Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 20 de 28
Filtrar
1.
Minerva Surg ; 77(1): 35-40, 2022 Feb.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-34160170

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: The realization of an esophagojejunostomy is a critical step in total gastrectomy. Several techniques based on a Roux-En-Y restoration of gastrointestinal continuity were described with similar results. We report our laparoscopic experience in intracorporeal esophagojejunostomy. METHODS: Adults who underwent laparoscopic total gastrectomy for cancer with latero-lateral (functional termino-terminal) Roux en Y intracorporeal esophagojejunostomy with linear stapler from January 2014 to December 2018 were included. Demographics, intra- and postoperative outcomes including 30-day readmissions and mortality were considered. RESULTS: Thirty-two patients were included. Nodal dissection D1 was 16. Median operative time was 280'. Median blood loss was 200 mL. Fluid oral intake is usually resumed on the second postoperative day and soft solid diet is started on the third postoperative day. Three patients had minimal anastomotic leakage and they underwent nonoperative management. Median postoperative stay was 8.5 days. CONCLUSIONS: This technique may improve the ergonomics of esophagojejunostomy creation. The procedure is suitable for experienced laparoscopic surgeons.


Assuntos
Laparoscopia , Neoplasias Gástricas , Adulto , Idoso , Anastomose em-Y de Roux/métodos , Anastomose Cirúrgica , Gastrectomia/métodos , Humanos , Laparoscopia/métodos , Neoplasias Gástricas/cirurgia
2.
BMC Surg ; 20(1): 319, 2020 Dec 07.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-33287793

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: Nerve identification is recommended in inguinal hernia repair to reduce or avoid postoperative pain. The aim of this prospective observational study was to identify nerve prevalence and find a correlation between neuroanatomy and chronic neuropathic postoperative inguinal pain (CPIP) after 6 months. MATERIAL: A total of 115 patients, who underwent inguinal hernia mesh repair (Lichtenstein tension-free mesh repair) between July 2018 and January 2019, were included in this prospective observational study. The mean age and BMI respectively resulted 64 years and 25.8 with minimal inverse distribution of BMI with respect to age. Most of the hernias were direct (59.1%) and of medium dimension (47.8%). Furthermore, these patients were undergoing Dermatome Mapping Test in preoperatively and postoperatively 6 months evaluation. RESULTS: Identification rates of the iliohypogastric (IH), ilioinguinal (II) and genitofemoral (GF) nerves were 72.2%, 82.6% and 48.7% respectively. In the analysis of nerve prevalence according to BMI, the IH was statistically significant higher in patients with BMI < 25 than BMI ≥ 25 P (< 0.05). After inguinal hernia mesh repair, 8 patients (6.9%) had chronic postoperative neuropathic inguinal pain after 6 months. The CPIP prevailed at II/GF dermatome. The relation between the identification/neurectomy of the II nerve and chronic postoperative inguinal pain after 6 months was not significant (P = 0.542). CONCLUSION: The anatomy of inguinal nerve is very heterogeneous and for this reason an accurate knowledge of these variations is needed during the open mesh repair of inguinal hernias. The new results of our analysis is the statistically significant higher IH nerve prevalence in patients with BMI < 25; probably the identification of inguinal nerve is more complex in obese patients. In the chronic postoperative inguinal pain, the II nerve may have a predominant role in determining postoperative long-term symptoms. Dermatome Mapping Test in an easy and safe method for preoperative and postoperative 6 months evaluation of groin pain. The most important evidence of our analysis is that the prevalence of chronic pain is higher when the nerves were not identified.


Assuntos
Virilha/inervação , Hérnia Inguinal/cirurgia , Herniorrafia/efeitos adversos , Canal Inguinal/inervação , Canal Inguinal/cirurgia , Dor Pós-Operatória/etiologia , Traumatismos dos Nervos Periféricos/prevenção & controle , Telas Cirúrgicas , Adulto , Idoso , Idoso de 80 Anos ou mais , Virilha/cirurgia , Humanos , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Dor Pós-Operatória/diagnóstico , Dor Pós-Operatória/epidemiologia , Nervos Periféricos/anatomia & histologia , Nervos Periféricos/cirurgia , Estudos Prospectivos , Fatores de Tempo
3.
J Trauma Acute Care Surg ; 88(6): 866-874, 2020 06.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32195994

