Multicentric experience of antegrade thoracic endovascular aortic repair for the treatment of thoracic aortic diseases.

OBJECTIVES: Aim of this multicentre retrospective cohort study is to evaluate technical success, early and late outcomes of thoracic endovascular repair (TEVAR) with grafts deployed upside-down through antegrade access, to treat thoracic aortic diseases. METHODS: Antegrade TEVAR performed between January 2010 and December 2021 have been collected and analyzed. Both elective and urgent procedures were included. Exclusion criteria were endografts deployed into previous or concomitant surgical or endovascular repairs. RESULTS: Fourteen patients were enrolled; 13 males (94%) with mean age of 71 years (IQR 62; 78). Five patients underwent urgent procedures (2 ruptured aortas and 3 symptomatic patients). Indication to treatment were 8 (57%) aneurysms/pseudoaneurysms, 3 (21%) dissections and 3 (21%) penetrating aortic ulcers. Technical success was achieved in all procedures. Early mortality occurred in 4 (28%) cases, all urgent procedures. Median follow-up was 13 months (IQR 1; 44). Late death occurred in 2 (20%) patients, both operated in elective setting. The first died at 19 months due to aortic-related reintervention, the second died at 34 months for a not aortic-related cause. Two patients (14%) underwent aortic-related reintervention for late type I endoleak. Survival rate in elective procedures was 100%, 84% and 67% at 12, 24 and 36 months respectively. Freedom from reintervention was 92%, 56% and 56% at 12, 24 and 36 months respectively. CONCLUSIONS: Antegrade TEVAR can seldomly be considered an alternative when traditional retrograde approach is not feasible. Despite good technical success and low access-site complications, this study demonstrates high rates of late type I endoleak and aortic-related reinterventions.

Inflow Artery Aneurysmal Degeneration After Long Term Native Arteriovenous Fistula for Haemodialysis.

OBJECTIVE: Inflow arterial aneurysms are a rare but serious complication after long term arteriovenous fistulae (AVF), probably due to arterial wall remodelling after an increase in flow and shear stress, and kidney transplantation with immunosuppressive therapy. This study aimed to describe the outcomes of surgical treatment and long term follow up in a large cohort. METHODS: This prospective cohort study collected data from patients with a true inflow artery aneurysm after AVF creation that was surgically repaired between 2010 and 2022. Anastomotic and infected aneurysms or post-puncture pseudoaneurysms were excluded. Demographic data, access characteristics, symptoms, treatment strategies, and long term follow up were recorded; patency was estimated using Kaplan-Meier survival analysis. RESULTS: During the study period, 28 patients (64% men, mean age 60.1 years) were treated surgically for aneurysmal degeneration of the axillary or brachial (n = 23) or radial (n = 5) artery after an AVF (10 distal, 18 proximal) performed a mean of 18.3 ± SD 7.9 years previously. Most AVFs were ligated or thrombosed, while all patients except one had previously received kidney transplants. Most of the cases (n = 18) were symptomatic: 13 with pain or swelling, four with distal embolisation, and one rupture. They were repaired by aneurysm partial excision and graft interposition (11 great saphenous vein, six ipsilateral basilic vein, three cephalic vein, and two PTFE graft), ligation (n = 3), or direct end to end anastomosis (n = 3). No major complications occurred before discharge, after a mean hospital stay of 2.4 days. After a mean follow up of 4.8 ± 3.3 years, three cases presented complications: two recurrent proximal brachial aneurysms were repaired with an additional proximal interposition graft (one with further late infected pseudoaneurysm) and an asymptomatic post-traumatic graft thrombosis. Five year primary and secondary patency was 84% and 96%, respectively. CONCLUSION: Aneurysmal degeneration of the inflow artery is an unusual complication during long term follow up of AVFs. Aneurysm excision and, in general, autogenous graft interposition using the saphenous or ipsilateral arm vein is a safe and effective strategy.

Outcomes After Endovascular Aortic Intervention in Patients With Connective Tissue Disease.

