Maintaining success, reducing treatment burden, focusing on survivorship: highlights from the third European consensus conference on diagnosis and treatment of germ-cell cancer.

In November 2011, the Third European Consensus Conference on Diagnosis and Treatment of Germ-Cell Cancer (GCC) was held in Berlin, Germany. This third conference followed similar meetings in 2003 (Essen, Germany) and 2006 (Amsterdam, The Netherlands) [Schmoll H-J, Souchon R, Krege S et al. European consensus on diagnosis and treatment of germ-cell cancer: a report of the European Germ-Cell Cancer Consensus Group (EGCCCG). Ann Oncol 2004; 15: 1377-1399; Krege S, Beyer J, Souchon R et al. European consensus conference on diagnosis and treatment of germ-cell cancer: a report of the second meeting of the European Germ-Cell Cancer Consensus group (EGCCCG): part I. Eur Urol 2008; 53: 478-496; Krege S, Beyer J, Souchon R et al. European consensus conference on diagnosis and treatment of germ-cell cancer: a report of the second meeting of the European Germ-Cell Cancer Consensus group (EGCCCG): part II. Eur Urol 2008; 53: 497-513]. A panel of 56 of 60 invited GCC experts from all across Europe discussed all aspects on diagnosis and treatment of GCC, with a particular focus on acute and late toxic effects as well as on survivorship issues. The panel consisted of oncologists, urologic surgeons, radiooncologists, pathologists and basic scientists, who are all actively involved in care of GCC patients. Panelists were chosen based on the publication activity in recent years. Before the meeting, panelists were asked to review the literature published since 2006 in 20 major areas concerning all aspects of diagnosis, treatment and follow-up of GCC patients, and to prepare an updated version of the previous recommendations to be discussed at the conference. In addition, ∼50 E-vote questions were drafted and presented at the conference to address the most controversial areas for a poll of expert opinions. Here, we present the main recommendations and controversies of this meeting. The votes of the panelists are added as online supplements.

Defective motion processing in children with cerebral visual impairment due to periventricular white matter damage.

AIM: We sought to characterize visual motion processing in children with cerebral visual impairment (CVI) due to periventricular white matter damage caused by either hydrocephalus (eight individuals) or periventricular leukomalacia (PVL) associated with prematurity (11 individuals). METHOD: Using steady-state visually evoked potentials (ssVEP), we measured cortical activity related to motion processing for two distinct types of visual stimuli: 'local' motion patterns thought to activate mainly primary visual cortex (V1), and 'global' or coherent patterns thought to activate higher cortical visual association areas (V3, V5, etc.). We studied three groups of children: (1) 19 children with CVI (mean age 9y 6mo [SD 3y 8mo]; 9 male; 10 female); (2) 40 neurologically and visually normal comparison children (mean age 9y 6mo [SD 3y 1mo]; 18 male; 22 female); and (3) because strabismus and amblyopia are common in children with CVI, a group of 41 children without neurological problems who had visual deficits due to amblyopia and/or strabismus (mean age 7y 8mo [SD 2y 8mo]; 28 male; 13 female). RESULTS: We found that the processing of global as opposed to local motion was preferentially impaired in individuals with CVI, especially for slower target velocities (p=0.028). INTERPRETATION: Motion processing is impaired in children with CVI. ssVEP may provide useful and objective information about the development of higher visual function in children at risk for CVI.

High-dose chemotherapy (HDCT) as second-salvage treatment in patients with multiple relapsed or refractory germ-cell tumors.

