RESUMO
Objective: To test vitamin D3 and omega-3 fatty acids (omega-3s) for late-life depression prevention under the National Academy of Medicine framework for indicated (targeting subthreshold depression) and selective (targeting presence of high-risk factors) prevention.Methods: The VITamin D and OmegA-3 TriaL (VITAL) is a 2 × 2 factorial trial of vitamin D3 (2,000 IU/d) and/or omega-3s (1 g/d) for cardiovascular and cancer prevention (enrollment: November 2011-March 2014; end date: December 31, 2017). In this targeted prevention study, we included 720 VITAL clinical sub-cohort participants who completed neurobehavioral assessments at baseline and 2 years (91.9% retention). High-risk factors were subthreshold or clinical anxiety, impaired activities of daily living, physical/functional limitation, medical comorbidity, cognitive impairment, caregiving burden, problem drinking, and low psychosocial support. Coprimary outcomes were incident major depressive disorder (MDD), adjudicated using DSM-IV (Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders, Fourth Edition), and change in mood (Patient Health Questionnaire-9 [PHQ-9]). We used exact tests to determine treatment effects on MDD incidence and repeated-measures models to determine treatment effects on PHQ-9.Results: A total of 11.1% had subthreshold depression, 60.8% had ≥ 1 high-risk factor, MDD incidence was 4.7% (5.1% among completers), and mean PHQ-9 score change was 0.02 points. Among those with subthreshold depression, the MDD risk ratio (95% confidence interval) was 0.36 (0.06 to 1.28) for vitamin D3 and 0.85 (0.25 to 2.92) for omega-3s, compared to placebo; results were also null among those with ≥ 1 high-risk factor (vitamin D3 vs placebo: 0.63 [0.25 to 1.53]; omega-3s vs placebo: 1.08 [0.46 to 2.71]). There were no significant differences in PHQ-9 score change comparing either supplement with placebo.Conclusions: Neither vitamin D3 nor omega-3s showed benefits for indicated and selective prevention of late-life depression; statistical power was limited.Trial Registration: ClinicalTrials.gov identifier: NCT01696435.
Assuntos
Transtorno Depressivo Maior , Ácidos Graxos Ômega-3 , Humanos , Idoso , Colecalciferol/uso terapêutico , Vitamina D , Depressão/tratamento farmacológico , Depressão/epidemiologia , Depressão/prevenção & controle , Transtorno Depressivo Maior/tratamento farmacológico , Transtorno Depressivo Maior/epidemiologia , Transtorno Depressivo Maior/prevenção & controle , Atividades Cotidianas , Método Duplo-Cego , Vitaminas/uso terapêutico , Suplementos NutricionaisRESUMO
BACKGROUND: The benefits and risks of augmenting or switching antidepressants in older adults with treatment-resistant depression have not been extensively studied. METHODS: We conducted a two-step, open-label trial involving adults 60 years of age or older with treatment-resistant depression. In step 1, patients were randomly assigned in a 1:1:1 ratio to augmentation of existing antidepressant medication with aripiprazole, augmentation with bupropion, or a switch from existing antidepressant medication to bupropion. Patients who did not benefit from or were ineligible for step 1 were randomly assigned in step 2 in a 1:1 ratio to augmentation with lithium or a switch to nortriptyline. Each step lasted approximately 10 weeks. The primary outcome was the change from baseline in psychological well-being, assessed with the National Institutes of Health Toolbox Positive Affect and General Life Satisfaction subscales (population mean, 50; higher scores indicate greater well-being). A secondary outcome was remission of depression. RESULTS: In step 1, a total of 619 patients were enrolled; 211 were assigned to aripiprazole augmentation, 206 to bupropion augmentation, and 202 to a switch to bupropion. Well-being scores improved by 4.83 points, 4.33 points, and 2.04 points, respectively. The difference between the aripiprazole-augmentation group and the switch-to-bupropion group was 2.79 points (95% CI, 0.56 to 5.02; P = 0.014, with a prespecified threshold P value of 0.017); the between-group differences were not significant for aripiprazole augmentation versus bupropion augmentation or for bupropion augmentation versus a switch to bupropion. Remission occurred in 28.9% of patients in the aripiprazole-augmentation group, 28.2% in the bupropion-augmentation group, and 19.3% in the switch-to-bupropion group. The rate of falls was highest with bupropion augmentation. In step 2, a total of 248 patients were enrolled; 127 were assigned to lithium augmentation and 121 to a switch to nortriptyline. Well-being scores improved by 3.17 points and 2.18 points, respectively (difference, 0.99; 95% CI, -1.92 to 3.91). Remission occurred in 18.9% of patients in the lithium-augmentation group and 21.5% in the switch-to-nortriptyline group; rates of falling were similar in the two groups. CONCLUSIONS: In older adults with treatment-resistant depression, augmentation of existing antidepressants with aripiprazole improved well-being significantly more over 10 weeks than a switch to bupropion and was associated with a numerically higher incidence of remission. Among patients in whom augmentation or a switch to bupropion failed, changes in well-being and the occurrence of remission with lithium augmentation or a switch to nortriptyline were similar. (Funded by the Patient-Centered Outcomes Research Institute; OPTIMUM ClinicalTrials.gov number, NCT02960763.).