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: Adhesive small bowel obstruction (ASBO) is one of the most frequent causes of emergency hospital admissions and surgical treatment. Current surgical treatment of ASBO consists of open adhesiolysis. With laparoscopic procedures rising, the question arises if laparoscopy for ASBO is safe and results in better patient outcomes. Although adhesiolysis was among the first surgical procedures to be approached laparoscopically, uncertainty remains about its potential advantages over open surgery. Therefore, we performed a systematic review and meta-analysis on the benefits and harms of laparoscopic surgery for ASBO. METHODS: A systematic literature review was conducted for articles published up to May 2019. Two reviewers screened all articles and did the quality assessment. Consecutively a meta-analysis was performed. To reduce selection bias, only matched studies were used in our primary analyses. All other studies were used in a sensitivity analyses. All the outcomes were measured within the 30th postoperative day. Core outcome parameters were postoperative mortality, iatrogenic bowel perforations, length of postoperative stay [days], severe postoperative complications, and early readmissions. Secondary outcomes were operative time [min], missed iatrogenic bowel perforations, time to flatus [days], and early unplanned reoperations. RESULTS: In our meta-analysis, 14 studies (participants = 37.007) were included: 1 randomized controlled trial, 2 matched studies, and 11 unmatched studies. Results of our primary analyses show no significant differences in core outcome parameters (postoperative mortality, iatrogenic bowel perforations, length of postoperative stay, severe postoperative complications, early readmissions). In sensitivity analyses, laparoscopic surgery favored open adhesiolysis in postoperative mortality (relative risk [RR], 0.36; 95% CI, 0.29-0.45), length of postoperative hospital stay (mean difference [MD], -4.19; 95% CI, -4.43 to -3.95), operative time (MD, -18.19; 95% CI, -20.98 to -15.40), time to flatus (MD, -0.98; 95% CI, -1.28 to -0.68), severe postoperative complications (RR, 0.51; 95% CI, 0.46-0.56) and early unplanned reoperations (RR, 0.82; 95% CI, 0.70-0.96). CONCLUSION: Results of this systematic review indicate that laparoscopic surgery for ASBO is safe and feasible. Laparoscopic surgery is not associated with better or worse postoperative outcomes compared with open adhesiolysis. Future research should focus on the correct selection of those patients who are suitable for laparoscopic approach and may benefit from this approach. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Systematic Review/Meta-analysis, Level III.


Assuntos
Procedimentos Cirúrgicos do Sistema Digestório/efeitos adversos , Obstrução Intestinal/cirurgia , Laparoscopia/efeitos adversos , Complicações Pós-Operatórias/epidemiologia , Aderências Teciduais/cirurgia , Procedimentos Cirúrgicos do Sistema Digestório/métodos , Procedimentos Cirúrgicos do Sistema Digestório/estatística & dados numéricos , Mortalidade Hospitalar , Humanos , Obstrução Intestinal/complicações , Laparoscopia/estatística & dados numéricos , Tempo de Internação/estatística & dados numéricos , Duração da Cirurgia , Readmissão do Paciente/estatística & dados numéricos , Seleção de Pacientes , Complicações Pós-Operatórias/etiologia , Reoperação/estatística & dados numéricos , Resultado do Tratamento
4.
Medicine (Baltimore) ; 98(35): e16746, 2019 Aug.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-31464904

RESUMO

This retrospective study shows the results of a 2 years application of a clinical pathway concerning the indications to NOM based on the patient's hemodynamic answer instead of on the injury grade of the lesions.We conducted a retrospective study applied on a patient's cohort, admitted in "Azienda Ospedaliero-Universitaria Ospedali Riuniti of Ancona" and in the Digestive and Emergency Surgery Department of the Santa Maria of Terni hospital between September 2015 and December 2017, all affected by blunt abdominal trauma, involving liver, spleen or both of them managed conservatively. Patients were divided into 3 main groups according to their hemodynamic response to a fluid administration: stable (group A), transient responder (group B) and unstable (group C). Management of patients was performed according to specific institutional pathway, and only patients from category A and B were treated conservatively regardless of the injury grade of lesions.From October 2015 to December 2017, a total amount of 111 trauma patients were treated with NOM. Each patient underwent CT scan at his admission. No contrast pooling was found in 50 pts. (45.04%). Contrast pooling was found in 61 patients (54.95%). The NOM overall outcome resulted in success in 107 patients (96.4%). NOM was successful in 100% of cases of liver trauma patients and was successful in 94.7% of splenic trauma patients (72/76). NOM failure occurred in 4 patients (5.3%) treated for spleen injuries. All these patients received splenectomy: in 1 case to treat pseudoaneurysm, (AAST, American Association for the Surgery of Trauma, grade of injury II), in 2 cases because of re-bleeding (AAST grade of injury IV) and in the remaining case was necessary to stop monitoring spleen because the patient should undergo to orthopedic procedure to treat pelvis fracture (AAST grade of injury II).Non-operative management for blunt hepatic and splenic lesions in stable or stabilizable patients seems to be the choice of treatment regardless of the grade of lesions according to the AAST Organ Injury Scale.