BACKGROUND: Survival after high-dose chemotherapy (HDCT) as second-salvage treatment (SST) in multiple relapsed germ-cell tumors (GCTs). PATIENTS AND METHODS: Existing databases in Berlin and Marburg of HDCT trials from 1989 to 2008 were retrospectively screened. Among 534 patients, 71 of 534 (13%) patients were scheduled for HDCT having failed previous conventional-dose first-line and first-salvage chemotherapy regimens; those 49 patients who had received at least cisplatin plus etoposide first-line as well as conventional-dose cisplatin-based first-salvage regimens and were diagnosed after 1 January 1990 were further analyzed. RESULTS: Median age at SST was 32 years (range 19-52 years). Median follow-up for surviving patients was 4 years (range 1.7-8.5 years). Three of 49 (6%) patients either progressed or died before scheduled HDCT; the remaining 46 of 49 (94%) received either single or sequential HDCT. The rate of favorable responses to HDCT was 27 of 49 (55%). Nine patients remain alive and free of progression. One additional patient was lost to follow without progression at 4 years. The projected overall survival rate at 5 years was 17% (95% confidence intervals 7% to 30%). CONCLUSION: HDCT can induce remissions in patients with multiple relapsed GCTs with a long-term survival rate of approximately 17%.

Risk factors in germ cell tumour patients with relapse or progressive disease after first-line chemotherapy: evaluation of a prognostic score for survival after high-dose chemotherapy.

PURPOSE: To retrospectively re-evaluate a published prognostic score for response to salvage treatment in patients with germ-cell tumours relapsing or progressing after cisplatin-based first-line chemotherapy. PATIENTS AND METHODS: From a database of 257 germ cell tumour (GCT) patients treated with salvage high-dose chemotherapy (HDCT) we identified 176 patients (67%) with relapse or progression after first-line conventional-dose chemotherapy (CDCT). Patients were retrospectively grouped according to a published prognostic score defined by Fossa and colleagues [Fossa SD, Stenning SP, Gerl A, et al. Prognostic factors in patients progressing after cisplatin-based chemotherapy for malignant non-seminomatous germ cell tumors. Br J Cancer 1999; 80:1392-9]. Overall survival (OS) and event free survival (EFS) after HDCT were retrospectively evaluated in each prognostic group. RESULTS: After a median follow-up of 9 years the OS probability for all 176 patients was 38% and the EFS probability was 35%. The respective survival probability at 5 years in 100/176 (57%) good prognosis patients and 76/176 (43%) poor prognosis patients were 47% versus 28% for OS (p<0.001) and 41% versus 26% for EFS (p<0.005). Whereas survival probabilities did not differ in good prognosis patients, OS and EFS in poor prognosis patients were substantially better in the current series of patients treated with HDCT compared to the ones reported by Fossa treated with CDCT. CONCLUSION: This retrospective analysis confirms the impact of prognostic factors on the results of salvage treatment in patients with GCT and suggests a clinical benefit for patients with poor prognosis features receiving a single course of HDCT.

[Lymphedema in patients with breast cancer--a consensus regarding diagnostics and therapy in patients with postoperative lymphedema after primary breast cancer]. / Lymphödem bei Mammakarzinom--Konsensus zur Sektoren übergreifenden Diagnostik und Therapie des postoperativen Lymphödems bei Patientinnen mit primärem Mammakarzinom.

UNLABELLED: Secondary lymphedema is one of the most frequent long-term side effects affecting up to 30% of all breast cancer patients after local surgical and radiation treatment. Destruction of the lymphatic system causes a progressive and chronic condition with functional impairments and disabilities limiting patients in their daily activities and involving nearly all aspects of their quality of life. Also, problems in the occupational area may be caused by lymphedema. The need for improving oncological management for early diagnosis and referral for effective treatment of lymphedema is a major goal of breast cancer heath care while survival improves. METHOD: A systematic consensus process was performed involving all relevant partners and providers of lymphedema health care to develop a practical documentation concept and make recommendations according to the evidence of clinical studies and currently available guidelines. RESULTS: A practical concept of documentation with defined assessment points was developed for evaluation and monitoring of lymphedema, which included the assessment of quality of life parameters with recognised instruments by the patient themselves. Consensus recommendations for the postoperative management, prevention, treatment and follow-up of breast cancer patients along a clinical algorithm for in- and outpatient care were finalized. CONCLUSION: With improved survival, long-term side effects with major impact on quality of life become a most important end point criteria of oncological treatment. The clearly defined documentation concept and the comprehensive recommendations for lymphedema management may assist clinicians and patients to make timely decisions about in- and outpatient health care practice to optimize the interface between acute medicine and rehabilitation. Patients' compliance with treatment and prevention routines will be as important as ensuring the continuity of care. A longitudinal prospective study evaluating the effectiveness and efficacy of the consensus recommendation is currently being implemented.

