Identifying Adolescent Vaping With Screening to Brief Intervention and Brief Screener for Tobacco, Alcohol, and Drugs Screening Tools.

PURPOSE: This study aimed to determine whether the modified Screening to Brief Intervention (S2BI) and Brief Screener for Tobacco, Alcohol, and Drugs (BSTAD) that included e-cigarettes/vaping as examples could identify all nicotine and cannabis use or whether additional questions specifically about vaping are needed. METHODS: Between July 2020 and February 2022, adolescents recruited from primary care or an outpatient adolescent substance use disorder program were randomized to complete S2BI or BSTAD followed by specific questions about vaping. Screen questions were updated to include "vaping" in the parenthetical examples of nicotine and cannabis use. RESULTS: Data from 502 adolescent participants who completed both the S2BI or BSTAD and vaping questions were analyzed. The S2BI and BSTAD identified 92% (23/25) and 100% (16/16) of nicotine vaping and 100% (16/16) and 95.5% (21/22) of cannabis vaping, respectively. DISCUSSION: The S2BI and BSTAD tools accurately identify nicotine and cannabis use without specific questions about vaping.

Which are more correctly diagnosed: conventional Papanicolaou smears or Thinprep samples? A comparative study of 9 years of external quality-assurance testing.

BACKGROUND: The Royal College of Pathologists of Australasia Cytopathology Quality Assurance Program offers external testing in gynecologic cytology to Australasian and international laboratories. Laboratory interpretation of conventional Papanicolaou (Pap) smears is compared with interpretation of liquid-based cervical cytologic (ThinPrep) samples. METHODS: Conventional Pap smears and ThinPrep samples were distributed to participating laboratories annually over 9 years (from 2004 to 2012), and a range of entities was tested. Target responses and major error rates and diagnostic trends over time were explored. RESULTS: In total, 23,373 conventional Pap smears and 14,104 ThinPrep samples were reported. Both Australasian (P = .003) and international (P < .001) laboratories achieved a higher percentage of the target diagnosis of squamous dysplasia with ThinPrep samples. Australasian laboratories more accurately diagnosed endocervical adenocarcinoma in situ with conventional smears (P = .036), whereas international laboratories performed better with ThinPrep samples (P = .006). Sampling of the lower uterine segment was more accurately diagnosed by both Australasian (P < .001) and international (P = .001) laboratories using conventional Pap smears. Significant improvements in achieving the target diagnosis over time for squamous dysplasias using both modalities were observed for Australasian and international laboratories (P < .001 for both). There was improvement in diagnosing high sampling using ThinPrep for both groups (P = .001 and P = .015, respectively). Australasian performance declined over time in reaching the target of normal (no infections) for both conventional (P = .001) and ThinPrep (P < .001) techniques and for international laboratories with the ThinPrep technique (P < .001). CONCLUSIONS: Participation in external proficiency testing in cervical cytology allows an analysis of performance, the identification of areas of diagnostic difficulty, a review of trends over time, and the highlighting of topics for ongoing education.