Risk of Pacemaker Implantation After Degenerative Mitral and Concomitant Tricuspid Valve Surgery.

BACKGROUND: A recent multicenter trial showed a reduction in tricuspid regurgitation (TR) progression when tricuspid annuloplasty was performed at the time of surgery for degenerative mitral regurgitation (MR), but with a 14% pacemaker (PPM) rate. We present real-world outcomes at a high-volume center for degenerative MR surgery with/without tricuspid annuloplasty. METHODS: Patients undergoing first-time degenerative mitral surgery between 2011-2021 were identified (n=1,738). After excluding patients undergoing aortic, aortic valve, or tricuspid replacement procedures, patients were stratified into mitral surgery alone (n=1,068) versus mitral surgery plus tricuspid annuloplasty (n=417). Outcomes including operative mortality, new PPM implantation, and postoperative length of stay as well as risk-adjusted overall mortality were compared. RESULTS: Among 1,485 patients in this study, 98% underwent mitral repair. Compared to concomitant tricuspid annuloplasty patients, those undergoing mitral surgery alone were 6 years younger and had lower median STS PROM. Among concomitant tricuspid repair patients, 85% (355/417) had moderate or less preoperative TR, while 15% (61/417) had severe TR. Operative mortality was 1.4%. The incidence of new PPM implantation was 0.7% (7/1,068) in the mitral only group and 5.5% (23/417) in the concomitant tricuspid group (p<0.001). Although unadjusted cumulative survival was lower in the concomitant tricuspid group, after risk adjustment, concomitant tricuspid surgery was not associated with worse overall mortality (HR 0.80 [95% CI, 0.53-1.19], p=0.27). CONCLUSIONS: Concomitant tricuspid annuloplasty is safe, with no difference in mortality and a less than 6% PPM rate at a high-volume mitral center. These data provide real-world context for concomitant tricuspid annuloplasty.

Sex-Based Differences in Concomitant Tricuspid Repair During Degenerative Mitral Surgery.

BACKGROUND: Women with mitral valve disease have higher rates of tricuspid regurgitation (TR) than men. Although tricuspid valve repair (TVr) decreases the progression of TR, we hypothesize that there may be sex-based differences in concomitant TVr at the time of mitral valve operations. METHODS: Adults undergoing mitral valve operation for degenerative disease with moderate or worse preoperative TR at a high-volume center from 2014 to 2023 were identified. Patients with a previous tricuspid intervention were excluded. A multivariable logistic regression identified predictors of concomitant TVr. To evaluate the clinical impact of not performing TVr, a competing risk model compared development of severe TR or valve-related reoperation by sex among patients without TVr. RESULTS: Most included patients were women (55% [n = 214 of 388]), and the median age was 73 years (quartile 1-quartile 3, 65-79 years). There was no difference in the rate of severe TR by sex (female, 28%; male, 26%; P = .63). The unadjusted rate of concomitant TVr was 57% for women and 73% for men (P < .001). Overall, women had 52% lower adjusted odds of TVr (adjusted odds ratio, 0.48; 95% CI, 0.29-0.81; P = .006), including a lower adjusted rate for moderate TR (47% [95% CI, 45%-49%] vs 66% [95% CI, 64%-69%]) and for severe TR (83% [95% CI, 81%-86] vs 92% [95% CI, 90%-93%]) Among those without TVr, 12% of women and 0% of men had severe TR or required a valve-related reoperation at 4 years (P < .001). CONCLUSIONS: Women with moderate or severe TR undergoing mitral valve operation for degenerative disease were less likely to receive concomitant TVr, severe TR was more likely to develop, or they would more likely need a valve-related reoperation. Evaluation of sex-based treatment differences is imperative to improve outcomes for women.

Impact of Frailty in Patients Undergoing Minimally Invasive Mitral Valve Surgery.

