (32/77) vs. 30.1% (22/73)]. CONCLUSIONS: Efficacy with single-dose golimumab IV induction was lower than expected and less than observed in the SC induction study. No new safety findings were observed. ClinicalTrials.gov Number, NCT00488774.

Population pharmacokinetics-pharmacodynamics of vedolizumab in patients with ulcerative colitis and Crohn's disease.

BACKGROUND: Vedolizumab, an anti-α(4)ß(7) integrin monoclonal antibody (mAb), is indicated for treating patients with moderately to severely active ulcerative colitis (UC) and Crohn's disease (CD). As higher therapeutic mAb concentrations have been associated with greater efficacy in inflammatory bowel disease, understanding determinants of vedolizumab clearance may help to optimise dosing. AIMS: To characterise vedolizumab pharmacokinetics in patients with UC and CD, to identify clinically relevant determinants of vedolizumab clearance, and to describe the pharmacokinetic-pharmacodynamic relationship using population modelling. METHODS: Data from a phase 1 healthy volunteer study, a phase 2 UC study, and 3 phase 3 UC/CD studies were included. Population pharmacokinetic analysis for repeated measures was conducted using nonlinear mixed effects modelling. Results from the base model, developed using extensive phase 1 and 2 data, were used to develop the full covariate model, which was fit to sparse phase 3 data. RESULTS: Vedolizumab pharmacokinetics was described by a 2-compartment model with parallel linear and nonlinear elimination. Using reference covariate values, linear elimination half-life of vedolizumab was 25.5 days; linear clearance (CL(L)) was 0.159 L/day for UC and 0.155 L/day for CD; central compartment volume of distribution (V(c)) was 3.19 L; and peripheral compartment volume of distribution was 1.66 L. Interindividual variabilities (%CV) were 35% for CLL and 19% for V(c); residual variance was 24%. Only extreme albumin and body weight values were identified as potential clinically important predictors of CL(L). CONCLUSIONS: Population pharmacokinetic parameters were similar in patients with moderately to severely active UC and CD. This analysis supports use of vedolizumab fixed dosing in these patients. Clinicaltrials.gov Identifiers: NCT01177228; NCT00783718 (GEMINI 1); NCT00783692 (GEMINI 2); NCT01224171 (GEMINI 3).

Randomised clinical trial: deep remission in biologic and immunomodulator naïve patients with Crohn's disease - a SONIC post hoc analysis.

BACKGROUND: As treatment goals in Crohn's disease (CD) evolve, targets now include clinical remission (CR), mucosal healing (MH) and biological remission [C-reactive protein normalisation (CRPnorm )]. AIMS: To evaluate the association of baseline factors and treatment with the achievement of different composite remission parameters at week 26. METHODS: This post hoc analysis of the SONIC trial evaluated different composite remission measures at week 26 in a subgroup of patients with Crohn's disease activity index (CDAI) scores, CRP, and endoscopic data available at baseline and week 26 (N = 188). Assessed composite remission measures were: CR (CDAI < 150) and MH (absence of any mucosal ulcerations), previously referred to as 'deep remission;' and alternative composite endpoints: CR + CRPnorm (CRP < 0.8 mg/dL); CRPnorm  + MH; and CR + CRPnorm  + MH. RESULTS: Among analysed patients, 136/188 (72.3%) achieved CR and 90/188 (47.9%) achieved MH at week 26. All composite outcomes were significantly greater (Bonferroni significance level, P ≤ 0.016) with combination therapy (i.e. infliximab and azathioprine; 52.3-63.6%) vs. azathioprine monotherapy (12.9-29.0%; p ≤ 0.005 for all comparisons). Composite remission rates including MH were significantly greater with combination therapy (52.3-56.9%) vs. infliximab (25.6-32.3%; P ≤ 0.015 for all comparisons except CRPnorm  + MH, P = 0.017) and vs. azathioprine monotherapy (12.9-20.4%; P ≤ 0.002 for all comparisons). Median serum trough infliximab concentrations among patients who achieved MH or CR + MH were greater when compared with those among patients who did not achieve MH (P = 0.018) or CR + MH (P = 0.053). Among the subgroup of patients with early Crohn's disease, MH alone or in combination with composite remission criteria significantly improved clinical outcomes of patients who received combination therapy. CONCLUSIONS: Combination therapy was more effective in achieving various composite remission measures vs. azathioprine or infliximab monotherapy. These data illustrate that 'deep remission' is achievable with combination therapy in a high percentage of patients with early Crohn's disease. ClinicalTrials.gov number: NCT00094458.