Activity of thalidomide in patients with platinum-refractory germ-cell tumours.

The aim of this study was assess the activity of thalidomide in patients with progressive relapsed or platinum-refractory germ-cell tumours (GCT). Between April 2002 and January 2003, 15 patients with inoperable progressive GCT were treated with escalated daily doses of 200-600 mg thalidomide. All patients had failed first-line and salvage chemotherapy with a median of 6 (range 4-12) cisplatin-based treatment cycles, 13/15 (87%) patients had received high-dose chemotherapy (HDCT) and 8/15 (53%) patients were considered platinum-refractory or absolute refractory; 8/15 (53%) patients had previously received other palliative chemotherapy regimens. No patient achieved a complete remission (CR) or partial remission (PR). However, 5/15 (33%) patients achieved serological PR and 1 additional patient had stable disease for 3 months. The median duration of remissions was 3 months (range 2-12 months) including 2 patients with a progression-free survival of 9 and 12 months. Responses occurred mainly in patients with a low tumour burden, slow disease progression and alpha-foetoprotein (AFP) elevations. Responses to thalidomide were independent from platinum-sensitivity. Toxicity was mild, with lethargy and constipation in the majority of patients. Skin rash grade II developed in 2 patients and peripheral neurotoxicity grade II/III developed in 4 patients. One responding patient died suddenly from an unknown cause. It is concluded that thalidomide shows single-agent activity in patients with heavily pre-treated GCT, AFP elevations and slowly progressive disease.

Residual tumor resection after high-dose chemotherapy in patients with relapsed or refractory germ cell cancer.

PURPOSE: To assess the role of residual tumor resection performed after high-dose chemotherapy (HDCT) in patients with relapsed or refractory germ cell tumors (GCT). PATIENTS AND METHODS: Between July 1987 and October 1999, postchemotherapy resections of residual tumors were performed in 57 patients who had been treated with HDCT for relapsed or refractory GCT and who had achieved a partial remission to this treatment. RESULTS: Complete resections of residual masses were achieved in 52 (91%) of 57 patients who were rendered disease free; in five (9%) of 57 patients, the resections were incomplete. Resection of a single site was performed in 39 (68%) of 57 patients, and the remaining 18 (32%) of 57 patients required interventions at two or more residual tumor sites. Necrosis was found in 22 (38%) of 57 patients, mature teratoma with or without necrosis was found in nine (16%) of 57 patients, and viable cancer with or without additional necrosis or mature teratoma was found in 26 (46%) of 57 patients. Viable cancer consisted either of residual germ cell or undifferentiated cancer in 22 (85%) of 26 patients, with additional non-GCT histologies in the remaining four patients. Patients with viable cancer had a significantly inferior outcome after surgery compared with patients with necrosis and/or mature teratoma even if all cancer was completely resected. Pulmonary lesions with a diameter of more than 2 cm were the only predictive variable for viable cancer in univariate analysis. CONCLUSION: Resections of all residual tumors should be attempted in patients with relapsed or refractory GCT and partial remissions after HDCT.

The role of high-dose chemotherapy in relapsed germ cell tumors.

Overall, patients with relapsed or progressive germ cell tumors after cisplatin-based chemotherapy have a low chance of cure. Using conventional-dose chemotherapy (CDCT) as salvage treatment, only 15-30% of the patients will become long-term survivors. It is well known that the majority of these patients will ultimately die of their disease. Therefore, improvement of the standard treatment is clearly desirable. In the last years, high-dose chemotherapy (HDCT) has been established as an effective salvage modality. A matched-pair analysis showed an advantage for HDCT compared with CDCT with an improvement in event-free and overall survival. Furthermore, due to increasing clinical experience in the management of side-effects, the use of peripheral blood progenitor cells and the availability of hematopoietic growth factors, HDCT has become relatively safe. Therefore, HDCT should be administered in patients with first relapse and unfavorable prognostic factors, and as second or subsequent salvage treatment followed by complete resections of tumor residuals. Patients with relapse or progressive disease after HDCT who do not qualify for desperation surgery could be salvaged with palliative chemotherapy combinations using gemcitabine, oxaliplatin and paclitaxel. This report reviews the current treatment strategies and recent developments with respect to HDCT given as salvage treatment and discusses the role of prognostic factors in the management of such situations.

