The role of patients' expectations in the development of anticipatory nausea related to chemotherapy for cancer.

Although anticipatory nausea (AN), which is reported by one-third of patients receiving chemotherapy for cancer, is thought to develop primarily by classical conditioning, response expectancies may also be important. The role of patients' expectations of nausea in the development of AN was examined in 63 female cancer patients receiving their first course of chemotherapy. Twenty women (32%) expected to experience nausea and twelve (19%) reported AN before the third cycle. Pretreatment expectations predicted AN at cycle three (Spearman's r = 0.41, P = 0.001). AN developed in 40% of patients who expected nausea, 13% of those who were uncertain whether they would develop it, and no patients who did not expect nausea. Logistic regression indicated that expecting nausea was the strongest predictor (chi(2) =13.15; P < 0.001). Results support a role for cognitive factors in the development of chemotherapy side effects and suggest testing psychologic interventions to modify patients' expectations.

Nausea and vomiting remain a significant clinical problem: trends over time in controlling chemotherapy-induced nausea and vomiting in 1413 patients treated in community clinical practices.

Data from 1413 outpatients in community-based clinical practices were collected in order to characterize the use and effectiveness of 5-HT(3) receptor antagonists for control of chemotherapy-induced nausea and vomiting (NV). Patients were divided by treatment starting date into six cohorts for trend analysis. In addition, NV symptoms were compared in 252 patients treated prior to the commercial introduction of the 5-HT(3) receptor antagonist antiemetics, and an equal number of patients treated after their introduction. A comparison of cohorts revealed a significant (P = 0. 027) downward trend over time for the frequency of post-treatment vomiting episodes, but not for frequency of post-treatment nausea (P = 0.69). The average duration of nausea following treatment increased significantly over time (P = 0.003). Although the introduction of 5-HT(3) receptor antagonist antiemetics has apparently led to a significant reduction in the frequency of post-treatment vomiting, there has been an accompanying increase in the duration of post-treatment nausea.

Patient expectations as predictor of chemotherapy-induced nausea.

We examined the relationship between patients' pretreatment expectations for nausea and vomiting and their subsequent development in a homogeneous group of 29 female cancer patients receiving platinum-containing chemotherapy as inpatients (Study 1) and in 81 subjects with any of a variety of cancer diagnoses treated largely as outpatients (Study 2). Each study found a significant relationship between patients' expectations for nausea development measured prior to their first treatment and their mean postchemotherapy nausea severity (both, p < 0.05). Patients' expectations accounted for unique variance in nausea severity in each study even after controlling for known pharmacological and physiological predictors of nausea (Study 1: delta R2 = .18, p < .04; Study 2: delta R2 = .05, p < .03). By contrast, we found no significant relationships between expectations for vomiting and subsequent vomiting. Our results support the view that patients' expectations for nausea affect its subsequent development, indicating the presence of a significant psychological component in treatment-related nausea. Implications of this are discussed.

Sources of information used by patients to learn about chemotherapy side effects.

BACKGROUND: Little is known about the relative importance of specific information sources patients use to obtain knowledge about treatment side effects. The authors examined information sources used to learn about side effects, why patients believe they will experience some but not others, and the meanings side effects have in terms of treatment efficacy. METHODS: Before treatment, 31 ovarian cancer patients and 81 men and women with a variety of cancer diagnoses completed a questionnaire assessing their expectations about experiencing specific side effects of chemotherapy and information sources used. RESULTS: The doctor or nurse was the most frequently cited source of side-effect information, with readings second. While most thought they would get certain side effects because the doctor or nurse had said so, most instinctively believed they would not get others. CONCLUSIONS: Patients relied on medical and non-medical information sources. Further research could examine other sources for their influences on information-seeking activities.

Use of 5-HT3 receptor antagonists to prevent nausea and emesis caused by chemotherapy for patients with breast carcinoma in community practice settings.

BACKGROUND: Although 5-HT3 receptor antagonists are clinically more effective in controlling emesis, particularly that caused by high dose cisplatin, than previously available agents, they appear to be less effective against nausea. This report focuses on the effectiveness of these agents against nausea and emesis in patients receiving two moderately emetogenic combination chemotherapy regimens as treatment for breast carcinoma in community practice settings. METHODS: Six hundred ninety-two breast carcinoma patients (688 female, 4 male; mean age, 51 years) enrolled in a nonrandomized study completed the Morrow Assessment of Nausea and Emesis (MANE) following 4 consecutive chemotherapy treatments. The frequency, duration, and severity of postchemotherapy nausea (PN) and postchemotherapy emesis (PE) were compared by type of antiemetic (5-HT3 receptor antagonist vs. other) and chemotherapy regimen (cyclophosphamide and doxorubicin with or without 5-fluorouracil [CA/CAF] vs. cyclophosphamide, methrotrexate, and 5-fluorouracil [CMF]). RESULTS: Within each regimen, the mean duration of PN was significantly longer for patients who received a 5-HT3 receptor antagonist than for those who were not given an antiemetic of that type (CA: 40.3 hours vs. 29.6 hours, P < 0.05; CMF: 37.6 hours vs. 30.2 hours, P < 0.05). There were no significant differences in the frequency or severity of nausea or in the frequency, severity, or duration of emesis by type of antiemetic for patients receiving either regimen. CONCLUSIONS: The results of this observational study suggest that 5-HT3 receptor antagonists are no more effective than other commonly used medications in controlling postchemotherapy nausea and emesis in women with breast carcinoma who are treated with moderately emetogenic chemotherapy in community practice settings. In fact, they may be associated with significant prolongation of the course of postchemotherapy nausea.

