Preoperative prediction of Bleeding Independently associated with Mortality after noncardiac Surgery (BIMS): an international prospective cohort study.

BACKGROUND: Diagnostic criteria for Bleeding Independently associated with Mortality after noncardiac Surgery (BIMS) have been defined as bleeding that leads to a postoperative haemoglobin <70 g L-1, leads to blood transfusion, or is judged to be the direct cause of death. Preoperative prediction guides for BIMS can facilitate informed consent and planning of perioperative care. METHODS: In a prospective cohort study of 16 079 participants aged ≥45 yr having inpatient noncardiac surgery at 12 academic hospitals in eight countries between 2007 and 2011, 17.3% (2782) experienced BIMS. An electronic risk calculator for BIMS was developed and internally validated by logistic regression with bootstrapping, and further simplified to a risk index. Decision curve analysis assessed the potential utility of each prediction guide compared with a strategy of identifying risk of BIMS based on preoperative haemoglobin <120 g L-1. RESULTS: With information about the type of surgery, preoperative haemoglobin, age, sex, functional status, kidney function, history of high-risk coronary artery disease, and active cancer, the risk calculator accurately predicted BIMS (bias-corrected C-statistic, 0.84; 95% confidence interval, 0.837-0.852). A simplified index based on preoperative haemoglobin <120 g L-1, open surgery, and high-risk surgery also predicted BIMS, but less accurately (C-statistic, 0.787; 95% confidence interval, 0.779-0.796). Both prediction guides could improve decision making compared with knowledge of haemoglobin <120 g L-1 alone. CONCLUSIONS: BIMS, defined as bleeding that leads to a postoperative haemoglobin <70 g L-1, leads to blood transfusion, or that is judged to be the direct cause of death, can be predicted by a simple risk index before surgery. CLINICAL TRIAL REGISTRATION: NCT00512109.

Bleeding Independently associated with Mortality after noncardiac Surgery (BIMS): an international prospective cohort study establishing diagnostic criteria and prognostic importance.

BACKGROUND: We aimed to establish diagnostic criteria for bleeding independently associated with mortality after noncardiac surgery (BIMS) defined as bleeding during or within 30 days after noncardiac surgery that is independently associated with mortality within 30 days of surgery, and to estimate the proportion of 30-day postoperative mortality potentially attributable to BIMS. METHODS: This was a prospective cohort study of participants ≥45 yr old having inpatient noncardiac surgery at 12 academic hospitals in eight countries between 2007 and 2011. Cox proportional hazards models evaluated the adjusted relationship between candidate diagnostic criteria for BIMS and all-cause mortality within 30 days of surgery. RESULTS: Of 16 079 participants, 2.0% (315) died and 36.1% (5810) met predefined screening criteria for bleeding. Based on independent association with 30-day mortality, BIMS was identified as bleeding leading to a postoperative haemoglobin <70 g L-1, transfusion of ≥1 unit of red blood cells, or that was judged to be the cause of death. Bleeding independently associated with mortality after noncardiac surgery occurred in 17.3% of patients (2782). Death occurred in 5.8% of patients with BIMS (161/2782), 1.3% (39/3028) who met bleeding screening criteria but not BIMS criteria, and 1.1% (115/10 269) without bleeding. BIMS was associated with mortality (adjusted hazard ratio: 1.87; 95% confidence interval: 1.42-2.47). We estimated the proportion of 30-day postoperative deaths potentially attributable to BIMS to be 20.1-31.9%. CONCLUSIONS: Bleeding independently associated with mortality after noncardiac surgery (BIMS), defined as bleeding that leads to a postoperative haemoglobin <70 g L-1, blood transfusion, or that is judged to be the cause of death, is common and may account for a quarter of deaths after noncardiac surgery. CLINICAL TRIAL REGISTRATION: NCT00512109.