Combination chemotherapy with gemcitabine plus oxaliplatin in patients with intensively pretreated or refractory germ cell cancer: a study of the German Testicular Cancer Study Group.

PURPOSE: Long-term survival is rarely achieved in patients with cisplatin-refractory germ cell cancer (GCT). Both single-agent gemcitabine and oxaliplatin have shown activity in patients who experience relapse or are refractory to cisplatin treatment. This study investigates the activity of a gemcitabine plus oxaliplatin regimen in these patients. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Gemcitabine was administered at a dose of 1,000 mg/m(2) on days 1 and 8; oxaliplatin was administered at a dose of 130 mg/m(2) on day 1. Response was evaluated every 4 weeks. RESULTS: Thirty-five patients with a median age of 37 years (range, 21 to 54 years) were enrolled onto the study. Primary tumor localization was gonadal, retroperitoneal, or mediastinal in 30, one, and four patients, respectively. Patients had been pretreated with a median of six platinum-containing cycles (range, four to 13 cycles) and 89% of patients previously had experienced treatment failure after high-dose chemotherapy with peripheral-blood stem-cell transplantation. Sixty-three percent of patients were considered absolutely cisplatin-refractory or cisplatin-refractory. A median of two cycles (range, 1 to 6 cycles) per patient were applied. Toxicity consisted mainly of myelosuppression, with Common Toxicity Criteria grade 3 occurring in 54% of patients. Only 9% of patients developed neutropenic fever. Three patients attained a complete remission (CR), two patients attained a marker-negative partial remission, and 11 patients attained a marker-positive partial remission, resulting in an overall response rate of 46% (95% CI, 30% to 64%). All three patients with CR and one patient with a marker-negative partial remission remained disease free at 16+, 12+, 4+, and 2+ months of follow-up. Seven (44%) of these 16 responses, including one CR, occurred in cisplatin-refractory patients. CONCLUSION: Gemcitabine plus oxaliplatin demonstrates antitumor activity with acceptable toxicity in heavily pretreated patients with relapsed or cisplatin-refractory GCT, and may offer a chance of long-term survival for selected patients.

Long-term results of first-line sequential high-dose etoposide, ifosfamide, and cisplatin chemotherapy plus autologous stem cell support for patients with advanced metastatic germ cell cancer: an extended phase I/II study of the German Testicular Cancer Study Group.

PURPOSE: Patients with disseminated germ cell cancer and poor prognosis (International Germ Cell Cancer Collaborative Group [IGCCCG] classification) achieve only a 45% to 50% long-term survival by standard chemotherapy. First-line high-dose chemotherapy might be able to improve the result. This analysis reports toxicity and long-term results of a large phase I/II study of sequential high-dose etoposide, ifosfamide, and cisplatin (VIP) in patients with advanced germ cell tumors. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Between July 1993 and November 1999, 221 patients with either Indiana "advanced disease" (n = 39) or IGCCCG "poor prognosis" criteria (n = 182) received one cycle of VIP followed by three to four sequential cycles of high-dose VIP chemotherapy plus stem cell support, every 3 weeks, at six consecutive dose levels. RESULTS: Dose limiting toxicity occurred at level 8 (100 mg/m2 cisplatinum, 1750 mg/m2 etoposide, 12 g/m2 ifosfamide) with grade 4 mucositis (three of eight patients), grade 3 CNS toxicity (one of eight patients), grade 4 renal toxicity (one of eight patients), and prolonged granulocytopenia (one of eight patients). After 4-year median follow-up, progression-free survival and disease-specific survival rates in the poor prognosis subgroup were 69% and 79% at 2 years and 68% and 73% at 5 years, with 76% for gonadal/retroperitoneal versus 67% for mediastinal primaries. Severe toxicity included treatment related death (4%), treatment-related acute myeloid leukemia (1%), long-term impared renal function (3%), chronic renal failure (1%), and persistent grade 2-3 neuropathy (5%). CONCLUSION: Repetitive cycles of high-dose VIP with peripheral stem cell support can be successfully applied in a multicenter setting. Dose level 6 with cisplatin 100 mg/m2, etoposide 1500 mg/m2, and ifosfamide 10 g/m2 is recommended for further investigation in randomized trials. An ongoing randomized trial within the European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer evaluates this protocol against four cycles of standard cisplatin, etoposide, and bleomycin.

