Application of artificial intelligence in cataract management: current and future directions.

The rise of artificial intelligence (AI) has brought breakthroughs in many areas of medicine. In ophthalmology, AI has delivered robust results in the screening and detection of diabetic retinopathy, age-related macular degeneration, glaucoma, and retinopathy of prematurity. Cataract management is another field that can benefit from greater AI application. Cataract  is the leading cause of reversible visual impairment with a rising global clinical burden. Improved diagnosis, monitoring, and surgical management are necessary to address this challenge. In addition, patients in large developing countries often suffer from limited access to tertiary care, a problem further exacerbated by the ongoing COVID-19 pandemic. AI on the other hand, can help transform cataract management by improving automation, efficacy and overcoming geographical barriers. First, AI can be applied as a telediagnostic platform to screen and diagnose patients with cataract using slit-lamp and fundus photographs. This utilizes a deep-learning, convolutional neural network (CNN) to detect and classify referable cataracts appropriately. Second, some of the latest intraocular lens formulas have used AI to enhance prediction accuracy, achieving superior postoperative refractive results compared to traditional formulas. Third, AI can be used to augment cataract surgical skill training by identifying different phases of cataract surgery on video and to optimize operating theater workflows by accurately predicting the duration of surgical procedures. Fourth, some AI CNN models are able to effectively predict the progression of posterior capsule opacification and eventual need for YAG laser capsulotomy. These advances in AI could transform cataract management and enable delivery of efficient ophthalmic services. The key challenges include ethical management of data, ensuring data security and privacy, demonstrating clinically acceptable performance, improving the generalizability of AI models across heterogeneous populations, and improving the trust of end-users.

Three-Year Outcomes of Simultaneous Accelerated Corneal Crosslinking and Femto-LASIK for the Treatment of High Myopia in Asian Eyes.

PURPOSE: To determine the long-term visual outcomes of simultaneous femtosecond laser-assisted laser in situ keratomileusis (femto-LASIK) and accelerated cross-linking (CXL) [LASIK Xtra] for the treatment of high myopia. PATIENTS AND METHODS: All 163 consecutive eyes of 85 patients who underwent LASIK Xtra for the treatment of high myopia and/or myopic astigmatism (spherical equivalent ≥ -6.00 D) in Singapore National Eye Centre from the years 2013 to 2017 were included in this retrospective case series. Post-operative follow-up was up to 3 years. RESULTS: Of the 163 eyes, 67 were followed up for 1 year (mean 12.9 months), 69 for 2 years (mean 24.0 months) and 43 for 3 years (mean 36.4 months). Overall mean follow-up was 22.8 months (9-46 months). The mean pre-operative spherical equivalent (SE) was -8.60 ± 1.47 D [range: -11.75 to -4.75] (n = 163) and mean attempted correction SE was -8.84 ± 1.41 D [range: -11.88 to -5.25]. Most eyes (>95%) maintained an uncorrected distance visual acuity of 6/12 or better over 3 years. Visual outcomes were predictable with ≥95% of eyes achieving a SE correction within ± 1D of attempted correction over 3 years. There was a mild regression in SE refraction over 3 years with a mean of -0.10 ± 0.45 D three years post-operatively (p = 0.03). The safety index was >1.05 at 3 years follow-up. There were no significant post-operative complications though 24 eyes had mild haze and 2 eyes had grade 1 diffuse lamellar keratitis that resolved within 1 month. CONCLUSION: Our 3-year LASIK Xtra results show favorable safety, efficacy, predictability and stability outcomes in Asian patients with high myopia.

Corneal Inlay Damage After Cosmetic Laser Treatment of the Eyelid With Long-Pulsed Nd:YAG Laser.