Assuntos
Traumatismos Abdominais/terapia , Fígado/lesões , Baço/lesões , Ferimentos não Penetrantes/terapia , Idoso , Tratamento Conservador , Feminino , Hidratação , Humanos , Escala de Gravidade do Ferimento , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Estudos Retrospectivos , Centros de Traumatologia
5.
Minerva Chir ; 74(2): 121-125, 2019 Apr.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-29795063

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: Proximal or extended bowel resections are sometimes necessary during emergency surgery of the small bowel and call for creating a high small bowel stomy as a part of damage control surgery. Secondary restoration of intestinal continuity in the frail geriatric patient, further weakened by subsequent severe malabsorption may be prohibitive. METHODS: Six patients underwent emergency small bowel resection for proximal jejunal disease (83.3% high-grade adhesive SBO and 16.7% jejunal diverticulitis complicated with perforation). With the intention to avoid end jejunostomy and the need for repeat laparotomy for bowel continuity restoration we modified the classic Paul-Mikulicz jejunostomy. RESULTS: The postoperative course was uneventful in four patients whose general condition improved considerably. At six-month follow-up, neither patients required parenteral nutrition. CONCLUSIONS: This modified stoma can have the advantage of allowing a partial passage of the enteric contents, reducing the degree of malabsorption, and rendering jejunostomy reversal easy to perform later.


Assuntos
Intestino Delgado/cirurgia , Doenças do Jejuno/cirurgia , Jejunostomia/métodos , Idoso , Idoso de 80 Anos ou mais , Emergências , Fragilidade/complicações , Humanos , Jejunostomia/mortalidade , Laparotomia/métodos , Ilustração Médica , Resultado do Tratamento
6.
Medicine (Baltimore) ; 97(45): e13176, 2018 Nov.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-30407351

RESUMO

RATIONALE: Retroperitoneal colonic perforation is a rare cause of retroperitoneal abscess. It presents, more frequently in frail elderly patients, with heterogeneous signs and symptoms which hamper the clinical diagnosis. Subcutaneous emphysema with pneumomediastinum and iliopsoas muscle abscess are unusual signs. Colonic retroperitoneal perforation may be consequent to diverticulitis or locally advanced colon cancer. Due to the anatomy of the retroperitoneal space and different physiopathology, diverticular perforation may present with air and pus collection; on the other hand perforated colon cancer may cause groin mass and psoas abscess. We reported 2 cases of colonic retroperitoneal perforation from diverticulitis and locally advanced colon cancer, respectively. Aim of this report is to improve differential diagnosis based on clinical signs. PATIENTS' CONCERNS: A 71-year-old man presented with pain in his left side, fatigue, fever, nausea, massive subcutaneous emphysema of the neck, and Blumberg sign in the left iliac fossa. A 67-year-old man presented with abdominal pain, sub-occlusion, left groin mass, left groin, and lower limb pain during walking, negative Blumberg sign. DIAGNOSIS: In the first patient the computerized tomography revealed pneumoperitoneum, gas in the mesosigma, pneumomediastinum, wall thickening of the descending colon, and retroperitoneal collection from diverticular perforation. In the second patient abdominal CT scan found thickening of the sigmoid colon adherent to the iliopsoas and fluid collection. INTERVENTIONS: In the first patient, a left hemicolectomy extending to the transverse colon, followed by a toilette and debridement of the retroperitoneum were performed. In the second patient, tumor of descending colon perforated in the retroperitoneum with iliopsoas abscess was treated with left hemicolectomy and a drainage of the abscess. OUTCOMES: The first patient underwent right colectomy with ileostomy in the 7 postoperative day for large bowel necrosis. He died of sepsis 2 days after. The second patient had regular postoperative and he is still alive. LESSONS: The spread of retroperitoneal abscess in complicated colonic diverticulitis is different from that in advanced colonic cancer. The former can present with a subcutaneous emphysema, the latter with a groin mass. Hence a thorough clinical examination and radiological studies are needed to diagnose these conditions.


Assuntos
Abscesso Abdominal/diagnóstico , Neoplasias do Colo/complicações , Doença Diverticular do Colo/complicações , Perfuração Intestinal/complicações , Espaço Retroperitoneal/patologia , Abscesso Abdominal/etiologia , Abscesso Abdominal/cirurgia , Idoso , Colectomia/métodos , Colo/patologia , Neoplasias do Colo/cirurgia , Doença Diverticular do Colo/cirurgia , Humanos , Perfuração Intestinal/diagnóstico , Perfuração Intestinal/cirurgia , Masculino , Espaço Retroperitoneal/cirurgia , Tomografia Computadorizada por Raios X
7.
Ann Ital Chir ; 89: 540-551, 2018.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-30665224

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: Trauma is the fourth leading cause of death and is more common in people under 45 age. Abdominal trauma is cause of death in 7-10% of traumatized patients. Aim is to evaluate the effectiveness of the diagnostic, therapeutic and health-care management protocol for major abdominal trauma. METHODS: A prospective study called DGR Azienda Ospedaliera S. Maria Terni n. 159. was registered on February 2014. Patients with abdominal major trauma admitted at Santa Maria Hospital of Terni from January 2015 to December 2016 were considered in this paper. Patients' demographics, comorbidities, application of the operative and non operative management (OM-NOM), Mortality, effectiveness of diagnostics were investigated. RESULTS: The most of the patients were the elderly. Staff members were compliant and operated in conformity to the protocol for abdominal trauma. Non operative management (NOM) was performed in 63% of patients, according to data from the literature. On the other hand data with respect to the performing of diagnostic examinations as Focused assessment with ultrasonography for trauma (FAST), chest X-ray, Computed Tomography (CT) were discordant with literature. No patient underwent damage control surgery (DCS). Number of missed injuries (3.3%) and overall (13.3%), daily and weekend mortality were similar to those from the available literature. In our experience, the best results were found regarding the sensitivity of the FAST and CT in unstable and stable patients respectively, and the lower incidence of: NOM failure (NOM 0%, NOM plus endovascular treatment 14.4%) , mortality in stable patients (2.3%) and night mortality (5%). CONCLUSIONS: Despite the application of trauma protocol at Terni Hospital has been effective it can be further improved. KEY WORDS: Diagnostic, Emergency surgery, Major Abdominal Trauma, Therapeutic and health-care management protocol.


