Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 15 de 15
Filtrar
Mais filtros











Base de dados
Intervalo de ano de publicação
1.
Respir Med ; 219: 107422, 2023.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-37827293

RESUMO

PURPOSE: To investigate the response to Acthar Gel® in patients with moderate to severe sarcoidosis uveitis. METHODS: This is a prospective open-label study that enrolled patients with moderate to severe sarcoidosis uveitis to receive 80 units daily of Acthar Gel for ten days followed by maintenance treatment with 80 units twice weekly. The primary outcome was the proportion of patients meeting at least one of the following variables 1) improved visual acuity, 2) resolution of intraocular inflammation, 3) ability to taper ocular or oral steroids by at least 50% or 4) reduction of cystoid macular edema, with no worsening of any single measure and no need for additional sarcoidosis therapies at 24 weeks. RESULTS: A total of nine patients were enrolled in the study. Four patients completed the full 24-week course of Acthar Gel, and three of these met the primary endpoint. Among the five patients who did not complete the 24-week course of treatment, four discontinued the treatment due to worsening ocular inflammation. One patient discontinued treatment due to severe adverse effects. The most common adverse effects were fluid retention (77%), insomnia (44%), hypertension (44%) and hyperglycemia (44%). CONCLUSIONS: We observed a clinical response to Acthar Gel in some patients with moderate to severe sarcoidosis uveitis, but a substantial proportion either failed to respond or did not tolerate the therapy. These observations may serve as preliminary data for controlled trials of Acthar Gel, but they do not support its role prior to failure of other agents.


Assuntos
Sarcoidose , Uveíte , Humanos , Estudos Prospectivos , Uveíte/tratamento farmacológico , Sarcoidose/complicações , Sarcoidose/tratamento farmacológico , Transtornos da Visão , Inflamação
2.
Eur Respir J ; 61(4)2023 04.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-36549706

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: A genomic classifier for usual interstitial pneumonia (gUIP) has been shown to predict histological UIP with high specificity, increasing diagnostic confidence for idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis (IPF). Whether those with positive gUIP classification exhibit a progressive, IPF-like phenotype remains unknown. METHODS: A pooled, retrospective analysis of patients who underwent clinically indicated diagnostic bronchoscopy with gUIP testing at seven academic medical centres across the USA was performed. We assessed the association between gUIP classification and 18-month progression-free survival (PFS) using Cox proportional hazards regression. PFS was defined as the time from gUIP testing to death from any cause, lung transplant, ≥10% relative decline in forced vital capacity (FVC) or censoring at the time of last available FVC measure. Longitudinal change in FVC was then compared between gUIP classification groups using a joint regression model. RESULTS: Of 238 consecutive patients who underwent gUIP testing, 192 had available follow-up data and were included in the analysis, including 104 with positive gUIP classification and 88 with negative classification. In multivariable analysis, positive gUIP classification was associated with reduced PFS (hazard ratio 1.58, 95% CI 0.86-2.92; p=0.14), but this did not reach statistical significance. Mean annual change in FVC was -101.8 mL (95% CI -142.7- -60.9 mL; p<0.001) for those with positive gUIP classification and -73.2 mL (95% CI -115.2- -31.1 mL; p<0.001) for those with negative classification (difference 28.7 mL, 95% CI -83.2-25.9 mL; p=0.30). CONCLUSIONS: gUIP classification was not associated with differential rates of PFS or longitudinal FVC decline in a multicentre interstitial lung disease cohort undergoing bronchoscopy as part of the diagnostic evaluation.


Assuntos
Fibrose Pulmonar Idiopática , Doenças Pulmonares Intersticiais , Humanos , Pulmão/patologia , Estudos Retrospectivos , Fibrose Pulmonar Idiopática/diagnóstico , Fibrose Pulmonar Idiopática/genética , Doenças Pulmonares Intersticiais/diagnóstico , Doenças Pulmonares Intersticiais/genética , Capacidade Vital , Genômica , Progressão da Doença
3.
Expert Rev Neurother ; 22(8): 695-705, 2022 08.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-35914766

RESUMO

INTRODUCTION: Clinically overt granulomatous involvement of the nervous system (i.e. neurosarcoidosis) can be seen in up to 10% of patients with sarcoidosis. Establishing a diagnosis of neurosarcoidosis is often challenging due to the heterogeneity of clinical presentations that are sometimes nonspecific, and inaccessibility of tissue confirmation. Recommended treatments are based on expert opinions that are derived from clinical experience and limited data from retrospective studies, as data from randomized controlled studies are limited. AREA COVERED: In this article, we comprehensively review all available literature on epidemiology, clinical presentations, diagnosis, treatment, and outcomes of neurosarcoidosis. We also offer our opinions on diagnostic approach and treatment strategy. EXPERT OPINION: Given the invasive nature and the limited sensitivity of biopsy of the nervous system, diagnosis of neurosarcoidosis is usually made when ancillary tests (such as magnetic resonance imaging and cerebrospinal fluid analysis) are compatible, and alternative diagnoses are reasonably excluded in patients with established extraneural sarcoidosis. Several factors must be taken into consideration to formulate the initial treatment strategy, including the extent of the disease, severity, functional impairment, comorbidities, and patient's preference. In addition, treatment regimen of neurosarcoidosis should be formulated with an emphasis on long-term strategy.