Current aspects of high-dose chemotherapy in germ-cell tumors.

The optimal treatment in patients with 'poor prognosis' germ-cell tumors (GCT) according to the 'International Germ Cell Cancer Collaborative Group' (IGCCCG)--classification and in patients with refractory or relapsed disease after cisplatin-based chemotherapy remains controversial. It is well known that the majority of these patients will suffer systemic relapses after primary or salvage treatment and most of them will ultimately die of their disease. Therefore, the optimizing of the standard treatment is clearly desirable. The question of using conventional-dose or high-dose chemotherapy (HDCT) in this high-risk patients is under discussion. However, HDCT as primary treatment in 'poor prognosis' patients and as first- or subsequent salvage therapy in patients with relapsed or refractory GCT remains to be a relevant curative option. Prognostic factors have recently been recognized to aid in this decision.

First-line sequential high-dose VIP chemotherapy with autologous transplantation for patients with primary mediastinal nonseminomatous germ cell tumours: a prospective trial.

To determine the efficacy of first-line sequential high-dose VIP chemotherapy (HD-VIP) in patients with primary mediastinal nonseminomatous germ cell tumours (GCT), 28 patients were enrolled on a German multicentre trial. High-Dose VIP chemotherapy consisted of 3-4 cycles of dose-intensive etoposide and ifosfamide plus cisplatin, q22days, each cycle followed by autologous peripheral blood stem cell transplantation plus granulocyte-colony stimulating factor (G-CSF) support. One cycle of standard-dose VIP was applied to harvest peripheral blood stem cells. Ten patients had mediastinal involvement as the only manifestation (36 %), 18 of 28 patients had additional metastatic sites, such as lung (n=17; 61%), liver (n=7; 25%), bone (n=5; 18%), lymph nodes (n=3; 11%) and CNS (n=3; 11%). Median follow-up was 43 months (range, 7-113) for all patients and 52 months (range, 22-113) for surviving patients. Nineteen of 28 patients obtained a disease-free status; 11 with HD-VIP alone and eight with adjunctive surgery. In addition, one of the four patients with marker negative partial remission after HD-VIP without resection of residual masses is currently alive. Two patients developed recurrence of GCT or teratoma. Two patients have died due to an associated haematologic disorder. The 2-year progression-free survival and overall survival rates are 64 and 68%, respectively. This report represents a subgroup analysis of 28 patients with mediastinal nonsemina within the German first-line study for 'poor prognosis' GCT. Compared to data of an international database analysis including 253 patients with mediastinal nonseminoma treated with conventional chemotherapy, the results may indicate that HD-VIP results in an approximately 15% survival improvement.

Analysis of salvage treatments for germ cell cancer patients who have relapsed after primary high-dose chemotherapy plus autologous stem cell support.

The aim of this study was to identify treatment strategies and therapeutic or clinical factors that predict for response to salvage therapy and survival in patients with metastatic 'Indiana advanced' or International Germ-Cell Cancer Collaborative Group (IGCCCG) poor prognosis' germ cell cancer (GCT) failing first-line sequential high-dose chemotherapy plus autologous stem cell support (HD-CT). A total of 58 'poor prognosis' patients who had relapsed after HD-CT were identified within two large prospective German first-line HD-CT trials (n=286) performed between March 1993 and March 2001. Salvage treatment consisted of the following: cisplatin-based conventional dose CTx+/-resection (19/58; 33%), non-cisplatin based CTx (16/58; 28%) or salvage HD-CT (14/58; 24%)+/-resection; resection (n=3) and/or radiation (n=5) only: 7 patients (12%); no specific therapy: 2 patients. 21 (38%) patients responded favourably (Complete Response (CR)/Partial Response (PR) marker-negative) to salvage therapy. The use of salvage HD-CT (2-year survival 48%; P=0.03, the complete resection of residual masses (2-year survival 42%; P=0.015) as well as a favourable response to salvage therapy (2-year survival: 31%, P=0.014) were the only variables on univariate analysis associated with an improved survival. The estimated 2-year overall survival rate is 32% (95% Confidence Interval CI: 29-45%). Approximately 30% of patients relapsing after first-line HD-CT will survive>2 years, particularly those patients who can be treated with a second HD-CT +and/or surgical resection. If feasible, complete surgical resection of residual tumours appears to be the most efficient treatment.

