A multicentred study to validate a consensus bleeding assessment tool developed by the biomedical excellence for safer transfusion collaborative for use in patients with haematological malignancy.

BACKGROUND: There continues to be uncertainty about the optimal approach to documenting bleeding data in platelet transfusion trials, with a desire to apply a common assessment tool across all trials. With this in mind, a consensus bleeding assessment tool (BAT) has been developed by the Biomedical Excellence for Safer Transfusion (BEST) collaborative, based on review of data collection forms used in published randomized trials and following content validation with a range of healthcare professionals at seven haematology centres through BEST members. This study aimed to evaluate reliability and reproducibility of the consensus BAT. METHODS: Replicated clinical assessments of bleeding were undertaken by participants with haematological malignancies recruited at four haematology centres in an international, multicentred, observational study. Concordance of repeat assessments was calculated for agreement in site and grade of bleeding observed. RESULTS: Forty patients consented to participate, and 13 trained bleeding assessors collected these data. Bleeding assessments were carried out on 113 separate days. Of all 225 bleeding assessments, 204 were compared for grade concordance, and 160 were compared for site concordance. There was very good grade concordance (83%, 95% confidence interval 74-93%) and good bleeding site concordance (69%, 95% confidence interval 57-79%) in observations of bleeding. Discordance was primarily in relation to assessing skin bleeding. CONCLUSIONS: Alongside a structured training programme, levels of concordance for a consensus BAT were high. Researchers using assessment tools for bleeding need to balance comprehensive data collection against potential loss of accuracy for some types of bleeding, such as skin findings.

Massive activation-induced cell death of alloreactive T cells with apoptosis of bystander postthymic T cells prevents immune reconstitution in mice with graft-versus-host disease.

After hematopoietic stem cell transplantation, the persistence and expansion of grafted mature postthymic T cells allow both transfer of donor immunologic memory and generation of a diverse T repertoire. This thymic-independent process, which is particularly important in humans, because most transplant recipients present severe thymus atrophy, is impaired by graft-versus-host disease (GVHD). The goal of this study was to decipher how GVHD influences the fate of grafted postthymic T cells. Two major findings emerged. First, we found that, after a brisk proliferation phase, alloreactive antihost T cells underwent a massive activation-induced cell death (AICD). For both CD4(+) and CD8(+) T cells, the Fas pathway was found to play a major role in this AICD: alloreactive T cells upregulated Fas and FasL, and AICD of antihost T cells was much decreased in the case of lpr (Fas-deficient) donors. Second, whereas non-host-reactive donor T cells neither upregulated Fas nor suffered apoptosis when transplanted alone, they showed increased membrane Fas expression and apoptosis when coinjected with host-reactive T cells. We conclude that GVHD-associated AICD of antihost T cells coupled with bystander lysis of grafted non-host-reactive T cells abrogate immune reconstitution by donor-derived postthymic T lymphocytes. Furthermore, we speculate that massive lymphoid apoptosis observed in the acute phase of GVHD might be responsible for the occurrence of autoimmunity in the chronic phase of GVHD.