Assuntos
Antidepressivos , Aripiprazol , Bupropiona , Compostos de Lítio , Nortriptilina , Troca de Tratamento , Idoso , Humanos , Antidepressivos/efeitos adversos , Antidepressivos/uso terapêutico , Aripiprazol/efeitos adversos , Aripiprazol/uso terapêutico , Bupropiona/efeitos adversos , Bupropiona/uso terapêutico , Depressão , Quimioterapia Combinada , Nortriptilina/efeitos adversos , Nortriptilina/uso terapêutico , Compostos de Lítio/efeitos adversos , Compostos de Lítio/uso terapêuticoRESUMO
Importance: Marine omega-3 fatty acid (omega-3) supplements have been used to treat depression but their ability to prevent depression in the general adult population is unknown. Objective: To test effects of omega-3 supplementation on late-life depression risk and mood scores. Design, Setting, and Participants: A total of 18â¯353 adults participated in the VITAL-DEP (Vitamin D and Omega-3 Trial-Depression Endpoint Prevention) ancillary study to VITAL, a randomized trial of cardiovascular disease and cancer prevention among 25â¯871 US adults. There were 16â¯657 at risk of incident depression (no previous depression) and 1696 at risk of recurrent depression (previous depression, but not for the past 2 years). Randomization occurred from November 2011 through March 2014; randomized treatment ended on December 31, 2017. Interventions: Randomized 2 × 2 factorial assignment to vitamin D3 (2000 IU/d), marine omega-3 fatty acids (1 g/d of fish oil, including 465 mg of eicosapentaenoic acid and 375 mg of docosahexaenoic acid) or placebo; 9171 were randomized to omega-3 and 9182 were randomized to matching placebo. Main Outcomes and Measures: Prespecified coprimary outcomes were risk of depression or clinically relevant depressive symptoms (total of incident + recurrent cases); mean difference in mood score (8-item Patient Health Questionnaire [PHQ-8] depression scale). Results: Among 18â¯353 participants who were randomized (mean age, 67.5 [SD, 7.1] years; 49.2% women), 90.3% completed the trial (93.5% among those alive at the end of the trial); the median treatment duration was 5.3 years. The test for interaction between the omega-3 and the vitamin D agents was not significant (P for interaction = .14). Depression risk was significantly higher comparing omega-3 (651 events, 13.9 per 1000 person-years) with placebo (583 events, 12.3 per 1000 person-years; hazard ratio [HR], 1.13; 95% CI, 1.01-1.26; P = .03). No significant differences were observed comparing omega-3 with placebo groups in longitudinal mood scores: the mean difference in change in PHQ-8 score was 0.03 points (95% CI, -0.01 to 0.07; P = .19). Regarding serious and common adverse events, the respective prevalence values in omega-3 vs placebo groups were major cardiovascular events (2.7% vs 2.9%), all-cause mortality (3.3% vs 3.1%), suicide (0.02% vs 0.01%), gastrointestinal bleeding (2.6% vs 2.7%), easy bruising (24.8% vs 25.1%), and stomach upset or pain (35.2% vs 35.1%). Conclusions and Relevance: Among adults aged 50 years or older without clinically relevant depressive symptoms at baseline, treatment with omega-3 supplements compared with placebo yielded mixed results, with a small but statistically significant increase in risk of depression or clinically relevant depressive symptoms but no difference in mood scores, over a median follow-up of 5.3 years. These findings do not support the use of omega-3 supplements in adults to prevent depression. Trial Registration: ClinicalTrials.gov Identifiers: NCT01696435 and NCT01169259.
Assuntos
Afeto , Depressão/prevenção & controle , Transtorno Depressivo/prevenção & controle , Ácidos Graxos Ômega-3/uso terapêutico , Idoso , Suplementos Nutricionais , Método Duplo-Cego , Feminino , Humanos , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Modelos de Riscos Proporcionais , Falha de TratamentoRESUMO
Depression is a disabling, highly prevalent, frequently chronic, and difficult-to-treat disorder with an immense cognitive, social, and economic burden. Given that many of the advances in other non-communicable disorders like cancer have been in prevention rather than treatment, the prevention of depression is currently an unmet public health priority. We sought to provide an overview of the meta-analytic literature through conducting a systematic umbrella review of universally delivered preventive interventions for depression. The search was conducted on March 18, 2021 utilising the following databases (all accessed through EBSCOHost); Allied and Complementary Medicine Database, CINAHL Complete, Global Health, Health Source: Nursing/Academic Edition, MEDLINE Complete and APA PsychArticles. The following search terms related to depression, prevention, and trial study design. Two authors independently screened articles and a third resolved discrepancies. Eligibility criteria sought to identify meta-analyses that investigated the prevention of depression (i.e., reduced incidence) through intervention studies that were universal, in that they were designed to be delivered to entire populations Six meta-analyses on psychological interventions, two school-based meta-analyses, and one eHealth meta-analysis were included in this umbrella review. Findings indicated that all identified studies were of good quality and one was of fair quality. One previous meta-review that examined physical activity to prevent depression was included in results, comprising eight meta-analyses. Preventive interventions have primarily and successfully utilized psychological therapeutic components, delivered at the school, community, and workplace settings. Both school- and eHealth-based interventions hold some utility for depression prevention. There is meta-analytic evidence that physical activity is efficacious for depression prevention. However, universal prevention is inconsistently defined. There is a pressing need for well-designed randomized controlled preventative interventions for depression before recommendations can be universally accepted with convincing level of evidence.