OBJECTIVE: Psoas muscle size is a reliable marker of sarcopenia and frailty that correlates with adverse outcomes after cardiac surgery. However, its use in mitral and minimally invasive cardiac surgery is lacking. We sought to determine whether frailty, as measured by psoas muscle index, increases surgical risk for minimally invasive mitral valve surgery. METHODS: Patients undergoing isolated minimally invasive mitral surgery via right minithoracotomy were identified. Patients who underwent maze, tricuspid intervention, and those who were emergent were excluded. Total psoas muscle area was calculated using the average cross-sectional area at the L3 vertebra on computed tomography scan and indexed to body surface area. Sarcopenia was defined as <25th gender-specific percentile. Patients were stratified by sarcopenia status and outcomes compared. RESULTS: Of 287 total patients, 192 patients met inclusion criteria. Sarcopenic patients were 6 years older (66 vs 60 years, P = 0.01), had lower preoperative albumin levels (4.0 vs 4.3 g/dL, P < 0.001), and had higher Society of Thoracic Surgeons risk of morbidity/mortality (13.1% vs 9.0%, P = 0.003). Operative major morbidity or mortality was 6.4% versus 5.5% (P = 0.824), while the 1-year mortality rate was 2.1% versus 0% (P = 0.08). After risk adjustment, psoas index did not predict operative morbidity or mortality. However, sarcopenia was associated with higher odds of readmission (odds ratio = 0.74, P = 0.02). CONCLUSIONS: Contrary to other cardiac operations, for patients undergoing isolated minimally invasive mitral valve surgery, sarcopenia was not associated with increased perioperative risk except for higher readmission rates. Minimally invasive surgical approaches should be strongly considered as the approach of choice in frail patients.

Does Sustained Reduction of Functional Mitral Regurgitation Impact Survival?

Functional mitral regurgitation (FMR) is associated with increased mortality and has been considered a marker for advanced heart disease, yet the value of mitral valve repair (MVr) in this population remains unclear. This study aims to evaluate the impact of reducing FMR burden through surgical MVr on survival. Patients with severe FMR who underwent MVr with an undersized, complete, rigid, annuloplasty between 2004 and 2017 were assessed (n = 201). Patients were categorized based on grade of recurrent FMR (0-4). Time-to-event Kaplan-Meier estimations of freedom from death or reoperation were performed using the log-rank test. Cox proportional hazards models evaluated all-cause mortality and reported in hazards ratios (HR) and 95% confidence intervals (CI). Patients were categorized by postoperative recurrent FMR: 45% (91/201) of patients had grade 0, 29% (58/201) grade 1, 20% (40/201) grade 2, 2% (4/201) grade 3%, and 4% (8/201) grade 4. The cumulative incidence of reoperation with death as a competing risk was higher in patients with grades ≥3 recurrent FMR compared to grades ≤2 (44.6% vs 14.6%, subhazard ratio 3.69 [95% CI, 1.17-11.6]; P = 0.026). Overall freedom from death or reoperation was superior for recurrent FMR grades ≤2 compared to grades ≥3 (log-rank P < 0.001). Increasing recurrent FMR grade was independently associated with mortality (HR 1.30 [95% CI, 1.07-1.59] P = 0.009). Reduced postoperative FMR grade resulted in an incrementally lower risk of death or reoperation after MVr. These results suggest that achieving a durable reduction in FMR burden improves long-term survival.

Incidence, characteristics, and outcomes of reintervention after mitral transcatheter edge-to-edge repair.

OBJECTIVE: The use of transcatheter edge-to-edge repair (TEER) is growing substantially, and reintervention after TEER by way of repeat TEER or mitral valve surgery (MVS) is increasing as a result. In this nationally representative study we examined the incidence, characteristics, and outcomes of reintervention after index TEER. METHODS: Between July 2013 and November 2017, we reviewed 11,396 patients who underwent index TEER using Medicare beneficiary data. These patients were prospectively tracked and identified as having repeat TEER or MVS. Primary outcomes included 30-day mortality, 30-day readmission, 30-day composite morbidity, and cumulative survival. RESULTS: Among 11,396 patients who underwent TEER, 548 patients (4.8%) required reintervention after a median time interval of 4.5 months. Overall 30-day mortality was 8.6%, 30-day readmission was 20.9%, and 30-day composite morbidity was 48.2%. According to reintervention type, 294 (53.7%) patients underwent repeat TEER, and 254 (46.3%) underwent MVS. Patients who underwent MVS were more likely to be younger and female, but had a similar comorbidity burden compared with the repeat TEER cohort. After adjustment, there were no differences in 30-day mortality (adjusted odds ratio [AOR], 1.26 [95% CI, 0.65-2.45]) or 30-day readmission (AOR, 1.14 [95% CI, 0.72-1.81]). MVS was associated with higher 30-day morbidity (AOR, 4.76 [95% CI, 3.17-7.14]) compared with repeat TEER. Requirement for reintervention was an independent risk factor for long-term mortality in a Cox proportional hazard model (hazard ratio, 3.26 [95% CI, 2.53-4.20]). CONCLUSIONS: Reintervention after index TEER is a high-risk procedure that carries a significant mortality burden. This highlights the importance of ensuring procedural success for index TEER to avoid the morbidity of reintervention altogether.