Influence of amifostine on reconstitution of lymphocyte subpopulations after conventional- and high-dose chemotherapy in patients with germ cell tumor.

We assessed the influence of amifostine on immune reconstitution after conventional-dose paclitaxel, ifosfamide, cisplatin and high-dose carboplatin, etoposide and thiotepa followed by autologous peripheral blood progenitor cell (PBPC) rescue in patients with germ cell tumor (GCT). A total of 40 patients were treated with one cycle of paclitaxel and ifosfamide (TI) followed by granulocyte-colony stimulating factor (G-CSF) to mobilize PBPC, three cycles of paclitaxel, ifosfamide and cisplatin (TIP) and one course of high-dose carboplatin, etoposide and thiotepa (CET) plus PBPC rescue. Patients were randomized to receive an absolute dose of 500 mg amifostine (group A, n=20) on each day of chemotherapy or no amifostine (group B, n=20). Prior to each cycle of chemotherapy, after hematologic engraftment from CET, 6 weeks and 3 months after transplantation the subpopulations of lymphocytes were phenotyped. Between the two study groups no statistically significant differences were observed concerning reconstitution of lymphocyte subpopulations. Throughout treatment with TIP or CET lymphocyte counts and their subpopulations remained low without severe clinical complications. Delayed reconstitution of the CD4(+) cell compartment after PBPC rescue was observed in both study groups, but did not result in any severe or atypical infections. Treatment with amifostine administered at this dose did not significantly influence the reconstitution of lymphocyte subpopulations. Low numbers of lymphocytes during chemotherapy and delayed reconstitution of CD4(+) cells and other lymphocyte subpopulations after PBPC rescue had no clinical relevance for patients with GCT.

Irinotecan in patients with relapsed or cisplatin-refractory germ cell cancer: a phase II study of the German Testicular Cancer Study Group.

Despite generally high cure rates in patients with metastatic germ cell cancer, patients with progressive disease on first-line cisplatin-based chemotherapy or with relapsed disease following high-dose salvage therapy exhibit a very poor prognosis. Irinotecan has shown antitumour activity in human testicular tumour xenografts in nude mice. We have performed a phase II study examining the single agent activity of irinotecan in patients with metastatic relapsed or cisplatin-refractory germ cell cancer. Refractory disease was defined as progression or relapse within 4 weeks after cisplatin-based chemotherapy or relapse after salvage high-dose chemotherapy with autologous stem cell support. Irinotecan was administered at a dose of 300 (-350) mg m(-2) every 3 weeks. Response was evaluated every 4 weeks. Fifteen patients have been enrolled. Median age was 35 (19-53) years. Primary tumour localisation was gonadal/mediastinal in 12/3 patients. Patients had been pretreated with a median of six (4-12) cisplatin-containing cycles and 13 out of 15 patients had previously failed high-dose chemotherapy with blood stem cell support. Median number of irinotecan applications was two (1-3). Fourteen patients are assessable for response and all for toxicity. In one patient, no adequate response evaluation was performed. Toxicity was generally acceptable and consisted mainly of haematological side effects with common toxicity criteria 3 degrees anaemia (two patients), common toxicity criteria 3 degrees leukocytopenia (one patient) and common toxicity criteria 3 degrees thrombocytopenia (three patients). Common toxicity criteria 3/4 degrees non-haematological toxicity occurred in five patients (33%): 1 x diarrhoea, 2 x alopecia, 1 x fever and in one patient worsening of pre-existing peripheral polyneuropathy from 1 degrees to 4 degrees. No response was observed to irinotecan therapy. Currently, 13 patients have died of the disease and two patients are alive with the disease. The patients included in our study exhibit similar prognostic characteristics as patients treated in previous trials evaluating new drugs in this setting. Irinotecan at a dose of 300-350 mg m(-2) every 3 weeks appears to have no antitumour activity in patients with cisplatin-refractory germ cell cancer and, thus, further investigation in this disease is not justified.