Assuntos
Depressão , Exercício Físico , Depressão/epidemiologia , Depressão/prevenção & controle , Humanos , Metanálise como AssuntoRESUMO
BACKGROUND: Antipsychotic drugs are well established to alter serum prolactin levels, often resulting in adverse effects including amenorrhea, galactorrhea, osteoporosis, and loss of libido. There is growing preclinical evidence that prolactin-elevating drugs can instigate the progression of precancerous lesions to breast cancer and that genes activated by prolactin are associated with the development and proliferation of breast cancer. Current guides advise a cautious approach (weighing risks and benefits) to the administration of prolactin-elevating antipsychotic drugs in women with a previously detected breast cancer. Aripiprazole is known to be a prolactin-sparing antipsychotic; however, data regarding its effects on prolactin and estrogens in postmenopausal women are lacking. METHODS: We examined serum hormone levels in n = 66 women who participated in a randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled, multicenter trial of aripiprazole (high and low doses) added to an antidepressant in adults older than 60 years. Aripiprazole or placebo tablets were administered for 12 weeks as an augmentation strategy in venlafaxine-treated women. The primary outcomes were the difference in prolactin and estrogen levels. RESULTS: There was no significant effect of aripiprazole treatment on prolactin or estrogen levels, including in models that divided groups into low and high doses: prolactin (P = 0.075), estrone (P = 0.67), and estradiol (P = 0.96). CONCLUSIONS: Aripiprazole addition to an antidepressant did not alter serum estrogens or prolactin. These findings may be relevant in the treatment of some postmenopausal women with depression.
Assuntos
Antipsicóticos/efeitos adversos , Aripiprazol/efeitos adversos , Depressão/tratamento farmacológico , Estrogênios/sangue , Prolactina/sangue , Idoso , Idoso de 80 Anos ou mais , Aripiprazol/administração & dosagem , Neoplasias da Mama/induzido quimicamente , Método Duplo-Cego , Feminino , Humanos , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Pós-Menopausa/fisiologiaRESUMO
BACKGROUND: Adherence to healthy lifestyles/behaviours promotes healthy ageing. However, little is known about whether age, sex and/or race/ethnicity moderate associations of lifestyle/behavioural factors with relative telomere length (RTL), a potential biomarker of ageing. METHODS: We included 749 midlife to older non-Hispanic White (n = 254), Black (n = 248) and Hispanic (n = 247) US participants [mean (standard deviation) age = 69.3 (7.2) years; women: 50.5%]. We extracted genomic DNA from peripheral leucocytes. RTL was assayed using real-time quantitative polymerase chain reaction. Multivariable regression was used to examine associations between lifestyle/behavioural exposures (i.e. physical activity, alcohol consumption, smoking and depression) with RTL. RESULTS: Increasing chronological age was associated with shorter RTL (P < 0.01). Higher physical activity was associated with longer RTL (P-trend = 0.03); daily versus never/rare alcohol consumption and 30+ versus <5 smoking pack-year were associated with shorter RTLs (P-trend = 0.02). Associations varied significantly by sex and race/ethnicity. The association between physical activity and longer RTL appeared strongest among non-Hispanic Whites (P-interaction = 0.01). Compared to men, women had stronger associations between heavy smoking and shorter RTLs (P-interaction = 0.03). Light/moderate alcohol consumption (monthly/weekly) was associated with longer RTL among non-Hispanic Whites, while daily consumption was related to shorter RTLs among Blacks and Hispanics (P-interactions < 0.01). Associations of daily alcohol and heavy smoking with shorter RTLs were particularly apparent among Black women. CONCLUSION: We observed novel variations by sex and race/ethnicity in associations between lifestyle/behavioural factors and RTL. Further work is needed to replicate these findings and to address potential public health implications for modifying strategies by sex or across racial/ethnic groups to optimise lifestyles/behaviours for healthy ageing.
Assuntos
Etnicidade , Telômero , Idoso , Envelhecimento/genética , Feminino , Hispânico ou Latino , Humanos , Estilo de Vida , MasculinoRESUMO
BACKGROUND: We aimed to identify trajectories of inflammation in older adults at elevated risk for syndromal depression and anxiety and to determine whether baseline physical, cognitive, and psychosocial factors could distinguish 15-month longitudinal trajectories. METHODS: Older adults (Nâ¯=â¯195, mean age (±SD)â¯=â¯74.4 years (9.0) participating in three depression and anxiety prevention protocols completed a comprehensive battery of psychosocial assessments and provided blood samples for analysis of interleukin-6 (IL-6) every 3 months over a maximum of 15 months. Group-based trajectory modeling identified trajectories. Adjusted logistic regression examined associations between baseline factors and trajectory groups. RESULTS: Two 15-month trajectories were identified: stable lower IL-6 levels (84%; mean (±SD)â¯=â¯3.2 (2.1) pg/mL); and consistently higher IL-6 levels (16%; meanâ¯=â¯9.5 (7.4) pg/mL). Poor sleep quality predicted consistently higher levels of IL-6 (ORâ¯=â¯1.9, 95% CIâ¯=â¯1.03-3.55). CONCLUSION: Poor sleep quality may represent a therapeutic target to reduce inflammation.
