Using a single abdominal computed tomography image to differentiate five contrast-enhancement phases: A machine-learning algorithm for radiomics-based precision medicine.

PURPOSE: The clinical adoption of quantitative imaging biomarkers (radiomics) has established the need for high quality contrast-enhancement in medical images. We aimed to develop a machine-learning algorithm for Quality Control of Contrast-Enhancement on CT-scan (CECT-QC). METHOD: Multicenter data from four independent cohorts [A, B, C, D] of patients with measurable liver lesions were analyzed retrospectively (patients:time-points; 503:3397): [A] dynamic CTs from primary liver cancer (60:2359); [B] triphasic CTs from primary liver cancer (31:93); [C] triphasic CTs from hepatocellular carcinoma (121:363); [D] portal venous phase CTs of liver metastasis from colorectal cancer (291:582). Patients from cohort A were randomized to training-set (48:1884) and test-set (12:475). A random forest classifier was trained and tested to identify five contrast-enhancement phases. The input was the mean intensity of the abdominal aorta and the portal vein measured on a single abdominal CT scan image at a single time-point. The output to be predicted was: non-contrast [NCP], early-arterial [E-AP], optimal-arterial [O-AP], optimal-portal [O-PVP], and late-portal [L-PVP]. Clinical utility was assessed in cohorts B, C, and D. RESULTS: The CECT-QC algorithm showed performances of 98 %, 90 %, and 84 % for predicting NCP, O-AP, and O-PVP, respectively. O-PVP was reached in half of patients and was associated with a peak in liver malignancy density. Contrast-enhancement quality significantly influenced radiomics features deciphering the phenotype of liver neoplasms. CONCLUSIONS: A single CT-image can be used to differentiate five contrast-enhancement phases for radiomics-based precision medicine in the most common liver neoplasms occurring in patients with or without liver cirrhosis.

Imaging-guided precision medicine in non-resectable gastro-entero-pancreatic neuroendocrine tumors: A step-by-step approach.

The majority of gastroenteropancreatic (GEP) neuroendocrine tumors (NETs) are diagnosed at a non-resectable stage due to non-specific clinical syndromes, late manifestations from mass effects, or incidental detection of a clinically silent disease. Management strategies include curative or cytoreduction surgery, imaging-guided intervention, chemotherapy, immunotherapy, and radionuclide therapies. In this step-by-step review, we provide a structured approach for standardized reading and reporting of medical imaging studies covering content and terminology. This review explains which imaging studies should be used for different NETs and what should be reported when interpreting these studies. This standardized data collection guide should enable precision medicine for the management of patients with GEP-NETs of neuroectodermal origin: gastrointestinal-NETs (giNETs) and pancreatic NETs (pNETs). To improve outcomes from GEP-NETs, it contains a comprehensive evaluation of imaging aids for determining surgical non-resectability, and serves as a surrogate measure for tumor differentiation and proliferation, assessing the spatial and temporal heterogeneity of the tumor sites with prognostic and therapeutic implications.

The role of multimodal imaging in guiding resectability and cytoreduction in pancreatic neuroendocrine tumors: focus on PET and MRI.

Pancreatic neuroendocrine tumors (pNETs) are rare neoplasms that secrete peptides and neuro-amines. pNETs can be sporadic or hereditary, syndromic or non-syndromic with different clinical presentations and prognoses. The role of medical imaging includes locating the tumor, assessing its extent, and evaluating the feasibility of curative surgery or cytoreduction. Pancreatic NETs have very distinctive phenotypes on CT, MRI, and PET. PET have been demonstrated to be very sensitive to detect either well-differentiated pNETs using 68Gallium somatostatin receptor (SSTR) radiotracers, or more aggressive undifferentiated pNETS using 18F-FDG. A comprehensive interpretation of multimodal imaging guides resectability and cytoreduction in pNETs. The imaging phenotype provides information on the differentiation and proliferation of pNETs, as well as the spatial and temporal heterogeneity of tumors with prognostic and therapeutic implications. This review provides a structured approach for standardized reading and reporting of medical imaging studies with a focus on PET and MR techniques. It explains which imaging approach should be used for different subtypes of pNET and what a radiologist should be looking for and reporting when interpreting these studies.

Single aortic branch device: the Mona LSA experience.

Endovascular treatment of aortic arch pathologies is challenging due to its complex anatomical architecture and the presence of vital collateral branches. This paper aims to provide an overview of the currently available and future endovascular options for these diseases, particularly regarding branched stent-grafts and the Mona LSA device. After discussing the indications for revascularization of supra-aortic trunks in endovascular aortic repair, we present the principles, benefits and drawbacks of the main modern methods to overcome an insufficient proximal landing zone, i.e. hybrid repair with associated surgical bypass, chimney or snorkel grafts, fenestrated stent-grafts and branched stent-grafts. Subsequently, we detail the technical specifications of the two main branched stent-graft devices under study: the Valiant Mona LSA (Medtronic, Santa Rosa, CA, USA) and the W.L. Gore (Flafstaff, AZ, USA) arch branch device. The steps of the deployment procedure are described from examples of branched stent-graft aortic repair of aortic dissection and aneurysm of the left subclavian artery. Finally, available results of the premarket trial on the Mona LSA branched stent-graft device are recalled. Branched stent grafts represent a promising therapeutic option for pathologies of the aortic arch with insufficient proximal landing zone or mandatory revascularization of supra-aortic trunks. Further studies are needed to specify their indications, long-term effectiveness and safety.

Other non-surgical treatments for liver cancer.

Interventional radiology plays a major role in the modern management of liver cancers, in primary hepatic malignancies or metastases and in palliative or curative situations. Radiological treatments are divided in two categories based on their approach: endovascular treatment and direct transcapsular access. Endovascular treatments include mainly three applications: transarterial chemoembolization (TACE), transarterial radioembolization (TARE) and portal vein embolization (PVE). TACE and TARE share an endovascular arterial approach, consisting of a selective catheterization of the hepatic artery or its branches. Subsequently, either a chemotherapy (TACE) or radioembolic (TARE) agent is injected in the target vessel to act on the tumor. PVE raises the volume of the future liver remnant in extended hepatectomy by embolizing a portal vein territory which results in hepatic regeneration. Direct transcapsular access treatments involve mainly three techniques: radiofrequency thermal ablation (RFA), microwave thermal ablation (MWA) and percutaneous ethanol injection (PEI). RFA and MWA procedures are almost identical, their clinical applications are similar. A probe is deployed directly into the tumor to generate heat and coagulation necrosis. PEI has known implications based on the chemical toxicity of intra-tumoral injection with highly concentrated alcohol by a thin needle.