Importance: Endovascular treatment is not recommended for aortic pathologies in patients with connective tissue diseases (CTDs) other than in redo operations and as bridging procedures in emergencies. However, recent developments in endovascular technology may challenge this dogma. Objective: To assess the midterm outcomes of endovascular aortic repair in patients with CTD. Design, Setting, and Participants: For this descriptive retrospective study, data on demographics, interventions, and short-term and midterm outcomes were collected from 18 aortic centers in Europe, Asia, North America, and New Zealand. Patients with CTD who had undergone endovascular aortic repair from 2005 to 2020 were included. Data were analyzed from December 2021 to November 2022. Exposure: All principal endovascular aortic repairs, including redo surgery and complex repairs of the aortic arch and visceral aorta. Main Outcomes and Measures: Short-term and midterm survival, rates of secondary procedures, and conversion to open repair. Results: In total, 171 patients were included: 142 with Marfan syndrome, 17 with Loeys-Dietz syndrome, and 12 with vascular Ehlers-Danlos syndrome (vEDS). Median (IQR) age was 49.9 years (37.9-59.0), and 107 patients (62.6%) were male. One hundred fifty-two (88.9%) were treated for aortic dissections and 19 (11.1%) for degenerative aneurysms. One hundred thirty-six patients (79.5%) had undergone open aortic surgery before the index endovascular repair. In 74 patients (43.3%), arch and/or visceral branches were included in the repair. Primary technical success was achieved in 168 patients (98.2%), and 30-day mortality was 2.9% (5 patients). Survival at 1 and 5 years was 96.2% and 80.6% for Marfan syndrome, 93.8% and 85.2% for Loeys-Dietz syndrome, and 75.0% and 43.8% for vEDS, respectively. After a median (IQR) follow-up of 4.7 years (1.9-9.2), 91 patients (53.2%) had undergone secondary procedures, of which 14 (8.2%) were open conversions. Conclusions and Relevance: This study found that endovascular aortic interventions, including redo procedures and complex repairs of the aortic arch and visceral aorta, in patients with CTD had a high rate of early technical success, low perioperative mortality, and a midterm survival rate comparable with reports of open aortic surgery in patients with CTD. The rate of secondary procedures was high, but few patients required conversion to open repair. Improvements in devices and techniques, as well as ongoing follow-up, may result in endovascular treatment for patients with CTD being included in guideline recommendations.

Position Paper on Young Vascular Surgeons Training of the Mediterranean Federation for the Advancing of Vascular Surgery (MeFAVS): State of the Art and Perspectives.

The Mediterranean Federation for the Advancing of Vascular Surgery (MeFAVS) was founded in 2018, with the aim to promote cooperation among vascular professionals within Mediterranean countries. Due to its prominent social and economic impact on national health systems, diabetic peripheral artery was selected as the very first topic to be investigated by the federation. In this second paper, different experiences from delegates of participating countries were shared to define common strategies to harmonize, standardize, and optimize education and training in the Vascular Surgery specialty.

The Initial Experience on Branched and Fenestrated Endografts in the Aortic Arch. A Systematic Review.

OBJECTIVE: Branched and fenestrated endografts (fEVAR/bEVAR) are complex techniques used to treat thoracic aorta pathologies involving the aortic arch. This systematic review aims to determine all the reported results regarding these techniques in the aortic arch, in order to describe their clinical outcomes. METHODS: A systematic review of the literature was performed, considering all articles published until October 2019. PubMed, Cochrane database resources were used. The protocol of the study was previously registered in the Prospero database (CRD42020147037). Primary exclusion criteria included opinion articles, merely technique descriptions, articles without the follow-up of at least 1 month, studies conducted on animals, mixed treatments, and ongoing trials without published data. Included variables were study design, aortic pathology, type of endovascular technique (fEVAR/bEVAR), endograft manufacturing, number of fenestrations/branches and type of bridge stents. Technical success, complications during surgery and follow-up were also described. RESULTS: From a total of 164 articles, 29 (28 retrospective, 1 prospective) were analyzed with a total of 693 cases (341 fEVAR and 352 bEVAR). The most common indications for repair were aneurysm (54.8%) and dissection (40%). Only fEVAR and bEVAR were considered, but different endograft materials and techniques were used and, therefore, reported upon in the current review. Zenith Alpha Thoracic Endovascular Graft was the most representative (24% of cases). Custom made, off-the-shelf, physician modified and in situ fenestrated endografts were also used in 39%, 22.4%, 18.6% and 18.9% of cases, respectively. Bridge stents were implanted in the 50.5% of cases. Technical success rate was 96%. The main intraoperative complication was the endoleak (5.2%) followed by stroke (4.8%). The in-hospital mortality was 2.5%. The mean follow-up was 18.5 months. The mortality related to the main operation during follow-up was 3.2% and not directly related to the main operation was 11.3%. During the follow-up, 92 cases (13.3%) in total had to undergo through a reintervention, 46.7% with endovascular repair and 26.1% with open surgical repair (the rest were not specified). CONCLUSION: published experience with bEVAR and fEVAR in the aortic arch showed acceptable short-term effectiveness and safety. More well-conducted prospective clinical studies with long term follow-up, combined with comparative meta-analysis, are needed to elucidate the real benefit of those endovascular techniques in the aortic arch pathology.