Assuntos
Traumatismos Abdominais/diagnóstico , Traumatismos Abdominais/terapia , Protocolos Clínicos , Humanos , Estudos Prospectivos , Fatores de Tempo , Resultado do Tratamento
8.
Expert Rev Gastroenterol Hepatol ; 11(1): 65-73, 2017 Jan.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-27781493

RESUMO

INTRODUCTION: The safety of laparoscopic resections (LPS) of pancreatic neuroendocrine neoplasms (PNENs) has been well established in the literature. Areas covered: Studies conducted between January 2003 and December 2015 that reported on LPS and open surgery (OPS) were reviewed. The primary outcomes were the rate of post-operative complications and the length of hospital stay (LoS) after laparoscopic and open surgical resection. The rate of recurrence was the secondary outcome. Eleven studies were included with a total of 907 pancreatic resections for PNENs, of whom, 298 (32.8%) underwent LPS and 609 (67.2%) underwent open surgery. LPS resulted in a significantly shorter LoS (p < 0.0001) and lower blood loss (p < 0.0001). The meta-analysis did not show any significant difference in the pancreatic fistula rate, recurrence rate or post-operative mortality between the two groups. Expert commentary: LPS is a safe approach even for PNENs and it is associated with a shorter LoS.


Assuntos
Laparoscopia , Tumores Neuroendócrinos/cirurgia , Pancreatectomia/métodos , Neoplasias Pancreáticas/cirurgia , Perda Sanguínea Cirúrgica , Distribuição de Qui-Quadrado , Humanos , Laparoscopia/efeitos adversos , Laparoscopia/mortalidade , Tempo de Internação , Recidiva Local de Neoplasia , Tumores Neuroendócrinos/mortalidade , Tumores Neuroendócrinos/patologia , Razão de Chances , Pancreatectomia/efeitos adversos , Pancreatectomia/mortalidade , Fístula Pancreática/etiologia , Neoplasias Pancreáticas/mortalidade , Neoplasias Pancreáticas/patologia , Fatores de Risco , Fatores de Tempo , Resultado do Tratamento
9.
Asian J Endosc Surg ; 9(2): 152-6, 2016 May.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-27117967

RESUMO

Small bowel obstruction (SBO) is mainly caused by postoperative adhesions, but a broad spectrum of diseases may cause this pathogenetic condition. Laparoscopic treatment represents an efficient approach to SBO. The aim of this paper was to review a single center's experience with a minimally invasive approach to multiple pathologic scenarios causing SBO. From January 2010 to December 2012, 50 consecutive patients underwent laparoscopic surgery for mechanical SBO. In 90% of patients, the surgical procedure was totally laparoscopic, while 10% required conversion to midline laparotomy. In-hospital morbidity was 15% among totally laparoscopic patients and 40% among those who underwent conversion to midline laparotomy. Thirty-day mortality was zero. One patient died 4 months postoperatively from neoplastic disease progression; the remaining patients were free from occlusive symptoms at follow-up. The minimally invasive technique applies to a broad spectrum of cases. A larger cohort of patients seems necessary to reproduce our results and confirm the effectiveness of a laparoscopic approach to SBO.


Assuntos
Obstrução Intestinal/etiologia , Obstrução Intestinal/cirurgia , Intestino Delgado , Laparoscopia , Seleção de Pacientes , Doença Aguda , Feminino , Humanos , Obstrução Intestinal/diagnóstico , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Estudos Retrospectivos , Resultado do Tratamento
10.
Medicine (Baltimore) ; 94(49): e1922, 2015 Dec.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-26656323