Importance: Protective eyewear or corneal shields are recommended during cosmetic facial laser treatment. Objective: To describe the occurrence of corneal inlay damage following treatment to the eyelids and face with an Nd:YAG laser. Design, Setting, and Participants: This observational case report includes a single incident case cared for at a tertiary care center. A 58-year-old man who had undergone bilateral uncomplicated myopic laser in situ keratomileusis surgery in 2003 and corneal inlay implant in the nondominant left eye in 2013 experienced decreased visual acuity (VA) and pain in the left eye after the application of 2 passes of the Nd:YAG laser to his face and both eyelids for facial tightening. At presentation, the uncorrected VA was counting fingers OS and 20/20 OD. Slitlamp biomicroscopy showed a corneal epithelial defect overlying a deformed corneal inlay, peripheral scattered pigmentary deposits, corneal haze, and brown discoloration of the lamellar pocket of the inlay. He underwent explant of the inlay and debridement 48 hours later because of deteriorating VA and increasing corneal haze. Exposure: Application of long-pulsed Nd:YAG laser at 1064 nm to the middle one-third of both upper eyelids and the periorbital region in a man with a corneal inlay implant. Corneal shields were not worn during the procedure. The peak penetration depth of this laser system is approximately 4 mm. The mean (SD) thickness of the upper eyelid in Asian eyes is 1.127 (0.238) mm. Main Outcomes and Measures: Improvement of corneal inlay damage. Results: In this 58-year-old man, 3 months after the inlay explant, the intrastromal discoloration had resolved. There was still residual corneal haze, but the patient was able to achieve a best-corrected VA of 20/25 OS for distance and J3 (Snellen equivalent, 20/30) OS for near. Conclusions and Relevance: Although the exact cause and effect cannot be determined from a single case, our findings suggest that a history of corneal inlay implant should be asked about prior to any long-pulsed Nd:YAG laser treatment to the periorbital skin and eyelids. Furthermore, these findings suggest that laser treatment to the eyelids should be avoided and that protective eyewear or corneal shields are recommended during cosmetic facial laser treatment in all patients.

Simultaneous Accelerated Corneal Crosslinking and Laser In situ Keratomileusis for the Treatment of High Myopia in Asian Eyes.

BACKGROUND: LASIK Xtra is a recently described technique which combines LASIK and accelerated corneal cross-linking(CXL) in the same setting. Its long-term outcome in Asians with high myopia is not well described. OBJECTIVES: To compare the efficacy, predictability and safety of LASIK Xtra with LASIK in patients with high myopia. METHOD: This is a retrospective study comparing 50 consecutive eyes undergoing LASIK Xtra for the correction of high myopia and/or myopic astigmatism (-6.63 to -15.50 D manifest spherical equivalent) with a matched control group of 50 eyes undergoing LASIK alone for correction of high myopia (-6.00 to -12.25 D manifest spherical equivalent). Mean follow-up was 5.7 months (range, 1.5-13.3 months) for LASIK Xtra and 3.6 months (range, 1.7-4.2 months) for LASIK only. Outcome measures included Uncorrected Distance Visual Acuity (UDVA), Corrected Distance Visual Acuity (CDVA), refraction and intraoperative and postoperative complications. RESULTS: At post-operative 3 months, all eyes achieved UDVA of 20/40 or better, and 80.0% of LASIK Xtra eyes achieved UDVA of 20/20 or better, compared to 66.0% of LASIK only eyes (p = 0.115). Efficacy indices were 0.99±0.17 for LASIK Xtra and 0.94±0.17 for LASIK only (p = 0.164). The proportion of eyes within ±0.50 D of attempted correction was 84% in the LASIK only group and 72% in the LASIK Xtra group at post-operative 3 months (p = 0.148). Safety indices were 1.11±0.19 and 1.11±0.18 in the LASIK Xtra and LASIK only groups, respectively (p = 0.735). CONCLUSION: LASIK Xtra achieved comparable safety, predictability and efficacy as LASIK in patients with high myopia. Good refractive stability was attained at 6-12 months. Further long term studies are required to determine whether simultaneous CXL is able to reduce postoperative LASIK keratectasia in high-risk individuals.

Enhancement after Small-Incision Lenticule Extraction: Incidence, Risk Factors, and Outcomes.

