REAL WORLD STUDY COMPARING PHAKIC VERSUS PSEUDOPHAKIC EYES IN DIABETIC MACULAR EDEMA TREATED WITH DEXAMETHASONE IMPLANT: The PHAKIDEX Study.

PURPOSE: Dexamethasone implant (DEX-implant) is one treatment choice in diabetic macular edema. However, steroid-induced cataract is a common complication when treating a chronic disease and could lead to vision loss. Because of the lack of studies specifically focused on the functional outcomes according to the lens status, the authors therefore aim to analyze the effectiveness and safety of DEX-implant treatment for diabetic macular edema in phakic versus pseudophakic eyes. METHODS: This multicenter, retrospective study conducted in France included eyes of consecutive patients who had received a DEX-implant for diabetic macular edema. RESULTS: A total of 328 eyes were included: 158 eyes (48.2%) were phakic, 167 eyes (50.9%) were pseudophakic and three were unknown. According to the lens status, mean change in best-corrected visual acuity from baseline was never significantly different between phakic and pseudophakic eyes (likelihood ratio test, P = 0.09) nor in the change in central macular thickness (likelihood ratio test, P = 0.79) in multivariate analysis. Cataract surgery was performed in 63 phakic eyes (39.9%) during the study period with a mean delay of 8.1 months (CI95% [6.59-9.69]). The mean change in best-corrected visual acuity between phakic eyes who underwent cataract surgery and those who did not, was not significantly different during the follow-up at each visit. The risk of ocular hypertension was not statistically different between phakic and pseudophakic subsets ( P = 0.9). CONCLUSION: The authors showed here that phakic eyes treated with DEX-implant for diabetic macular edema did not have a significant difference in visual gain in comparison to pseudophakic eyes, with a comparable safety profile.

[Cancer diagnosis disclosure and supportive care seen from the patient side. A cross sectional multicentre survey]. / Étude transversale, multicentrique, sur le ressenti des patients concernant le dispositif d'annonce du diagnostic de cancer.

The objective of this study was to describe patients' experience during cancer disclosure and initial carers' support phase, in three healthcare facilities in Haute-Savoie District, France. METHODOLOGY: We conducted a multicentric, cross-sectional telephone survey. Patients registered on the multidisciplinary cancer consultation platform lists were randomised. Practitioners validated the inclusion criteria of their patients, i.e. age over 18, patient fully informed of his/her diagnosis and able to answer a telephone interview. RESULTS: Two hundred thirty-six patients have been included. Outcome indicators reported as satisfactory were: the general setting of the disclosure consultation, the patient-doctor relationship, the coordination between the different carers and the patient carer relationship. The overall duration of the medical disclosure consultation and the time dedicated to explain the treatment and its adverse effects have been considered as insufficient. DISCUSSION: The measured indicators, which were by essence subjective, convey useful information on the quality of care in cancer treatment in the initial disclosure phase, as experienced by patients. This study has in particular allowed carers to start exploring ways to improve the experience of care of their patients.

Patient exposure to X-rays during coronary angiography and percutaneous transluminal coronary intervention: results of a multicenter national survey.

OBJECTIVES: To evaluate practices for the protection from radiation of patients during coronary angiography (CA) and percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI), and to update reference values for the main radiation dose parameters. BACKGROUND: Few multicenter data from large populations exist on radiation doses to patients during CA and PCI. METHODS: RAY'ACT is a multicenter, nationwide French survey, with retrospective analysis of radiation parameters routinely registered in professional software from 33,937 CAs and 27,826 PCIs performed at 44 centers from January 1, through December 31, 2010. RESULTS: Kerma-area product (KAP) was registered in 91.7% (44/48) of centers and in 91.5% of procedures for CA (median, 27.2 Gy·cm(2) , interquartile range [IQR], 15.5-45.2) and 91.1% for PCI (median, 56.8 Gy·cm(2) , IQR, 32.8-94.6). Fluoroscopy time was registered in 87.5% (42/48) of centers and in 83.1% of procedures (median, 3.7 min, IQR, 2.3-6.3 for CA; 10.3 min, 6.7-16.2 for PCI). Variability across centers was high. Old equipment and routine left ventriculography were more common and number of registered frames and frame rate were higher in centers delivering high doses. The radial route was associated with lower doses than the femoral route (median KAP 26.8 Gy·cm(2) [15.1-44.25] vs. 28.1 [16.4-46.9] for CA, respectively; and 55.6 Gy·cm(2) [32.2-92.1] vs. 59.4 [24.6-99.9] for PCI, respectively; P < 0.01). CONCLUSIONS: This survey showed a very high rate of compliance with dose registration during CA and PCI in French nonacademic hospitals. Updated diagnostic reference values are established for the main dose parameters (KAP, 45 Gy·cm(2) for CA, 95 Gy·cm(2) for PCI).