Assuntos
Interleucina-6/imunologia , Sono/imunologia , Sono/fisiologia , Idoso , Ansiedade/sangue , Ansiedade/prevenção & controle , Depressão/sangue , Depressão/prevenção & controle , Feminino , Humanos , Inflamação/sangue , Inflamação/imunologia , Inflamação/prevenção & controle , Interleucina-6/sangue , MasculinoRESUMO
Mitochondrial DNA copy number (mtDNAcn) is a putative biomarker of oxidative stress and biological aging. Modifiable factors, including physical activity (PA), avoidance of heavy alcohol use and smoking, and maintaining good mental health, may reduce oxidative stress and promote healthy aging. Yet, limited data exist regarding how these factors are associated with mtDNAcn or whether age, sex or race/ethnicity moderate associations. In this cross-sectional study, we selected 391 adults (183 non-Hispanic White, 110 Black and 98 Hispanic; mean = 67 years) from the VITAL-DEP (VITamin D and OmegA-3 TriaL-Depression Endpoint Prevention) ancillary to the VITAL trial. We estimated associations between lifestyle and behavioral factors (PA, alcohol consumption, cigarette smoking and depression) and log-transformed mtDNAcn using multivariable linear regression models. MtDNAcn was not correlated with chronological age; women had ~17% higher mtDNAcn compared to men. There were no significant associations between PA measures (frequency, amount or intensity) or alcohol consumption with mtDNAcn. Cigarette smoking (per 5 pack-years) was significantly associated with mtDNAcn (percent difference = -2.9% (95% confidence interval (CI) = -5.4%, -0.4%)); a large contrast was observed among heavy vs. non-smokers (≥30 vs. 0 pack-years): percent difference = -28.5% (95% CI = -44.2%, -8.3%). The estimate of mtDNAcn was suggestively different for past vs. no depression history (percent difference = -15.1% 95% CI = -30.8%, 4.1%), but this difference was not statistically significant. The association between smoking and log-mtDNAcn varied by sex and race/ethnicity; it was stronger in men and Black participants. While chance findings cannot be excluded, results from this study support associations of smoking, but not chronological age, with mtDNAcn and suggest nuanced considerations of mtDNAcn as indicative of varying oxidative stress states vs. biological aging itself.
Assuntos
Variações do Número de Cópias de DNA , DNA Mitocondrial/genética , Estilo de Vida , Idoso , Envelhecimento , Consumo de Bebidas Alcoólicas/genética , Fumar Cigarros/genética , Estudos Transversais , Depressão/genética , Exercício Físico , Feminino , Humanos , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-IdadeRESUMO
Importance: Low levels of 25-hydroxyvitamin D have been associated with higher risk for depression later in life, but there have been few long-term, high-dose large-scale trials. Objective: To test the effects of vitamin D3 supplementation on late-life depression risk and mood scores. Design, Setting, and Participants: There were 18â¯353 men and women aged 50 years or older in the VITAL-DEP (Vitamin D and Omega-3 Trial-Depression Endpoint Prevention) ancillary study to VITAL, a randomized clinical trial of cardiovascular disease and cancer prevention among 25â¯871 adults in the US. There were 16â¯657 at risk for incident depression (ie, no depression history) and 1696 at risk for recurrent depression (ie, depression history but no treatment for depression within the past 2 years). Randomization occurred from November 2011 through March 2014; randomized treatment ended on December 31, 2017, and this was the final date of follow-up. Intervention: Randomized assignment in a 2 × 2 factorial design to vitamin D3 (2000 IU/d of cholecalciferol) and fish oil or placebo; 9181 were randomized to vitamin D3 and 9172 were randomized to matching placebo. Main Outcomes and Measures: The primary outcomes were the risk of depression or clinically relevant depressive symptoms (total of incident and recurrent cases) and the mean difference in mood scores (8-item Patient Health Questionnaire depression scale [PHQ-8]; score range, 0 points [least symptoms] to 24 points [most symptoms]; the minimal clinically important difference for change in scores was 0.5 points). Results: Among the 18â¯353 randomized participants (mean age, 67.5 [SD, 7.1] years; 49.2% women), the median treatment duration was 5.3 years and 90.5% completed the trial (93.5% among those alive at the end of the trial). Risk of depression or clinically relevant depressive symptoms was not significantly different between the vitamin D3 group (609 depression or clinically relevant depressive symptom events; 12.9/1000 person-years) and the placebo group (625 depression or clinically relevant depressive symptom events; 13.3/1000 person-years) (hazard ratio, 0.97 [95% CI, 0.87 to 1.09]; P = .62); there were no significant differences between groups in depression incidence or recurrence. No significant differences were observed between treatment groups for change in mood scores over time; mean change in PHQ-8 score was not significantly different from zero (mean difference for change in mood scores, 0.01 points [95% CI, -0.04 to 0.05 points]). Conclusions and Relevance: Among adults aged 50 years or older without clinically relevant depressive symptoms at baseline, treatment with vitamin D3 compared with placebo did not result in a statistically significant difference in the incidence and recurrence of depression or clinically relevant depressive symptoms or for change in mood scores over a median follow-up of 5.3 years. These findings do not support the use of vitamin D3 in adults to prevent depression. Trial Registration: ClinicalTrials.gov Identifiers: NCT01169259 and NCT01696435.