Anaemia in inflammatory bowel disease: a population-based 10-year follow-up.

BACKGROUND: The point prevalence estimates of anaemia in patients with inflammatory bowel disease (IBD) range between 6% and 74%. The variation is probably due to differences in the definition of anaemia and the study populations. AIM: To retrospectively determine the prevalence of anaemia at diagnosis and at the 1-, 5- and 10-year follow-ups in patients with IBD from a prospectively followed, population-based inception cohort (the IBSEN Study). To compare the prevalence of anaemia after a 10-year disease course with the prevalence of anaemia in the background population, and to assess clinical factors associated with anaemia at diagnosis and during follow-up. METHODS: Newly diagnosed IBD patients were included in a population-based, prospective cohort. Follow-up was performed at 1, 5 and 10 years. All visits included clinical examinations and blood samples. Anaemia was defined according to the WHO. RESULTS: A total of 756 patients (UC, n = 519 and CD, n = 237) were included; 48.8% of CD and 20.2% of UC patients were anaemic at diagnosis (P < 0.001). The proportion of patients with anaemia decreased during the disease course in all patients, except in women with CD. After 10 years of disease, the relative risk for anaemia was increased in all groups, except for women with UC. The variables associated with anaemia were generally unchanged during the disease course, and elevated CRP was the strongest predictor of risk. CONCLUSIONS: Anaemia was more common in CD than in UC. The prevalence of anaemia decreased during the disease course. Women with CD were at high risk for anaemia. Elevated CRP was independently associated with anaemia.

Guidelines on the use of extracorporeal photopheresis.

BACKGROUND: After the first investigational study on the use of extracorporeal photopheresis for the treatment of cutaneous T-cell lymphoma was published in 1983 with its subsequent recognition by the FDA for its refractory forms, the technology has shown significant promise in the treatment of other severe and refractory conditions in a multi-disciplinary setting. Among the major studied conditions are graft versus host disease after allogeneic bone marrow transplantation, systemic sclerosis, solid organ transplant rejection and inflammatory bowel disease. MATERIALS AND METHODS: In order to provide recognized expert practical guidelines for the use of this technology for all indications the European Dermatology Forum (EDF) proceeded to address these questions in the hands of the recognized experts within and outside the field of dermatology. This was done using the recognized and approved guidelines of EDF for this task. RESULTS AND CONCLUSION: These guidelines provide at present the most comprehensive available expert recommendations for the use of extracorporeal photopheresis based on the available published literature and expert consensus opinion.

The management of iron deficiency in inflammatory bowel disease--an online tool developed by the RAND/UCLA appropriateness method.

BACKGROUND: Iron deficiency is a common and undertreated problem in inflammatory bowel disease (IBD). AIM: To develop an online tool to support treatment choice at the patient-specific level. METHODS: Using the RAND/UCLA Appropriateness Method (RUAM), a European expert panel assessed the appropriateness of treatment regimens for a variety of clinical scenarios in patients with non-anaemic iron deficiency (NAID) and iron deficiency anaemia (IDA). Treatment options included adjustment of IBD medication only, oral iron supplementation, high-/low-dose intravenous (IV) regimens, IV iron plus erythropoietin-stimulating agent (ESA), and blood transfusion. The panel process consisted of two individual rating rounds (1148 treatment indications; 9-point scale) and three plenary discussion meetings. RESULTS: The panel reached agreement on 71% of treatment indications. 'No treatment' was never considered appropriate, and repeat treatment after previous failure was generally discouraged. For 98% of scenarios, at least one treatment was appropriate. Adjustment of IBD medication was deemed appropriate in all patients with active disease. Use of oral iron was mainly considered an option in NAID and mildly anaemic patients without disease activity. IV regimens were often judged appropriate, with high-dose IV iron being the preferred option in 77% of IDA scenarios. Blood transfusion and IV+ESA were indicated in exceptional cases only. CONCLUSIONS: The RUAM revealed high agreement amongst experts on the management of iron deficiency in patients with IBD. High-dose IV iron was more often considered appropriate than other options. To facilitate dissemination of the recommendations, panel outcomes were embedded in an online tool, accessible via http://ferroscope.com/.