Anticipatory nausea and vomiting in the era of 5-HT3 antiemetics.

Cancer chemotherapy is known to lead to nausea and vomiting in a large proportion of cases. If emesis is severe it can lead in its turn to anticipatory nausea and vomiting (ANV), which cannot be controlled by antiemetic medication. The etiology of ANV and various methods that have been used to counteract the condition are discussed.

Initial control of chemotherapy-induced nausea and vomiting in patient quality of life.

The side effects commonly experienced by patients receiving chemotherapy for the treatment of cancer can challenge many aspects of daily life. Nausea and vomiting, the most common side effects reported by patients, affect the ability to continue with usual life activities and, thus have a pronounced impact on quality of life. This paper reviews studies of the impact of nausea and emesis on quality of life, and highlights the importance of prevention of these side effects by presenting new data on how persistent uncontrolled nausea and vomiting can be. The Morrow Assessment of Nausea and Emesis (MANE) was used to collect information on symptoms experienced by consecutive patients starting chemotherapy between September 1987 and December 1995 at any of 18 geographically diverse member sites of the University of Rochester Cancer Center Community Clinical Oncology Program. Data from 1,413 patients were collected after each of four successive chemotherapy treatments. Reported incidences of posttreatment nausea and posttreatment vomiting after the first treatment were 59.4% and 28.6%, respectively. Occurrence of nausea/vomiting at the first treatment was a strong predictor of nausea/vomiting at later treatments. Of the 839 patients reporting initial nausea, 763 (90.9%) reported nausea at at least one subsequent treatment, and approximately 59% reported nausea after all three subsequent treatments. Fewer than half (45.6%) of the patients who had no nausea at the first treatment developed it later. The majority (72.0%) of patients reporting vomiting at the first treatment also reported subsequent vomiting, 30.7% of whom experienced emesis at all remaining treatments. Conversely, 76.2% of patients who were emesis-free at the first treatment remained so for all later treatments. These findings show a continuing need for further progress in controlling nausea and vomiting, and demonstrate the importance of aggressive nausea/vomiting control at the first treatment. In addition, more emphasis on controlling chemotherapy-induced nausea after its initial occurrence is necessary.

Progress in reducing anticipatory nausea and vomiting: a study of community practice.

Chemotherapy-related nausea and vomiting (NV) in 300 consecutive patients treated in community practices prior to the availability of 5-HT3 antiemetics (9/87 to 1/91) were compared with NV in a second sample of 300 patients treated after their commercial introduction (9/93 to 2/95). Eighty-six percent of the later patients received 5-HT3 antiemetics, and significantly fewer (43.3%) reported one or more episodes of posttreatment vomiting during their first four cycles of chemotherapy compared with those in the previous sample (55.0%: P < .01). Identical numbers of both groups (79.3%) reported at least one episode of posttreatment nausea. A significant increase in the average duration of both posttreatment nausea (from 28.1 h to 37.2 h; P = 0.001) and posttreatment vomiting (from 10.9 h-16.5 h, P = .02) was found; no significant differences were seen in the reported severity of either symptom. The proportion of patients experiencing at least one episode of anticipatory nausea (31.0% vs 32.0%) or anticipatory vomiting (7.7% vs 6.3%) did not differ significantly (P > 0.5) between groups, nor were there significant differences in the duration or severity of anticipatory symptoms (P > 0.4 for all comparisons). The reduction in the frequency of posttreatment vomiting supports research findings of efficacy. Findings of an increase in duration of posttreatment nausea and emesis and no change in the frequency of posttreatment nausea or in anticipatory symptoms show a continuing need for progress in control of posttreatment emesis and emphasize the need for further research on the control of chemotherapy-induced nausea.

Human astrocytoma U251 RNA and genomic brain glycogen phosphorylase sequences.

There are two versions of human brain glycogen phosphorylase (B-GP) cDNA in the literature that differ significantly in their C-terminal coding and 3' untranslated regions; one isolated from human fetal brain, and the other from human brain astrocytoma cell line U251. A 280 bp absence in the cDNA sequence isolated from human brain astrocytoma cell line U251 changes the predicted protein length from 842 aa (estimated from fetal brain cDNA) to 862 aa. RNA and genomic DNA were isolated from U251 cells and the 280 bp region of interest was amplified by the polymerase chain reaction (PCR). Sequence analysis of the amplified region has unexpectedly confirmed the presence of the 280 bp in U251 RNA and genomic DNA. Thus, the predicted protein length of 842 aa, as reported for fetal brain glycogen phosphorylase, is most likely the correct one.