Bleeding impacting mortality after noncardiac surgery: a protocol to establish diagnostic criteria, estimate prognostic importance, and develop and validate a prediction guide in an international prospective cohort study.

INTRODUCTION: Various definitions of bleeding have been used in perioperative studies without systematic assessment of the diagnostic criteria for their independent association with outcomes important to patients. Our proposed definition of bleeding impacting mortality after noncardiac surgery (BIMS) is bleeding that is independently associated with death during or within 30 days after noncardiac surgery. We describe our analysis plan to sequentially 1) establish the diagnostic criteria for BIMS, 2) estimate the independent contribution of BIMS to 30-day mortality and 3) develop and internally validate a clinical prediction guide to estimate patient-specific risk of BIMS. METHODS: In the Vascular Events In Noncardiac Surgery Patients Cohort Evaluation (VISION) study, we prospectively collected bleeding data for 16 079 patients aged 45 years or more who had noncardiac inpatient surgery between 2007 and 2011 at 12 centres in 8 countries across 5 continents. We will include bleeding features independently associated with 30-day mortality in the diagnostic criteria for BIMS. Candidate features will include the need for reoperation due to bleeding, the number of units of erythrocytes transfused, the lowest postoperative hemoglobin concentration, and the absolute and relative decrements in hemoglobin concentration from the preoperative value. We will then estimate the incidence of BIMS and its independent association with 30-day mortality. Last, we will construct and internally validate a clinical prediction guide for BIMS. INTERPRETATION: This study will address an important gap in our knowledge about perioperative bleeding, with implications for the 200 million patients who undergo noncardiac surgery globally every year. Trial registration: ClinicalTrials.gov, no NCT00512109.

Percutaneous left atrial appendage Closure for Thromboembolic Prevention in atrial Fibrillation / Cierre percutáneo de la orejuela izquierda para prevención tromboembólica en fibrilación auricular

Background: Atrial fibrillation (AF) produces a five-fold increase in the risk of stroke, and the exclusion of the left atrial appendage (LAA), the main source of thrombi, is an interesting therapeutic option in patients with contraindication for oral anticoagulation. Objectives: The goal of this study was to evaluate the initial experience, immediate results and outcome at 45 days of percutaneous closure of the LAA in patients with AF and high risk of thromboembolic events, in whom chronic oral anticoagulation was contrain-dicated. Methods: Twenty-two patients with non-valvular AF and a CHA2DS2-Vasc ≥2 in whom there was contraindication or impossibility of long-term oral anticoagulation underwent percutaneous closure of the LAA with the WATCHMANT device. The patients were evaluated 45 days after the procedure by clinical assessment and transesophageal echocardiography. Results: The implant was successful in 21 of 22 patients (95.4%). Median (interquartile range) age and CHA2DS2-VASc and HAS-BLED scores were 76 years (IQR 14.5), 5 (IQR 1.5) and 4 (IQR 1), respectively. Three (13.6%) periprocedural complications were observed: one cardiac tamponade requiring surgery, one concealed major bleeding and one pseudoaneurysm of the femoral artery. No device-related complications or thromboembolic events were observed during the 45-day follow-up. The LAA was adequately excluded in 95% of the cases. Conclusions: In our initial experience, the procedure is feasible, with an acceptable risk, and can be considered a therapeutic option in patients with AF and high thromboembolic risk who cannot receive oral anticoagulation.