High-dose chemotherapy as salvage treatment for seminoma.

Between October 1989 and February 1997, 13 patients with refractory or relapsed seminomas were treated with high-dose chemotherapy (HDCT) as part of consecutive phase I/II studies. Six patients had failed prior cisplatin-based first-line treatments and seven patients had also failed cisplatin-based salvage treatments. After HDCT 4/12 (33%) patients became disease-free, 4/12 (33%) patients achieved partial remissions and 4/12 (33%) patients suffered progressive disease despite HDCT. One patient developed multiorgan failure and died. With a median follow-up of 4.5 years (range 3.4 to 8 years) five patients (38%) are alive and eight patients (62%) have died. Patients with non-pulmonary visceral metastases, with short relapse-free intervals and with cisplatin-refractory tumors were more likely to fail. HDCT can be curative in seminoma patients even if offered as second salvage treatment.

Activity of oxaliplatin in patients with relapsed or cisplatin-refractory germ cell cancer: a study of the German Testicular Cancer Study Group.

PURPOSE: To investigate the efficacy and toxicity of oxaliplatin, a diaminocyclohaxane platinum derivative with incomplete cross-resistance to cisplatin in patients with relapsed or cisplatin-refractory germ cell cancer. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Thirty-two patients with nonseminomatous cisplatin-refractory germ cell cancer or relapsed disease after high-dose chemotherapy (HDCT) plus autologous stem-cell support were treated with single-agent oxaliplatin 60 mg/m(2) on days 1, 8, and 15 repeated every 4 weeks (group 1; n = 16) or oxaliplatin 130 mg/m(2) given on days 1 and 15 of a 4-week cycle (group 2; n = 16). Patients were pretreated with a median of seven (range, three to 13) cisplatin-containing treatment cycles; 78% had received carboplatin/etoposide-based HDCT before oxaliplatin therapy. Twenty-seven patients (84%) were considered refractory (n = 20; 63%) or absolutely refractory (n = 7; 22%) to cisplatin therapy. RESULTS: Overall, four patients achieved a partial remission (13%; 95% confidence interval, 1% to 24%). Two additional patients achieved disease stabilization. All responses were observed in cisplatin-refractory patients, including three who had not responded to previous HDCT. Patients received a median two cycles of oxaliplatin with a median cumulative dose of 350 mg/m(2). Hematologic toxicity was generally mild, with five patients developing grade 3/4 thrombocytopenia. Nonhematologic side effects consisted mainly of nausea/vomiting. One patient developed grade 3 neurotoxicity. CONCLUSION: Considering the particularly unfavorable prognostic characteristics of this patient population compared with patients from previous trials for new drugs in germ cell cancer, eg, paclitaxel and gemcitabine, a 13% overall response rate and a 19% response rate in the group treated with oxaliplatin 130 mg/m(2) seems to be of interest. Oxaliplatin may be a palliative treatment option for this patient population, and evaluation in combination regimens is warranted.

Assessment of amifostine as protection from chemotherapy-induced toxicities after conventional-dose and high-dose chemotherapy in patients with germ cell tumor.