Total endovascular treatment for thoraco-abdominal aortic aneurysm in a patient with Behçet's disease: Case report and literature review.

INTRODUCTION: To report total endovascular treatment for a rare case of Crawford extent IV thoraco-abdominal aortic aneurysm (TAAA) using custom-designed branched device in a patient with Behçet's disease. METHODS: A 50 years' old man with history of BD was accidentally diagnosed Crawford extent IV TAAA during computed tomography follow-up after left nephrectomy of renal carcinoma. The aneurysm extended from descending aorta to right common iliac artery with a maximum diameter of 6.2 cm. RESULTS: The endovascular procedure wassuccessfully performed using custom-designed branched component to cannulate visceral arteries, bifurcated endograft and iliac legs to exclude the aneurysm sac in abdominal aorta and an iliac branched device to preserve the right internal iliac artery. The patient was discharged without any complication. Computed tomography angiogram at one month after endovascular repair demonstrated total exclusion of the aneurysm, patent visceral branches and right internal iliac artery. No complication occurred to six-month follow-up. CONCLUSION: Endovascular treatment of stable TAAA in patients with Behc?et's disease using custom-designed branched device is feasible, microinvasive and safe. The long-term efficacy needs to be observed.

Surgical Decision Making in Uncomplicated Type B Aortic Dissection: A Survey of Australian/New Zealand and European Surgeons.

OBJECTIVE: There is controversy about the role of pre-emptive thoracic endovascular aortic repair (TEVAR) in uncomplicated type B aortic dissection (TBAD). The aim was to understand expert opinions and the factors influencing decision making. METHODS: In 2018, surgeons from Australia/New Zealand (ANZ) and Europe (EUR) were contacted to participate in an online survey which comprised questions about preferences for pre-emptive TEVAR, followed by five case scenarios, and two ranking questions for anatomical and technical risk factors respectively. Case 1 was designed to favour TEVAR in a hypertensive patient with partial false lumen thrombosis and large diameter (aortic ≥ 40 mm, false lumen ≥ 22 mm). Case 2 had no risk factors mandating TEVAR, according to current evidence. Cases 3, 4, and 5 were designed to test one risk factor respectively, large entry tear on the inner aortic curvature (≥10 mm), partial false lumen thrombosis, and large diameter alone. RESULTS: There were 75 responses, 42 from EUR and 33 from ANZ. Almost half of surgeons (49.3%) endorsed pre-emptive TEVAR with 82.3% preferring to perform TEVAR in the subacute phase. In Case 1 and 5, 58.3% and 52.8% of surgeons respectively chose TEVAR, the highest rates obtained in the survey. Cases 1 and 5 included large diameters ≥40 mm, which were ranked the highest in importance when surgeons considered anatomical risk factors. Surgeons who recommend pre-emptive TEVAR were more likely to choose TEVAR in both Case 1 (83.3% vs. 33.3%, p < .001, 95% CI 27.6%-65.8%) and Case 5 (69.4% vs. 38.2%, p = .008, 95% CI 8.2%-50.0%). CONCLUSION: In this survey about uncomplicated TBAD, about half of surgeons recommended pre-emptive TEVAR in selected cases. The surgeon's predisposition towards intervention and large diameters appear to be the most influential factors in decision making. These findings underline the uncertainty in today's practice and emphasise the need for better predictive tools.

Improved Remodeling With TEVAR and Distal Bare-Metal Stent in Acute Complicated Type B Dissection.

