Maximizing Learning in the Operating Room: Residents' Perspectives.

BACKGROUND: Few studies examine how residents can optimize their educational experience in the OR on their terms. This study aimed to examine residents' perceptions of how learners can maximize their education in the OR. METHOD: Using constructivist grounded theory methodology, the authors conducted focus groups with general surgery residents, PGY1-5, followed by semi-structured interviews with attending surgeons from a single, academic medical center. Constant comparison was used to identify themes and explore their relationships. Theoretical sampling was used until saturation was achieved. RESULTS: Residents and attendings participated. Two phases of OR learning were identified, intra-operative and inter-operative. Characters that made optimized learning included control, struggling, and reflection. Residents who practiced self-reflection with their experiences, and were able to articulate this awareness to attendings, felt the OR was an ideal learning environment. Attendings echoed similar findings. CONCLUSIONS: Providing residents with a method of maximizing OR learning is critical to postgraduate clinical education. Currently, observation passively morphs into active learning and eventually independent operating in the OR. However, residents who practice self-regulated learning, and are able to discuss their educational goals with attendings, seem to find the OR a better learning environment and progress to independence more quickly. This was echoed by practicing attendings. Providing residents with a generalizable, self-regulated learning framework specific to operative educational experiences could maximize learning potential and expedite resident progression in the OR.

Unprofessional behavior by specialty: a qualitative analysis of six years of student perceptions of medical school faculty.

BACKGROUND: Unprofessional behavior has well documented negative effects both on the clinical care environment and on the learning environment. If unprofessional behavior varies by department or specialty, this has implications both for faculty development and for undergraduate and graduate level training. AIMS: We sought to learn which unprofessional behaviors were endemic in our school, and which were unique to particular departments. METHODS: Students graduating from medical school between 2007 and 2012 were asked to complete a questionnaire naming the most professional and least professional faculty members they encountered in during school. For the least professional faculty members, they were also asked to provide information about the unprofessional behavior. RESULTS: Students noted several types of unprofessional behavior regardless of the department faculty were in; however, there were some behaviors only noted in individual departments. The unprofessional behavior profiles for Surgery and Obstetrics/Gynecology were markedly similar, and were substantially different from all other specialties. CONCLUSION: Undergraduate, graduate, and faculty education focused on unprofessional behavior that may occur in various learning environments may provide a feasible, practical, and an effective approach to creating a culture of professional behavior throughout the organization.

The impact of brief team communication, leadership and team behavior training on ad hoc team performance in trauma care settings.

BACKGROUND: Communication breakdowns and care coordination problems often cause preventable adverse patient care events, which can be especially acute in the trauma setting, in which ad hoc teams have little time for advanced planning. Existing teamwork curricula do not address the particular issues associated with ad hoc emergency teams providing trauma care. METHODS: Ad hoc trauma teams completed a preinstruction simulated trauma encounter and were provided with instruction on appropriate team behaviors and team communication. Teams completed a postinstruction simulated trauma encounter immediately afterward and 3 weeks later, then completed a questionnaire. Blinded raters rated videotapes of the simulations. RESULTS: Participants expressed high levels of satisfaction and intent to change practice after the intervention. Participants changed teamwork and communication behavior on the posttest, and changes were sustained after a 3-week interval, though there was some loss of retention. CONCLUSIONS: Brief training exercises can change teamwork and communication behaviors on ad hoc trauma teams.

A surgical simulation curriculum for senior medical students based on TeamSTEPPS.

OBJECTIVE: To investigate whether the existing Team Strategies and Tools to Enhance Performance and Patient Safety (TeamSTEPPS) curriculum can effectively teach senior medical students team skills. DESIGN Single-group preintervention and postintervention study. SETTING AND INTERVENTION: We integrated a TeamSTEPPS module into our existing resident readiness elective. The curriculum included interactive didactic sessions, discussion groups, role-plays, and videotaped immersive simulation scenarios. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Improvement of self-assessment scores, multiple-choice examination scores, and performance ratings of videotaped simulation scenarios before and after intervention. The videos were rated by masked reviewers on the basis of a global rating instrument (TeamSTEPPS) and a more detailed nontechnical skills evaluation tool(NOTECHS). PARTICIPANTS: Seventeen students participated and completed the study. RESULTS: The self-evaluation scores improved from 12.76 to 16.06 (P < .001). The increase was significant for all of the TeamSTEPPS competencies and highest for leadership skills (from 2.2 to 3.2; P < .001). The multiple-choice score rose from 84.9% to 94.1% (P < .01). The postintervention video ratings were significantly higher for both instruments (TeamSTEPPS, from 2.99 to 3.56; P < .01; and NOTECHS, from 4.07 to 4.59; P < .001). CONCLUSIONS: The curriculum led to improved self-evaluation and multiple-choice scores as well as improved team skills during simulated immersive patient encounters. The TeamSTEPPS framework may be suitable for teaching medical students teamwork concepts and improving their competencies. Larger studies using this framework should be considered to further evaluate the generalizability of our results and the effectiveness of TeamSTEPPS for medical students.

Pursuing professional accountability: an evidence-based approach to addressing residents with behavioral problems.