Assuntos
Afeto/efeitos dos fármacos , Colecalciferol/uso terapêutico , Depressão/tratamento farmacológico , Transtorno Depressivo/prevenção & controle , Vitaminas/uso terapêutico , Idoso , Colecalciferol/farmacologia , Depressão/prevenção & controle , Suplementos Nutricionais , Método Duplo-Cego , Feminino , Humanos , Incidência , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Recidiva , Inquéritos e Questionários , Vitaminas/farmacologiaRESUMO
OBJECTIVES: To evaluate the feasibility and acceptability of a behavioral intervention and explore its impact on depression symptom burden among older spousally-bereaved adults. METHODS: Participants were age ≥60 years, bereaved ≤8 months, and at high risk for depression. Participants were randomized to 12 weeks of digital monitoring of sleep, meals, and physical activity; digital monitoring plus health coaching; or enhanced usual care and followed for 9 months for new-episode depression. RESULTS: We enrolled 57 participants, 85% of eligible adults and 38% of all adults screened. We observed high levels of adherence in both digital monitoring (90%) and health coaching (92%); 88% of participants were retained. In linear mixed-effects models, depression symptoms significantly decreased, but the interaction between time and intervention was not significant. CONCLUSION: A behavioral intervention that uses both digital monitoring and motivational health coaching is feasible and acceptable to older bereaved adults.
Assuntos
Transtorno Depressivo Maior/prevenção & controle , Aplicativos Móveis , Monitorização Ambulatorial/métodos , Idoso , Ingestão de Alimentos/fisiologia , Exercício Físico/fisiologia , Feminino , Humanos , Masculino , Entrevista Motivacional , Projetos Piloto , Sintomas Prodrômicos , Sono/fisiologiaRESUMO
Importance: Knowledge gaps persist regarding racial and ethnic variation in late-life depression, including differences in specific depressive symptoms and disparities in care. Objective: To examine racial/ethnic differences in depression severity, symptom burden, and care. Design, Setting, and Participants: This cross-sectional study included 25â¯503 of 25â¯871 community-dwelling older adults who participated in the Vitamin D and Omega-3 Trial (VITAL), a randomized trial of cancer and cardiovascular disease prevention conducted from November 2011 to December 2017. Data analysis was conducted from June to September 2018. Exposure: Racial/ethnic group (ie, non-Hispanic white; black; Hispanic; Asian; and other, multiple, or unspecified race). Main Outcomes and Measures: Depressive symptoms, assessed using the Patient Health Questionnaire-8 (PHQ-8); participant-reported diagnosis, medication, and/or counseling for depression. Differences across racial/ethnic groups were evaluated using multivariable zero-inflated negative binomial regression to compare PHQ-8 scores and multivariable logistic regression to estimate odds of item-level symptom burden and odds of depression treatment among those with diagnosed depression. Results: There were 25â¯503 VITAL participants with adequate depression data (mean [SD] age, 67.1 [7.1] years) including 12â¯888 [50.5%] women, 17â¯828 [69.9%] non-Hispanic white participants, 5004 [19.6%] black participants, 1001 [3.9%] Hispanic participants, 377 [1.5%] Asian participants, and 1293 participants [5.1%] who were categorized in the other, multiple, or unspecified race group. After adjustment for sociodemographic, lifestyle, and health confounders, black participants had a 10% higher severity level of PHQ-8 scores compared with non-Hispanic white participants (rate ratio [RR], 1.10; 95% CI, 1.04-1.17; P < .001); Hispanic participants had a 23% higher severity level of PHQ-8 scores compared with non-Hispanic white participants (RR, 1.23; 95% CI, 1.10-1.38; P < .001); and participants in the other, multiple, or unspecified group had a 14% higher severity level of PHQ-8 scores compared with non-Hispanic white participants (RR, 1.14; 95% CI, 1.04-1.25; P = .007). Compared with non-Hispanic white participants, participants belonging to minority groups had 1.5-fold to 2-fold significantly higher fully adjusted odds of anhedonia (among black participants: odds ratio [OR], 1.76; 95% CI, 1.47-2.11; among Hispanic participants: OR, 1.96; 95% CI, 1.43-2.69), sadness (among black participants: OR, 1.31; 95% CI, 1.07-1.60; among Hispanic participants: OR, 2.09; 95% CI, 1.51-2.88), and psychomotor symptoms (among black participants: OR, 1.77; 95% CI, 1.31-2.39; among Hispanic participants: OR, 2.12; 95% CI, 1.28-3.50); multivariable-adjusted odds of sleep problems and guilt appeared higher among Hispanic vs non-Hispanic white participants (sleep: OR, 1.24; 95% CI, 1.01-1.52; guilt: 1.84; 95% CI, 1.31-2.59). Among those with clinically significant depressive symptoms (ie, PHQ-8 score ≥10) and/or those with diagnosed depression, black participants were 61% less likely to report any treatment (ie, medications and/or counseling) than non-Hispanic white participants after adjusting for confounders (adjusted OR, 0.39; 95% CI, 0.27-0.56). Conclusions and Relevance: In this cross-sectional study, significant racial and ethnic differences in late-life depression severity, item-level symptom burden, and depression care were observed after adjustment for numerous confounders. These findings suggest a need for further examination of novel patient-level and clinician-level factors underlying these associations.