BACKGROUND: The ASSIST (A multicentre Study in Survivors of type B aortic dissection undergoing Stenting) study compared both 1-year outcomes and evolution of true and false lumen (eg, remodeling) in patients with complicated type B aortic dissection subjected to thoracic endovascular aortic repair (TEVAR) with distal true lumen scaffolding by self-expanding nitinol open stent in comparison with TEVAR alone. METHODS: The ASSIST study was a multicenter prospective single-arm study comparing clinical and imaging data from 39 consecutive patients (59.4 ± 13 years of age) who received TEVAR and the JOTEC E-XL open stent with data from matched control subjects treated with TEVAR alone based on 1:1 propensity score matching. Clinical data were collected by an independent Contract Research Organization (CRO) and computed tomography images were subjected to blinded core-lab analysis. RESULTS: There were no differences in baseline demographics, clinical profiles, morphological data, procedural details, and in-hospital and 1-year outcomes between groups. Differences emerged with regard to evolution of both true lumen distal to stent graft, false lumen over the entire length of dissection, and remodeling (P < .001). At 1 year, TEVAR with the E-XL stent revealed false lumen thrombosis at the level of celiac trunk in 53.8% vs 17.9% with TEVAR alone (P = .004). Kaplan-Meier survival analysis indicated favorable clinical outcomes with the additional E-XL stent. CONCLUSIONS: TEVAR for acute complicated type B aortic dissection proved to be safe and promoted remodeling of the stent grafted thoracic aorta. Additional scaffolding of the true lumen distal to TEVAR with a self-expanding stent supported distal true lumen expansion, false lumen regression, and thrombosis, with evidence of improved distal remodeling at 1 year.

Review of serum biomarkers in carotid atherosclerosis.

BACKGROUND: Carotid artery atherosclerotic stenosis is a preventable major cause of stroke, but there is still a need for definition of high-risk plaque in asymptomatic patients who might benefit from interventional therapies. Several image markers are recommended to characterize unstable plaques. The measurement of serum biomarkers is a promising method to assist in decision making, but the lack of robust evidence in the carotid environment burdens their potential as a standard of care. The goal of this review was to offer an updated state-of-the-art study of available serum biomarkers with clinical implications, with focus on those that may predict carotid symptom development. METHODS: The Cochrane Library and MEDLINE databases were searched (all until September 2018) for studies on carotid plaque and serum biomarkers of atherosclerosis. Nonhuman, basic science, and histology studies were excluded, focusing on clinical studies. Selected abstracts were screened to include the most relevant articles on atherosclerotic plaque presence, progression, instability or symptom development. RESULTS: Some well-established biomarkers for coronary disease are not relevant to carotid atherosclerosis and other inflammatory biomarkers, lipids, interleukins, homocysteine, and adipokines may be useful in quantifying carotid disease-related risk. Some serum biomarkers combined with image features may assist vascular specialists in selecting patients at high risk for stroke and in need of intervention. CONCLUSIONS: Prospective studies applying a combination of biomarkers are essential to prove clinical usefulness.

FEVAR/BEVAR have limitations and do not always represent the preferred option for juxtarenal reconstruction.

Following the definition given by the recent ESVS guidelines, juxtarenal abdominal aortic aneurysm (JAAA) is defined as an aneurysm extending up to but not involving the renal arteries, necessitating suprarenal aortic clamping for open surgery, i.e. a short neck (<10 mm). JAAA repair always represents a challenge intervention, either by open or endovascular means, mostly related to the renal arteries involvement. Concerning endovascular repair, different options can be considered. Among them, fenestrated endografts (FEVAR) should be considered as a first option1, due to their reported safety and efficacy. However, when the anatomy is not favorable or when FEVAR devices are not available in an emergency setting for instance, other alternatives can be considered like parallel graft or chimney technique (ChEVAR). Do nothing is the last alternative when medical and anatomical circumstances are absolutely poor. In the following pages, we will review the limitations of FEVAR and branched endografts, the better indications and anatomical conditions for a successful repair with ChEVAR technique and its current clinical results reported in the literature.

Influence of On-Call Vascular Surgery Team and Off-Hour Effect on Survival after Ruptured Abdominal Aortic Aneurysm.

