Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 2 de 2
Filtrar
Mais filtros











Base de dados
Intervalo de ano de publicação
1.
J Prosthet Dent ; 113(4): 343-6, 2015 Apr.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-25702970

RESUMO

Adequate visualization of existing/proposed tooth position, denture base contours, and prosthetic space is critical to treatment planning of dental implants. Multiple techniques exist for fabricating radiographic guides; many involve duplicating the patient's existing prosthesis or fabricating a new diagnostic template. This article describes a technique that provides anatomic and restorative information by using an existing prosthesis and a radiographic impression method without the need to fabricate a duplicate or new template.


Assuntos
Meios de Contraste/química , Implantação Dentária Endóssea/instrumentação , Implantes Dentários , Materiais para Moldagem Odontológica/química , Técnica de Moldagem Odontológica/instrumentação , Arcada Edêntula/diagnóstico por imagem , Sulfato de Bário/química , Desenho Assistido por Computador , Tomografia Computadorizada de Feixe Cônico/métodos , Bases de Dentadura , Reembasamento de Dentadura , Humanos , Processamento de Imagem Assistida por Computador/métodos , Planejamento de Assistência ao Paciente , Polivinil/química , Siloxanas/química , Cirurgia Assistida por Computador/instrumentação
2.
J Adv Prosthodont ; 6(5): 395-405, 2014 Oct.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-25352962

RESUMO

PURPOSE: This study aims to investigate the degree of subjective pain and the satisfaction of patients who have undergone an implant treatment using a computer-guided template. MATERIALS AND METHODS: A survey was conducted for 135 patients who have undergone implant surgery with and without the use of the computer-guided template during the period of 2012 and 2013 in university hospitals, dental hospitals and dental clinics that practiced implant surgery using the computer-guided template. Likert scale and VAS score were used in the survey questions, and the independent t-test and One-Way ANOVA were performed (α=.05). RESULTS: The route that the subjects were introduced to the computer-guided implant surgery using a surgical template was mostly advices by dentists, and the most common reason for which they chose to undergo such surgery was that it was accurate and safe. Most of them gave an answer that they were willing to recommend it to others. The patients who have undergone the computer-guided implant surgery felt less pain during the operation and showed higher satisfaction than those who have undergone conventional implant surgery. Among the patients who have undergone computer-guided implant surgery, those who also had prior experience of surgery without a computer-guided template expressed higher satisfaction with the former (P<.05). CONCLUSION: In this study, it could be seen that the patients who have undergone computer-guided implant surgery employing a surgical template felt less pain and had higher satisfaction than those with the conventional one, and the dentist's description could provide the confidence about the safety of surgery.

SELEÇÃO DE REFERÊNCIAS
DETALHE DA PESQUISA