Assuntos
Depressão/epidemiologia , Etnicidade/estatística & dados numéricos , Grupos Raciais/estatística & dados numéricos , Idoso , Efeitos Psicossociais da Doença , Estudos Transversais , Depressão/fisiopatologia , Depressão/terapia , Disparidades nos Níveis de Saúde , Inquéritos Epidemiológicos , Humanos , Pessoa de Meia-IdadeRESUMO
OBJECTIVE: Evidence from clinical trials comparing effectiveness and safety of pharmacological strategies in older adults unresponsive to first-line antidepressants is limited. The study, Optimizing Outcomes of Treatment-Resistant Depression in Older Adults (OPTIMUM), tests three hypotheses concerning pharmacotherapy strategies for treatment-resistant late-life depression: 1) augmentation strategies will provide greater improvement than switching monotherapies; 2) augmentation strategies will have lower tolerability and more safety concerns than switching monotherapies; and 3) age will moderate the effectiveness and safety differences between treatment strategies. The authors describe the methodology, processes for stakeholder engagement, challenges, and lessons learned in the early phases of OPTIMUM. METHODS: This pragmatic randomized clinical trial located in five North American regions will enroll 1,500 participants aged 60 years and older unresponsive to two or more antidepressant trials. The authors evaluate two strategies (medication augmentation versus switch) using four medications (aripiprazole, bupropion, lithium, and nortriptyline) via a stepwise, prespecified protocol. Primary outcomes include: 1) symptom remission (Montgomery Asberg Depression scale ≤10); 2) psychological well-being, comprising positive affect, general life satisfaction, and purpose; and 3) safety (rates of serious adverse events and prevalence of falls and fall-related injuries). RESULTS: To date, 396 participants have been randomized. The authors report on four challenges: 1) engagement and recruitment; 2) increasing polypharmacy in older adults, resulting in potentially hazardous scenarios; 3) reporting adverse events and procedure standardization across sites; and 4) dissemination of results. CONCLUSION: Solutions to these challenges, including early inclusion of stake holders, will inform future pragmatic studies in older adults with depression.
Assuntos
Antidepressivos/efeitos adversos , Antidepressivos/uso terapêutico , Transtorno Depressivo Resistente a Tratamento/tratamento farmacológico , Idoso , Aripiprazol , Bupropiona , Humanos , Compostos de Lítio , Estudos Multicêntricos como Assunto , Nortriptilina , Ensaios Clínicos Pragmáticos como Assunto , Resultado do TratamentoRESUMO
Relations of DNA methylation markers to other biological aging markers and to psychosocial, behavioral, and health measures remain unclear. The sample included 23 participants (n = 11 cases with psychiatric diagnoses and n = 12 controls without current or lifetime psychiatric disorder), balanced by age and sex. Genomic DNA was extracted from blood samples; the following were performed: genome-wide DNA methylation assay using Illumina 850k methylationEPIC; PCR assays for relative telomere length (RTL) and mitochondrial DNA copy number (mtCN). Exposures were: case status; depression and anxiety symptoms; psychosocial support; subjective and objective cognition. Outcomes were: DNA methylation age (DNAm age); RTL; mtCN; extrinsic and intrinsic epigenetic age acceleration (EEAA and IEAA). Stronger correlation with chronological age was observed for DNAm age (ρ = 0.86; p < 0.0001) compared to RTL (ρ = -0.53; p < 0.01); mtCN was not correlated with age. DNAm age was more strongly correlated with behavioral and health variables than RTL or mtCN; e.g., correlations with DNAm age: body mass index (ρ = 0.36; p = 0.10); smoking pack-years (ρ = 0.37; p = 0.08); physical activity (ρ = -0.56; p = 0.01); alcohol intake (ρ = 0.56; p = 0.01). DNAm age was inversely correlated with psychosocial support (ρ = -0.42; p = 0.048) and Modified Mini-Mental State score (ρ = -0.44; p = 0.01). Anxiety, psychosocial support, and objective cognition were significantly related to accelerated aging; depression and subjective cognition were not. In conclusion, DNAm age correlated more strongly with chronological age and key psychosocial, behavioral, and health variables than RTL or mtCN. Signals for associations with epigenetic aging were observed for psychosocial and neurobehavioral variables.