Healthcare resource utilization and costs for patients with postoperative atrial fibrillation in the United States.

BACKGROUND: Postoperative atrial fibrillation (POAF) is one of the most common complications following cardiac surgery. POAF is associated with increased hospitalization costs, but its long-term economic burden is not well defined. OBJECTIVE: To assess 30-day and 1-year incremental healthcare resource utilization (HRU) and costs associated with POAF in the United States (US). METHODS: This retrospective cohort study used claims data from the IBM Watson MarketScan database. A cohort of US adults aged 55--90 years who underwent open-heart surgery between 1 January 2017 and 31 December 2018 was used to compare patients who experienced POAF versus patients who did not (controls). The outcomes of interest were incremental HRU and costs, which were assessed during the index hospitalization and 30-day and 1-year postdischarge time periods. Inverse probability weighting was used to adjust for differences in baseline characteristics. RESULTS: A total of 8,020 patients met the study inclusion criteria with 5,765 patients in the control cohort (mean age, 63.4 years) and 2,255 patients in the POAF cohort (mean age, 65.8 years). After adjustment, patients with POAF had an index hospitalization that was 1.9 days longer (99% CI, 1.3-2.4 days; p < 0.001) and cost $13,919 more (99% CI, $2,828-$25,011; p < 0.001) than for patients without POAF. POAF patients also had significantly higher HRU at 30 days and 1-year postdischarge with incremental costs of $4,649 (99% CI, $1,479-$7,819; p < 0.001) and $10,671 (99% CI, $2,407-$18,935; p < 0.001), respectively. CONCLUSION: POAF following open-heart surgery poses a significant economic burden up to 1 year postdischarge.

Should mitral valve replacement age guidelines be lowered due to better bioprosthetic mitral valve durability?

OBJECTIVE: Guideline recommendations for mechanical or bioprosthetic valve for mitral valve replacement by age remains controversial. We sought to determine bovine pericardial valve durability by age and risk of reintervention. METHODS: This retrospective study between 2 large university-based cardiac surgery programs examined patients who underwent bioprosthetic mitral valve replacement from 2004 to 2020. Follow-up was obtained through June 2022. Durability outcomes involving structural valve deterioration were compared by age decile. RESULTS: Of 1544 available patients, mean age was 66 ± 13 years and 652 (42%) were aged less than 65 years. Indications for mitral valve replacement were as follows: mitral regurgitation greater than 2+ in 53% (n = 813), mitral stenosis in 44% (n = 650), endocarditis in 18% (n = 277), and reoperation in 39% (n = 602). Concomitant procedures were aortic valve replacement in 28% (n = 426), tricuspid valve in 36% (n = 550), and coronary artery bypass in 19% (n = 290). Thirty-day mortality was 5.4%. In follow-up (clinical: median [interquartile range] 75 [25-129] months), reoperation for endocarditis and new stroke were low (0.30 and 1.06 per 100 patient/years, respectively). The cumulative incidence of mitral valve reintervention for structural valve deterioration among all patients was 6.2% at 10 years and 9.0% at 12 years with no statistical difference in structural valve deterioration in patients aged 40 to 70 years (P = .1). In 90 patients with mitral valve reintervention, 30-day mortality after reintervention was 4.7% (n = 2) for 43 with mitral valve-in-valve and 6.4% (n = 3) for 47 with reoperation. CONCLUSIONS: Bovine pericardial mitral valve replacement is a durable option for younger patients. The opportunity to avoid anticoagulation and the associated risks with mechanical mitral valve replacement may be of benefit to patients. These insights may provide data needed to revise the current guidelines.

Postoperative atrial fibrillation in mitral valve surgery is not benign.