PURPOSE: To report the incidence, risk factors, and outcomes of enhancement after small-incision lenticule extraction (SMILE). DESIGN: Retrospective cohort study. PARTICIPANTS: Five hundred twenty-four eyes of 307 patients who underwent SMILE at Singapore National Eye Center between February 2012 and March 2016. METHODS: The data collected included patient age at primary SMILE, gender, race, preoperative and postoperative manifest refraction spherical equivalent (MRSE), preoperative and postoperative uncorrected distance visual acuity and corrected distance visual acuity, the occurrence of suction loss during the procedure, and the need for enhancement. All enhancements were carried out by performing an alcohol-assisted photorefractive keratectomy (PRK) procedure with application of mitomycin C (MMC). MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Incidence, prevalence, preoperative and intraoperative risk factors for enhancement, and outcomes after enhancement. RESULTS: The prevalence of enhancement was 2.7%, and 71.4% eyes had enhancement within 1 year of primary SMILE. The incidence of enhancement was 2.1% and 2.9% at 1 and 2 years, respectively. Age older than 35 years, preoperative MRSE more than -6.00 diopters (D), preoperative myopia more than 6.00 D, preoperative astigmatism more than 3.00 D, and intraoperative suction loss were significant risk factors for enhancement after SMILE after adjusting for all other covariates (odds ratios, 5.58, 4.80, 1.41, 3.06, and 2.14, respectively; P = 0.004, 0.021, 0.022, 0.002, and 0.020, respectively). In the patients who underwent bilateral SMILE, the first-operated eye had a marginal trend toward significance for enhancement (P = 0.054). There was no gender or racial difference. In the 14 eyes requiring enhancement, the uncorrected distance visual acuity before enhancement ranged from 20/80 to 20/25, and the mean attempted enhancement spherical equivalent was -0.50±0.86 D. The uncorrected distance visual acuity improved in most patients (92.9%) after enhancement. CONCLUSIONS: The 2-year incidence of enhancement after SMILE was 2.9%. Risk factors associated with enhancement included older age at SMILE procedure, greater preoperative MRSE, greater preoperative myopia, greater preoperative astigmatism, and the occurrence of intraoperative suction loss. Clinical outcomes of using PRK with application of MMC for enhancement were good.

Extracapsular cataract extraction training: junior ophthalmology residents' self-reported satisfaction level with their proficiency and initial learning barrier.

PURPOSE: To investigate residents' self-reported satisfaction level with their proficiency in extracapsular cataract extraction (ECCE) surgery and the initial barriers to learning the procedure. METHODS: This is a single-centre prospective descriptive case series involving eight first-year ophthalmology residents in Singapore National Eye Center. We recorded the demographics, frequency of review by the residents of their own surgical videos and their satisfaction level with their proficiency at each of the ECCE steps using a 5-point Likert scale. All ECCE surgical videos between October 2013 and May 2014 were collected and analysed for the overall time taken for the surgery and the time taken to perform the individual steps of the procedure. RESULTS: The mean age of the residents was 27.6 ± 1.5 years and 62.5% (5/8) were women. More than half (62.5%, 5/8) reviewed their own surgical videos while 37.5% (3/8) discussed the surgical videos with their peers or supervisors. Of the ECCE steps, the residents were most dissatisfied with their proficiency in performing irrigation and aspiration (87.5%, 7/8), followed by suturing (62.5%, 5/8), intraocular lens insertion (62.5%, 5/8) and tin can capsulotomy (62.5%, 5/8). The average time taken for each ECCE case was 55.0 ± 12.2 min and, of all the steps, most time was spent on suturing (20.5 ± 6.8 min), followed by irrigation and aspiration (5.5 ± 3.6 min) and tin can capsulotomy (3.3 ± 1.8 min). CONCLUSIONS: The first-year ophthalmology residents were most dissatisfied with their proficiency in irrigation/aspiration, suturing and tin can capsulotomy. More training needs to be directed to these areas during teaching sessions in the operating room, wet laboratory or cataract simulation training sessions.

Comparative analysis of two femtosecond LASIK platforms using iTRAQ quantitative proteomics.

PURPOSE: New femtosecond laser platforms may reduce ocular surface interference and LASIK-associated dry eye. This study investigated tear protein profiles in subjects who underwent LASIK using two femtosecond lasers to assess differences in protein expression. METHODS: This was a randomized interventional clinical trial involving 22 patients who underwent femtosecond laser refractive surgery with a contralateral paired eye design. Corneal flaps of 22 subjects were created by either Visumax or Intralase laser. Tear samples were collected preoperatively, and at 1 week and 3 months postoperatively using Schirmer's strips. Tear protein ratios were calculated relative to preoperative protein levels at baseline. The main outcome measures were the levels of a panel of dry eye protein markers analyzed using isobaric tagging for relative and absolute quantitation (iTRAQ) mass spectrometry. RESULTS: A total of 824 unique proteins were quantifiable. Tear protein ratios were differentially regulated between the eyes treated with different lasers. The secretoglobulins Lipophilin A (1.80-fold) and Lipophilin C (1.77) were significantly upregulated (P < 0.05) at 1 week postoperatively in Visumax but not in Intralase-treated eyes. At 1 week, orosomucoid1 was upregulated (1.78) in Intralase but not Visumax-treated eyes. In the same eyes, lysozyme, cathepsin B, and lipo-oxygenase were downregulated at 0.44-, 0.64-, and 0.64-folds, respectively. Transglutaminase-2 was downregulated in both groups of eyes. CONCLUSIONS: Different laser platforms induce distinct biological responses in the cornea and ocular surface, which manifests as different levels of tear proteins. This study has implications for surgical technology and modulation of wound healing responses. (ClinicalTrials.gov number, NCT01252654.).