RESUMO

Gastric cancer constitutes a major health problem. Robotic surgery has been progressively developed in this field. Although the feasibility of robotic procedures has been demonstrated, there are unresolved aspects being debated, including the reproducibility of intracorporeal in place of extracorporeal anastomosis.Difficulties of traditional laparoscopy have been described and there are well-known advantages of robotic systems, but few articles in literature describe a full robotic execution of the reconstructive phase while others do not give a thorough explanation how this phase was run.A new reconstructive approach, not yet described in literature, was recently adopted at our Center.Robotic total gastrectomy with D2 lymphadenectomy and a so-called "double-loop" reconstruction method with intracorporeal robot-sewn anastomosis (Parisi's technique) was performed in all reported cases.Preoperative, intraoperative, and postoperative data were collected and a technical note was documented.All tumors were located at the upper third of the stomach, and no conversions or intraoperative complications occurred. Histopathological analysis showed R0 resection obtained in all specimens. Hospital stay was regular in all patients and discharge was recommended starting from the 4th postoperative day. No major postoperative complications or reoperations occurred.Reconstruction of the digestive tract after total gastrectomy is one of the main areas of surgical research in the treatment of gastric cancer and in the field of minimally invasive surgery.The double-loop method is a valid simplification of the traditional technique of construction of the Roux-limb that could increase the feasibility and safety in performing a full hand-sewn intracorporeal reconstruction and it appears to fit the characteristics of the robotic system thus obtaining excellent postoperative clinical outcomes.


Assuntos
Gastrectomia/métodos , Robótica , Neoplasias Gástricas/cirurgia , Idoso , Idoso de 80 Anos ou mais , Anastomose em-Y de Roux/métodos , Esôfago/cirurgia , Feminino , Humanos , Jejuno/cirurgia , Excisão de Linfonodo/métodos , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Complicações Pós-Operatórias , Técnicas de Sutura , Resultado do Tratamento
11.
Int J Surg ; 24(Pt A): 95-100, 2015 Dec.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-26584958

RESUMO

INTRODUCTION: Laparoscopic surgery is considered in the treatment of diverticular fistula for the possible reduction of overall morbidity and complication rate if compared to open surgery. Aim of this review is to assess the possible advantages deriving from a laparoscopic approach in the treatment of diverticular fistulas of the colon. METHODS: Studies presenting at least 10 adult patients who underwent laparoscopic surgery for sigmoid diverticular fistula were reviewed. Fistula recurrence, reintervention, Hartmann's procedure or proximal diversion, conversion to laparotomy were the outcomes considered. RESULTS: 11 non randomized studies were included. Rates of fistula recurrence (0.8%), early reintervention (30 days) (2%) and need for Hartmann's procedure or proximal diversion (1.4%) did not show significant difference between laparoscopy and open technique. DISCUSSION: there is still concern about which surgery in complicated diverticulitis should be preferred. Laparoscopic approach has led to less postoperative pain, shorter hospital stay, faster recovery and better cosmetic results. Laparoscopic resection and primary anastomosis is a possible approach to sigmoid fistulas but its advantages in terms of lower mortality rate and postoperative stay after colon resection with primary anastomosis should be interpreted with caution. When there is firm evidence supporting it, it is likely that minimally invasive surgery should become the standard approach for diverticular fistulas, thus achieving adequate exposure and better visualization of the surgical field. CONCLUSION: The lack of RCTs, the small sample size, the heterogeneity of literature do not allow to draw statistically significant conclusions on the laparoscopic surgery for fistulas despite this approach is considered safe.


Assuntos
Colectomia/métodos , Colo Sigmoide , Doença Diverticular do Colo/complicações , Fístula Intestinal/cirurgia , Laparoscopia/métodos , Humanos , Fístula Intestinal/etiologia
12.
Medicine (Baltimore) ; 94(44): e1710, 2015 Nov.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-26554768

RESUMO

Colonic diverticular disease is the most common cause of lower gastrointestinal bleeding. In the past, this condition was usually managed with urgent colectomy. Recently, the development of endoscopy and interventional radiology has led to a change in the management of colonic diverticular bleeding.The aim of this systematic review is to define the best treatment for colonic diverticular bleeding.A systematic bibliographic research was performed on the online databases for studies (randomized controlled trials [RCTs], observational trials, case series, and case reports) published between 2005 and 2014, concerning patients admitted with a diagnosis of diverticular bleeding according to the PRISMA methodology.The outcomes of interest were: diagnosis of diverticulosis as source of bleeding; incidence of self-limiting diverticular bleeding; management of non self-limiting bleeding (endoscopy, angiography, surgery); and recurrent diverticular bleeding.Fourteen studies were retrieved for analysis. No RCTs were found. Eleven non-randomized clinical controlled trials (NRCCTs) were included in this systematic review. In all studies, the definitive diagnosis of diverticular bleeding was always made by urgent colonoscopy. The colonic diverticular bleeding stopped spontaneously in over 80% of the patients, but a re-bleeding was not rare. Recently, interventional endoscopy and angiography became the first-line approach, thus relegating emergency colectomy to patients presenting with hemodynamic instability or as a second-line treatment after failure or complications of hemostasis with less invasive treatments.Colonoscopy is effective to diagnose diverticular bleeding. Nowadays, interventional endoscopy and angiographic treatment have gained a leading role and colectomy should only be entertained in case of failure of the former.