BACKGROUND: Ruptured abdominal aortic aneurysms (rAAAs) represent a life-threatening emergency and carry a high community and in-hospital mortality, despite treatment and protocol advances. Identifying prognostic factors like the presence of on-call vascular surgery teams at first hospital admissions or times of hospital admissions can modify hospital protocols and mechanisms to ameliorate general outcomes. The aim of this study is to analyze the influence of on-call vascular surgery teams and off-hour admissions on survival after rAAAs in Catalonia, Spain. METHODS: We used data from public health official registries (based on registration of the minimum basic data set) to collect diagnosed cases of rAAAs (ICD-9-CM [International Classification of Diseases, Ninth Revision, Clinical Modification] 441.3) between January 2008 and December 2017. Variables included patient comorbidities, aneurysm treatment and type (endovascular treatment: ICD-9-CM 39.7 or open surgery: ICD-9-CM 398.44 and 39.25), in-hospital mortality, initial hospital admissions and transfers, days and times of admission, and final treatment received. We compared intervention rates and mortalities in all samples and operated cases, in patients initially admitted into tertiary vascular centers (with on-call vascular surgery teams) and community centers (without on-call vascular surgery teams), and the "off-hour effect" (night [22:00 hr to 8:00 hr] or weekend admissions [Friday to Sunday]) in mortality and type of surgery (open or endovascular repair). RESULTS: Of 717 patients with rAAAs (92% men), 561 (78.2%) were initially admitted into tertiary vascular centers and 156 (21.8%) into community centers. The rate of operated cases and global mortality was higher when cases were initially admitted into tertiary vascular centers (388, 69.2% vs. 46, 29.5%; P < 0.001 and 63.6% vs. 88.5%, P < 0.001, respectively), but when surgery was performed (excluding palliative nonoperated cases), the postoperative mortality in both groups was comparable (47.4% vs. 60.9%, P = 0.085), in both univariate and multivariate analysis. On the other hand, patients admitted during night hours (210, 29.3%) did not reveal noteworthy differences in the overall mortality (68.6% vs. 69.2%, P = 0.860) or postoperative mortality compared to those admitted during day hours (61.0% vs. 60.4%, P = 0.880). Weekend admissions neither showed worse results (280, 39.1%, admitted during weekend: overall mortality 70.4% vs. 68.2%, P = 0.541 and postoperative mortality 51.2% vs. 47.3%, P = 0.436). No significant dissimilarities were seen either in the use of endovascular or open repair at night (42.2% vs. 46.1%, P = 0.457) or weekend (41.8% vs. 47%, P = 0.287). CONCLUSIONS: Patients with rAAAs initially admitted into tertiary vascular centers have better overall survival rates than those initially admitted into community centers, mainly because of higher rates of rejected cases in community centers. No differences were seen in terms of mortality or type of surgery in the off-hour admitted cases (night hours or during weekends).

The most relevant unmet needs in endovascular management of descending thoracic aorta.

Endovascular repair of descending thoracic aorta (DTA) is considered as first interventional option for most part of the aortic disorders. However, many unmet needs and issues are still limiting its applicability. One of the major limitations is related to the existing gaps in evidence. Clear and robust evidence is still needed in many aspects of the management of DTA pathologies. In numerous clinical scenarios, adequate trials are lacking. Besides those gaps in evidence, it is well recognized that thoracic endografting (TEVAR) is technically evolving in order to overcome technical and device-related complications and limitations. We can deploy endografts in any aortic segment: in the descending, in the ascending, in the arch, even preserving aortic branches. Nevertheless, from the pure technical point of view, current generations of endografts still need more development and improvement. Durability remains the major concern for any endovascular treatment, and thoracic endografting is not an exception. As Galenus said, the physician is only nature's assistant, thoracic endograft should also follow the natural anatomy instead of fighting against it. We will focus the following pages on the graft conformability and compliance, both related to durability and safety of thoracic endografting. We will review the current knowledge and concerns associated with the anatomical and hemodynamic modifications induced by the thoracic endograft strength, stiffness and straightness and their implications for the future thoracic endograft designs.

Vascular access surgery can be safely performed in an ambulatory setting.