OBJECTIVE: Postoperative atrial fibrillation (POAF) is common after cardiac surgery and is often considered to be benign despite recent data suggesting worse outcomes. There are no guidelines for the amount of POAF that triggers anticoagulation or for postoperative surveillance. We examined the rate of POAF, incidence of neurologic events, development of permanent atrial fibrillation, and mortality in patients undergoing isolated mitral valve surgery at a Mitral Foundation reference center. METHODS: This is a retrospective cohort study of 922 adult patients from 2011 to 2022 with no preoperative history of arrhythmias. Multivariable logistic regression was used to identify independent risk factors for the primary outcomes. Kaplan-Meier analysis and Cox proportional-hazards model were used to characterize long-term survival. RESULTS: The incidence of POAF was 39%. Median follow-up was 4.9 months (interquartile range, 1.1-42.6 months). Diabetes (odds ratio [OR], 2.2; 95% CI, 1.2-4.1; P = .01) and increasing age (OR, 1.1; 95% CI, 1.0-1.1; P < .001) were risk factors for POAF, whereas New York Heart Association functional class was not. POAF was a risk factor for the development of permanent atrial fibrillation (OR, 3.2; 95% CI 1.9-5.4; P < .001), which was associated with increased risk of neurologic events (OR, 3.8; 95% CI, 1.5-9.7; P = .004). Ultimately, patients with POAF had worse unadjusted (P < .001) and adjusted long-term mortality (hazard ratio, 1.8; 95% CI, 1.1-3.1; P = .03). CONCLUSIONS: POAF is associated with an increased rate of neurologic events, portends development of permanent atrial fibrillation, and is associated with worse long-term survival. POAF is not benign and carries a long-term mortality implication.

Reoperation following transcatheter aortic valve replacement: Insights from 10 years' experience.

OBJECTIVE: Use of transcatheter aortic valve replacement (TAVR) has demonstrated dramatic growth in the past decade. This study aims to investigate implications of post-TAVR reoperation from our 10-year experience. METHODS: Between 2011 and 2022, 66 post-TAVR patients underwent a reoperation, consisting of 42 (63.6%) patients with native TAVR and 24 (36.4%) patients with valve-in-valve TAVR (VIV-TAVR) after surgical aortic valve replacement. RESULTS: The aggregate proportion of patients belonging to the low-/intermediate-risk group at the time of TAVR exceeded that of the high-/extreme-risk cohort in 2021. The native TAVR group received a larger TAVR valve, whereas more frequent low-risk status at the time of TAVR than the VIV-TAVR group. Concurrent procedures were highly common during reoperation and isolated surgical aortic valve replacement represented only 18.2% of the entire cohort. The native TAVR group demonstrated significantly higher TAVR explant difficulty index score (2.0 vs 1.0 points; P < .001) and operative mortality (14.2% vs 0%; P = .079) compared with the VIV-TAVR group. The 8-year cumulative incidence of reoperation was 1.9% and 14.1% (subdistribution hazard ratio, 8.0; 95% CI, 4.1-15.9; P < .001) in the native and VIV-TAVR group, respectively. Furthermore, cumulative incidence of valve reintervention, combining reoperations and redo TAVRs, was 3.3% and 19.0% (subdistribution hazard ratio, 6.2; 95% CI, 3.6-10.9; P < .001). CONCLUSIONS: Low-/intermediate-risk patients are emerging as the predominant group necessitating reoperations. Native TAVR was associated with lower postimplant reintervention rates, albeit with higher reoperative technical difficulty and mortality. Conversely, VIV-TAVR was associated with higher reintervention, but demonstrated lower technical difficulty and mortality for reoperation.

Barriers to atrial fibrillation ablation during mitral valve surgery.

BACKGROUND: Nearly 40% of patients with atrial fibrillation (AF) undergoing mitral valve surgery do not receive concomitant ablation despite societal guidelines. We assessed barriers to implementation of this evidence-based practice through a survey of cardiac surgeons in 2 statewide quality collaboratives. METHODS: Adult cardiac surgeons across 2 statewide collaboratives were surveyed on their knowledge and practice regarding AF ablation. Questions concerning experience, clinical practice, case scenarios, and barriers to implementation were included. RESULTS: Among 66 respondents (66 of 135; 48.9%), the majority reported "very comfortable/frequently use" cryoablation (53 of 66; 80.3%) and radiofrequency (55 of 66; 83.3%). Only 12.1% (8/66) were not aware of the recommendations. Approximately one-half of the respondents reported learning AF ablation in fellowship (50.0%; 33 of 66) or attending courses (47.0%; 31 of 66). Responses to clinical scenarios demonstrated wide variability in practice patterns. One-half of the respondents reported no barriers; others cited increased cross-clamp time, excessive patient risk, and arrhythmia incidence as obstacles. Desired interventions included cardiology/electrophysiology support, protocols, pacemaker rate information, and education in the form of site visits, videos and proctors. CONCLUSIONS: Knowledge of evidence-based recommendations and practice patterns vary widely. These data identify several barriers to implementation of concomitant AF ablation and suggest specific interventions (mentorship/support, protocols, research, and education) to overcome these barriers.