Assuntos
Gerenciamento Clínico , Divertículo do Colo/complicações , Hemorragia Gastrointestinal/terapia , Hemorragia Gastrointestinal/etiologia , Humanos
13.
PLoS One ; 10(7): e0134062, 2015.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-26214845

RESUMO

OBJECTIVES: The aim of this systematic review and meta-analysis is to compare robotic colectomy (RC) with laparoscopic colectomy (LC) in terms of intraoperative and postoperative outcomes. MATERIALS AND METHODS: A systematic literature search was performed to retrieve comparative studies of robotic and laparoscopic colectomy. The databases searched were PubMed, Embase and the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials from January 2000 to October 2014. The Odds ratio, Risk difference and Mean difference were used as the summary statistics. RESULTS: A total of 12 studies, which included a total of 4,148 patients who had undergone robotic or laparoscopic colectomy, were included and analyzed. RC demonstrated a longer operative time (MD 41.52, P<0.00001) and higher cost (MD 2.42, P<0.00001) than did LC. The time to first flatus passage (MD -0.51, P = 0.003) and the length of hospital stay (MD -0.68, P = 0.01) were significantly shorter after RC. Additionally, the intraoperative blood loss (MD -16.82, P<0.00001) was significantly less in RC. There was also a significantly lower incidence of overall postoperative complications (OR 0.74, P = 0.02) and wound infections (RD -0.02, P = 0.03) after RC. No differences in the postoperative ileus, in the anastomotic leak, or in the conversion to open surgery rate and in the number of harvested lymph nodes outcomes were found between the approaches. CONCLUSIONS: The present meta-analysis, mainly based on observational studies, suggests that RC is more time-consuming and expensive than laparoscopy but that it results in faster recovery of bowel function, a shorter hospital stay, less blood loss and lower rates of both overall postoperative complications and wound infections.


Assuntos
Neoplasias do Colo/cirurgia , Laparoscopia/métodos , Procedimentos Cirúrgicos Robóticos/métodos , Neoplasias do Colo/patologia , Neoplasias do Colo/fisiopatologia , Feminino , Humanos , Laparoscopia/efeitos adversos , Masculino , Estudos Observacionais como Assunto , PubMed , Recuperação de Função Fisiológica , Procedimentos Cirúrgicos Robóticos/efeitos adversos
14.
Int J Surg ; 21 Suppl 1: S30-3, 2015 Sep.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-26117433

RESUMO

INTRODUCTION: The most frequent reason for performing a distal pancreatectomy is the presence of cystic or neuroendocrine tumors, in which the distal pancreatic stump is often soft and non fibrotic. This parenchymal consistence represents the main risk factor for post-operative pancreatic fistula. In order to identify the fistula and assessing its severity postoperative monitoring of amylase from intraperitoneal drains is important. METHODS: From a retrospective multicentric database analysis were included 33 patients who underwent distal pancreatectomy for pancreatic neoplastic disease. RESULTS: Postoperative pancreatic fistula occurred in four cases. One patient had a ductal adenocarcinoma, two presented with pancreatic endocrine neoplasms and the last one had an intraductal papillary mucinous neoplasia. Two patients underwent open, the other two laparoscopic distal pancreatectomy. DISCUSSION: Postoperative pancreatic fistulas after distal pancreatectomy worsen the quality of life, prolong the post-operative stay and delay further adjuvant therapy. In patients who underwent distal pancreatectomy literature exposed some advantages deriving from the placement of abdominal drainages only in selected cases and from their early removal. Patients presenting a high risk of pancreatic fistula had higher amylase levels of drainage fluid in the first postoperative day. CONCLUSION: POPF is the most frequently complication after pancreatectomy. In our analysis DFA1>5000 can be considered as a predictive factor for pancreatic fistula. For this reason, the systematic measurement of amylase in drain fluid in first-postoperative day can be considered a good clinical practice.


Assuntos
Amilases/metabolismo , Drenagem , Fístula Pancreática/diagnóstico , Adulto , Idoso , Feminino , Humanos , Itália , Laparoscopia/efeitos adversos , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Pancreatectomia/efeitos adversos , Fístula Pancreática/etiologia , Neoplasias Pancreáticas/cirurgia , Complicações Pós-Operatórias , Valor Preditivo dos Testes , Estudos Retrospectivos
15.
Int J Surg ; 21 Suppl 1: S40-3, 2015 Sep.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-26118603

RESUMO

INTRODUCTION: Spleen-preserving left pancreatectomy (SPDP) with splenic vessels preservation (SVP) or without (Warshaw technique, WT) has been described with robotic, laparoscopy and open surgery. Nevertheless, significant data on medium- and long-term follow-up are still not available, since data in literature are scarce and the level of evidence is low. METHODS: In this retrospective study, we describe and compare short and medium term results of spleen-preserving distal pancreatectomy in eight patients. RESULTS: In WT group the duration and the intraoperative bleeding was superior than SVP group. The incidence of perigastric collateral vessels and presence of submucosal varices evidenced at CT scan was 66% in WT group, while only one case occurred in SVP group. DISCUSSION: The limit of laparoscopic approach is the fact that it needs advanced laparoscopic skills, which might result in intraoperative bleeding and splenectomy. The most of literature considered salvage WT intraoperatively performed in case of classical SVP and not only elective WT. The consequence is that there is no difference in immediate postoperative results (operative time, intraoperative bleeding, hospital stay) that are in favour of SVP because WT is performed only in case of failure in preserving the splenic vessels. In fact when this intervention is performed electively, the procedure time is reduced as well as the intraoperative bleeding. CONCLUSIONS: WT is safe and feasible, even if there are not definitive evidences that demonstrate it is superior to classic SVP. RCTs are needed to determine advantages and disadvantages of WT compared to the classic SVP.


