RESUMO
Background: Opioid misuse after surgery remains a public health crisis in the United States. Recent efforts have focused on tracking pain medication use in surgical populations. However, accurate interpretations of medication use remain quite challenging given inconsistent usage of different datasets. The purpose of this study was to investigate the agreement between electronic medical records (EMR) versus patient self-reported use of pain medications in a surgical amputation population. Methods: Patients undergoing major lower extremity amputation or amputation-related procedures were included in this study. Both self-reported and EMR data for pain medication intake were obtained for each patient at three time points (preoperatively, 4 months postoperatively, and 12 months postoperatively). Percentage agreement and the kappa statistic were calculated for both usage (yes/no) and dose categories. Results: Forty-five patients were included in this study, resulting in 108 pairs of self-reported and EMR datasets. Substantial levels of agreement (>70% agreement, kappa >0.61) for opioid use was seen at preoperative and 12 months postoperative. However, agreement dropped at 4 months postoperatively. Anticonvulsant medication showed high levels, whereas acetaminophen showed lower levels of agreements at all time points. Conclusions: Either self-reported or EMR data may be used in research and clinical settings for preoperative or 12-month postoperative patients with little concern for discrepancies. However, at time points immediately following the expected end of acute surgical pain, self-reported data may be needed for more accurate medication reporting. With these findings in mind, usage of datasets should be driven by study objectives and the dataset's strength (eg, accuracy, ease, lack of bias).
Assuntos
Neoplasias da Mama/cirurgia , Dor Crônica , Mamoplastia , Humanos , Mastectomia , Dor Pós-OperatóriaRESUMO
In line with other major surgeries including breast cancer surgery (BCS), recent studies suggest a striking rate of chronic postsurgical pain (CPSP) following breast reconstruction. This commentary will critically examine evidence for the degree to which the prevalence of CPSP following breast reconstruction is directly attributable to reconstructive surgery. The discussion will trace similarities and distinctions between breast reconstruction and BCS in considering the risk for CPSP, and describe recent advances in the definition of CPSP, highlighting methodological limitations in the general investigation of CPSP, which also characterize the study of CPSP more specifically for breast reconstruction outcome. A convenience sample of relevant studies examining CPSP following breast reconstruction reveals inadequate evidence to support a serious concern for reconstruction-induced CPSP and further that these studies fail to adhere to recommended methodological standards to effectively isolate surgery as the etiology of persistent pain reported by women following reconstructive surgery. Suggestions for future exploration of problematic chronic pain after breast reconstruction are considered.
Assuntos
Neoplasias da Mama/fisiopatologia , Dor Crônica/fisiopatologia , Mamoplastia/efeitos adversos , Dor Pós-Operatória/fisiopatologia , Neoplasias da Mama/complicações , Dor Crônica/etiologia , Feminino , Humanos , Mastectomia/efeitos adversos , Dor Pós-Operatória/etiologiaRESUMO
BACKGROUND: Chronic postsurgical pain (CPSP) is a reported risk for women undergoing breast reconstruction, but it remains unclear that such persistent pain is induced by reconstructive surgery. To address this concern, this prospective cohort study examined the prevalence of and risk factors associated with CPSP among women undergoing breast reconstruction. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Women (n = 1996) recruited for the Mastectomy Reconstruction Outcomes Consortium (MROC) Study were assessed preoperatively and at two-years postoperatively for relevant medical/.surgical variables, pain experience, body physical well-being, anxiety, depression, and reconstruction procedure type and characteristics. RESULTS: Nearly half of the entire sample reported some level of preoperative pain. At two years there were statistically significant but not clinically meaningful increases in both pain intensity and chest/upper body discomfort but a decrease in affective pain rating. Average clinical pain severity was strikingly similar for preoperative and postoperative assessments. Preoperative levels of pain, acute postoperative pain, and (marginally) level of depression held consistent relationship at two-year follow-up with all outcome measures. Autologous flap reconstruction was associated with more severe CPSP compared to TE/I reconstruction. Older age, higher BMI, bilateral reconstruction, and adjuvant radiation and chemotherapy were associated with CPSP and chest/upper body discomfort for at least one outcome measure at two years. CONCLUSIONS: The substantial rate of preoperative pain and comparable prevalence of preoperative and postoperative pain ratings suggest that persistent pain after breast reconstruction may not necessarily reflect surgery-induced pain. Future research will need to determine those factors that contribute to long-term pain following breast reconstruction.
