Evaluation of acoustic-thermal simulations of in vivo magnetic resonance guided focused ultrasound ablative therapy.

PURPOSE: To evaluate numerical simulations of focused ultrasound (FUS) with a rabbit model, comparing simulated heating characteristics with magnetic resonance temperature imaging (MRTI) data collected during in vivo treatment. METHODS: A rabbit model was treated with FUS sonications in the biceps femoris with 3D MRTI collected. Acoustic and thermal properties of the rabbit muscle were determined experimentally. Numerical models of the rabbits were created, and tissue-type-specific properties were assigned. FUS simulations were performed using both the hybrid angular spectrum (HAS) method and k-Wave. Simulated power deposition patterns were converted to temperature maps using a Pennes' bioheat equation-based thermal solver. Agreement of pressure between the simulation techniques and temperature between the simulation and experimental heating was evaluated. Contributions of scattering and absorption attenuation were considered. RESULTS: Simulated peak pressures derived using the HAS method exceeded the simulated peak pressures from k-Wave by 1.6 ± 2.7%. The location and FWHM of the peak pressure calculated from HAS and k-Wave showed good agreement. When muscle acoustic absorption value in the simulations was adjusted to approximately 54% of the measured attenuation, the average root-mean-squared error between simulated and experimental spatial-average temperature profiles was 0.046 ± 0.019 °C/W. Mean distance between simulated and experimental COTMs was 3.25 ± 1.37 mm. Transverse FWHMs of simulated sonications were smaller than in in vivo sonications. Longitudinal FWHMs were similar. CONCLUSIONS: Presented results demonstrate agreement between HAS and k-Wave simulations and that FUS simulations can accurately predict focal position and heating for in vivo applications in soft tissue.

Vitamin D associates with improved quality of life in participants with irritable bowel syndrome: outcomes from a pilot trial.

BACKGROUND: Vitamin D deficiency has been associated or implicated with the pathophysiology of the gastrointestinal conditions inflammatory bowel disease and colorectal cancer, as well as with depression. No trials or epidemiology studies to date have investigated a link with irritable bowel syndrome (IBS). A single case report has suggested a benefit in IBS of vitamin D supplementation. We hypothesised that IBS participants with vitamin D insufficiency would benefit from repletion in terms of their IBS symptoms. We undertook a pilot trial to provide data to support a power calculation and to justify a full trial. METHODS: This was a randomised, double blinded, three-arm parallel design trial of vitamin D, placebo or a combination of vitamin D and probiotics. Participants were further stratified according to whether they were vitamin D replete or insufficient. Vitamin D status was determined by blood test at baseline and exit; IBS symptoms were assessed by validated questionnaire; dietary intakes were assessed by food frequency questionnaire. RESULTS: A significant proportion of the IBS population were vitamin D deficient, such that the replete stratum could not be adequately recruited. There was a significant association in the baseline data between circulating vitamin D level and quality of life ("How much has IBS affected your life?"). Supplementation significantly improved vitamin D level versus placebo. IBS symptoms were not significantly improved in this pilot, although a power calculation was enabled from the intervention data. CONCLUSIONS: The IBS population exhibits significant levels of vitamin D insufficiency and would benefit from screening and possible supplementation. The impact of IBS on quality of life may be reduced by vitamin D level. Future trials should have a sample size of over 97. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER: ICTRN 6116003917.