Patient and surgeon experience during laser in situ keratomileusis using 2 femtosecond laser systems.

PURPOSE: To describe the subjective experience of patients and surgeons during laser in situ keratomileusis (LASIK) using the Intralase 60 kHz or the Visumax 500 kHz femtosecond laser. SETTING: Singapore National Eye Centre, Singapore. DESIGN: Prospective randomized clinical study. METHODS: In myopic patients, LASIK was performed with the corneal flap created using the 60 kHz laser in 1 eye and the 500 kHz laser in the contralateral eye. Postoperatively, patients completed a standardized validated questionnaire about their subjective intraoperative experiences (eg, light perception, pain, fear). Surgeons reported their intraoperative experiences and preferences. RESULTS: Loss of light perception occurred in 50.0% of 60 kHz laser cases and 0% of 500 kHz laser cases during docking and in 63.0% and 0% of cases, respectively, during laser flap creation (P < .0001). The mean pain score with the 60 kHz laser was significantly higher during docking (P < .0001) but not during laser flap cutting (P = .006). Subconjunctival hemorrhage occurred in 67.4% of eyes with the 60 kHz laser and in 2.2% of eyes with the 500 kHz laser (P < .0001). The 500 kHz laser was preferred by 78.3% of patients, while 21.7% preferred the 60 kHz laser (P < .0001). The surgeons preferred the 60 kHz laser in 50.0% of cases and the 500 kHz laser in 8.7% (P < .0001); 41.3% had no preference. CONCLUSIONS: Patients preferred surgery with the 500 kHz laser with no loss of light perception, less pain, less fear, and less subconjunctival hemorrhage. Surgeons preferred the 60 kHz laser.

Visual outcomes comparison of 2 femtosecond laser platforms for laser in situ keratomileusis.

PURPOSE: To compare the efficacy, predictability, and safety outcomes of 2 femtosecond laser platforms for flap creation during laser in situ keratomileusis (LASIK) for myopia and myopic astigmatism. SETTING: Singapore National Eye Centre, Singapore. DESIGN: Retrospective case review. METHODS: In this single-center multisurgeon study, patients had LASIK with flaps created using a Visumax 500 kHz or Intralase 60 kHz femtosecond laser system. Ablation was performed with the Wavelight Allegretto Eye-Q 400 Hz excimer laser in all patients. Preoperative and 3-month postoperative manifest refraction, attempted treatment spherical equivalent (SE), visual acuity, and complications were compared. RESULTS: The 500 kHz femtosecond laser group comprised 381 patients (381 eyes) and the 60 kHz femtosecond laser group, 362 patients (362 eyes). Three months postoperatively, the uncorrected distance visual acuity was 20/40 or better in 99.1% of eyes in the 60 kHz laser group and 99.4% of eyes in the 500 kHz laser group (P=.678). Regarding predictability, 98.6% of eyes and 97.4% of eyes, respectively, were within ± 1.0 diopter of the attempted SE correction postoperatively (P=.228). The safety index was similar in the 60 kHz laser group and the 500 kHz laser group (mean 1.06 ± 0.16 [SD] versus 1.05 ± 0.14) (P=.321). CONCLUSION: The safety, predictability, and efficacy profiles of the 500 kHz femtosecond platform for LASIK were excellent and comparable to those of the 60 kHz platform.

Comparison of efficacy and safety of laser in situ keratomileusis using 2 femtosecond laser platforms in contralateral eyes.