INTRODUCTION:: Ambulatory surgery is associated with lower costs, but there is lack of evidence of the safety for ambulatory vascular access surgery. The objective of this study is to substantiate the safety and effectiveness of performing vascular access surgery in an ambulatory setting. METHODS:: A review of our prospectively maintained database including all vascular access open surgeries (creations and repairs) performed by our Vascular Access Unit between 2013 and 2017 was compiled. Patient comorbidities, surgery details, hospital admission conditions, and 1-week and 1-month follow-up patency and complications (death, infection, bleeding, and readmission/reintervention) were scrutinized. RESULTS:: In the last 5 years, 1414 vascular access procedures were performed (67.8% access creations, 32.2% previous access repairs) in 1012 patients. Most surgeries were performed under local anesthesia (59.2%) or axillary plexus block (38.4%) and mainly in an ambulatory setting, without overnight hospital stays (90.9%). During the first postoperative week follow-up, 9 cases (0.6%) needed readmission or reintervention; significant infection materialized in 11 (0.8%) and 10 cases (0.7%) showed noteworthy hematoma or bleeding, only three (0.2%) requiring reintervention. The primary composite endpoint of 24-h death and 1 week readmission, reintervention, infection, or bleeding was 1.9% (27 cases); 1-month access failure was 6.2%. After univariate analysis, ambulatory settings were not related to higher rates of complications or readmissions. CONCLUSION:: Arteriovenous access surgery can be safely performed in an ambulatory setting, in spite of complex cases, comorbidities, or the increasing implementation of axillary plexus blocks. Surgical results and patency are good, and complications necessitating readmission remain very low.

Aortic Curvature Remodeling after Thoracic Endovascular Aortic Repair: Assessing Device Conformability, Using Image Vector Analysis.

BACKGROUND: Aortic arch curvature can be straightened by endograft placement. However, different measurement methods with dissimilar follow-up and endografts have been published. The aim of this study was to corroborate, for the first time, the pliability of the Conformable Gore TAG Thoracic Endoprosthesis (W.L. Gore and Associates, Flagstaff, AZ, USA) into the aortic arch, using different image vector analysis. MATERIAL AND METHODS: We, retrospectively, analyzed patients primarily treated for thoracic aortic aneurysms and blunt traumatic aortic injuries by means of a Conformable Gore TAG Thoracic Endoprosthesis endograft proximally sealed into the aortic arch (zones Z1-Z3) in five different Spanish centers, between 2010 and 2017. The preoperative, one-month and six-month postoperative, computed tomography angiographies (CTAs) were obtained, creating accurate 3D center lumen line and external lumen line from the aortic valve to the renal arteries. Three different image analysis methods were used to compare modifications of the aortic curvature: first, segment analysis (angulations of the center lumen line when divided into seven precise segments, examining anterior-posterior, right-left, and cranial-caudal displacement), second, center lumen line analysis (bending of the center lumen line itself in seven definite points), and third, expected behavior (length of the endograft in the external lumen line). Two independent observers performed a blind analysis of all CTAs. Changes between preoperative and postoperative CTAs at one and six months are compared, and differences are viewed between cases sealed proximally (Z1-Z2) and distally (Z3) into the aortic arch. RESULTS: We analyzed 37 cases. At 1- and 6-month follow-ups, minimal changes occurred first in segment analysis (only a slight decrease of -2.0° in the XY plane at 10 cm from the brachiocephalic trunk at six-month follow-up was seen, P = 0.027). Second, center lumen line analysis again only showed negligible aortic curvature straightening (+3.5° at 10 cm from the brachiocephalic trunk at one month, P = 0.006, disappearing at six-month follow-up). Finally, good device length predictability was shown (interclass correlation coefficients: 0.995 and 0.994 at one and six months, P > 0.001). No differences were seen between cases proximally sealed into the proximal and distal aortic arch. CONCLUSIONS: Conformable Gore TAG Thoracic Endoprosthesis thoracic endograft showed a good pliability into the aortic arch and proximal thoracic aorta, with minimal changes in the aortic curvature after endograft placement in the short-term follow-up (up to six months). In addition, final endograft length into outer aortic curvature is highly predictable.

The best in vitro conditions for two and three parallel stenting during endovascular aneurysm repair.