Assuntos
Neoplasias da Mama/terapia , Dor Crônica/etiologia , Mamoplastia/efeitos adversos , Dor Pós-Operatória/etiologia , Adulto , Fatores Etários , Índice de Massa Corporal , Quimioterapia Adjuvante/efeitos adversos , Dor Crônica/epidemiologia , Depressão/epidemiologia , Feminino , Humanos , Mastectomia , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Medição da Dor , Dor Pós-Operatória/epidemiologia , Período Pós-Operatório , Período Pré-Operatório , Prevalência , Estudos Prospectivos , Radioterapia Adjuvante/efeitos adversos , Retalhos Cirúrgicos/efeitos adversos , Fatores de TempoRESUMO
INTRODUCTION: Post-mastectomy breast reconstruction has become an increasingly important component of breast cancer treatment. Unfortunately, some patients experience severe postoperative pain, placing them at risk for increased clinical morbidity and the development of disabling chronic pain. In an attempt to identify at-risk patients, we prospectively evaluated patient characteristics and medical/surgical variables associated with more severe acute post-reconstruction pain. METHODS: Women (N = 2207; one-week 82.8% response rate) undergoing breast reconstruction were assessed for pain experience, anxiety, depression, and sociodemographic characteristics prior to surgery. Pain assessments were made preoperatively and postoperative at 1-week using validated survey instruments including the McGill Pain Questionnaire-Short Form (MPQ-SF), Numerical Pain Rating Scale (NPRS), and BREAST-Q Chest and Upper Body scale. Depressive symptoms and anxiety severity were assessed by the Patient Health Questionnaire and Generalized Anxiety Disorders Scale, respectively. Mixed-effects regression modeling was used to examine the relationships between patient characteristics and medical/surgical factors and 1-week postoperative pain. RESULTS: Younger age, bilateral reconstruction, and severity of preoperative pain, anxiety and depression were all associated with more severe acute postoperative pain on all the pain measures and BREAST-Q. Comparison of surgical procedure type indicated less severe postoperative pain for PTRAM, DIEP and SIEA reconstructive surgery compared to tissue expander/implant reconstruction. CONCLUSIONS: This study identified patients at risk for greater acute postoperative pain following breast reconstruction. These findings will allow plastic surgeons to better tailor postoperative care to improve patient comfort, reduce clinical morbidity, and further enhance patient satisfaction with their surgical outcome.
RESUMO
BACKGROUND: This prospective study examined the contribution of psychological factors to the prediction of patient satisfaction with postmastectomy breast reconstruction surgery. METHODS: Women presenting for breast reconstruction were administered presurgical psychological inventories. Measures of affective distress, depressive symptoms, anxiety, somatization, and somatic preoccupation were obtained from standardized inventories. At 1-year (n = 295) and 2-year (n = 205) follow-up, subjects completed ratings of their satisfaction with both the general and aesthetic results of surgery. RESULTS: After controlling for sociodemographic variables and both surgical procedure type and timing, multiple linear regression analyses indicated that at 1-year follow-up preoperative measures of affective distress, depression, somatization, and somatic anxiety predicted less general satisfaction with surgical outcome, while presurgical levels of affective distress, depression, anxiety, somatization, and somatic anxiety predicted decreased aesthetic satisfaction. At 2-year follow-up, only preoperative affective distress retained a significant association with lowered general satisfaction with reconstructive surgery. In addition, at 2-year reassessment, aesthetic quality of surgical outcome was inversely related to all the presurgical psychological variables. CONCLUSIONS: Affective distress and somatic preoccupation negatively influence patient satisfaction with both aesthetic and general outcomes associated with postmastectomy breast reconstruction. Presurgical psychological screening and counseling of selected women who are being considered for breast reconstruction may be advisable to enhance patient satisfaction with reconstructive surgery.
