Impact of Targeted Systemic Therapy and Radiotherapy on Patients Undergoing Spine Surgery for Metastatic Renal Cell Carcinoma.

BACKGROUND: In patients undergoing spine surgery for renal cell carcinoma (RCC), we sought to: (1) describe patterns of postoperative targeted systemic therapy and radiotherapy (RT), (2) compare perioperative outcomes among those treated with targeted systemic therapy to those without, and (3) evaluate the impact of targeted systemic therapy and/or RT on overall survival (OS) and local recurrence (LR). METHODS: A single-institution, retrospective cohort study of patients undergoing spine surgery for metastatic RCC from 2010 to 2021 was undertaken. Treatment groups were RT alone, targeted systemic therapy alone, dual therapy consisting of RT and targeted systemic therapy, and neither therapy. Multivariable Cox regression controlled for age, race, sex, insurance, and preoperative targeted systemic therapy. RESULTS: Forty-nine patients underwent spine surgery for RCC. Postoperatively, 4 patients (8%) received RT alone, 19 (38.8%) targeted systemic therapy alone, 12 (24.5%) dual therapy, and 13 (28.6%) neither. All groups were similar in demographics, preoperative Karnofsky Performance Score (P = 0.372), tumor size (P = 0.413), readmissions (P = 0.884), complications (P = 0.272), Karnofsky Performance Score (P = 0.466), and Modified McCormick Scale (P = 0.980) at last follow-up. Higher 1-year survival was found in dual therapy (83.3%) compared with other therapies. OS was significantly longer in patients with dual therapy compared with other therapies (log-rank; P = 0.010). Multivariate Cox regression (HR = 0.08, 95% CI = 0.02-0.31, P < 0.001) showed longer OS in dual therapy compared with other therapies. Seven patients (14.3%) experienced LR, and a similar time to LR was found between groups (log-rank; P = 0.190). CONCLUSION: In patients undergoing metastatic spine surgery for RCC, postoperative dual therapy demonstrated significantly higher 1-year survival and OS compared with other therapies. CLINICAL RELEVANCE: Multidisciplinary management of metastatic RCC is necessary to ensure timely implementation of targeted systemic therapy and RT to improve outcomes.

Comparing the Upper Instrumented Vertebrae Tilt Angle vs Screw Angle in the Development of Proximal Junction Kyphosis After Adult Spinal Deformity Surgery: Which Matters More?

BACKGROUND: We sought to determine which aspect of the upper instrumented vertebrae (UIV)-tilt angle or screw angle-was more strongly associated with: (1) proximal junctional kyphosis/failure (PJK/F), (2) other mechanical complications and reoperations, and (3) patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs). METHODS: A single-institution, retrospective cohort study was undertaken for patients undergoing adult spinal deformity (ASD) surgery from 2011 to 2017. Only patients with UIV at T7 or below were included. The primary exposure variables were UIV tilt angle (the angle of the UIV inferior endplate and the horizontal) and UIV screw angle (the angle of the UIV screws and superior endplate). Multivariable logistic regression included age, body mass index, osteopenia/osteoporosis, postoperative sagittal vertical axis, postoperative pelvic-incidence lumbar lordosis mismatch, UIV tilt angle, and UIV screw angle. RESULTS: One hundred and seventeen patients underwent adult spinal deformity surgery with a minimum of 2-year follow-up. A total of 41 patients (35.0%) had PJK and 26 (22.2%) had PJF. (1) UIV tilt angle: 96 (82.1%) had lordotic UIV tilt angles, 6 (5.1%) were neutral, and 15 (12.8%) were kyphotic. (2) UIV screw angle: 38 (32.5%) had cranially directed screws, 4 (3.4%) were neutral, and 75 (64.1%) were caudally directed. Both lordotic-angled UIV endplate (OR = 1.06, 95% CI = 1.01-1.12, and P = 0.020) and cranially directed screws (OR = 1.19, 95% CI = 1.07-1.33, and P < 0.001) were associated with higher odds of PJK, with a more pronounced effect of UIV screw angle compared with UIV tilt angle (Wald test, 9.40 vs 4.42). Similar results were found for PJF. Neither parameter was associated with other mechanical complications, reoperations, or patient-reported outcome measures. CONCLUSIONS: UIV screw angle was more strongly associated with development of PJK/F compared with tilt angle. Overall, these modifiable parameters are directly under the surgeon's control and can mitigate the development of PJK/F. CLINICAL RELEVANCE: Surgeons may consider selecting a UIV with a neutral or kyphotically directed UIV tilt angle when performing ASD surgery with a UIV in the lower thoracic or lumbar region, as well as use UIV screw angles that are caudally directed, for the purprose of decreasing the risk of developing PJK/F.

