Laparoscopic versus open liver resection for hepatocellular carcinoma in elderly patients: a propensity score matching analysis.

BACKGROUND: Surgical resection is a first-line curative option for hepatocellular carcinoma, but its role is still unclear in elderly patients. The aim of our study was to compare short- and long-term outcomes of laparoscopic and open liver resection in elderly patients with hepatocellular carcinoma. METHODS: The study included 665 consecutive hepatocellular carcinoma liver resection cases in patients with ≥70 years of age treated in eight European hospital centres. Patients were divided into laparoscopic and open liver resection groups. Perioperative and long-term outcomes were compared between these groups. RESULTS: After a 1:1 propensity score matching, 219 patients were included in each group. Clavien-Dindo grades III/IV (6 vs. 20%, p = 0.04) were lower in the laparoscopic than in the open matched group. Hospital stay was shorter in the laparoscopic than in the open matched group (5 vs. 7 days, p < 0.001). There were no significant differences between laparoscopic and open groups regarding overall survival and disease-free survival at 1-, 3- and 5- year periods. CONCLUSION: Laparoscopic liver resection for hepatocellular carcinoma is associated with good short-term outcomes in patients with ≥70 years of age compared to open liver resection. Laparoscopic liver resection is safe and feasible in elderly patients with hepatocellular carcinoma.

The Role of Laparoscopic Surgery in Localized Pancreatic Neuroendocrine Tumours.

OPINION STATEMENT: Pancreatic neuroendocrine tumours (PNETs) are a rare and heterogeneous group of tumours with various clinical manifestations and biological behaviours. They represent approximately 2-4% of all pancreatic tumours, with an incidence of 2-3 cases per million people. PNETs are classified clinically as non-functional or functional, and pancreatic resection is recommended for lesions greater than 2 cm. The surgical approach can involve "typical" and "atypical" resections depending on the number, size and location of the tumour. Typical resections include pancreaticoduodenectomy, distal pancreatectomy enucleation and, rarely, total pancreatectomy. Atypical resections comprise central pancreatectomies or enucleations. Minimally invasive pancreatic resection has been proven to be technically feasible and safe in high-volume and specialized centres with highly skilled laparoscopic surgeons, with consolidated benefits for patients in the postoperative course. However, open and minimally invasive pancreatic surgery remains to have a high rate of complications; there is no specific technical contraindication to minimally invasive pancreatic surgery, but an appropriate patient selection is crucial to obtain satisfactory clinical and oncological outcomes.

Laparoscopic vs. open mesorectal excision for rectal cancer: Are these approaches still comparable? A systematic review and meta-analysis.

BACKGROUND: To analyze pathologic and perioperative outcomes of laparoscopic vs. open resections for rectal cancer performed over the last 10 years. METHODS: A systematic literature search of the following databases was conducted: Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials, MEDLINE (through PubMed), EMBASE, and Scopus. Only articles published in English from January 1, 2008 to December 31, 2018 (i.e. the last 10 years), which met inclusion criteria were considered. The review only included articles which compared Laparoscopic rectal resection (LRR) and Open Rectal Resection (ORR) for rectal cancer and reported at least one of the outcomes of interest. The analyses followed the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-analysis (PRISMA) statement checklist. Only prospective randomized studies were considered. The body of evidence emerging from this study was evaluated using the Grading of Recommendations Assessment Development and Evaluation (GRADE) system. Outcome measures (mean and median values, standard deviations, and interquartile ranges) were extracted for each surgical treatment. Pooled estimates of the mean differences were calculated using random effects models to consider potential inter-study heterogeneity and to adopt a more conservative approach. The pooled effect was considered significant if p <0.05. RESULTS: Five clinical trials were found eligible for the analyses. A positive involvement of CRM was found in 49 LRRs (8.5%) out of 574 patients and in 30 ORRs out of 557 patients (5.4%) RR was 1.55 (95% CI, 0.99-2.41; p = 0.05) with no heterogeneity (I2 = 0%). Incorrect mesorectal excision was observed in 56 out of 507 (11%) patients who underwent LRR and in 41 (8.4%) out of 484 patients who underwent ORR; RR was 1.30 (95% CI, 0.89-1.91; p = 0.18) with no heterogeneity (I2 = 0%). Regarding other pathologic outcomes, no significant difference between LRR and ORR was observed in the number of lymph nodes harvested or concerning the distance to the distal margin. As expected, a significant difference was found in the operating time for ORR with a mean difference of 41.99 (95% CI, 24.18, 59.81; p <0.00001; heterogeneity: I2 = 25%). However, no difference was found for blood loss. Additionally, no significant differences were found in postoperative outcomes such as postoperative hospital stay and postoperative complications. The overall quality of the evidence was rated as high. CONCLUSION: Despite the spread of laparoscopy with dedicated surgeons and the development of even more precise surgical tools and technologies, the pathological results of laparoscopic surgery are still comparable to those of open ones. Additionally, concerning the pathological data (and particularly CRM), open surgery guarantees better results as compared to laparoscopic surgery. These results must be a starting point for future evaluations which consider the association between ''successful resection" and long-term oncologic outcomes. The introduction of other minimally invasive techniques for rectal cancer surgery, such as robotic resection or transanal TME (taTME), has revealed new scenarios and made open and even laparoscopic surgery obsolete.

Doege-Potter syndrome by malignant solitary fibrous tumor of the liver: A case report and review of literature.