Assuntos
Laparoscopia/métodos , Pancreatectomia/métodos , Neoplasias Pancreáticas/cirurgia , Baço/cirurgia , Adulto , Idoso , Feminino , Humanos , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Estudos Retrospectivos , Resultado do Tratamento
16.
World J Surg Oncol ; 13: 65, 2015 Feb 19.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-25849316

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: Pancreatic fistula is still one of the most serious and potential complications after D2-D3 distal and total gastrectomy (4% to 6%). Despite their importance, pancreatic fistulas still have not been uniformly defined. Amylase concentration of the drainage fluid after surgery for gastric cancer can be considered as a predictive factor of the presence of pancreatic fistula. METHODS: From January 2009 to April 2013, 53 patients underwent surgery for gastric cancer. Amylase concentration in the drainage fluid was measured on the first postoperative day and if it was ≥1,000 UI, it was measured again on the third postoperative day. Pancreatic fistula occurred in four cases (7.5%). Pancreatic fistulas were classified using the International Study Group on Pancreatic Fistula (ISGPF) criteria into different grades of severity. Two fistulas were Grade A, one was Grade B, and one was Grade C. RESULTS: Management of drainage tubes is still crucial after gastrectomy, not only for the likelihood of anastomotic leaks but also the eventual diagnosis and management of pancreatic fistula. High amylase drainage content and then the presence of the pancreatic fistula may be due to several causes: the operation itself when it includes splenectomy or pancreatic tail-splenectomy, the extended lymphadenectomy but even the 'gently and softly' pancreatic manipulation, according literature, may be a risk factor. CONCLUSIONS: The authors assessed amylase concentration in the drainage fluid collected from the left subphrenic cavity on POD1 and POD3 in 53 patients who had undergone curative gastrectomy for cancer and concluded that amylase drainage content >3 times the serum amylase was a useful predictive risk factor for pancreatic fistula. Our work is an interim analysis and the aim of this study is to increase the accrual of the number of patients to have a significant number. For this reason, a protocol for a multicenter trial will be designed to verify whether the systematic measurement of amylase in drain fluid is better than abdominal ultrasound for the detection of pancreatic fistula after gastric cancer surgery.


Assuntos
Amilases/análise , Gastrectomia/efeitos adversos , Excisão de Linfonodo/efeitos adversos , Fístula Pancreática/diagnóstico , Complicações Pós-Operatórias , Esplenectomia/efeitos adversos , Neoplasias Gástricas/complicações , Adulto , Idoso , Idoso de 80 Anos ou mais , Biomarcadores/análise , Drenagem , Feminino , Seguimentos , Humanos , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Estadiamento de Neoplasias , Fístula Pancreática/etiologia , Fístula Pancreática/metabolismo , Prognóstico , Fatores de Risco , Neoplasias Gástricas/cirurgia
17.
Medicine (Baltimore) ; 94(12): e537, 2015 Mar.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-25816027

RESUMO

Insulinoma is a rare pancreatic endocrine tumor, typically sporadic and solitary. Although the Whipple triad, consisting of hypoglycemia, neuroglycopenic symptoms, and symptoms relief with glucose administration, is often present, the diagnosis may be challenging when symptoms are less typical. We report a case of road accident due to an episode of loss of consciousness in a patient with pancreatic insulinoma. In the previous months, the patient had occasionally reported nonspecific symptoms. During hospitalization, endocrine examinations were compatible with an insulin-producing tumor. Abdominal computerized tomography and magnetic resonance imaging allowed us to identify and localize the tumor. The patient underwent a robotic distal pancreatectomy with partial omentectomy and splenectomy. Insulin-producing tumors may go undetected for a long period due to nonspecific clinical symptoms, and may cause episodes of loss of consciousness with potentially lethal consequences. Robot-assisted procedures can be performed with the same techniques of the traditional surgery, reducing surgical trauma, intraoperative blood loss, and hospital stays.