Combined Anterior-Posterior vs. Posterior-Only Approach in Adult Spinal Deformity Surgery: Which Strategy Is Superior?

Introduction: Whether a combined anterior-posterior (AP) approach offers additional benefits over the posterior-only (P) approach in adult spinal deformity (ASD) surgery remains unknown. In a cohort of patients undergoing ASD surgery, we compared the combined AP vs. the P-only approach in: (1) preoperative/perioperative variables, (2) radiographic measurements, and (3) postoperative outcomes. Methods: A single-institution, retrospective cohort study was performed for patients undergoing ASD surgery from 2009 to 2021. Inclusion criteria were ≥5-level fusion, sagittal/coronal deformity, and 2-year follow-up. The primary exposure was the operative approach: a combined AP approach or P alone. Postoperative outcomes included mechanical complications, reoperation, and minimal clinically important difference (MCID), defined as 30% of patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs). Multivariable linear regression was controlled for age, BMI, and previous fusion. Results: Among 238 patients undergoing ASD surgery, 34 (14.3%) patients underwent the AP approach and 204 (85.7%) underwent the P-only approach. The AP group consisted mostly of anterior lumbar interbody fusion (ALIF) at L5/S1 (73.5%) and/or L4/L5 (38.0%). Preoperatively, the AP group had more previous fusions (64.7% vs. 28.9%, p < 0.001), higher pelvic tilt (PT) (29.6 ± 11.6° vs. 24.6 ± 11.4°, p = 0.037), higher T1 pelvic angle (T1PA) (31.8 ± 12.7° vs. 24.0 ± 13.9°, p = 0.003), less L1-S1 lordosis (-14.7 ± 28.4° vs. -24.3 ± 33.4°, p < 0.039), less L4-S1 lordosis (-25.4 ± 14.7° vs. 31.6 ± 15.5°, p = 0.042), and higher sagittal vertical axis (SVA) (102.6 ± 51.9 vs. 66.4 ± 71.2 mm, p = 0.005). Perioperatively, the AP approach had longer operative time (553.9 ± 177.4 vs. 397.4 ± 129.0 min, p < 0.001), more interbodies placed (100% vs. 17.6%, p < 0.001), and longer length of stay (8.4 ± 10.7 vs. 7.0 ± 9.6 days, p = 0.026). Radiographically, the AP group had more improvement in T1PA (13.4 ± 8.7° vs. 9.5 ± 8.6°, p = 0.005), L1-S1 lordosis (-14.3 ± 25.6° vs. -3.2 ± 20.2°, p < 0.001), L4-S1 lordosis (-4.7 ± 16.4° vs. 3.2 ± 13.7°, p = 0.008), and SVA (65.3 ± 44.8 vs. 44.8 ± 47.7 mm, p = 0.007). These outcomes remained statistically significant in the multivariable analysis controlling for age, BMI, and previous fusion. Postoperatively, no significant differences were found in mechanical complications, reoperations, or MCID of PROMs. Conclusions: Preoperatively, patients undergoing the combined anterior-posterior approach had higher PT, T1PA, and SVA and lower L1-S1 and L4-S1 lordosis than the posterior-only approach. Despite increased operative time and length of stay, the anterior-posterior approach provided greater sagittal correction without any difference in mechanical complications or PROMs.

Does Preoperative Bilsky Score Predict Outcome Following Surgical Resection of Primary Tumors of the Spine?

OBJECTIVE: In patients undergoing surgery for primary bone tumors of the spine, we sought to compare Bilsky score 0-1 versus 2-3 in: 1) preoperative presentation, 2) perioperative variables, and 3) long-term outcomes. METHODS: A single-center, retrospective cohort study was undertaken of patients undergoing surgery for extradural, primary bone tumors of the spine between January 2010 and January 2021. The primary exposure variable was Bilsky score, dichotomized as 0-1 versus 2-3. Survival analysis was performed to assess local recurrence (LR) and overall survival (OS). RESULTS: Of 38 patients undergoing resection of primary spinal tumors, 19 (50.0%) patients presented with Bilsky 0-1 and 19 (50.0%) Bilsky 2-3 grades. The most common diagnosis was chondrosarcoma (33.3%), followed by chordoma (16.7%). There were 15 (62.5%) malignant tumors. Preoperatively, there was no significant difference in demographics, Karnofsky Performance Scale (KPS) (P > 0.999), or motor deficit (P > 0.999). Perioperatively, no difference was found in operative time (P = 0.954), blood loss (P = 0.416), length of stay (P = 0.641), neurologic deficit (P > 0.999), or discharge disposition (P = 0.256). No difference was found in Enneking resection status (69.2% vs. 54.5%, P = 0.675). Long-term, no differences were found regarding reoperation (P = 0.327), neurologic deficit (P > 0.999), postoperative KPS (P = 0.605) and modified McCormick Scale (MMS) (P = 0.870). No difference was observed in KPS (P = 0.418) and MMS (P = 0.870) at last follow-up. However, patients with Bilsky 2-3 had shorter time to LR (1715.0 vs. 513.0 ± 633.4 days, log-rank; P = 0.002) and shorter OS (2025.0 ± 1165.3 vs. 794.0 ± 952.6 days, log-rank; P = 0.002). CONCLUSIONS: Bilsky 2-3 lesions were associated with shorter time to LR and shorter OS. Patients harboring primary spinal tumors with higher grade Bilsky score appear to be at a higher risk for worse outcomes.