Introducción: La fibrilación auricular (FA) incrementa cinco veces el riesgo de accidente cerebrovascular y la orejuela auricular izquierda (OI) es la principal fuente de formación de trombos, por lo que su exclusión se presenta como una alternativa terapéutica interesante en pacientes con contraindicación para la anticoagulación oral. Objetivos: Evaluar la experiencia inicial, los resultados del implante y la evolución a los 45 días del cierre percutáneo de la OI en pacientes con FA de riesgo tromboembólico alto en los cuales no podía emplearse la anticoagulación oral crónica. Material y métodos: Veintidós pacientes con FA no valvular y CHA2DS2-Vasc ≥2 en los que la anticoagulación a largo plazo estaba contraindicada o era impracticable fueron sometidos al cierre percutáneo de la OI con el dispositivo WATCHMAN®. Los pacientes fueron evaluados a los 45 días mediante control clínico y con ecocardiografía transesofágica. Resultados: El implante fue exitoso en 21 de los 22 pacientes (95,4%). Las medianas (rango intercuartil) de edad, CHA2DS2-VASc y HAS-BLED fueron 76 años (RIC 14,5), 5 (RIC 1,5) y 4 (RIC 1), respectivamente. Se observaron 3 (13,6%) complicaciones periprocedimiento: un taponamiento que requirió revisión quirúrgica, un sangrado mayor oculto y un seudoaneurisma femoral. Durante el seguimiento a 45 días no se observaron complicaciones relacionadas con el dispositivo ni eventos tromboembólicos. En el 95% de los casos, la OI se encontraba adecuadamente excluida. Conclusiones: En nuestra experiencia inicial, el procedimiento es factible con un riesgo aceptable, constituyéndose en una alternativa terapéutica en pacientes con FA de riesgo tromboembólico alto que no pueden recibir anticoagulantes orales.

Postoperative low-molecular-weight heparin bridging is associated with an increase in wound hematoma following surgery for pacemakers and implantable defibrillators.

BACKGROUND: The perioperative management of patients receiving oral anticoagulation therapy (OAC) who undergo pacemaker (PM) and defibrillator (ICD) surgery remains controversial. Low-molecular-weight heparin (LMWH) is often used; however, wound hematoma is a common complication. METHODS: At a single academic Canadian center, between July 2003 and June 2005, details of perioperative OAC bridging and the rate of wound hematoma requiring reoperation or interruption of OAC were reviewed for all patients receiving LMWH bridging for PM or ICD surgery. RESULTS: A total of 148 PM/ICD patients underwent perioperative bridging with LMWH. A significant hematoma occurred in 23 patients, requiring reoperation in three patients. No patient died, developed infection, or stroke. The initial bridging regimen included LMWH (enoxaparin 1 mg/kg BID) given until evening prior to surgery, and reinitiated on postoperative day 3. In response to high rates of postoperative hematoma, subsequent protocols omitted the LMWH on the evening before surgery, all postoperative LMWH, or both. The use of LMWH the night before surgery had no effect on hematoma rates (12% vs 17%, P = 0.62); however, the use of any postoperative LMWH increased hematoma rates (23% vs 8%, P = 0.01). Hematoma rates were not increased in patients receiving acetylsalicylic acid (19% vs 16%, P = 0.62) or clopidogrel (25% vs 17%, P = 0.54). In a multivariate analysis, independent predictors of significant wound hematoma included postoperative LMWH (P = 0.001), a higher international normalized ratio on the day of surgery (P = 0.03), and male sex (P = 0.05). CONCLUSION: Elimination of postoperative LMWH was associated with a substantial reduction in hematoma rates following PM and ICD surgery.

Cardiomiopatia hipertrófica e taquiarritmias detectadas por marcapasso / Hypertrophic cardiomyopathy and tachyarrhythmias detected by a pacemaker / Cardiomiopatía hipertrófica y taquiarritmias detectadas por marcapaso

Um homem de 56 anos veio à Clínica de Marcapasso para verificação de rotina de seu marcapasso. Ele havia apresentado um episódio de síncope na semana anterior. O paciente tinha um diagnostico prévio de cardiomiopatia hipertrófica (CMH) não-obstrutiva crônica. Devido a um episódio prévio de síncope e bloqueio infrahisiano 2:1 documentado, um marcapasso permanente de dupla câmara havia sido implantado alguns anos antes. O dispositivo foi verificado, mostrando vários episódios de altas freqüências ventriculares. Uma análise cuidadosa dos eletrogramas intracardíacos armazenados no dispositivo mostrou taquicardia ventricular (TV) com condução ventrículo-atrial 2:1. A seguinte exposição discute o diagnóstico alternativo e o manejo clínico em um diagnóstico não-usual de TV na presença de cardiomiopatia hipertrófica não-obstrutiva.

