Prospective assessment of the impact of intraoperative diuretics in kidney transplant recipient surgery.

BACKGROUND: The use of intraoperative diuretics, such as furosemide or mannitol, during kidney transplantation has been suggested to reduce the rate of delayed graft function (DGF). The evidence base for this is sparse, however, and there is substantial variation in practice. We sought to evaluate whether the use of intraoperative diuretics during kidney transplantation translated into a reduction in DGF. METHODS: We conducted a cohort study evaluating the use of furosemide or mannitol given intraoperatively before kidney reperfusion compared with control (no diuretic). Adult patients receiving a kidney transplant for end-stage renal disease were allocated to receive furosemide, mannitol, or no diuretic. The primary outcome was DGF; secondary outcomes were graft function at 30 days and perioperative changes in potassium levels. Descriptive and comparative statistics were used where appropriate. RESULTS: A total of 162 patients who received a kidney transplant from a deceased donor (either donation after neurologic determination of death or donation after circulatory death) were included over a 2-year period, with no significant between-group differences. There was no significant difference in DGF rates between the furosemide, mannitol, and control groups. When the furosemide and mannitol groups were pooled (any diuretic use) and compared with the control group, however, there was a significant improvement in the odds that patients would be free of DGF (odds ratio 2.10, 95% confidence interval 1.06-4.16, 26% v. 44%, p = 0.03). There were no significant differences noted in any secondary outcomes. CONCLUSION: This study suggests the use of an intraoperative diuretic (furosemide or mannitol) may result in a reduction in DGF in patients undergoing kidney transplantation. Further study in the form of a randomized controlled trial is warranted.

Clinical Significance of Isolated V1 Arteritis in Renal Transplantation.

BACKGROUND: The presence of intimal arteritis (v) in renal allograft biopsy specimens establishes the presence of acute T-cell mediated rejection (TCMR), Grade IIa-III, according to the Banff classification of rejection. The clinical significance of isolated v1 lesions (v1), characterized by arteritis alone, compared with lesions of arteritis with tubulointerstitial inflammation (i-t-v) has been controversial. METHODS: We performed a retrospective review of 280 patients undergoing renal transplantation between 2005 and 2015 who received a "for cause" transplant biopsy using the Banff 2013 classification. Patients with TCMR grade IIa (n = 83) were subdivided into groups with isolated v1 arteritis and i-t-v. Pre- and postoperative renal function, graft survival, and overall survival were evaluated in all patients. RESULTS: Donor and recipient demographics were similar between groups. One month following treatment of rejection, patients with v1 disease had superior recovery of glomerular filtration rate vs patients with i-t-v (P < .002). At a median follow-up of 41 months from transplant, death-censored graft survival was 92% vs 79% (P = .04), and overall survival was 98% vs 79% (P < .004) in the isolated v1 and i-t-v groups, respectively. CONCLUSION: Despite having identical Banff classification of TCMR IIa, our results indicate that graft survival in patients with isolated v1 rejection is superior to those with i-t-v. Following corroboration with data from other centers, modification of the Banff classification scheme should be considered.