Racial disparities in mitral valve surgery: A statewide analysis.

OBJECTIVE: Racial disparities in health care have come to the forefront. We hypothesized that Black race was associated with worse preoperative risk, lower repair rates, and worse outcomes among patients who underwent mitral valve surgery. METHODS: All patients who underwent mitral valve repair or replacement with or without coronary artery bypass grafting from 2011 to 2020 in a statewide collaborative database were stratified into 3 racial groups, White, Black, and other. Preoperative characteristics, procedure type, and outcomes were evaluated. RESULTS: A total of 9074 mitral valve operations were performed at 33 centers (Black 1009 [11.1%], White 7862 [86.6%]). Preoperative combined Society of Thoracic Surgeons morbidity and mortality was higher for Black patients (Black 32%, White 22%, other 23%, [P < .001]) because of a greater proportion of diabetes, hypertension, and chronic lung disease. White patients were more likely to undergo mitral repair (White 66%, Black 53.3%, other 57%; P < .001). Operative mortality was similar across racial groups (White 3.7%, Black 4.6%, other 4.5%; P = .36). After adjusting for preoperative factors, mitral etiology, and hospitals, race was not associated with mitral valve repair, complications, or mortality, but Black patients had higher odds of extended care facility utilization and readmission. CONCLUSIONS: Contrary to our hypothesis, there was no difference in the odds of repair or operative mortality across races after accounting for risk and etiology. However, Black patients were more likely to be readmitted after discharge. These findings support a greater focus on reducing disparities in mitral valve surgery.

Cardiac Reoperations in Patients With Transcatheter Aortic Bioprosthesis.

BACKGROUND: Despite the rapid adoption of transcatheter aortic valve replacement (TAVR), the frequency and clinical outcomes of reoperation after TAVR are not well-described. METHODS: Between 2011 and 2020, 1719 patients underwent a TAVR at our institution. Among these, 32 patients (2%) required a reoperation. Additionally, 16 patients who received a TAVR at another institution received a reoperation at our institution. We retrospectively reviewed these 48 patients. The median interval from TAVR to reoperation was 2.3 years. RESULTS: Primary reoperations included 37 TAVR valve explants (TAVR-explant; 77%) with surgical aortic valve replacement (SAVR), 8 mitral repairs/replacements (17%), 2 coronary artery bypass grafting procedures (4%), and 1 tricuspid valve replacement (2%). Forty-nine percent of nonaortic valve cardiac lesions were present at the time of TAVR. Furthermore, 18 TAVR-explant patients (49%) were deemed anatomically unsuitable for repeat TAVR based on the index TAVR imaging. During TAVR-explant, 6 patients (13%) with native TAVR sustained various degrees of aortic trauma. Patients with unplanned aortic repair demonstrated a smaller sinotubular junction diameter than those without unplanned repair. In contrast, no unplanned aortic repair was needed in the 14 patients with previous SAVR or the latest 20 consecutive patients. The overall in-hospital mortality was 15%, with an observed-to-expected morality ratio of 1.8. CONCLUSIONS: The clinical impact of post-TAVR reoperation remains substantial despite the lower frequency of unplanned aortic repair over time. The necessity of reoperations or unfavorable repeat TAVR anatomy appears predictable at the time of the index TAVR, and implanters must be mindful of "lifetime management" strategy during candidate selection.

Delayed Discharge From the Intensive Care Unit Is Associated With Longer Hospital Lengths of Stay.