OBJECTIVE: The aim of this study is to identify which endograft-parallel stent combinations and which degree of oversizing result in the most adequate fit in a juxtarenal abdominal aneurysmal neck, when using a double or triple parallel-stent (chimney) technique. METHODS: In vitro silicon, juxtarenal, abdominal aortic aneurysmal neck models of different diameters, with two and three side-branches (simulating both the renal and superior mesenteric arteries), were constructed. Two different endografts of three diameters each, with two or three parallel stents (of 6 mm and 6 mm; or 6 mm, 6 mm, and 8 mm) were tested (Endurant-II endograft [Medtronic Inc, Santa Rosa, Calif] with balloon-expandable BeGraft stent [Bentley InnoMed, Hechingen, Germany] and an Excluder endograft [W. L. Gore and Associates, Flagstaff, Ariz] with self-expanding Viabahn stent [W. L. Gore and Associates]), applying three endograft-oversizing degrees: recommended (15%), excessive (30%), and over-excessive (40%). After remodeling, using the kissing-balloon technique at 37°C (98.6°F), 36 endograft-stent-oversizing models were scanned by computed tomography. The area of the gutters, parallel-stent compression, and main endograft infolding were recorded. RESULTS: Increasing oversizing (15%, 30%, and 40%) revealed a nonsignificant propensity toward smaller gutters and similar parallel-stent compression, but it significantly augmented infolding, more in three parallel-stent models (0%, 0%, 67% and 0%, 33%, 83% of cases; P = .015 and .018, for two and three parallel-stent models; n = 36) and mainly for the Excluder-Viabahn combination. The Excluder-Viabahn showed significantly smaller gutters, but with higher stent compression, than Endurant-BeGraft combinations for both two and three parallel stents (8.2 mm2, 22.6 mm2; P = .002 and 14.4 mm2, 23.3 mm2; P = .009 gutter area; and 18%, 2%; P < .001 and 15%, 2%; P = .007 relative stent area compression, respectively). CONCLUSIONS: Better endograft stent apposition was usually attained when using 30% oversizing during two and three parallel-stent techniques. Higher oversizing was related to nonsignificant smaller gutters but higher rates of infolding. Smaller gutters, but higher stent compression and risk of infolding, were achieved with the Excluder-Viabahn than with the Endurant-BeGraft combination.

Parallel-Stenting Technique in a Sandwich Configuration for Hypogastric Artery Preservation during Endovascular Aneurysm Repair: An In Vitro Study.

BACKGROUND: The aim of the study was to identify the best conditions in iliac sandwich procedure for hypogastric artery preservation during endovascular aneurysm repair, testing different devices, different oversizing (OS) degrees as well as different methods to measure it. METHODS: Four external iliac devices (16-mm Endurant and 12-mm Aorfix limb extensions; 11- and 13-mm Viabahn endografts) were tested with 2 distinct internal iliac stent grafts (8-mm Advanta V12 and 8-mm Viabahn) inside different proximal silicon iliac limb models (10, 12, 14, 16, and 18 mm), simulating an iliac sandwich procedure for hypogastric preservation. After remodeling all devices in a saline bath at 37°C, the combinations were computed tomography scanned. Gutter size, parallel-stent compression, and inadequate parallel-stent deployment or infolding were recorded. Oversizing between both parallel stents and the iliac limb models were examined in terms of added diameter, perimeter, and area being additionally compared. RESULTS: All three sizing methods (diameter, perimeter, and area) were highly correlated (diameter OS to perimeter and area OS correlation coefficient 0.998 and 0.997, respectively, P < 0.001 for both); thus, diameter OS was used for further comparisons. Increasing diameter OS (< 30%, 30-55%, 55-75%, and > 75%) showed a significant tendency toward smaller gutters (38.9, 12.2, 5.4, and 2.6 mm2, respectively, P < 0.001) but also increasing parallel-stent compression (13.5%, 28.9%, 43.9%, and 55.1%, P < 0.001) and infolding (0%, 0%, 38%, and 60%, P < 0.001). There were no significant differences between the analyzed devices. CONCLUSIONS: In iliac sandwich procedures, better apposition is usually achieved when using 30-55% diameter OS; higher OS is related to smaller gutters but higher rates of malpositioning and parallel-stent compression. No clear recommendations in material selection can be performed. All sizing methods are highly correlated and predictable.

