Effects and Mechanisms of Fisetin Against Ischemia-reperfusion Injuries: A Systematic Review.

BACKGROUND: Ischemia-reperfusion injury (IRI) is a well-known ailment that can disturb organ function. OBJECTIVES: This systematic review study investigated fisetin's effects and possible mechanisms in attenuating myocardial, cerebral, renal, and hepatic IRIs. METHODS: This systematic review included studies earlier than Sep 2023 by following the PRISMA statement 2020. After determining inclusion and exclusion criteria and related keywords, bibliographic databases, such as Cochrane Library, PubMed, Web of Science, Embase, and Scopus databases, were used to search the relevant studies. Studies were imported in End- Note X8, and the primary information was recorded in Excel. RESULTS: Fisetin reduced reactive oxygen species (ROS) generation and upregulated antioxidant enzymes, such as superoxide dismutase (SOD), glutathione (GSH), catalase (CAT), and glutathione peroxidase (GPx), in ischemic tissues. Moreover, fisetin can attenuate oxidative stress by activating phosphoinositide-3-kinase-protein kinase B/Akt (PI3K/Akt) and nuclear factor erythroid 2-related factor 2 (Nrf2) signaling pathways. Fisetin has been indicated to prevent the activation of several pro-inflammatory signaling pathways, including NF-κB (Nuclear factor kappa-light-chain-enhancer of activated B cells) and MAPKs (Mitogen-activated protein kinases). It also inhibits the production of pro-inflammatory cytokines and enzymes like tumor necrosis factor-a (TNF-α), inducible-NO synthase (iNOS), cyclooxygenase-2 (COX-2), prostaglandin E2 (PGE2), interleukin-1ß (IL-1ß), IL-1, and IL-6. Fisetin attenuates IRI by improving mitochondrial function, anti-apoptotic effects, promoting autophagy, and preserving tissues from histological changes induced by IRIs. CONCLUSION: Fisetin, by antioxidant, anti-inflammatory, mitochondrial protection, promoting autophagy, and anti-apoptotic properties, can reduce cell injury due to myocardial, cerebral renal, and hepatic IRIs without any significant side effects.

Anti-seizure Effects and Mechanisms of Berberine: A Systematic Review.

BACKGROUND: Epilepsy is one of the most common in all age groups and disabling neurologic disorders around the world. OBJECTIVES: This systematic review was to explore whether berberine (BBR) has any anti-seizure or anti-epileptic effects and also reviewed this possible mechanism. METHODS: The EMBASE, Scopus, Cochrane Library, PubMed, and Web of Science databases were searched before Sep 2023. All types of studies that investigated the effects of BBR on epilepsy or chemical-induced seizures were eligible for inclusion. Two authors independently evaluated and reviewed titles/abstracts to identify publications for potential eligibility, and a third team member resolved discrepancies. Data were extracted in an Excel form, and the outcomes were discussed. RESULTS: BBR showed its neuroprotective properties by reducing oxidative stress, neuroinflammation, and anti-apoptosis effects. It also increases brain-derived neurotrophic factor (BDNF) release and reduces transforming growth factor-beta (TGF-ß1) and hypoxia-inducible factor 1α (HIF-1α). BBR by increasing scavenging reactive oxygen species (ROS), nuclear factor erythroid 2-related factor 2 (Nrf2), endogenous antioxidant enzymes, heme oxygenase-1 (HO-1), and inhibition of lipid peroxidation insert its antioxidant activity. Moreover, BBR showed antiinflammatory activity by reducing Interleukin (IL)-1ß, IL-6, and tumor necrosis factor-alpha (TNF-α) levels and through inhibiting cyclooxygenase-2 (COX-2), and including nuclear factor κB (NF-κB). In addition, it modulated c-fos expression and neuronal excitability in the brain. CONCLUSION: BBR indicated promising anti-seizure effects with remarkable antioxidant, antiinflammatory, anti-apoptotic, and neuroprotective activity. Future studies should be based on well-designed clinical trial studies that are integrated with new methods related to increasing bioavailability.

The Therapeutic Effect of Silymarin and Silibinin on Depression and Anxiety Disorders and Possible Mechanism in the Brain: A Systematic Review.

BACKGROUND: Depression and anxiety are the most common mental disorders worldwide. OBJECTIVE: We aimed to review silymarin and silibinin effects and underlying mechanisms in the central nervous system (CNS) for depression and anxiety treatment. METHODS: The research protocol was prepared based on following the PRISMA statement. An extensive search was done in essential databases such as PubMed, Cochrane Library, Web of Science (ISI), Embase, and Scopus. Considering the study inclusion and exclusion criteria, 17 studies were finally included. The desired information was extracted from the studies and recorded in Excel, and the consequences and mechanisms were reviewed. RESULTS: Silymarin and silibinin upregulated brain-derived neurotrophic factor (BDNF) and improved neural stem cells (NSCs) proliferation in the cortex and hippocampus. They also increased neurochemical serotonin (5-HT), dopamine (DA), and norepinephrine (NE) levels. Silymarin and silibinin reduced malondialdehyde (MDA) formation and increased glutathione (GSH), superoxide dismutase (SOD), and catalase (CAT) activities. In addition, silymarin and silibinin reduced interleukin (IL)-6, IL-1ß, and IL-12ß, reducing tumor necrosis factor α (TNF-α) induced neuroinflammation. CONCLUSION: Silymarin and silibinin exert anti-depression and anxiolytic effects by regulating neurotransmitters, endocrine, neurogenesis, and immunologic systems. Therefore, as natural and complementary medicines, they can be used to reduce the symptoms of depression and anxiety; However, more clinical studies are needed in this field.

Assessment of the Relationship Between Gastric-Acid Suppressants and the Risk of Esophageal Adenocarcinoma: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.

Background: Esophageal cancer is a cancerous tumor that develops in the esophagus. It is the 10th most common cancer and has a low survival rate. Esophageal adenocarcinoma (EAC) is increasing in incidence globally. Those with EAC are affected by Barrett's esophagus metaplasia, which is attributed to genetic predisposition and is more common in men. Studies suggest that gastric acid suppressants, like proton pump inhibitors and histamine-2 receptor antagonists, have anticancer properties and reduce EAC. However, other research has suggested that they are not cancer-protective, and the use of antisecretory drugs is a risk factor for developing EAC. Objective: This systematic review and meta-analysis investigated the properties and risk factors associated with using gastric acid suppressants in patients with EAC. Methods: This meta-analysis used the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses checklist. Information from selected articles, including the lead author's name, year of publication, study setting, sample size, and gender, was extracted and recorded into an Excel (Microsoft, Redmond, Washington) form. Statistical data included odds ratio, hazard ratio, and/or risk ratio, with a 95% CI associated with patients with EAC and receiving gastric acid suppressants. Data were compared with individuals not receiving treatment. Publication bias was assessed using Begg's and Egger's tests. Statistical analyzes used Stata 14.0 (Stata LLC, College Station, Texas). Results: The initial electronic literature search retrieved 3761 titles/abstracts. Extensive screening selected 20 articles for analysis. Odds ratios associated with EAC in the individuals using gastric acid suppressants were 0.77 (95% CI, 0.49-1.22; P = 0.274) and 0.67 (95% CI, 0.39-1.29; P = 0.240) for proton pump inhibitors and 1.02 (95% CI, 0.44-2.36; P = 0.967) for histamine-2 receptor antagonists. Conclusions: The results found that gastric acid suppressants do not have a protective role in EAC and are not risk factors. Future studies of confounding variables and risk factors are needed to understand what affects EAC development.