Assuntos
Envelhecimento , Variações do Número de Cópias de DNA , Metilação de DNA , Epigênese Genética , Transtornos Mentais/genética , Idoso , Biomarcadores , Estudos de Casos e Controles , DNA Mitocondrial/genética , Feminino , Humanos , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Projetos Piloto , Ensaios Clínicos Controlados Aleatórios como Assunto , Telômero/ultraestruturaRESUMO
Late-life depression (LLD) is a major depressive disorder that affects someone after the age of 60 years. LLD is frequently associated with inadequate response and remission from antidepressants, in addition to polypharmacy. Pharmacogenetics offers a promising approach to improve clinical outcomes in LLD via new discoveries determining the genetic basis of response rates and side effects, as well as the development of tailored pharmacogenetic-based decision support tools. This invited review evaluates the LLD pharmacogenetic evidence base and the extent to which this was incorporated into existing commercial decision support tools and clinical pharmacogenetic guidelines.
Assuntos
Antidepressivos/uso terapêutico , Depressão/tratamento farmacológico , Transtorno Depressivo Maior/tratamento farmacológico , Farmacogenética/normas , Humanos , Testes Farmacogenômicos/normas , Medicina de Precisão/normasRESUMO
IMPORTANCE: Depression in older adults is a common psychiatric disorder affecting their health-related quality of life. Major depression occurs in 2% of adults aged 55 years or older, and its prevalence rises with increasing age. In addition, 10% to 15% of older adults have clinically significant depressive symptoms, even in the absence of major depression. OBSERVATIONS: Depression presents with the same symptoms in older adults as it does in younger populations. In contrast to younger patients, older adults with depression more commonly have several concurrent medical disorders and cognitive impairment. Depression occurring in older patients is often undetected or inadequately treated. Antidepressants are the best-studied treatment option, but psychotherapy, exercise therapy, and electroconvulsive therapy may also be effective. Psychotherapy is recommended for patients with mild to moderate severity depression. Many older patients need the same doses of antidepressant medication that are used for younger adult patients. Although antidepressants may effectively treat depression in older adults, they tend to pose greater risk for adverse events because of multiple medical comorbidities and drug-drug interactions in case of polypharmacy. High-quality evidence does not support the use of pharmacologic treatment of depression in patients with dementia. Polypharmacy in older patients can be minimized by using the Screening Tool of Older Persons Prescriptions and Screening Tool to Alert doctors to Right Treatment (STOPP/START) criteria, a valid and reliable screening tool that enables physicians to avoid potentially inappropriate medications, undertreatment, or errors of omissions in older people. Antidepressants can be gradually tapered over a period of several weeks, but discontinuation of antidepressants may be associated with relapse or recurrence of depression, so the patient should be closely observed. CONCLUSIONS AND RELEVANCE: Major depression in older adults is common and can be effectively treated with antidepressants and electroconvulsive therapy. Psychological therapies and exercise may also be effective for mild-moderate depression, for patients who prefer nonpharmacological treatment, or for patients who are too frail for drug treatments.
Assuntos
Antidepressivos/uso terapêutico , Transtorno Depressivo/terapia , Idoso , Antidepressivos/efeitos adversos , Comorbidade , Transtorno Depressivo/tratamento farmacológico , Eletroconvulsoterapia , Exercício Físico , Idoso Fragilizado , Humanos , Polimedicação , PsicoterapiaRESUMO
OBJECTIVE: Several immunological biomarkers are altered in late-life major depressive disorder (LLD). Immunological alterations could contribute to LLD's consequences, but little is known about the relations between specific immunological biomarkers and brain health in LLD. We performed an exploratory pilot study to identify, from several candidates, the specific immunological biomarkers related to important aspects of brain health that are altered in LLD (brain structure and executive function). METHODS: Adults (n = 31) were at least 60 years old and had major depressive disorder. A multiplex immunoassay assessed 13 immunological biomarkers, and we examined their associations with structural MRI (grey matter volume and white matter hyperintensity volume (WMH)) and executive function (Color-Word Interference and Trail-Making tests) measures. RESULTS: Vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF) and the chemokine eotaxin had significant negative associations with grey matter volume (VEGF: n = 31, r = -0.65; eotaxin: n = 29, r = -0.44). Tumor necrosis factor alpha (TNF-α) had a significant positive relationship with WMHs (n = 30, r = 0.52); interferon-γ (IFN-γ) and macrophage inflammatory protein-1α (MIP-1α) were also significantly associated with WMHs (IFN-γ: n = 31, r = 0.48; MIP-1α: n = 29, r = 0.45). Only eotaxin was associated with executive function (set-shifting performance as measured with the Trail-making test: n = 33, r = -0.43). CONCLUSIONS: Immunological markers are associated with brain structure in LLD. We found the immunological correlates of grey and white matter differ. Prospective studies are needed to evaluate whether these immunological correlates of brain health increase the risk of LLD's consequences. Eotaxin, which correlated with both grey matter volume and set-shifting performance, may be particularly relevant to neurodegeneration and cognition in LLD. Copyright © 2016 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.