BACKGROUND: Solitary fibrous tumor of the liver (SFTL) is a rare occurrence with a low number of cases reported in literature. SFTL is usually benign but, 10%-20% cases are reported to be malignant with a tendency to metastasize. The majority of malignant SFTL cases are associated with a paraneoplastic hypoglycaemia defined as Doege-Potter syndrome. Surgery is the best therapeutic treatment, however, long- life follow-up is recommended. CASE SUMMARY: A 74-year-old man, was admitted to the emergency department after a syncopal episode with detection of hypoglycaemia resistant to medical treatment. The computed tomography revealed a solid mass measuring 15 cm of the left liver. An open left hepatectomy was performed with complete resection of tumor. Histopathological analyses confirmed a malignant SFTL. CONCLUSION: Large series with long-term follow-up have not been published neither have clinical trials been undertaken. Consequently, the methodical long-term follow-up of surgically treated SFTLs is strongly recommended.

Jaw bones regeneration using mesenchymal stem cells. A single-center experience.

PURPOSE: Mesenchymal stem cells (MSC), which are multipotent stromal cells, are considered to be a promising resource in tissue engineering and tissue regeneration. MSCs have been used to generate new maxillary bone with clinically successful results. The aim of this study was to determine the role of MSC in bone regeneration procedures in patients with benign maxillary lesions. METHODS: A study was conducted on five patients treated for maxillary bone defects resulting from biopsy of benign lesions at the University Hospital of Magna Græcia, Catanzaro, Italy from January 2015 to October 2016. MSC from autologous bone marrow were used for bone regeneration. The bone mineral density was compared, using the Hounsfield scale, before and after treatment. Follow-up was monthly for six months, and the patients underwent a computed tomography scan of the maxilla at 6 months. RESULTS: Five patients, who underwent biopsy of osteolytic odontogenic benign tumors, were included in the study. There were no intraoperative or postoperative complications. The mean volume of the newly formed bone was 2.44cm3 (range 2,0-3,1) and the mean bone density was 1137 Hounsfield Units (range 898-1355). CONCLUSIONS: Bone regeneration with MSC from autologous bone marrow appears to be a valid treatment option for maxillary bone defects. KEY WORDS: Bone regeneration, Mesenchymal stem cells, BM-MSC, Upper jaw, Mandible.

A case of symmetrical lipomatosis of the tongue presenting as macroglossia.

UNLABELLED: Lipomas are the most common benign soft tissue mesenchymal tumours composed of mature adipose tissue. They are uncommon in the oral and maxillofacial regions, with 15-20 % of cases involving the head and neck region and less than 5% of all benign oral lesions. Multiple symmetric lipomatosis is rare and characterized by diffuse growth and nonencapsulated lipomas. It is usually found in the posterior neck and upper trunk and they are relatively infrequent on the oral and maxillofacial regions like Madelung disease. In the report, we describe a rare case of symmetrical lipomatosis of tongue with OSAS and Dysartria. This lesions were resected under general anesthesia. Intraoperative findings revealed only adipose tissues with replacement of lingual muscles and no capsulation. The lesion was finally diagnosed as symmetric lipomatosis of the tongue based on clinical radiological and histologic examination. SLT (Symmetrical lipomatosis of the tongue) is an extremely rare case that appears like a macroglossia. Partial glossectomy is the treatment of choice because of the improvement of symptoms and the low rate of recurrence. KEY WORDS: Macroglossia, Oral lipoma, Tongue lipomatosis.

Identification of prognosis-related proteins in gingival squamous cell carcinoma by twodimensional gel electrophoresis and mass spectrometry-based proteomics.

OBJECTIVES: The aim of this study was to identify differentially expressed proteins in oral squamous carcinoma cells that could be potential prognosis-related cancer biomarkers. MATERIALS AND METHODS: We compared protein expression patterns from gingival squamous cellc carcinoma (GSCC) tissues and adjacent non-cancerous matched tissues by proteomic analysis using two-dimensional gel electrophoresis coupled to mass spectrometry (2D-PAGE/MS). RESULTS: Seventeen protein spots were found to be over-expressed and eight were under-expressed in cancerous tissue compared to the normal counterpart. Of these, annexin A2 and ezrin were validated by Western blot. We also demonstrated by immunohistochemistry that POSTN is highly expressed in the neoplastic tissues examined. Among the differentially expressed proteins, we focused our attention on Chloride intracellular channel 1 (CLIC1). CONCLUSION: The 2D-PAGE/MS-based proteomics appears an efficient approach in detecting and identifying differentially expressed proteins that might function as potential biomarkers and/or molecular targets for early cancer diagnosis and prognosis and that might contribute to a innovative therapeutic strategies in GSCC. However, further validation and functional studies are needed to confirm and to support these promising, still preliminary data. KEY WORDS: Cancer biomarkers, Oral squamous cell carcinoma, Proteomics.

Gardner's syndrome: a clinical and genetic study of a family.

OBJECTIVE: Gardner syndrome (GS) is an autosomal dominant genetic disorder with almost complete penetrance (80%) and variable expression. GS is a variant of familial adenomatous polyposis and characterized by extracolonic manifestations including osteomas and soft tissue tumors (desmoid tumors, epidermoid cysts). We describe clinical and surgical approaches in a family in which the genetic disorder was diagnosed in 3 generations. STUDY DESIGN: The studied family underwent clinical history and instrumental and genomic studies. Two members of this family, affected with GS, underwent surgery for skeletal osteomas. RESULTS: The patients that we treated with clinical-instrumental monitoring for a period of 5 years had no major disturbances of the stomatognathic system and no clinical signs of pathology of the gastrointestinal tract, eyes, or endocrine systems. CONCLUSIONS: The orofacial complex disorders are exclusively functional and esthetic, concerning primarily the stomatognathic system. We had no cases of malignant transformation of osteomatosis lesions. Clinical sequelae are manly facial eumorphy and occlusion problems of the temporomandibular joint.