Assuntos
Doenças do Sistema Nervoso Central , Sarcoidose , Doenças do Sistema Nervoso Central/tratamento farmacológico , Doenças do Sistema Nervoso Central/terapia , Humanos , Imageamento por Ressonância Magnética , Estudos Retrospectivos , Sarcoidose/tratamento farmacológico , Sarcoidose/terapia
5.
BMC Pulm Med ; 22(1): 215, 2022 Jun 02.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-35655191

RESUMO

RATIONALE: Transbronchial cryobiopsy has been increasingly used to diagnose interstitial lung diseases. However, there is uncertainty regarding its accuracy and risks, mainly due to a paucity of prospective or randomized trials comparing cryobiopsy to surgical biopsy. OBJECTIVES: To evaluate the diagnostic yield and complications of cryobiopsy in patients selected by multidisciplinary discussion. METHODS: This was a prospective cohort from 2017 to 2019. We included consecutive patients with suspected interstitial lung diseases being considered for lung biopsy presented at our multidisciplinary meeting. MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS: Of 112 patients, we recommended no biopsy in 31, transbronchial forceps biopsy in 16, cryobiopsy in 54 and surgical biopsy in 11. By the end of the study, 34 patients had had cryobiopsy and 24 patients, surgical biopsy. Overall pathologic and multidisciplinary diagnostic yield of cryobiopsy was 47.1% and 61.8%, respectively. The yield increased over time for both pathologic (year 1: 28.6%, year 2: 54.5%, year 3: 66.7%, p = 0.161) and multidisciplinary (year 1: 50%, year 2: 63.6%, year 3: 77.8%, p = 0.412) diagnosis. Overall rate of grade 4 bleeding after cryobiopsy was 11.8%. Cryobiopsy required less chest tube placement (11.8% vs 100%, p < 0.001) and less hospitalizations compared to surgical biopsy (26.5% vs 95.7%, p < 0.001), but hospitalized patients had a longer median hospital stay (2 days vs 1 day, p = 0.004). CONCLUSIONS: Diagnostic yield of cryobiopsy increased over time but the overall grade 4 bleeding rate was 11.8%.


Assuntos
Doenças Pulmonares Intersticiais , Biópsia/efeitos adversos , Hemorragia/etiologia , Humanos , Doenças Pulmonares Intersticiais/complicações , Estudos Prospectivos , Instrumentos Cirúrgicos/efeitos adversos
6.
Eur Heart J Case Rep ; 5(6): ytab208, 2021 Jun.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-34189398

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: Cardiac sarcoidosis (CS) is an inflammatory granulomatous process of the myocardium that can be asymptomatic or have several different clinical phenotypes. One of its rarely described presentations consists of hypertrophy of the septal myocardium, similar to hypertrophic cardiomyopathy (HCM). Isolated cardiac sarcoidosis that haemodynamically mimics hypertrophic obstructive cardiomyopathy (HOCM) has been rarely described in the literature. CASE SUMMARY: A 64-year-old Caucasian female previously diagnosed with non-critical aortic stenosis presented with pre-syncope, and echocardiography showed significant obstruction based on left ventricular outflow tract gradients, confirmed by cardiac magnetic resonance (CMR), concerning for a phenocopy of HCM. Septal myectomy was performed and pathology specimen revealed non-caseating granulomata consistent with cardiac sarcoidosis. She was started on oral corticosteroids and initial cardiac fluorodeoxyglucose positron emission tomography (FDG-PET) done after 1 month of treatment was negative. Repeat FDG-PET 15 months later, in the setting of haemodynamic decompensation, demonstrated diffuse FDG uptake in the myocardium without extra-cardiac involvement. DISCUSSION: Our case brings together two entities: isolated cardiac sarcoidosis and its presentation mimicking HOCM, which has been very rarely described in the literature. And it also shows the scenario of surgical pathology diagnosis of sarcoidosis that was not suspected by initial CMR or FDG-PET, despite adequate preparation, only appearing on repeat FDG-PET done 15 months later. Isolated cardiac sarcoidosis should remain a differential diagnosis for any non-ischaemic cardiomyopathy without a clear cause, despite imaging evidence of HCM.