[Adalimumab for the treatment of adult Crohn's disease--update of a consensus report by the Working Group Inflammatory Bowel Disease of the Austrian Society of Gastroenterology and Hepatology]. / Adalimumab in der Behandlung des adulten Morbus Crohn--Update eines Konsensus der Arbeitsgruppe Chronisch Entzündliche Darmerkrankungen der Österreichischen Gesellschaft für Gastroenterologie und Hepatologie.

TNF alpha antibodies have clearly improved the outcome of moderate to severe Crohn's disease. Adalimumab is the first fully human, monoclonal TNF alpha antibody, which can be self-administered subcutaneously. Since August 2012 adalimumab is approved for the treatment of moderately to severely active Crohn's disease, in patients who have not responded despite a full and adequate course of therapy with a corticosteroid and/or an immunosuppressant or who are intolerant to or have medical contraindications for such therapies. Compared to placebo adalimumab can induce significantly more often steroid-free remission and mucosal healing in patients with moderate to severe Crohn's disease, reduce the rate of Crohn's disease-related hospitalisations and surgery and improve health-related quality of life. Adalimumab is clinically efficacious both in patients with Crohn's disease naïve to previous exposure to TNF-alpha antibodies and in those previously exposed with a rapid onset of action within days and confirmed maintenance performance over 3 years. The safety profile of adalimumab is comparable to those of other TNF alpha inhibitors. Due to its low immunogenicity allergic reactions are rare. The update of a consensus report by the Working Group Inflammatory Bowel Disease of the Austrian Society of Gastroenterology and Hepatology presents the existing evidence on adalimumab for the treatment of Crohn's disease and is aimed to assist as a code of practice in its applications.

[Colorectal cancer: screening and surveillance in inflammatory bowel diseases - consensus of the working group for inflammatory bowel diseases of the Austrian Society of Gastroenterology and Hepatology]. / Kolorektales Karzinom: Screening und Surveillance bei chronisch entzündlichen Darmerkrankungen - Konsensus der Arbeitsgruppe für chronisch entzündliche Darmerkrankungen der ÖGGH.

Patients with ulcerative colitis and Crohn's colitis are at increased risk of colorectal cancer (CRC). This risk is dependent on the duration and extent of disease, inflammatory activity and possible additional risk factors. Thus, the aim is to reduce this risk and to detect dysplastic and malignant lesions at an early stage. The working group for Inflammatory Bowel Diseases (IBD) of the Austrian Society of Gastroenterology and Hepatology (ÖGGH) has developed consensus statements on the following topics: risk of colorectal cancer, screening and surveillance, procedure of surveillance colonoscopy, dysplasia and its management, and chemoprevention. This consensus is intended to increase awareness of the increased risk of CRC in IBD and to support a standardised approach in cancer prevention.

Review article: the role of anti-TNF in the management of ulcerative colitis -- past, present and future.

BACKGROUND: Until recently, the management of ulcerative colitis (UC) consisted of the stepwise use of mesalazine, corticosteroids and immunomodulators, or consideration of surgery. Anti-tumour necrosis factor (TNF) agents are recent additions to the UC-treatment algorithm. AIM: To provide clinicians with a review of the role of anti-TNFs in UC, discussing how the drug(s) were used in the past, their current use and to determine their future role. METHODS: The scientific literature was reviewed to evaluate data on the use of anti-TNFs in UC. RESULTS: In this review, we report how the management of UC has changed with the availability of anti-TNFs. The results from landmark anti-TNF trials have impacted clinical practice, leading to a readjustment of treatment goals. In addition, experience from clinical trials and local real-life cohorts have helped to clarify some misunderstandings in the management of UC. New anti-TNFs are on the horizon but questions still remain on the future role of anti-TNFs with regard to impact on disability, digestive damage and the possible development of risk matrices. Experiences from the use of anti-TNFs in Crohn's disease (for example, combination therapy and early treatment) now need to be addressed in UC. CONCLUSIONS: The use of anti-TNFs in the management of UC has matured rapidly. Clinical experience has helped shape the current role of anti-TNFs, but more clinical research is needed to optimise their future role.