Effect of comprehensive oncogenetics training interventions for general practitioners, evaluated at multiple performance levels.

General practitioners (GPs) are increasingly called upon to identify patients at risk for hereditary cancers, and their genetic competencies need to be enhanced. This article gives an overview of a research project on how to build effective educational modules on genetics, assessed by randomized controlled trials (RCTs), reflecting the prioritized educational needs of primary care physicians. It also reports on an ongoing study to investigate long-term increase in genetic consultation skills (1-year follow-up) and interest in and satisfaction with a supportive website on genetics among GPs. Three oncogenetics modules were developed: an online Continuing Professional Development (G-eCPD) module, a live genetic CPD module, and a "GP and genetics" website (huisartsengenetica.nl) providing further genetics information applicable in daily practice. Three assessments to evaluate the effectiveness (1-year follow-up) of the oncogenetic modules were designed: 1.An online questionnaire on self-reported genetic competencies and changes in referral behaviour, 2.Referral rates from GPs to clinical genetics centres and 3.Satisfaction questionnaire and visitor count analytics of supportive genetics website. The setting was Primary care in the Netherlands and three groups of study participants were included in the reported studies:. Assessment 1. 168 GPs responded to an email invitation and were randomly assigned to an intervention or control group, evaluating the G-eCPD module (n = 80) or the live module (n = 88). Assessment 2. Referral rates by GPs were requested from the clinical genetics centres, in the northern and southern parts of the Netherlands (Amsterdam and Maastricht), for the two years before (2010 [n = 2510] and 2011 [n = 2940]) and the year after (2012 [n = 2875]) launch of the oncogenetics CPD modules and the website. Assessment 3. Participants of the website evaluation were all recruited online. When they visited the website during the month of February 2013, a pop-up invitation came up. Of the 1350 unique visitors that month, only 38 completed the online questionnaire. Main outcomes measure showed long-term (self-reported) genetic consultation skills (i.e. increased genetics awareness and referrals to clinical genetics centres) among GPs who participated in the oncogenetic training course, and interest in and satisfaction with the supportive website. 42 GPs (52%) who previously participated in the G-eCPD evaluation study and 50 GPs (57%) who participated in the live training programme responded to the online questionnaire on long-term effects of educational outcome. Previous RCTs showed that the genetics CPD modules achieved sustained improvement of oncogenetic knowledge and consultation skills (3-months follow-up). Participants of these RCTs reported being more aware of genetic problems long term; this was reported by 29 GPs (69%) and 46 GPs (92%) participating in the G-eCPD and live module evaluation studies, respectively (Chisquare test, p<0.005). One year later, 68% of the respondents attending the live training reported that they more frequently referred patients to the clinical genetics centres, compared to 29% of those who attended the online oncogenetics training (Chisquare test, p<0.0005). However, the clinical genetics centres reported no significant change in referral numbers one year after the training. Website visitor numbers increased, as did satisfaction, reflected in a 7.7 and 8.1 (out of 10) global rating of the website (by G-eCPD and live module participants, respectively). The page most often consulted was "family tree drawing". Self-perceived genetic consultation skills increased long-term and GPs were interested in and satisfied with the supportive website. Further studies are necessary to see whether the oncogenetics CPD modules result in more efficient referral. The results presented suggest we have provided a flexible and effective framework to meet the need for effective educational programmes for non-geneticist healthcare providers, enabling improvement of genetic medical care.

Effectiveness of oncogenetics training on general practitioners' consultation skills: a randomized controlled trial.

PURPOSE: General practitioners are increasingly called upon to deliver genetic services and could play a key role in translating potentially life-saving advancements in oncogenetic technologies to patient care. If general practitioners are to make an effective contribution in this area, their genetics competencies need to be upgraded. The aim of this study was to investigate whether oncogenetics training for general practitioners improves their genetic consultation skills. METHODS: In this pragmatic, blinded, randomized controlled trial, the intervention consisted of a 4-h training (December 2011 and April 2012), covering oncogenetic consultation skills (family history, familial risk assessment, and efficient referral), attitude (medical ethical issues), and clinical knowledge required in primary-care consultations. Outcomes were measured using observation checklists by unannounced standardized patients and self-reported questionnaires. RESULTS: Of 88 randomized general practitioners who initially agreed to participate, 56 completed all measurements. Key consultation skills significantly and substantially improved; regression coefficients after intervention were equivalent to 0.34 and 0.28 at 3-month follow-up, indicating a moderate effect size. Satisfaction and perceived applicability of newly learned skills were highly scored. CONCLUSION: The general practitioner-specific training proved to be a feasible, satisfactory, and clinically applicable method to improve oncogenetics consultation skills and could be used as an educational framework to inform future training activities with the ultimate aim of improving medical care.

GPs' needs for practice-oriented nutrition education; a Delphi study among Dutch GPs.

BACKGROUND: Published guidelines and lists of topics in nutrition education for GPs are affected by practical drawbacks, which prevent them from being easily implemented in vocational training curricula. OBJECTIVE: Our aim was to draw up a concise priority list of disease-related nutrition topics reflecting the needs among Dutch GPs for nutrition education geared to everyday practice, which can be used to decide on the main topics and educational content of computer-based instruction. METHODS: This was a two-round Delphi study, using pilot-tested questionnaires carried out among 41 GPs who attended a national CME meeting on nutrition in The Netherlands. Sum scores of, and summarized comments on nutrition topics and their frequencies in top-10 lists drawn up by respondents were the main outcome measures. RESULTS: The response in both Delphi rounds was high (93 and 95%). Analysis of questionnaires in both rounds yielded a priority list of disease-related nutrition topics, with the 14 highest ranking topics identical in both rounds. A fifteenth topic, only found in the second questionnaire, completed the priority list. A group of experts assessed this list as fully acceptable. CONCLUSION: It was possible to compile a priority list of disease-related nutrition topics reflecting the needs of GPs for nutrition education. Based on the results of the Delphi study, we generated the following list of five priority topics: weight problems; diabetes mellitus; hypercholesterolaemia; intestinal complaints; and hypertension. This list of five and the summarized comments of respondents will determine the main topics and educational content of a computer-based instruction we are currently developing.

How to introduce incognito standardized patients into outpatient clinics of specialists in rheumatology.

To know what is going on in physicians' surgery hours, assessment of practice performance is important with regard to quality assessment activities. The incognito standardized patient (SP) method is a powerful method to assess this. However, until now no reports have been published about specialists' performance using this method. In this study, 27 rheumatologists in 16 hospitals were each visited by eight incognito SPs to study the feasibility of sending incognito SPs to specialists working in different hospitals, of follow-up consultations and of simulating additional investigations. SPs recorded performance on case-specific checklists. The different steps needed for these visits are described in detail. A total of 136 first and 32 follow-up visits took place. SPs remained undetected in 98% of the visits. It is concluded that this SP method is a feasible one, however, only to be used for very specific purposes. Use of incognito SPs for larger scale projects is not recommended.