OBJECTIVE: To develop an evidence-based approach to the identification, prevention, and management of surgical residents with behavioral problems. DESIGN: The American College of Surgeons and Southern Illinois University Department of Surgery hosted a 1-day think tank to develop strategies for early identification of problem residents and appropriate interventions. Participants read a selection of relevant literature before the meeting and reviewed case reports. SETTING: American College of Surgeons headquarters, Chicago, Illinois. PARTICIPANTS: Medical and nursing leaders in the field of resident education; individuals with expertise in dealing with academic law, mental health issues, learning deficiencies, and disruptive physicians; and surgical residents. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Evidence-based strategies for the identification, prevention, and management of problem residents. RESULTS: Recommendations based on the literature and expert opinions have been made for the identification, remediation, and reassessment of problem residents. CONCLUSIONS: It is essential to set clear expectations for professional behavior with faculty and residents. A notice of deficiency should define the expected acceptable behavior, timeline for improvement, and consequences for noncompliance. Faculty should note and address systems problems that unintentionally reinforce and thus enable unprofessional behavior. Complaints, particularly by new residents, should be investigated and addressed promptly through a process that is transparent, fair, and reasonable. The importance of early intervention is emphasized.

Using the hidden curriculum to teach professionalism during the surgery clerkship.

BACKGROUND: It has been shown that medical student professionalism is influenced by the hidden curriculum, although the extent to which this occurs during the surgery clerkship is unknown. Furthermore, the processes within the hidden curriculum have been used to teach professionalism to medical students, but this strategy has not been used during the surgery clerkship. The purpose of this study was to review a 2-year experience with a surgery clerkship instructional session where the hidden curriculum was used to teach professionalism to medical students. STUDY DESIGN: Medical student essays were analyzed to evaluate the influence of the hidden curriculum on their ideas about professionalism and to identify specific behaviors that they regarded as professional and unprofessional. The instructional session was evaluated using the average satisfaction session ratings and through an analysis of medical student session evaluation comments. RESULTS: Seventy-five percent of medical students reported that their ideas about professionalism changed. This change involved their general concepts about professionalism, identifying specific behaviors that they planned to adopt or avoid, or developing opinions about the professionalism of surgeons. The average satisfaction rating was consistently high throughout the study period, and the most helpful session feature was reported as the opportunity to share and discuss their observations. CONCLUSIONS: The hidden curriculum has a substantial influence on the development of professionalism of medical students during the surgery clerkship. It was possible to illuminate and use the hidden curriculum to create an instructional session devoted to professionalism for medical students on the surgery clerkship.

Capturing the teachable moment: a grounded theory study of verbal teaching interactions in the operating room.

BACKGROUND: Teaching in the operating room is one of the major cornerstones of surgical education. As time available for intraoperative resident teaching diminishes, such teaching time becomes increasingly precious. We studied how surgeons communicate with residents during an operation, with the goal of enhancing intraoperative teaching opportunities. METHODS: Grounded theory methodology was used to investigate intraoperative verbal communication during four videotaped surgical procedures. Utterance-by-utterance analysis was performed to generate codes for each surgeon-resident interaction. Interactions were then analyzed to determine the percentage time spent in verbal teaching, number of topics covered, times each topic was visited, and time per topic. RESULTS: Four main types of teaching surgeon-resident verbal interaction were identified from 1306 interactions. Instrumental interactions were intended solely to move the operation forward. Pure teaching interactions served to educate the trainee, shape judgment, or enhance performance. Instrumental and Teaching interactions were directive but also contained teaching. Banter was discussion unrelated to the operation. Analysis of a subset of the operations demonstrated 13-29 topics covered per procedure, with each topic addressed between 1 and 8 times, and 25-330 seconds spent per topic. Most teaching instances were prompted by errors in resident performance. CONCLUSION: Instances of verbal teaching were numerous, arose opportunistically in this study, and focused typically on multiple points. To maximize teaching opportunities, the authors propose a structured approach to intraoperative teaching that involves identification of a limited set of specific learning objectives, followed by intraoperative teaching and postoperative debriefing targeted to those objectives.

The nature of general surgery resident performance problems.

BACKGROUND: Residents with performance problems are challenging to program directors and complicate the work of other residents and health care providers. Having an effective, targeted remediation process to address these problems is dependent on being able to diagnose their nature. The purpose of this study was to identify residents who had serious, substantive, and recurring academic, clinical, and/or professional behavior problems, and to describe and classify their nature. METHODS: Raters performed a retrospective record review of general surgery categorical residents in one program over 30 years. Residents with substantial problems were reviewed, described, and classified independently by 3 raters. RESULTS: Seventeen residents had serious enough performance problems to be included. Four had only 1 class of problem (3 were professional behavior problems). Eight residents had 2 problems each (5 academic and clinical performance problems; 3 clinical performance and professional behavior problems). Five residents had 3 problems. The number of performance problem facets per case varied from 11 to 2 with an average of 5.9 facets. Relations with health care workers was identified most frequently, followed closely by insufficient knowledge. Poor communication was third. Performance problems of 14 residents (82%) were identified in their first year. For 15 cases, the resident had unresolved performance problems at the end of the program. CONCLUSION: There are 2 possible explanations for our findings: (1) resident problems similar to these are refractory to remediation; (2) treatments used historically are not well designed for the problems. Choosing among the 2 explanations will require developing remediation strategies targeted to specific patterns of performance problems.