PURPOSE: To compare the efficacy, predictability, and refractive outcomes of laser in situ keratomileusis (LASIK) using 2 femtosecond platforms for flap creation. SETTING: Multisurgeon single center. DESIGN: Clinical trial. METHODS: Bilateral femtosecond LASIK was performed using the Wavelight Allegretto Eye-Q 400 Hz excimer laser system. The Visumax femtosecond platform (Group 1) was used to create the LASIK flap in 1 eye, while the Intralase femtosecond platform (Group 2) was used to create the LASIK flap in the contralateral eye. The preoperative, 1-month, and 3-month postoperative visual acuities, refraction, and contrast sensitivity in the 2 groups were compared. RESULTS: The study enrolled 45 patients. Three months after femtosecond LASIK, 79.5% of eyes in Group 1 and 82.1% in Group 2 achieved an uncorrected distance visual acuity of 20/20 (P=.808). The mean efficacy index was 0.97 in Group 1 and 0.98 in Group 2 at 3 months (P=.735); 89.7% of eyes in Group 1 and 84.6% of eyes in Group 2 were within ± 0.50 diopter of emmetropia at 3 months (P=.498). No eye in either group lost more than 2 lines of corrected distance visual acuity. The mean safety index at 3 months was 1.11 in Group 1 and 1.10 in Group 2 (P=.570). CONCLUSION: The results of LASIK with both femtosecond lasers were similar, and both platforms produced efficacious and predictable LASIK outcomes. FINANCIAL DISCLOSURE: No author has a financial or proprietary interest in any material or method mentioned.

Refractive stability of LASIK with the Visx 20/20 excimer laser vs ZB5m phakic iol implantation in patients with high myopia (>-10.00 d): a 10-year retrospective study.

PURPOSE: To compare the long-term outcomes of LASIK and ZB5M phakic intraocular lens implantation (PIOL) (Domilens) for high myopia (>-10.00 diopters [D]). METHODS: This long-term (10 years) follow-up retrospective interventional case series study included 126 eyes that underwent LASIK and 52 eyes that underwent ZB5M angle-supported PIOL implantation. Both groups of eyes were similar in terms of preoperative spherical equivalent refraction (SE), corrected distance visual acuity (CDVA), and age. RESULTS: Mean preoperative SE was -14.33 D in the LASIK group and -14.84 D in the PIOL group. At 10-year follow-up, mean postoperative SE was -1.47±2.00 D in the LASIK group and -1.01±1.36 D in the PIOL group (P=.21). In the LASIK group, 67% of eyes were within ±1.00 D of emmetropia at 2 years after surgery, compared to 42% at 10 years. In the PIOL group, 68% of eyes were within ±1.00 D of emmetropia 2 years after implantation compared to 53% at 10 years. In the LASIK group, 43.5% of eyes achieved UDVA of 20/40 or better 10 years after surgery compared to 67.9% in the PIOL group (P=.02). CONCLUSIONS: The ZB5M angle-supported PIOL was shown to have better predictability and stability compared to LASIK over 10 years. However, reductions in endothelial cell count over time were observed in eyes with PIOLs.

Comparison of LASIK and photorefractive keratectomy for myopia from -10.00 to -18.00 diopters 10 years after surgery.

PURPOSE: To compare the long-term outcomes of LASIK and photorefractive keratectomy (PRK) for high myopia (> or = -10.00 diopters [D]). METHODS: This retrospective study included eyes with high myopia that underwent PRK (51 eyes) and LASIK (141 eyes) at the Instituto Oftalmologico de Alicante, Spain, and returned for 10-year follow-up. RESULTS: Ten years after surgery, 45.5% of eyes in the LASIK group achieved uncorrected visual acuity (UCVA) of 20/40 or better compared to 31.3% in the PRK group. Mean efficacy indices after 10 years in both groups were similar (0.87 in the LASIK group and 0.82 in the PRK group, P=.51). Twenty-one (41%) eyes in the PRK group were within +/-1.00 D whereas 60 (42.5%) eyes from the LASIK group were within +/-1.00 D 10 years after surgery. Six (14%) eyes from the PRK group lost 2 or more lines of BSCVA compared to 7 (6%) eyes from the LASIK group. CONCLUSIONS: LASIK and PRK have been shown to have similar visual acuity efficacy in the treatment of eyes with high myopia in the long-term, with LASIK having superior visual acuity efficacy and safety over PRK within the first 2 years after surgery. However, treatment of myopia > or =-10.00 D by LASIK is no longer routinely advocated whereas the treatment of high myopia by PRK is no longer performed due to potential complications associated with the treatment. Haze in postoperative PRK eyes was a significant long-term problem in our study.

A questionnaire-based assessment of symptoms associated with tear film dysfunction and lid margin disease in an Asian population.

