Foodborne Botulism Outbreak Associated With Commercial Nacho Cheese Sauce From a Gas Station Market.

BACKGROUND: Botulism is a rare and potentially fatal paralytic disease caused by botulinum neurotoxin (BoNT). In April 2017, 4 California residents from 2 adjacent counties were hospitalized with suspected foodborne botulism, precipitating an investigation by state and local public health departments in California. METHODS: We interviewed suspected botulism patients and their families, inspected the suspect establishment, and collected suspect food. We tested patient sera, stool, and gastric aspirates using mouse bioassay for BoNT and/or culture for Clostridium botulinum. We tested suspect food and environmental samples for BoNT and confirmed presumptive positives using direct mouse bioassay and culture. We performed whole-genome sequencing on food and clinical isolates. RESULTS: From April 2017 through May 2017, 10 patients in the Sacramento area were hospitalized with laboratory-confirmed botulism; 7 required mechanical ventilation, and 1 died. Of 9 patients with information, all had visited Gas Station X before illness onset, where 8 reported consuming a commercial cheese sauce. BoNT/A and/or BoNT/A-producing C. botulinum were detected from each patient and from leftover cheese sauce. Clostridium botulinum isolates from 4 patients were closely related to cheese sauce isolates by whole-genome high-quality single-nucleotide polymorphism analysis. No other botulism cases associated with this cheese sauce were reported elsewhere in the United States. CONCLUSIONS: This large foodborne botulism outbreak in California was caused by consumption of commercial cheese sauce dispensed at a gas station market. The epidemiologic and laboratory evidence confirmed the cheese sauce as the outbreak source. The cheese sauce was likely locally contaminated, although the mechanism is unclear.

Wound Botulism Outbreak Among Persons Who Use Black Tar Heroin - San Diego County, California, 2017-2018.

During September 29-October 6, 2017, the County of San Diego Public Health Services (COSD) was notified of two patients with suspected wound botulism and a history of using black tar heroin. On October 9, COSD, which had reported an average of one wound botulism case per year during 2001-2016, sent a health alert through the California Health Alert Network, notifying Southern California providers of these two patients, including their signs and symptoms and black tar heroin exposure. In collaboration with the California Department of Public Health, COSD conducted an investigation to identify additional cases, determine risk factors for illness, estimate cost of medical care, and develop recommendations to prevent further illness. By April 18, 2018, nine (eight confirmed and one probable) patients with wound botulism were identified, all of whom were hospitalized; one of the nine died. All nine were persons who inject drugs; seven specifically reported using black tar heroin and six practiced subcutaneous injection known as skin popping. Clinically compatible signs and symptoms included muscle weakness, difficulty swallowing, blurred vision, drooping eyelids, slurred speech, difficulty breathing, loss of facial expression, or descending paralysis. All patients were treated with heptavalent botulism antitoxin (BAT). Wound botulism is likely underrecognized because of its rarity and the overlapping signs and symptoms with opioid intoxication, overdose, and other neurologic syndromes including Guillain-Barré syndrome, the Miller Fisher variant of Guillain-Barré syndrome, and myasthenia gravis. Prompt diagnosis, administration of BAT, and provision of supportive care can help stop the progression of paralysis and be lifesaving.

Regional variations in breast cancer incidence among California women, 1988-1997.

BACKGROUND: Internationally, California has some of the highest breast cancer rates; these rates also show substantial regional variations within the state. This study describes geographic breast cancer incidence patterns within California and evaluates the degree to which socioeconomic status (SES) and urbanization explain the regional variability. METHODS: Invasive breast cancer cases in women > or =20 year of age were identified from the California Cancer Registry, for 1988-1997, then assigned to one of three regions (San Francisco Bay Area, Southern Coastal Area and the rest of California), based on residence at diagnosis. Neighborhood SES and urbanization were derived from U.S. Census data. Rate ratios (RR) and 95% confidence intervals (CI) were computed using Poisson regression. Analyses were conducted for all invasive breast cancer cases (n=176,302) and by selected histologic subtypes: ductal (n=121,619); lobular (n=13,410); mixed ductal and lobular (n=9744). RESULTS: Compared to block groups with the lowest quartile of SES, rates were highest in block groups with high SES. Rates also were higher in suburban and city areas than in small town/rural areas. Compared to the rest of California, age- and race-adjusted rates for all breast cancer were approximately 20% higher in the San Francisco Bay Area and 10% higher in the Southern Coastal Area. After adjusting for SES and urbanization the rate ratios were reduced to near unity (RR=1.06, 95% CI: 1.03-1.09 for San Francisco Bay Area; RR=1.02, 95% CI: 0.99-1.04 for Southern Coastal Area). Rates ratios for ductal carcinomas mirrored those for all cases. For lobular cases, rate ratios remained elevated after adjustment for age, race/ethnicity, neighborhood SES and urbanization (RR=1.18, 95% CI: 1.11-1.27 for San Francisco Bay Area; RR=1.10, 95% CI: 1.04-1.17 for Southern Coastal Area). For the subset of cases with mixed ductal and lobular histologies, the rate ratio for the San Francisco Bay Area was no longer elevated after adjusting for age, race/ethnicity, SES and urbanization (RR=0.92, 95% CI: 0.84-1.01); the adjusted rate ratio for the Southern Coastal Area, however, remained elevated (RR=1.22, 95% CI: 1.12-1.32). CONCLUSIONS: Regional differences in neighborhood SES and urbanization appear to largely explain regional rate differences in California for all breast cancers and ductal carcinomas but do not fully explain geographic patterns of breast cancer with a lobular component.