Assuntos
Acidentes de Trânsito , Hipoglicemia/etiologia , Insulinoma/diagnóstico , Neoplasias Pancreáticas/diagnóstico , Inconsciência/etiologia , Adulto , Humanos , Insulinoma/cirurgia , Masculino , Neoplasias Pancreáticas/cirurgia , Procedimentos Cirúrgicos Robóticos
18.
Medicine (Baltimore) ; 94(1): e334, 2015 Jan.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-25569649

RESUMO

To this day, the treatment of generalized peritonitis secondary to diverticular perforation is still controversial. Recently, in patients with acute sigmoid diverticulitis, laparoscopic lavage and drainage has gained a wide interest as an alternative to resection. Based on this backdrop, we decided to perform a systematic review of the literature to evaluate the safety, feasibility, and efficacy of peritoneal lavage in perforated diverticular disease.A bibliographic search was performed in PubMed for case series and comparative studies published between January 1992 and February 2014 describing laparoscopic peritoneal lavage in patients with perforated diverticulitis.A total of 19 articles consisting of 10 cohort studies, 8 case series, and 1 controlled clinical trial met the inclusion criteria and were reviewed. In total these studies analyzed data from 871 patients. The mean follow-up time ranged from 1.5 to 96 months when reported. In 11 studies, the success rate of laparoscopic peritoneal lavage, defined as patients alive without surgical treatment for a recurrent episode of diverticulitis, was 24.3%. In patients with Hinchey stage III diverticulitis, the incidence of laparotomy conversion was 1%, whereas in patients with stage IV it was 45%. The 30-day postoperative mortality rate was 2.9%. The 30-day postoperative reintervention rate was 4.9%, whereas 2% of patients required a percutaneous drainage. Readmission rate after the first hospitalization for recurrent diverticulitis was 6%. Most patients who were readmitted (69%) required redo surgery. A 2-stage laparoscopic intervention was performed in 18.3% of patients.Laparoscopic peritoneal lavage should be considered an effective and safe option for the treatment of patients with sigmoid diverticulitis with Hinchey stage III peritonitis; it can also be consider as a "bridge" surgical step combined with a delayed and elective laparoscopic sigmoidectomy in order to avoid a Hartmann procedure. This minimally invasive staged approach should be considered for patients without systemic toxicity and in centers experienced in minimally invasive surgery techniques. Further evidence is needed, and the ongoing RCTs will better define the role of the laparoscopic peritoneal lavage/drainage in the treatment of patients with complicated diverticulitis.


Assuntos
Doença Diverticular do Colo/complicações , Lavagem Peritoneal , Peritonite/terapia , Colectomia , Humanos , Laparoscopia , Peritonite/etiologia
19.
Medicine (Baltimore) ; 93(25): e184, 2014 Nov.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-25437034

RESUMO

Many of the treatment strategies for sigmoid diverticulitis are actually focusing on nonoperative and minimally invasive approaches. The aim of this systematic review was to evaluate the actual role of damage control surgery (DCS) in the treatment of generalized peritonitis caused by perforated sigmoid diverticulitis.A literature search was performed in PubMed and Google Scholar for articles published from 1960 to July 2013. Comparative and noncomparative studies that included patients who underwent DCS for complicated diverticulitis were considered.Acute Physiology and Chronic Health Evaluation score, duration of open abdomen, intensive care unit length of stay, reoperation, bowel resection performed at first operation, fecal diversion, method, and timing of closure of abdominal wall were the main outcomes of interest.According to the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses algorithm for the literature search and review, 10 studies were included in this systematic review. DCS was exclusively performed in diverticulitis patients with septic shock or requiring vasopressors intraoperatively. Two surgical different approaches were highlighted: limited resection of the diseased colonic segment with or without stoma or reconstruction in situ, and laparoscopic washing and drainage without colonic resection.Despite the heterogeneity of patient groups, clinical settings, and interventions included in this review, DCS appears to be a promising strategy for the treatment of Hinchey III and IV diverticulitis, complicated by septic shock. A tailored approach to each patient seems to be appropriate.


Assuntos
Colo Sigmoide , Diverticulite/complicações , Perfuração Intestinal/complicações , Peritonite/etiologia , Peritonite/cirurgia , APACHE , Doença Aguda , Humanos , Tempo de Internação , Fatores de Tempo
20.
World J Surg Oncol ; 12: 372, 2014 Dec 04.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-25475024

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: Laparoscopic pancreaticoduodenectomy is rarely performed, and it has not been particularly successful due to its technical complexity. The objective of this study is to highlight how robotic surgery could improve a minimally invasive approach and to expose the usefulness of robotic surgery even in complex surgical procedures. CASE PRESENTATION: The surgical technique employed in our center to perform a pancreaticoduodenectomy, which was by means of the da Vinci™ robotic system in order to remove a duodenal gastrointestinal stromal tumor, is reported. CONCLUSIONS: Robotic technology has improved significantly over the traditional laparoscopic approach, representing an evolution of minimally invasive techniques, allowing procedures to be safely performed that are still considered to be scarcely feasible or reproducible.


Assuntos
Neoplasias Duodenais/cirurgia , Tumores do Estroma Gastrointestinal/cirurgia , Pancreaticoduodenectomia/métodos , Robótica/métodos , Idoso , Anastomose Cirúrgica , Neoplasias Duodenais/patologia , Feminino , Tumores do Estroma Gastrointestinal/patologia , Humanos , Laparoscopia , Tratamentos com Preservação do Órgão , Prognóstico , Piloro
SELEÇÃO DE REFERÊNCIAS
DETALHE DA PESQUISA