PURPOSE: To study the prevalence, associated factors and impact of symptomatic dry eye in an Asian population. METHODS: A population based survey of eye diseases in 3,280 (78.7% response rate) Malay persons aged 40-80 selected from designated areas in southwestern Singapore. Participants were administered a standardized dry eye questionnaire consisting of 6 questions on symptoms, and had a comprehensive systemic and ocular examination. Symptoms of tear film dysfunction (STFD) was defined as one or more self-reported symptoms that were frequently present (ranked often or all the time). RESULTS: The prevalence rate of STFD was 6.5% (95% confidence interval [CI]: 5.7, 7.4). The prevalence was significantly higher in men compared to women (8.2% and 4.9%, respectively; p < 0.001) and decreased with age in men (p = 0.002) but not in women (p = 0.101). After adjusting for age, gender, nature of work (outdoor/indoor), and housing type, factors significantly associated with STFD were cigarette smoking (odds ratio [OR] 1.77, 95% CI: 1.17-2.66), thyroid disease (OR 2.58; 95% CI: 1.29-5.18) and higher income (OR 1.74; 95% CI: 1.13-2.68). STFD were associated with self-reported difficulty in performing daily activities (work, family and leisure related) (p = 0.006). CONCLUSION: STFD are present in 6.5% of Singapore Malay adults and is associated with cigarette smoking, presence of thyroid disease and a reduced visual function-related quality of life.

Diffuse lamellar keratitis after laser in situ keratomileusis associated with surgical marker pens.

PURPOSE: To describe a series of cases of diffuse lamellar keratitis (DLK) after laser in situ keratomileusis (LASIK) associated with intraoperative use of a surgical marker pen. SETTING: Singapore National Eye Centre, Singapore, Singapore. METHODS: A review of all 115 patients (125 eyes) who had myopic LASIK from July 23 to July 26, 2007, was performed to determine whether eyes in which the Codman surgical marker pen (Johnson & Johnson Medical) was used intraoperatively developed postoperative DLK. RESULTS: Nine of 12 eyes that had LASIK or flap relifting with a Codman surgical marker pen developed grade 1 to grade 3 DLK on the first postoperative day. The 113 other eyes that had LASIK in the same week with another brand of surgical marker pen (Securline, Precision Dynamics Corp.) did not develop DLK. All eyes with DLK were treated with intensive topical steroid therapy. The DLK resolved in 2 eyes after the steroid treatment; 7 eyes required flap relifting with interface irrigation. One month postoperatively, 6 eyes with DLK had an uncorrected visual acuity of 6/7.5 or better. Two eyes developed central corneal scarring with consecutive hyperopia with a best corrected visual acuity of 6/12 after 1 month. CONCLUSIONS: There was a strong association between the occurrence of DLK after LASIK with the use of the Codman surgical marker pen. One or more constituents of the ink in the Codman pen may have been responsible for this series of cases.

Chronic angle-closure with glaucomatous damage: long-term clinical course in a North American population and comparison with an Asian population.

PURPOSE: To study the long-term clinical course of North American chronic angle-closure glaucoma (CACG) patients with optic disc damage and visual field loss in the presence of an angle closed at least partially by peripheral anterior synechiae and to compare it with a similar group of Singaporean patients. DESIGN: A retrospective, interventional case-control study series. PARTICIPANTS: Fifty-one patients (80 eyes) diagnosed with CACG with glaucomatous optic nerve head and visual field damage at a New York hospital from January 1990 through December 1994. All study eyes underwent laser peripheral iridotomy (LPI). METHODS: The presenting features, management, and subsequent long-term intraocular pressure (IOP) outcome were analyzed and compared with 65 Asian patients (83 eyes) from a Singapore hospital who were similarly diagnosed during the same period. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: The long-term outcome after LPI was assessed in terms of IOP and the requirement for additional therapy. RESULTS: The mean presenting IOP was higher in the Singapore eyes (40 +/- 15 mmHg) compared with the New York eyes (31 +/- 12.5 mmHg). All 80 New York eyes (100%) and 78 of 83 Singapore eyes (94%) required further treatment to control IOP during follow-up. Of the eyes with a subsequent rise in IOP, 33 of 80 eyes (41.3%) compared with 34 of 83 eyes (41.0%) of the Singapore patients were controlled with additional topical medication. Of the New York eyes, 25 of 80 (31.3%) eventually underwent filtering surgery, compared with 44 of 83 (53.0%) in the Singapore study. The other 22 eyes (27.5%) in the New York group went on to additional laser procedures, peripheral iridoplasty, laser trabeculoplasty, or a combination thereof, after which IOPs were controlled and no surgery was required. There was no similar comparison for the Singapore group, because these eyes went directly on to surgery. CONCLUSIONS: Despite the presence of a patent LPI, most eyes with CACG presenting with elevated IOP and having both optic disc and visual field damage in both populations required further treatment to control IOP. Results in the American population are similar to that reported in Asian patients.