7.
Respir Med ; 171: 106074, 2020 09.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32917351

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: Diagnosis of extra-pulmonary sarcoidosis can be difficult, and a biopsy is usually required. We evaluated the utility of endobronchial ultrasound-transbronchial needle aspiration (EBUS-TBNA) in patients with suspected extra-pulmonary sarcoidosis with thoracic lymph nodes ≤10 mm on chest computed tomography (CT) and no or minimal pulmonary infiltrates. METHODS: The Cleveland Clinic bronchoscopy registry was screened. Patients with thoracic lymph nodes >10 mm on short axis or significant pulmonary infiltrates in the chest CT scan were excluded. Two separate analyses using expert consensus (before and after release of bronchoscopy results) were the reference standard. RESULTS: 15 patients met the inclusion criteria. 40% had suspected ocular, 33% cardiac and 27% neurologic sarcoidosis. Six patients (40%) had EBUS-TBNA compatible with sarcoidosis. When the reference standard was the consensus diagnosis blinded to bronchoscopy results, the sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value and negative predictive value of EBUS-TBNA were 56%, 83%, 83%, and 56% respectively. The combination of a positive EBUS-TBNA and BAL CD4/CD8 improved the specificity from 83 to 100%, but the difference was not statistically significant (p = 0.074). When the reference standard was the consensus diagnosis with the bronchoscopic results, the sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value and negative predictive value of EBUS-TBNA were 75%, 100%, 100%, and 78% respectively. CONCLUSIONS: In patients with suspected extra-pulmonary sarcoidosis, the EBUS-TBNA may be useful in the diagnosis of patients with thoracic lymph nodes ≤10 mm and no or minimal pulmonary infiltrates on chest CT. Larger and prospective studies are needed to validate our findings.


Assuntos
Broncoscopia/métodos , Aspiração por Agulha Fina Guiada por Ultrassom Endoscópico/métodos , Linfonodos/patologia , Sarcoidose Pulmonar/patologia , Adulto , Idoso , Feminino , Humanos , Linfonodos/diagnóstico por imagem , Linfadenopatia , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Sarcoidose Pulmonar/diagnóstico por imagem , Sensibilidade e Especificidade , Tórax , Tomografia Computadorizada por Raios X
8.
Am Heart J ; 223: 106-109, 2020 05.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32240829

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: The diagnosis of cardiac sarcoidosis (CS) is challenging. Because of the current limitations of endomyocardial biopsy as a reference standard, physicians rely on advanced cardiac imaging, multidisciplinary evaluation, and diagnostic criteria to diagnose CS. AIMS: To compare the 3 main available diagnostic criteria in patients clinically judged to have CS. METHODS: We prospectively included patients clinically judged to have CS by a multidisciplinary sarcoidosis team from November 2016 to October 2017. We included only incident cases (diagnosis of CS within 1 year of inclusion). We applied retrospectively the following diagnostic criteria: the World Association of Sarcoidosis and Other Granulomatous Diseases (WASOG), the Heart Rhythm Society (HRS), and the Japanese Circulation Society (JCS) 2016 criteria. RESULTS: We identified 69 patients. Diagnostic criteria classified patients as follows: WASOG as highly probable (1.4%), probable (52.2%), possible (0%), some criteria (40.6%), and no criteria (5.8%); HRS as histological diagnosis (1.4%), probable (52.2%), some criteria (40.6%), and no criteria (5.8%); JCS as histological diagnosis (1.4%), clinical diagnosis (58%), some criteria (39.1%), and no criteria (1.4%). Concordance was high between WASOG and HRS (κ = 1) but low between JCS and the others (κ = 0.326). CONCLUSIONS: A high proportion of patients clinically judged to have CS are unable to be classified according to the 3 main diagnostic criteria. There is low concordance between JCS criteria and the other 2 criteria (WASOG and HRS).


