[Differences in the reduction of blood pressure according to drug administration at activity hours or rest hours]. / Diferencias en la reducción de la presión arterial en función de la toma de la medicación en horario diurno o nocturno.

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVE: In this study, 123 recordings of blood pressure (BP) obtained by ambulatory BP monitoring were analyzed. These recordings were measured in 2011 in patients from a Spanish tertiary university hospital. All participating patients were treated with 2, 3 or 4 anti-hypertensive drugs. The main aim of this study was to determine differences in BP control, if any, depending on the medication schedule. Thus, BP levels were studied at 3 periods of the day: activity hours, rest hours and 24h. PATIENTS AND METHOD: We compared subjects taking all anti-hypertensive agents during the day (n=70, group 1) with those taking at least one at night (n=53, group 2). RESULTS: Significant differences were found on diastolic BP, where group 2 patients had lower levels at activity, 24h periods and sleep-time. Even if it was not statistically significant, lower levels of systolic BP from group 2 were also observed at activity and 24h periods as well as lower levels of systolic, diastolic and mean BP at rest hours periods. There were also significant group differences in relation to the number of prescribed agents (with the mean being higher for group 2) and the type of agent (beta-blockers and calcium antagonists were more prevalent in group 2). Nevertheless, the multivariate regression analysis done taking into account these variables did not change the observed statistical significance. CONCLUSION: The administration of anti-hypertensive drugs at night could be associated with lower BP levels.

[Fixed drug combinations in hypertension: a budget impact analysis for the Spanish Health System on the marketing of a fixed combination of olmesartan/amlodipine]. / Las combinaciones fijas en hipertensión: análisis de impacto presupuestario para el Sistema Nacional de Salud Español de la comercialización de la combinación fija de olmesartan/amlodipino.

OBJECTIVE: To carry out a budget impact analysis (BIA) of olmesartan/amlodipine (20/5, 40/5 and 40/10mg) marketed as a fixed combination (FC) in its approved indication for the National Health System (NHS). DESIG: We developed a decision tree model in order to estimate usual hypertension treatment algorithm in Spanish clinical practice. SETTINGS: The BIA has been developed from the perspective of the NHS for a period of 3 years (years 2010-2012). PARTICIPANTS: Spanish hypertensive population ≥ 35 years old. INTERVENTIONS: Introduction into the market of a fixed combination (FC) olmesartan/amlodipine in Spain. PRIMARY MEASURES: Expected costs to be assumed by the Spanish NHS (RRP-VAT) for hypertensive population able to be treated with the FC versus currently assumed costs by the NHS with free combination olmesartan and amlodipine. RESULTS: Estimated pharmaceutical costs in hypertensive population treated with olmesartan and amlodipine (2 pills) would be €25.2M (1(st) year), €26.4M (2011), €27.6M (2012), with a total 3-year period of €79.2M. According to patient tree model, the population able to be treated with FC would be 71,283 patients (2010), with a growth rate of 4.8% in the successive years, which supposes an annual cost of €21.2M (2010), €21.8M (2011) and €22.4M (2012), with a total 3-year period of €65.4M. The BIA shows savings of €13.8M in a total 3-year period. CONCLUSION: The BIA of FC olmesartan/amlodipine could generate net savings of €13.8M for the NHS in the period ranging from years 2010 to 2012.

Putative endothelial progenitor cells are associated with flow-mediated dilation in refractory hypertensives.

BACKGROUND: Hypertension has been related to endothelial dysfunction. Patients with refractory hypertension (RH) have a reduced number of endothelial progenitor cells (EPCs). AIM: To evaluate if blood EPC levels relate to endothelium-dependent vasodilation (ED-VD) in RH. METHODS: We analyzed 29 RH confirmed by 24-h ambulatory blood pressure monitoring and assessed complete clinical and laboratory evaluation. EPCs were isolated from peripheral mononuclear cells (MNC) by flow cytometry. ED-VD was determined measuring flow-mediated dilation (FMD) by venous occlusion plethysmography. Results. Circulating EPCs/10(5) MNC (median [Q1-Q3]): 23.0 [4.5-53.8]. FMD (median [Q1-Q3]): 211.7 [79.5-365.8]%. Significant correlations with log-FMD: EPCs (r = 0.469; p = 0.018) and homocysteine (r = -0.414; p = 0.045). There was no collinearity between EPCs and homocysteine. FMD did not correlate with age, gender, office BP, 24-h systolic blood pressure or 24-h diastolic blood pressure, laboratory parameters, C-reactive-protein, left ventricular-mass index, dyslipidaemia, smoking habit and statin or angiotensin system blockers treatment. Multiple linear regression analysis showed that after age-adjustment, EPC (p = 0.027) and homocysteine (p = 0.004) were the only variables that predicted FMD (R = 0.740). After dividing patients according to EPC number, patients in the lower tertile showed a significantly reduced FMD compared with those in the group of the two upper tertiles of EPC: log-FMD (mean+/-SD): 4.7+/-0.9 vs 5.6+/-0.8, respectively (p = 0.031). CONCLUSIONS: ED-VD independently correlates with circulating EPCs in RH. Homocysteine is also an independent predictor of lower FMD in such patients.