BACKGROUND: We assessed the efficacy of amifostine for protection from chemotherapy-induced toxicities in patients treated with conventional-dose paclitaxel, ifosfamide, cisplatin (TIP) and high-dose carboplatin, etoposide and thiotepa (CET) followed by peripheral blood progenitor cell (PBPC) rescue. PATIENTS AND METHODS: In a prospective single-center study 40 patients with relapsed or refractory germ-cell tumors (GCT) were treated with 3 cycles of conventional-dose TIP followed by one cycle of high-dose CET. Patients were randomized either to receive one fixed dose of 500 mg amifostine per day of conventional-dose TIP and two fixed doses of 500 mg per day amifostine during high-dose CET (group A, n = 20) or no amifostine (group B, n = 20). Prior to the first cycle of TIP, one course of 175 mg/m2 paclitaxel and 5 g/m2 ifosfamide (TI) followed by granulocyte-colony stimulating factor (G-CSF) at 10 microg/kg/day were given for PBPC mobilization. RESULTS: Toxicities and response to conventional-dose TIP and high-dose CET could be evaluated in 40 patients (100%) and 32 of 40 patients (80%), respectively. Peripheral neurotoxicity (i.e. paresthesia or sensorymotor impairment), hearing impairment, hematologic toxicity, nephrotoxicity, nausea, myalgia, skin- and liver-toxicity did not differ siginificantly between the two patient groups. Likewise, the response rates to TIP and high-dose CET were comparable in patients with or without amifostine. After a median follow-up of 18 months, 8 of 20 (40%) patients of group A and 6 of 20 (30%) patients of group B are without relapse. CONCLUSION: Repeated low doses of 500 mg amifostine additional to conventional-dose TIP or high-dose CET showed no unequivocal advantage in protection from treatment-related toxicities. Furthermore, no significant differences in response rates or survival could be observed in this small number of patients.

Inverse relationship between patient peripheral blood CD34+ cell counts and collection efficiency for CD34+ cells in two automated leukapheresis systems.

BACKGROUND: The purpose of this study was to analyze the CD34 cell collection efficiency (CE) of automated leukapheresis protocols of two blood cell separators (Spectra, COBE [AutoPBSC protocol] and AS104, Fresenius [PBSC-Lym, protocol]) for peripheral blood progenitor cell (PBPC) harvest in patients with malignant diseases. STUDY DESIGN AND METHODS: PBPCs were collected by the Spectra AutoPBSC protocol in 95 patients (123 collections) and the AS104 PBSC-Lym protocol in 87 patients (115 harvests). Patients underwent a median of one (range, 1-4) conventional-volume apheresis procedure of 10.8 L (9.0-13.9) to obtain a target cell dose of > or =2.5 x 10(6) CD34+ cells per kg. RESULTS: The median overall CD34 CE was significantly better on the AS104 than on the Spectra: 55.8 percent versus 42.4 percent (p = 0.000). This was also true below (59.2% vs. 50.1%; p = 0.022) and above (51.2% vs. 41.3%; p = 0.001) the preleukapheresis threshold of 40 CD34+ cells per microL needed to collect a single-apheresis autograft. However, at > or =40 circulating CD34+ cells per microL, both cell separators achieved the target of > or =2.5 x 10(6) CD34+ cells per kg. The CD34 CE dropped significantly, from 59.2 percent at <40 cells per microL to 51.2 percent at > or =40 cells per microL on the AS104 (p = 0.017) and from 50.1 percent to 41.3 percent on the Spectra (p = 0.033). CONCLUSION: Whereas the CD34 CE was significantly different with the AS104 and the Spectra, the CD34 CE of both machines correlated inversely with peripheral blood CD34+ cell counts, showing a significant decline with increasing numbers of circulating CD34+ cells. Nevertheless, at > or 40 preapheresis CD34+ cells per microL, sufficient hematopoietic autografts of > or =2.5 x 10(6) CD34+ cells per kg were harvested by a single conventional-volume (11 L) leukapheresis on both cell separators.

Salvage chemotherapy in relapsed germ cell tumors.

Issues concerning the optimal salvage treatment in patients with germ cell tumors are for the most part controversial. As the majority of patients will suffer systemic relapses, chemotherapy will remain the mainstay of any salvage treatment. However, the question of whether to use conventional-dose or high-dose chemotherapy (HDCT) immediately arises. Prognostic factors have recently been recognized as an aid in this decision. However, as reliable data are lacking for many clinical scenarios, the salvage treatment of germ-cell tumors continues to be a therapeutic challenge.