Randomized Phase III Trial of Prophylactic Cranial Irradiation With or Without Hippocampal Avoidance for Small-Cell Lung Cancer (PREMER): A GICOR-GOECP-SEOR Study.

PURPOSE: Radiation dose received by the neural stem cells of the hippocampus during whole-brain radiotherapy has been associated with neurocognitive decline. The key concern using hippocampal avoidance-prophylactic cranial irradiation (HA-PCI) in patients with small-cell lung cancer (SCLC) is the incidence of brain metastasis within the hippocampal avoidance zone. METHODS: This phase III trial enrolled 150 patients with SCLC (71.3% with limited disease) to standard prophylactic cranial irradiation (PCI; 25 Gy in 10 fractions) or HA-PCI. The primary objective was the delayed free recall (DFR) on the Free and Cued Selective Reminding Test (FCSRT) at 3 months; a decrease of 3 points or greater from baseline was considered a decline. Secondary end points included other FCSRT scores, quality of life (QoL), evaluation of the incidence and location of brain metastases, and overall survival (OS). Data were recorded at baseline, and 3, 6, 12, and 24 months after PCI. RESULTS: Participants' baseline characteristics were well balanced between the two groups. The median follow-up time for living patients was 40.4 months. Decline on DFR from baseline to 3 months was lower in the HA-PCI arm (5.8%) compared with the PCI arm (23.5%; odds ratio, 5; 95% CI, 1.57 to 15.86; P = .003). Analysis of all FCSRT scores showed a decline on the total recall (TR; 8.7% v 20.6%) at 3 months; DFR (11.1% v 33.3%), TR (20.3% v 38.9%), and total free recall (14.8% v 31.5%) at 6 months, and TR (14.2% v 47.6%) at 24 months. The incidence of brain metastases, OS, and QoL were not significantly different. CONCLUSION: Sparing the hippocampus during PCI better preserves cognitive function in patients with SCLC. No differences were observed with regard to brain failure, OS, and QoL compared with standard PCI.

Mapeo del lenguaje utilizando estimulación magnética transcraneal repetitiva por navegación: un estudio comparativo con la estimulación cortical directa intraoperatoria / Language mapping using repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation by navigation: a comparative study with direct intraoperative cortical stimulation

Introducción: la estimulación cortical directa (DCS) es una metodología corrientemente usada para localizar áreas del lenguaje en intervenciones quirúrgicas que incluyan resecciones.La estimulación magnética transcraneana repetitiva (rTMS) a demostrado también su capacidad para inducir alteraciones transitorias. Recientemente el desarrollo del Sistema de Navegación de TMS asegura precisa localización del sitio estimulado. El objetivo del trabajo es estudiar la confiabilidad de la estimulación magnética transcraneal repetitiva navegada (nrTMS) en la localización de los sitios del lenguaje. Métodos: Once pacientes seleccionados para mapeo del lenguaje por DCS fueron evaluados pre-cirugía con nrTMS. Los mapeos de lenguaje prequirúrgicos mediante nrTMS fueron comparados con DCS. Resultados: Un total de 25 nrTMS sitios del lenguaje y 38 DCS fueron localizados. La sensibilidad y la especificidad obtenida fue de 88.4 y 95.6, respectivamente. La distancia media fue evaluada en 4,5mm. Conclusiones: Los dispositivos de nrTMS permiten la identificación de las áreas corticales del lenguaje. Con un alto grado de concordancia con el mapeo TMS. La nrTMS se muestra como una herramienta de interés en la investigación y aplicación práctica en la función del lenguaje.

Introduction: direct cortical stimulation (DCS) is currently used to localise language areas in surgical resections. Repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation (rTMS) has also shown its capacity to induce transient language alterations. Newly developed Navigated Brain Systems of TMS ensure precise topographical localisation of the stimulated site. The objective was to study the reliability of navigated repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation (nrTMS) in language sites localisation.Methods: Eleven patients selected for DCS language mapping were presurgically evaluated with nrTMS. These presurgicalnrTMS language maps were then compared with DCS.Results: A total number of 25 nrTMS and 38 DCS language sites were localised. Sensitivity and specificity were calculated as 88.4 and 95.6 respectively. Mean distance was assessed as 4.5 millimetres. Conclusions: nrTMS devices allow identification of cortical language areas, with a high degree of concordance to TMS mapping. NrTMS shows up as an interesting tool for research and practical application in language function.