OBJECTIVE: The study authors sought to determine if delayed discharge from the intensive care unit (ICU) secondary to a lack of floor beds led to longer postoperative hospital length of stay (LOS) or more hospital readmissions. DESIGN: A retrospective study comparing patients with delayed discharge from the ICU to patients without delayed discharge. SETTING: At a cardiovascular ICU in a tertiary care university hospital. PARTICIPANTS: A total of 5,777 patients that were ready for discharge from the ICU after recovering from cardiac surgery. INTERVENTIONS: None. MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS: The authors used linear regression to measure postoperative hospital LOS and logistic regression to measure hospital readmission in patients whose transfer out of the ICU was delayed at least overnight to patients who were transferred out the same day. There were 3,903 patients transferred to the stepdown unit on the same day as the transfer order and 1,874 patients were transferred on a subsequent day. The postoperative LOS was shorter in the no delay group (9 ± 9 v 11 ± 10 days, standardized difference = 0.162), whereas the stepdown unit stay was similar (6 ± 6 v 5 ± 6 days, standardized difference = 0.076). The readmission rates were 15% in the no delay group versus 14% in the delayed discharge group (standardized difference = 0.032). After adjustment, the authors found by linear regression that delayed discharge was associated with an increase (0.72 [95% CI 0.43-1.01] days, p < 0.001) in postoperative LOS but was not associated with readmission. CONCLUSIONS: The study authors found that patients who had their discharge from the ICU delayed had an increased hospital LOS but a similar rate of hospital readmission.

Contemporary Management of Ischemic Mitral Regurgitation at Coronary Artery Bypass Grafting.

BACKGROUND: Recent guidelines for the treatment of moderate or severe ischemic mitral regurgitation (IMR) in patients undergoing coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG) have changed. This study assessed the real-world impact of changing guidelines on the management of IMR during CABG over time. We hypothesized that the utilization of mitral valve repair for IMR would decrease over time, whereas mitral valve replacement for severe IMR would increase. METHODS: Patients undergoing CABG in a statewide collaborative database (2011-2020) were stratified by severity of IMR. Trends in mitral valve repair or replacement were evaluated. To account for differences of the patients, propensity score-matched analyses were used to compare patients with and without mitral intervention. RESULTS: A total of 11,676 patients met inclusion criteria, including 1355 (11.6%) with moderate IMR and 390 (3.3%) with severe IMR. The proportion of patients undergoing mitral intervention for moderate IMR decreased over time (2011, 17.7%; 2020, 7.5%; Ptrend = .001), whereas mitral replacement for severe IMR remained stable (2011, 11.1%; 2020, 13.3%; Ptrend = .14). Major morbidity was higher for patients with moderate IMR who underwent mitral intervention (29.1% vs 19.9%; P = .005). In a propensity analysis of 249 well-matched pairs, there was no difference in major morbidity (29.3% with mitral intervention vs 23.7% without; P = .16) or operative mortality (1.2% vs 2.4%; P = .5). CONCLUSIONS: Consistent with recent guideline updates, patients with moderate IMR were less likely to undergo mitral repair. However, the rate of replacement for severe IMR did not change. Mitral intervention during CABG did not increase operative mortality or morbidity.

Surgical outcomes of patients at prohibitive risk who are reconsidered for surgery.

Objectives: Transcatheter treatment of advanced mitral and tricuspid valve disease is largely limited to patients at prohibitive surgical risk, although many are not candidates for transcatheter treatment. Here, we describe surgical outcomes of patients at prohibitive risk who were ineligible for transcatheter therapies to guide surgeons in management of this unique population. Methods: Patients at prohibitive risk, defined per surgeon or cardiologist discretion, who were initially referred for a transcatheter mitral or tricuspid intervention in a multidisciplinary atrioventricular valve clinic, were identified from 2019 to 2022. Preoperative risk, operative outcomes, and long-term mortality were evaluated. Results: A total of 337 patients at prohibitive risk were referred for evaluation in a multidisciplinary atrioventricular valve clinic. Of those, 161 underwent transcatheter therapy, 130 patients underwent continued medical management, and 45 were reevaluated and had high-risk surgery. Among surgical patients, 51% were women with a median age of 76 years (quartile 1-quartile 3, 65-81 years). Most patients presented in heart failure (83%; n = 37 out of 45), and 73% were in New York Heart Association functional class III or IV. Most patients (94%; n = 43) had a mitral valve intervention, of whom 56% (24 out of 43) had a mitral valve replacement. The 30-day mortality rate was 4% (2 out of 45) and major morbidity occurred in 33% (15 out of 45). By Kaplan-Meier analysis, 1-year survival was 86% ± 9%. Conclusions: Select patients at prohibitive risk who were ineligible for transcatheter mitral or tricuspid valve intervention underwent surgery with overall low operative mortality and excellent 1-year survival. Patients a prohibitive risk whose anatomy is not amenable to transcatheter devices should be reconsidered for surgery.