Assuntos
Citocinas/sangue , Transtorno Depressivo Maior , Função Executiva/fisiologia , Substância Cinzenta/patologia , Substância Branca/patologia , Idoso , Idoso de 80 Anos ou mais , Biomarcadores/metabolismo , Transtorno Depressivo Maior/sangue , Transtorno Depressivo Maior/imunologia , Transtorno Depressivo Maior/patologia , Feminino , Humanos , Imageamento por Ressonância Magnética , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Projetos Piloto , Estudos ProspectivosAssuntos
Depressão/diagnóstico , Transtorno Depressivo/diagnóstico , Programas de Rastreamento/normas , Serviços Preventivos de Saúde , Atenção Primária à Saúde , Psicoterapia/métodos , Adulto , Comitês Consultivos , Depressão/terapia , Transtorno Depressivo/terapia , Diagnóstico Precoce , Feminino , Humanos , Masculino , Programas de Rastreamento/métodos , Guias de Prática Clínica como Assunto , Serviços Preventivos de Saúde/métodos , Serviços Preventivos de Saúde/organização & administração , Serviços Preventivos de Saúde/normas , Serviços Preventivos de Saúde/tendências , Atenção Primária à Saúde/métodos , Atenção Primária à Saúde/organização & administração , Atenção Primária à Saúde/normas , Atenção Primária à Saúde/tendências , Fatores de Risco , Fatores de Tempo , Estados UnidosRESUMO
This article aims to discuss the rapidly growing field of palliative medicine and its unique approach to treating depression in older adults.
Assuntos
Depressão/terapia , Cuidados Paliativos/organização & administração , Assistência Centrada no Paciente/organização & administração , Relações Profissional-Paciente , Espiritualidade , Idoso , Idoso de 80 Anos ou mais , Medicina Baseada em Evidências , Feminino , Idoso Fragilizado/psicologia , Promoção da Saúde/organização & administração , Humanos , Masculino , Terapias Mente-Corpo , Religião e MedicinaRESUMO
OBJECTIVE: To describe an electronic, telephone-delivered, suicide risk management protocol (SRMP) that is designed to guide research staff and safely triage study participants who are at risk for self-harm. METHODS: We tested the SRMP in the context of the NIH-funded randomized clinical trial "Bypassing the Blues" in which 302 patients who had undergone coronary artery bypass graft surgery (CABG) were screened for depression and assessed by telephone 2-weeks following hospital discharge and at 2-, 4-, and 8-month follow-up. We programmed the SRMP to assign different risk levels based on patients' answers from none to imminent with action items for research staff keyed to each of them. We describe frequency of suicidal thinking, SRMP use, and completion of specific steps in the SRMP management process over the 8-month follow-up period. RESULTS: Suicidal ideation was expressed by 74 (25%) of the 302 study participants in 139 (13%) of the 1069 blinded telephone assessments performed by research staff. The SRMP was launched in 103 (10%) of assessments, and the suicidal risk level was classified as moderate or high in 10 (1%) of these assessments, thereby necessitating an immediate evaluation by a study psychiatrist. However, no hospitalizations, emergency room visits, or deaths ascribed to suicidal ideation were discovered during the study period. CONCLUSION: The SRMP was successful in systematically and safely guiding research staff lacking specialty mental health training through the standardized risk assessment and triaging research participants at risk for self-harm. TRIAL REGISTRATION: Clinicaltrials.gov Identifier: NCT00091962 (http://clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/NCT00091962?term=rollman+cabg&rank=1).
Assuntos
Ponte de Artéria Coronária/psicologia , Depressão/diagnóstico , Depressão/etiologia , Ideação Suicida , Prevenção do Suicídio , Feminino , Humanos , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Medição de Risco , Suicídio/psicologiaRESUMO
OBJECTIVE: To identify patient characteristics associated with concordance of Medicare claims with clinically identified depression. METHODS: The authors studied a cohort of 742 older primary care patients linked to Medicare claims data using the Structured Clinical Interview for Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders, Fourth Edition major depressive disorder and clinically significant minor depression. RESULTS: Among 474 patients with depression, 198 patients had a Medicare claim for depression (sensitivity: 42%; 95% confidence interval [CI]: 37%-46%). Among 268 patients who did not meet criteria for depression, 235 patients did not have a Medicare claim for depression (specificity: 88%; 95% CI: 83%-91%). After adjustment for demographic and clinical characteristics, non-white participants were nearly twice as likely not to have Medicare claims for depression among patients who met criteria for depression ("false negatives"). Smoking status, depression severity (Hamilton Depression Rating Scale), cardiovascular disease, and more primary care physician office visits were also significantly associated with decreased odds to be false negatives. In contrast, after covariate adjustment, white race and chronic pulmonary disease were associated with increased odds of a Medicare claim for depression among patients who did not meet criteria for depression ("false positives"). Using weights based on the screened sample, the positive predictive value of a Medicare claim for depression was 66% (95% CI [63%, 69%]), whereas the negative predictive value was 77% (95% CI [76%, 78%]). CONCLUSION: Investigators using Medicare data to study depression must recognize that diagnoses of depression from Medicare data may be biased by patient ethnicity and the presence of medical comorbidity.