Apparent diffusion coefficient for differentiation between extra-nodal lymphoma and squamous cell carcinoma in the head and neck: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

BACKGROUND: Radiological differentiation between extra-nodal lymphoma and squamous cell carcinoma in the head and neck is often difficult due to their similarities. PURPOSE: To evaluate the diagnostic benefit of apparent diffusion coefficient (ADC) calculated from diffusion-weighted imaging (DWI) in differentiating the two. MATERIAL AND METHODS: A systematic review was performed by searching the MEDLINE, Scopus, and Embase databases in accordance with the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) 2020 statement. Forest plots and the pooled mean difference of ADC values were calculated to describe the relationship between extra-nodal lymphoma and squamous cell carcinoma in the head and neck. Heterogeneity among studies was evaluated using the Cochrane Q test and I2 statistic. RESULTS: The review identified eight studies with 440 patients (441 lesions) eligible for meta-analysis. Among all studies, the mean ADC values of squamous cell carcinoma was 0.88 × 10-3mm2/s and that of lymphoma was 0.64 × 10-3mm2/s. In the meta-analysis, the ADC value of lymphoma was significantly lower than that of squamous cell carcinoma (pooled mean difference = 0.235, 95% confidence interval [CI] = 0.168-0.302, P <0.0001). The Cochrane Q test (chi-square = 55.7, P <0.0001) and I2 statistic (I2 = 87.4%, 95% CI = 77.4-93.0%) revealed significant heterogeneity. CONCLUSION: This study highlights the value of quantitative assessment of ADC for objective and reliable differentiation between extra-nodal lymphoma and squamous cell carcinoma in the head and neck. Conclusions should be interpreted with caution due to heterogeneity in the study data.

Performance of axial diameter on MR imaging for identification of retropharyngeal lymph node metastases in head and neck cancer: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

PURPOSE: To summarize previous studies' data and to calculate the diagnostic performance of minimum axial diameter (MIAD) and maximum axial diameter (MAAD) on each of the cutoff values in retropharyngeal lymph node (RPLNs) metastases in head and neck cancer. METHODS: MEDLINE, Scopus, and Embase databases were searched for systematic review. Meta-analysis was performed to summarize estimates of sensitivity, specificity, and diagnostic odds ratio (DOR) and generate summary recipient operator characteristic (sROC). RESULTS: The review identified 5 studies with a total of 634 patients (971 lesions) that were eligible for the meta-analysis. The estimated sensitivity, specificity, and DOR at MIAD 5 mm cutoff and MIAD 6 mm cutoff were 89.8% and 74.3%, 82.7% and 92.7%, and 39.1 and 57.9, respectively. The estimated sensitivity, specificity, and DOR at MAAD 7 mm cutoff and MAAD 8 mm cutoff were 90.3% and 84.7%, 62.7% and 79.9%, and 17.8 and 21.7, respectively. The AUCs of sROC at MIAD 5 mm cutoff and MIAD 6 mm cutoff were 0.922 and 0.943. At MAAD 7 mm and MAAD 8 mm, they were 0.840 and 0.888. CONCLUSION: The diagnostic performance of the MIAD 6 mm cutoff in RPLN metastases from head and neck cancer was 2% higher than the MIAD 5 mm cutoff. The diagnostic performance of MIAD was higher than that of MAAD.

Dual-energy computed tomography for improved visualization of internal jugular chain neck lymph node metastasis and nodal necrosis in head and neck squamous cell carcinoma.

PURPOSE: To evaluate and compare the utility of 40-keV virtual monochromatic imaging (VMI) reconstructed from dual-energy computed tomography (DECT) in the assessment of neck lymph node metastasis with 70-keV VMI, which is reportedly equivalent to conventional 120-kVp single-energy computed tomography. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Patients with head and neck squamous cell carcinoma who had neck lymph node metastasis in contact with the sternocleidomastoid muscle (SCM) and underwent contrast-enhanced DECT were included. In 40- and 70-keV VMI, contrast differences and contrast noise ratio (CNR) between the solid component of neck lymph node metastasis (SC) and the SCM and between SC and nodal necrosis (NN) were calculated. Two board-certified radiologists independently and qualitatively evaluated the boundary discrimination between SC and SCM and the diagnostic certainty of NN. RESULTS: We evaluated 45 neck lymph node metastases. The contrast difference between SC and SCM and SC and NN were significantly higher at 40-keV VMI than at 70-keV VMI (p < 0.001). The CNR between SC and SCM was significantly higher at 40-keV VMI than at 70-keV VMI (p < 0.001). Scoring of the boundary discrimination between SC and SCM as well as the diagnostic certainty of NN at 40-keV VMI was significantly higher than that at 70-keV VMI (p < 0.001). The inter-rater agreements for these scores were higher at 40-keV VMI than at 70-keV VMI. CONCLUSION: Additional employing 40-keV VMI in routine clinical practice may be useful in the diagnosis of head and neck lymph node metastases and nodal necrosis.