Surgical strategy and outcomes for atrial functional mitral regurgitation: All functional mitral regurgitation is not the same!

OBJECTIVE: Functional mitral regurgitation (FMR) is a cardiac pathology that causes the mitral valve to malfunction, leading to mitral regurgitation (MR). The optimal strategy for FMR remains unclear, and FMR outcomes are poor. All etiologies of FMR might not be the same, and subdividing patients with FMR caused by atrial (AFMR) versus ventricular FMR pathology might be important. Herein, we present outcomes of patients with AFMR to define this "new" population. METHODS: Data of patients who underwent mitral valve repair for MR from 2000 to 2020 were reviewed. Patients with degenerative/myxomatous disease, ejection fraction <50% (ventricular FMR), and miscellaneous etiologies including endocarditis and rheumatic disease were excluded to isolate a population of "pure" AFMR patients. Descriptive characteristics and outcomes data were analyzed. RESULTS: Among 123 total AFMR patients, mean preoperative left atrial dimensions were enlarged to 4.9 (95% CI, 4.7-5.0) cm, whereas mean preoperative left ventricular diastolic dimensions remained near normal at 5.0 (95% CI, 4.9-5.2) cm. Preoperative atrial fibrillation was noted in 61% (74/123). Echocardiogram was performed in 58% (71/123) of patients at a median of 569 (interquartile range, 75-1782) days after surgery. Of those, 72% (51/71) had trivial or no MR, 22% (16/71) mild, and only 6% (4/71) moderate or greater MR. Only 1.6% (2/123) required redo mitral valve reoperation. Estimated 5-year survival was 74%. CONCLUSIONS: Patients with AFMR do well after mitral valve repair using an annuloplasty ring, with low rates of reoperation, mortality, and recurrence of MR. Mitral annuloplasty should be considered the surgical therapy of choice for AFMR.

Ultrasonic Emulsification of Severe Mitral Annular Calcification During Mitral Valve Replacement.

PURPOSE: Severe mitral annular calcification (MAC) increases surgical complexity and is independently associated with increased operative mortality for mitral valve replacement (MVR). Recently we adopted ultrasonic emulsification/aspiration for annular decalcification to address these risks and describe our early experience with this new technology. DESCRIPTION: Excluding previous mitral valve surgery or endocarditis, 179 patients with MAC underwent MVR at a single institution between January 2015 and March 2020. Of these, 15 consecutive patients with severe MAC (≥50% of the annulus) underwent annular decalcification with ultrasonic emulsification/aspiration as an adjunct treatment during MVR from April 2019 to March 2020. EVALUATION: Mean patient age was 68 ± 12 years, and 72% (n = 128) were female. Mean preoperative left ventricular ejection fraction was 60% ± 11%, and mean mitral valve gradient was 9.1 ± 4.4 mm Hg. Concomitant procedures included antiarrhythmia (n = 52), aortic valve replacement (n = 32), and coronary artery bypass grafting (n = 20). There were no operative deaths or strokes in the group undergoing ultrasonic emulsification and aspiration. CONCLUSIONS: The use of ultrasonic emulsification and aspiration in severe MAC patients may help mitigate the risks of MVR and facilitate operative success in this challenging, high-risk population.

Patient and Surgeon Predictors of Mitral and Tricuspid Valve Repair for Infective Endocarditis.