Assuntos
Neoplasias da Mama/cirurgia , Mamoplastia/psicologia , Mastectomia/psicologia , Transtornos Mentais/complicações , Satisfação do Paciente , Neoplasias da Mama/complicações , Feminino , Humanos , Estudos Prospectivos , Testes PsicológicosRESUMO
This study prospectively examined the long-term effects of type (transverse rectus abdominis musculocutaneous [TRAM] versus implant) and timing (immediate versus delayed) of postmastectomy reconstructive surgery on patient reports of pain at multiple body sites. Women (n = 205) seeking immediate or delayed breast reconstruction, choosing either expander implant or autologous tissue transfer surgical procedures, provided ratings for the presence of bodily, breast, abdominal, and back pain and abdominal tightness prior to surgery and at 2-year follow-up. At baseline, nonwhite women were more likely to undergo delayed reconstruction (P < 0.05), and women seeking delayed reconstruction had less breast pain (P < 0.001) and more back pain (P < 0.01). Multiple regression analyses, controlling for ethnicity and baseline pain, indicated that women receiving TRAM flap surgery reported more problems with abdominal pain and tightness. There was a trend for implant subjects to report more frequent problems with breast pain. These results suggest the need for heightened awareness of potential long-term pain morbidity for women undergoing TRAM flap or implant breast reconstruction.
Assuntos
Neoplasias da Mama/cirurgia , Mamoplastia/efeitos adversos , Mamoplastia/métodos , Mastectomia/efeitos adversos , Dor Intratável/epidemiologia , Dor Pós-Operatória/epidemiologia , Dor Abdominal/epidemiologia , Implantes de Mama/efeitos adversos , Distribuição de Qui-Quadrado , Feminino , Humanos , Modelos Lineares , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Medição da Dor , Prevalência , Estudos Prospectivos , Fatores de Risco , Retalhos Cirúrgicos/efeitos adversos , Inquéritos e Questionários , Fatores de TempoRESUMO
BACKGROUND: This study compared the presurgical psychosocial and functional status of 238 women seeking breast reconstruction, either at the time of their mastectomy (immediate) (n = 151) or after prior mastectomy (delayed) (n = 87). Delayed subjects were further categorized in groups of time-since-mastectomy to examine the effects of time on postmastectomy psychosocial adjustment. METHODS: Presurgical measures of quality of life, psychological distress, and somatic anxiety were obtained. RESULTS: The results revealed relative impairment of quality of life and psychosocial functioning for immediate compared with delayed subjects. Immediate subjects reported greater disturbance in general mental health functioning, more severe impairment in emotional well being related to their cancer diagnosis, and higher levels of anxiety. Immediate subjects also reported a trend toward greater disturbance in work and daily activities, more frequent interference in social activities, and less vitality. Similarly, it was noted that the immediate group reported greater impairment in physical and functional well being related to their cancer adjustment. On psychological assessment, immediate subjects were more likely to report higher levels of affective distress, depressive symptoms, and obsessive-compulsive traits. For the delayed group, no statistically significant differences in the dependent measures were obtained when comparing subjects at 1 year, 2 years, and more than 2 years after mastectomy. CONCLUSIONS: Women seeking immediate reconstruction at the time of mastectomy show a relatively higher incidence of psychosocial impairment and functional disability. Women who undergo mastectomy demonstrate early restoration of psychosocial health within the first year after surgery. Patient preoperative psychosocial distress may have important implications for clinical decision-making and surgical outcome for women seeking combined mastectomy and breast reconstruction.