A 56-year-old man came to the Pacemaker Clinic for his regular pacemaker control. He had experienced a syncopal episode in the previous week. He had a previous diagnosis of non-obstructive hypertrophic cardiomyopathy. Due to a previous syncope and documented 2:1 infrahisian block, a dual-chamber permanent pacemaker had been implanted a few years before. The device was interrogated, showing several ventricular high rate episodes. A careful analysis of the stored intracardiac electrograms showed ventricular tachycardia (VT) with 2:1 ventriculoatrial conduction. The following presentation discusses the alternative diagnosis and clinical management in an unusual diagnosis of VT in the presence of non-obstructive hypertrophic cardiomyopathy.

Un varón de 56 anos vino a la Clínica de Marcapaso para verificación rutinaria de su marcapaso. Él había presentado un episodio de síncopa la semana anterior. El paciente tenía un diagnostico previo de cardiomiopatía hipertrófica (CMH) no obstructiva crónica. Un marcapaso permanente de doble cámara había sido implantado algunos años antes, en virtud de un episodio previo de síncopa y bloqueo infrahisiano documentado 2:1. Se verificó el dispositivo, que presentó varios episodios de altas frecuencias ventriculares. Un análisis cuidadoso de los electrogramas intracardiacos almacenados en el dispositivo reveló taquicardia ventricular (TV) con conducción ventrículo-atrial 2:1. La presente exposición discute el diagnóstico alternativo y el manejo clínico en un diagnóstico no usual de TV en la presencia de cardiomiopatía hipertrófica no obstructiva.

[Real time intracardiac electrograms for the diagnosis of pacemaker malfunction]. / Electrogramas intracardíacos en tiempo real en el diagnóstico de fallas de marcapasos.

Chronic ventricular lead dislodgement is an infrequent complication of pacemaker implantation. Occasionally, the dislodged lead may sense and capture a chamber in which the lead was not originally positioned. Intracardiac real time electrograms and channel markers are useful tools for the diagnosis of pacemaker malfunction. We present the case of a patient with a ventricular lead dislodgement into the atrium. The ventricular lead was able to sense and capture the atrium. Initial diagnosis was performed based on the deductive analysis of intracardiac real time electrograms and channel markers and confirmed by chest X-ray.

Electrogramas intracardíacos en tiempo real en el diagnóstico de fallas de marcapasos / Real time intracardiac electrograms for the diagnosis of pacemaker malfunction

El desplazamiento crónico del catéter ventricular es una complicación infrecuente del implante de marcapasos. Es infrecuente que un catéter desplazado sense y capture en una cámara donde no fue implantado originalmente. Se presenta el caso de un paciente con marcapasos doble cámara en el que el catéter ventricular se desplazó hacia la aurícula derecha. El catéter desplazado permite sensar y capturar la aurícula. El diagnóstico inicial se realizó mediante el análisis deductivo conjunto de los electrogramas en tiempo real y los eventos en los canales de registro ("marker channel"). La radiografía de tórax confirmó el diagnóstico presuntivo.

Chronic ventricular lead dislodgement is an infrequent complication of pacemaker implantation. Occasionally, the dislodged lead may sense and capture a chamber in which the lead was not originally positioned. Intracardiac real time electrograms and channel markers are useful tools for the diagnosis of pacemaker malfunction. We present the case of a patient with a ventricular lead dislodgement into the atrium. The ventricular lead was able to sense and capture the atrium. Initial diagnosis was performed based on the deductive analysis of intracardiac real time electrograms and channel markers and confirmed by chest X-ray.