Assuntos
Cardiomiopatias/diagnóstico , Sarcoidose/diagnóstico , Adulto , Técnicas de Diagnóstico Cardiovascular , Feminino , Humanos , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Estudos Retrospectivos
9.
Am J Respir Crit Care Med ; 201(8): 955-964, 2020 04 15.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-31825646

RESUMO

Rationale: Socioeconomic factors are associated with worse disease severity at presentation in sarcoidosis, but the relative importance of socioeconomic variables on morbidity and disease burden has not been fully elucidated.Objectives: To determine the association between income and sarcoidosis outcomes after controlling for socioeconomic and disease-related factors.Methods: Using the Sarcoidosis Advanced Registry for Cures database, we analyzed data from 2,318 patients with sarcoidosis in the United States to determine the effect of income and other variables on outcomes. We divided comorbidities arising after diagnosis into those likely related to steroid use and those likely related to sarcoidosis. We assessed the development of health-related, functional, and socioeconomic outcomes following the diagnosis of sarcoidosis.Measurements and Main Results: In multivariate analysis, low-income patients had significantly higher rates of new sarcoidosis-related comorbidities (<$35,000, odds ratio [OR], 2.4 [1.7-3.3]; $35,000-84,999, OR, 1.4 [1.1-1.9]; and ≥$85,000 [reference (Ref)]) and new steroid-related comorbidities (<$35,000, OR, 1.3 [0.9-2.0]; $35,000-84,999, OR, 1.5 [1.1-2.1]; and ≥$85,000 [Ref]), had lower health-related quality of life as assessed by the Sarcoidosis Health Questionnaire (P < 0.001), and experienced more impact on family finances (<$35,000, OR, 7.9 [4.9-12.7]; $35,000-84,999, OR, 2.7 [1.9-3.9]; and ≥$85,000 [Ref]). The use of supplemental oxygen, need for assistive devices, and job loss were more common in lower income patients. Development of comorbidities after diagnosis of sarcoidosis occurred in 63% of patients and were strong independent predictors of poor outcomes. In random forest modeling, income was consistently a leading predictor of outcome.Conclusions: These results suggest the burden from sarcoidosis preferentially impacts the economically disadvantaged.


Assuntos
Efeitos Psicossociais da Doença , Hospitalização/estatística & dados numéricos , Renda/estatística & dados numéricos , Oxigenoterapia/estatística & dados numéricos , Qualidade de Vida , Sarcoidose/fisiopatologia , Desemprego/estatística & dados numéricos , Adulto , Negro ou Afro-Americano , Cardiomiopatias/epidemiologia , Doenças do Sistema Nervoso Central/epidemiologia , Dor Crônica/epidemiologia , Comorbidade , Depressão/epidemiologia , Síndrome de Fadiga Crônica/epidemiologia , Feminino , Glucocorticoides/uso terapêutico , Humanos , Hipertensão/epidemiologia , Modelos Logísticos , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Limitação da Mobilidade , Análise Multivariada , Obesidade/epidemiologia , Razão de Chances , Pobreza , Fatores de Risco , Sarcoidose/tratamento farmacológico , Sarcoidose/epidemiologia , Tecnologia Assistiva/estatística & dados numéricos , Apneia Obstrutiva do Sono/epidemiologia , Transtornos do Sono-Vigília/epidemiologia , Fatores Socioeconômicos , Estados Unidos/epidemiologia , População Branca
10.
Ann Am Thorac Soc ; 16(11): 1341-1350, 2019 11.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-31322914

RESUMO

Increasing awareness of cardiac manifestations of sarcoidosis and the widespread availability of advanced imaging tests have led to a tidal wave of interest in a condition that was once considered rare. In this Focused Review, we explore important clinical questions that may confront specialists faced with possible cardiac involvement. In the absence of an ideal reference standard, three main sets of clinical criteria exist: the Japanese Ministry of Health and Welfare, the Heart Rhythm Society, and the World Association for Sarcoidosis and Other Granulomatous Disorders criteria. Once cardiac sarcoidosis is suspected, clinicians should be familiar with the prevalence of the disease in different clinical scenarios. Before obtaining advanced cardiac imaging, electrocardiogram, ambulatory electrocardiogram, echocardiogram, and B-type natriuretic peptide may be useful. The available therapies for cardiac sarcoidosis include immunosuppression, antiarrhythmic medications, heart failure medications, device therapy, ablation therapy, and heart transplantation. Contemporary data suggest that long-term survival in cardiac sarcoidosis is better than previously believed. There is no randomized controlled trial demonstrating benefits of screening, but screening is recommended based on observational data.


Assuntos
Cardiomiopatias/diagnóstico , Cardiomiopatias/terapia , Sarcoidose/diagnóstico , Sarcoidose/terapia , Biomarcadores/análise , Técnicas de Imagem Cardíaca , Ablação por Cateter , Desfibriladores Implantáveis , Eletrocardiografia , Glucocorticoides/uso terapêutico , Coração/diagnóstico por imagem , Transplante de Coração , Humanos , Imunossupressores/uso terapêutico , Marca-Passo Artificial , Taquicardia Ventricular/etiologia , Taquicardia Ventricular/cirurgia
SELEÇÃO DE REFERÊNCIAS
DETALHE DA PESQUISA