[Urodynamics: All the nurse needs to know]. / Bilan urodynamique : tout ce que l'infirmier(e) doit savoir.

Urodynamic (UD) is an exam intended to explore the mechanisms underlying lower urinary tract symptoms (LUTS) or urinary incontinence (UI). It involves the measurement of bladder and sphincter pressures using uretrovesical and rectal catheters with pressure transducers, but also the measurement of urinary flow and bladder sensation during filling. UD is far from being systematic in the assessment of LUTS or UI and must seek to tackle a specific clinical or therapeutic question. Thus, history taking, physical examination, voiding diary and questionnaires are essential prerequisites to UD per se. UD steps include a free (unintubated) uroflowmetry, a cystometry, post-void residual measurement±an urethral profilometry, a pressure-flow study or sensitization tests. The pressures are set to zero before to start the study and the validity of the equipment is tested. This control is continued throughout the procedure to ensure the quality of the recording. Any event (e.g., urine leakage, change of position, urgency) is noted during the study. A final report is made by the doctor. The competence of the nurse ensures the reliability, reproducibility and interpretability of the UD study and the nurse's humanity guarantee f an atmosphere as favourable as possible for this uncomfortable and invasive test.

Implementing screening, brief intervention and referral to treatment in a French cohort of people living with HIV: a pilot study.

OBJECTIVES: Screening, brief intervention and referral to treatment (SBIRT) is an evidence-based practice used to identify, reduce and prevent problematic use and abuse of, and dependence on, tobacco, alcohol and psychoactive substances. To date, the pertinence of this practice among people living with HIV (PLHIV) is unknown. In this pilot study, we aimed to assess the acceptability of SBIRT in a cohort of HIV-infected out-patients who were asked about their consumption of alcohol, tobacco and psychoactive substances. METHODS: A monocentric study was performed at the University Hospital of Montpellier. In a 6-month period, 20 trained physicians screened for the consumption of alcohol [using the Alcohol Use Disorders Identification Test (AUDIT)], tobacco (using the Short Fagerstrom Test) and psychoactive substances [using the Alcohol, Smoking and Substance Involvement Screening Test (ASSIST) V3.0] via an auto-questionnaire and proposed a brief intervention to patients with misusage. RESULTS: One thousand and eighteen PLHIV completed the questionnaire, and 861 [84.6%; 95% confidence interval (CI) 82.2-86.7%] PLHIV returned it to the physician. Among the latter, 650 patients wished to discuss the answers with their physician (75.5%; 95% CI 72.5-78.3%), and brief interventions were realized in 405 patients (62.3%). CONCLUSIONS: SBIRT is a simple screening and harm reduction tool that is well accepted by PLHIV in out-patient clinics. This method could be implemented in routine HIV care to screen and manage patients systematically for harmful substance use.

[New patterns of substance use and abuse among French adolescents, a knowledge synthesis]. / Nouveaux styles de consommation de produits psychoactifs chez les adolescents en France.

AIM: There have been significant changes in adolescent consumption habits over the past fifteen years. New molecules have been synthesized, new devices created and a number of products have increased in popularity; and as a result clinicians sometimes lack information. We chose to focus on this population because of its vulnerability, as adolescents show low sensitivity to long-term outcomes of their actions and may be easily influenced by peers as regards experimentation of new drugs. The most consumed products by adolescents in France are tobacco, alcohol and cannabis with the physiological effects and consumption patterns of these drugs well documented. The purpose of this review is to identify and describe other products that are frequently used by adolescents to get high, to increase performance, for purposes of self-medication or because of peer pressure. We summarized the current scientific evidence regarding drug availability, physical and chemical properties, pharmacodynamics and adverse effects. METHOD: A literature review was conducted from 2000 to 2015 based on Pudmed, Google Scholar and governmental websites, using the following keyword alone or in combination: "adolescent", "new", "misuse", "abuse", "toxicity", "pharmacology" "cocaine", "MDMA", "inhalant", "poppers", "magic mushroom", "psilocybin", "designer drug", "legal high", "smart drug", "cathinone", "mephedrone", "cannabinoid", "prescription drug", "codeine", "opioid", "methylphenidate", "cough syrup", "purple drank". RESULTS: New products, including synthetic cannabis, cathinone or purple drank seem to be the most dangerous. They are easily accessible and may lead to short-term severe or lethal complications. Other substances do not pose a major short-term health risk by themselves. However, their consumption may be an indication of other unhealthy risk behaviors, such as prescription drug use, which may be related to psychiatric comorbidity. Unfortunately, we do not have enough data to determine the long-term consequences of the use of these substances. Moreover, these products have a strong addictive potential and may be a risk factor for other addictions. For this reason, increased supervision is justified, both for surveillance and reduction of harm. CONCLUSION: Taking care of an adolescent with substance abuse can be difficult. Updated information regarding these new substances and the particular danger they pose to adolescent health is needed. Informed clinicians can provide up to date and accurate information to the patient and family, assess potential risk factors and comorbidities, and provide appropriate support. Furthermore, because of the high prevalence of substance abuse in the adolescent population, systematic screening of adolescent consumption habit is useful to avoid or anticipate complications. Often, problematic substance consumption behaviors are signs of more complicated psychological or psychiatric issues. Substance abuse behaviors will often disappear over time but they can also become a major problem as the adolescent moves into adulthood. If problems persist, consultation with an addiction specialist may be warranted.