Mitral repair (MVr) is superior to replacement for degenerative disease; however, its benefit is less established for endocarditis. We report outcomes of repair or replacement for mitral/tricuspid endocarditis and identify predictors of MVr. Patients undergoing first-time surgery for mitral (n = 260) or tricuspid (n = 71) endocarditis between 1992 to 2018 were identified. Patients with aortic endocarditis were excluded. Primary outcome was all-cause mortality and secondary outcome was MVr. Patients were stratified into active and treated endocarditis separately for mitral and tricuspid groups. Predictors of MVr were assessed through multivariable logistic regression and adjusted likelihood of MVr through marginal effects estimates. A mitral specialist was defined by performing ≥25 annual degenerative MVr. Among 331 patients, 70% (181/260) of those with mitral valve endocarditis and 52% (37/71) of those with tricuspid endocarditis underwent repair. The MVr group compared with replacement had a higher proportion of elective acuity and less diabetes, hypertension, active endocarditis, cardiogenic shock, and dialysis. Estimated 5-year survival did not differ between repair versus replacement for active mitral (68 ± 14% vs 60 ± 14%, P = 0.34) or tricuspid endocarditis (60 ± 17% vs 61 ± 19%, P = 0.67), but was superior after repair for treated mitral endocarditis (86 ± 7% vs 51 ± 24%, P = 0.014). Independent predictors of mortality included dialysis for active and treated mitral endocarditis, and mitral replacement (vs MVr) for treated mitral endocarditis. The likelihood of MVr was 82 ± 5% for mitral specialists and 47 ± 9% for non-specialists (P < 0.001). MVr for endocarditis should be pursued, if feasible. Importantly, achieving MVr was driven not only by patient factors, but also surgeon experience.

Rheumatic mitral valve repair or replacement in the valve-in-valve era.

OBJECTIVE: For degenerative mitral disease, repair is superior to replacement; however, the best operative strategy for rheumatic mitral disease remains unclear. We evaluated the association between decision-making in choosing repair versus replacement and outcomes across 2 decades of rheumatic mitral surgery. METHODS: Patients undergoing isolated, first-time rheumatic mitral surgery were identified. Era 1 (1997-2008) and Era 2 (2009-2018) were distinguished by intraoperative assessment of anterior leaflet mobility/calcification (Era 2) in deciding between mitral repair versus replacement. Primary outcome was a composite of death, reoperation, and severe valve dysfunction. RESULTS: Among 180 patients, age was 59 ± 14 years, and ejection fraction was 58% ± 10%. A higher proportion in Era 1 (n = 56) compared with Era 2 (n = 124) had preoperative atrial fibrillation (68% vs 46%; P = .006); the groups were otherwise similar. Primary indication was mitral stenosis in 69% (124 out of 180; pure = 35, mixed = 89) and did not differ by era (P = .67). During Era 1, 70% (39 out of 56) underwent repair, compared with 33% (41 out of 124) during Era 2 (P < .001). Freedom from death, reoperation, or severe valve dysfunction at 5 years was higher in Era 2 (72% ± 9%) than Era 1 (54% ± 13%; P = .04). Five-year survival was higher in Era 2 than Era 1, but did not differ between repair versus replacement. Five-year cumulative incidence of reoperation with death as a competing risk did not differ by era, but was higher after repair than replacement. CONCLUSIONS: Careful assessment of anterior leaflet mobility/calcification to determine mitral repair or replacement was associated with improved outcomes. This decision-making strategy may alter the threshold for rheumatic mitral replacement in the current valve-in-valve era.

The Clinical Impact of Implementation of a Multidisciplinary Endocarditis Team.

BACKGROUND: Infectious endocarditis is associated with substantial in-hospital mortality of 15%-20%. Effective management requires coordination between multiple medical and surgical subspecialties, which can often lead to disjointed care. Previous European studies have identified multidisciplinary endocarditis teams as a tool for reducing endocarditis mortality. METHODS: The multidisciplinary endocarditis team was formed in May 2018. The group developed an evidence-based algorithm for management of endocarditis that was used to provide recommendations for hospitalized patients over a 1-year period. Mortality outcomes were then retroactively assessed and compared to a historical control utilizing propensity matching. RESULTS: Between June 2018 and June 2019 the team provided guideline-based recommendations on 56 patients with Duke Criteria-definite endocarditis and at least 1 American Heart Association indication for surgery. The historical control included 68 patients with definite endocarditis and surgical indications admitted between July 1, 2014, and June 30, 2015. In-hospital mortality decreased significantly from 29.4% in 2014-2015 to 7.1% in 2018-2019 (P < .0001). There was a non-significant increase in the rate of surgical intervention after implementation of the team (41.2% vs 55.4%; P = 0.12). Propensity score matching demonstrated similar results. CONCLUSIONS: Implementation of a multidisciplinary endocarditis team was associated with a significant 1-year decrease in all-cause in-hospital mortality for patients with definite endocarditis and surgical indications, in the presence of notable differences between the 2 studied cohorts. In conjunction with previous studies demonstrating their effectiveness, these data support the idea that widespread adoption of endocarditis teams in North America could improve outcomes for this patient population.