Optimizing a fully automated and closed system process for red blood cell reduction of human bone marrow products.

BACKGROUND AIMS: Hematopoietic stem cell transplantation using bone marrow as the graft source is a common treatment for hematopoietic malignancies and disorders. For allogeneic transplants, processing of bone marrow requires the depletion of ABO-mismatched red blood cells (RBCs) to avoid transfusion reactions. Here the authors tested the use of an automated closed system for depleting RBCs from bone marrow and compared the results to a semi-automated platform that is more commonly used in transplant centers today. The authors found that fully automated processing using the Sepax instrument (Cytiva, Marlborough, MA, USA) resulted in depletion of RBCs and total mononuclear cell recovery that were comparable to that achieved with the COBE 2991 (Terumo BCT, Lakewood, CO, USA) semi-automated process. METHODS: The authors optimized the fully automated and closed Sepax SmartRedux (Cytiva) protocol. Three reduction folds (10×, 12× and 15×) were tested on the Sepax. Each run was compared with the standard processing performed in the authors' center on the COBE 2991. Given that bone marrow is difficult to acquire for these purposes, the authors opted to create a surrogate that is more easily obtainable, which consisted of cryopreserved peripheral blood stem cells that were thawed and mixed with RBCs and supplemented with Plasma-Lyte A (Baxter, Deerfield, IL, USA) and 4% human serum albumin (Baxalta, Westlake Village, CA, USA). This "bone marrow-like" product was split into two starting products of approximately 600 mL, and these were loaded onto the COBE and Sepax for direct comparison testing. Samples were taken from the final products for cell counts and flow cytometry. The authors also tested a 10× Sepax reduction using human bone marrow supplemented with human liquid plasma and RBCs. RESULTS: RBC reduction increased as the Sepax reduction rate increased, with an average of 86.06% (range of 70.85-96.39%) in the 10×, 98.80% (range of 98.1-99.5%) in the 12× and 98.89% (range of 98.80-98.89%) in the 15×. The reduction rate on the COBE ranged an average of 69.0-93.15%. However, white blood cell (WBC) recovery decreased as the Sepax reduction rate increased, with an average of 47.65% (range of 38.9-62.35%) in the 10×, 14.56% (range of 14.34-14.78%) in the 12× and 27.97% (range of 24.7-31.23%) in the 15×. COBE WBC recovery ranged an average of 53.17-76.12%. Testing a supplemented human bone marrow sample using a 10× Sepax reduction resulted in an average RBC reduction of 84.22% (range of 84.0-84.36%) and WBC recovery of 43.37% (range of 37.48-49.26%). Flow cytometry analysis also showed that 10× Sepax reduction resulted in higher purity and better recovery of CD34+, CD3+ and CD19+ cells compared with 12× and 15× reduction. Therefore, a 10× reduction rate was selected for the Sepax process. CONCLUSIONS: The fully automated and closed SmartRedux program on the Sepax was shown to be effective at reducing RBCs from "bone marrow-like" products and a supplemented bone marrow product using a 10× reduction rate.

High efficiency closed-system gene transfer using automated spinoculation.

BACKGROUND: Gene transfer is an important tool for cellular therapies. Lentiviral vectors are most effectively transferred into lymphocytes or hematopoietic progenitor cells using spinoculation. To enable cGMP (current Good Manufacturing Practice)-compliant cell therapy production, we developed and compared a closed-system spinoculation method that uses cell culture bags, and an automated closed system spinoculation method to decrease technician hands on time and reduce the likelihood for microbial contamination. METHODS: Sepax spinoculation, bag spinoculation, and static bag transduction without spinoculation were compared for lentiviral gene transfer in lymphocytes collected by apheresis. The lymphocytes were transduced once and cultured for 9 days. The lentiviral vectors tested encoded a CD19/CD22 Bispecific Chimeric Antigen Receptor (CAR), a FGFR4-CAR, or a CD22-CAR. Sepax spinoculation times were evaluated by testing against bag spinoculation and static transduction to optimize the Sepax spin time. The Sepax spinoculation was then used to test the transduction of different CAR vectors. The performance of the process using healthy donor and a patient sample was evaluated. Functional assessment was performed of the CD19/22 and CD22 CAR T-cells using killing assays against the NALM6 tumor cell line and cytokine secretion analysis. Finally, gene expression of the transduced T-cells was examined to determine if there were any major changes that may have occurred as a result of the spinoculation process. RESULTS: The process of spinoculation lead to significant enhancement in gene transfer. Sepax spinoculation using a 1-h spin time showed comparable transduction efficiency to the bag spinoculation, and much greater than the static bag transduction method (83.4%, 72.8%, 35.7% n = 3). The performance of three different methods were consistent for all lentiviral vectors tested and no significant difference was observed when using starting cells from healthy donor versus a patient sample. Sepax spinoculation does not affect the function of the CAR T-cells against tumor cells, as these cells appeared to kill target cells equally well. Spinoculation also does not appear to affect gene expression patterns that are necessary for imparting function on the cell. CONCLUSIONS: Closed system-bag spinoculation resulted in more efficient lymphocyte gene transfer than standard bag transductions without spinoculation. This method is effective for both retroviral and lentiviral vector gene transfer in lymphocytes and may be a feasible approach for gene transfer into other cell types including hematopoietic and myeloid progenitors. Sepax spinoculation further improved upon the process by offering an automated, closed system approach that significantly decreased hands-on time while also decreasing the risk of culture bag tears and microbial contamination.