Routine enema before urodynamics has no impact on the quality of abdominal pressure curves: Results of a prospective controlled study.

AIMS: The presence of stools in the rectum might affect the quality of the abdominal pressure curve during filling cystometry, but, to date, no study has evaluated the impact of bowel preparation before urodynamics. We evaluated the influence of a sodium phosphate enema before urodynamics on the quality of the abdominal pressure curve. METHODS: A prospective, controlled, single-blind study was conducted in a single center from May to June 2013. The patients were divided into 2 consecutive groups: patients seen in outpatient clinics during the first 6 weeks (group A) who underwent urodynamics without bowel preparation and patients seen in outpatient clinics during the second 6 weeks (group B) who had a prescription of sodium phosphate enema before urodynamics. The primary endpoint was the quality of the abdominal pressure curve evaluated independently by three physicians who were blinded to the study group. The following data were also collected: age, gender, the presence of a neurological disorder, complicated nature of urodynamics and bother related to preparation for it, assessed using a Likert scale (0 to 10), and the equipment used. A per protocol analysis and an intent-to-treat analysis were conducted. RESULTS: One hundred and thirty-nine patients were included: 54 in group A and 85 in group B. One-third of patients had neurological conditions. 14 patients in group B did not perform their scheduled enema. Thus, 68 patients performed an enema before urodynamics and 71 did not. There was no difference between groups A and B regarding the complicated nature of urodynamics (Likert scale: 3.12 vs. 3.18; P=0.91) or bother related to preparation for it (Likert scale: 3.46 vs. 2.97; P=0.43). In the per protocol analysis, the abdominal pressure curve was considered perfectly interpretable (PI) in 69% of patients who did not receive an enema before urodynamics and in 65% of patients who did (P=0.61). The between-group difference was not statistically significant in intent-to-treat analysis (P=0.99). In patients who did not receive an enema before urodynamics, the only factors statistically associated with better quality of abdominal pressure curves were age <60years (P=0.001) and the urodynamic equipment used (Dantec®>Laborie®; P=0.01). CONCLUSION: In this prospective study, routine enema before urodynamics did not improve the quality of the abdominal pressure curve and did not increase the complicated nature of urodynamics or the bother of preparation for it. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: 3.

[Management of overactive bladder in women]. / Prise en charge de l'hyperactivité vésicale chez la femme.

Overactive bladder (OAB) is defined as urgency, with or without urge incontinence, usually with frequency and nocturia. OAB has been reported in 9 to 43% of female patients. It is usually idiopathic. The diagnosis is clinical but an initial work-up may be needed to exclude an underlying cause (bladder tumor, stone, cystitis, neurological disorder…) using urinary tract ultrasound, urine culture or cystoscopy. The initial assessment may also include a frequency-volume chart and urodynamics. Behavioral therapy is the first line treatment. In case of failure, antimuscarinics are recommended. Nowadays, three treatment options are available for OAB refractory to antimuscarinics: sacral neuromodulation, peripheral tibial nerve stimulation and intra-detrusor injections of botulinum toxin. Surgical procedures such as augmentation cystoplasty are very rarely required.