Aortic Arch and Thoracic Aorta Curvature Remodeling after Thoracic Endovascular Aortic Repair.

BACKGROUND: The objective of this study was to analyze the original curvature of the aortic arch and thoracic aorta, and how it is modified after the placement of a thoracic endograft. METHODS: We retrospectively analyzed all patients primarily treated for thoracic aortic aneurysms and blunt traumatic aortic injuries by means of an endograft sealed into the aortic arch (zones, Z1-Z3) in 2 different centers (Vascular Surgery Division, Hospital Clinic, UB; and Vascular and Endovascular Surgery Department, Hospital Vall d'Hebron, UAB; Barcelona, Spain), between 2010 and 2015. The last preoperative and early (1-month) postoperative computed tomography angiography (CTA) was obtained for all cases, and an accurate 3-dimensional (3D) center lumen line was created, from the aortic valve to the renal arteries. Angles in 2-dimensional (2D; XY-plane) and 3D (referred to cranial-caudal Z-axis) were analyzed in: the distal ascending aorta, aortic arch, and thoracic aorta (at 5, 10, 15, and 20 cm from the brachiocephalic trunk [BCT]) and celiac trunk (CT). Changes in preoperative-postoperative CTA were compared independently for both diseases. Thirty-six cases were included (20 aneurysms, 16 blunt traumatic injuries; mean age, 69.5 and 42.5 years). RESULTS: After placement of an aortic endograft (sealed in Z1-Z2 in 30% of aneurysms and 75% of traumatic injuries; mean endograft length: 22.6 cm and 11.3 cm, respectively), a global left anterior displacement of the ascending aorta was observed (2D examination: -13.1° and -7.5°, P = 0.049 and 0.041, respectively). The 3D examination showed an average increase of the aortic angle at 5 and 10 cm from the BCT in the whole sample (+4.0°, +4.9° in reference to the vertical; P = 0.017, 0.001), softening the curvature of the proximal descending thoracic aorta. In addition, in traumatic injuries, a decrease in the aortic arch angle was observed (-3.5°, P = 0.030). CONCLUSIONS: Placement of an endograft into the aortic arch and proximal thoracic aorta engenders a softening of the proximal descending thoracic aorta curvature, increasing its angle from the vertical. In blunt traumatic aortic injuries (with shorter and more proximally sealed endografts), an additional decrease of the aortic arch angle (3.5° more vertical), was observed.

European Multicenter Registry for the Performance of the Chimney/Snorkel Technique in the Treatment of Aortic Arch Pathologic Conditions.

BACKGROUND: To study the performance of the chimney technique in the treatment of aortic arch pathologic conditions. METHODS: We retrospectively evaluated the clinical and procedural outcome data of patients undergoing endovascular treatment in the aortic arch by use of the chimney technique at four European centers between June 2002 and December 2014. The primary endpoint was technical success. The secondary endpoints were type I endoleak, 30-day mortality, stroke, primary patency of the chimney graft, and freedom from reintervention. RESULTS: Ninety-five patients were included in the study. The underlying pathologic conditions were degenerative aneurysm (n = 45, 47.4%), type B aortic dissection (n = 30, 31.6%), dissecting aneurysm (n = 6, 6.5%), penetrating atherosclerotic ulcer (n = 5, 5.3%), type I endoleak after previous thoracic endovascular aortic repair (n = 6, 6.3%), and aortic embolic disease (n = 3, 3.2%). Twenty-one patients (22%) underwent arch-branch debranching before chimney graft implantation. The majority of patients were treated electively (n = 49, 51.6%). Forty-six patients (48.4%) underwent urgent placement of chimney grafts because of their symptoms (n = 25) or rupture (n = 21). Technical success was 89.5%. The 30-day mortality was 9.5% (9 patients). No aorta-related death was observed. A type Ia endoleak occurred in 10 patients (10.5%) intraoperatively, resolving spontaneously within the first 30 days in 50% of these cases. Major stroke was diagnosed in 2 patients (2%). Primary patency of the chimney grafts was 98%, and 5 patients (5.2%) required a reintervention. CONCLUSIONS: The chimney technique in the aortic arch proved highly and predictably successful, with a low rate of reinterventions.