Comparison of Outcomes in Patients with Cervical Spine Metastasis After Different Surgical Approaches: A Single-Center Experience.

OBJECTIVE: In patients undergoing cervical spine surgery for metastatic spine disease, we sought to 1) compare perioperative and oncologic outcomes among 3 different operative approaches, 2) report fusion rates, and 3) compare different types of anterior vertebral body replacement. METHODS: A single-center retrospective cohort study of patients undergoing extradural cervical/cervicothoracic spine metastasis surgery between February 2010 and January 2021 was conducted. Operative approaches were anterior-alone, posterior-alone, or combined anterior-posterior, and the grafts/cages used in the anterior fusions were cortical allografts, static cages, or expandable cages. All cages were filled with autograft/allograft. Outcomes included perioperative/postoperative variables, along with fusion rates, functional status, local recurrence (LR), and overall survival (OS). RESULTS: Sixty-one patients underwent cervical spine surgery for metastatic disease, including 11 anterior (18.0%), 28 posterior (45.9%), and 22 combined (36.1%). New postoperative neurologic deficit was the highest in the anterior approach group (P = 0.038), and dysphagia was significantly higher in the combined approach group (P = 0.001). LR (P > 0.999), OS (P = 0.655), and time to both outcomes (log-rank test, OS, P = 0.051, LR, P = 0.187) were not significantly different. Of the 51 patients alive at 3 months, only 19 (37.2%) obtained imaging ≥3 months. Fusion was seen in 11/19 (57.8%) at a median of 8.3 months (interquartile range, 4.6-13.7). Among the anterior corpectomies, the following graft/cage was used: 6 allografts (54.5%), 4 static cages (36.3%), and 1 expandable cage (9.0%), with no difference found in outcomes among the 3 groups. CONCLUSIONS: The only discernible differences between operative approaches were that patients undergoing an anterior approach had higher rates of new postoperative neurologic deficit, and the combined approach group had higher rates of postoperative dysphagia.

L1-pelvic angle: a convenient measurement to attain optimal deformity correction.

PURPOSE: (1) Evaluate the associations between L1-pelvic angle (L1PA) and both sagittal vertical axis (SVA) and T1-pelvic angle (T1PA), and (2) assess the clinical impact of L1PA. METHODS: A single-institution retrospective cohort study was undertaken for patients undergoing adult spinal deformity (ASD) surgery from 2013 to 2017. Ideal L1PA was defined as (0.5xPelvic Incidence)-21. Pearson correlation was performed to compare L1PA, SVA, and T1PA. Univariate/multivariate regression was performed to assess the effect of L1PA on mechanical complications, controlling for age, BMI, and postoperative pelvic incidence-lumbar lordosis mismatch (PI/LL). Due to the overlapping nature of patients with pseudarthrosis and rod fracture, these patients were analyzed together. RESULTS: A total of 145 patients were included. Mean preoperative L1PA, SVA, and T1PA were 15.5 ± 8.9°, 90.7 ± 66.8 mm, and 27.1 ± 13.0°, respectively. Mean postoperative L1PA, SVA, and T1PA were 15.0 ± 8.9°, 66.7 ± 52.8 mm, and 22.3 ± 11.1°, respectively. Thirty-six (24.8%) patients achieved ideal L1PA. Though the correlation was modest, preoperative L1PA was linearly correlated with preoperative SVA (r2 = 0.16, r = 0.40, 95%CI = 0.22-0.60, p < 0.001) and T1PA (r2 = 0.41, r = 0.62, 95%CI = 0.46-0.76, p < 0.001). Postoperative L1PA was linearly correlated with postoperative SVA (r2 = 0.12, r = 0.37, 95%CI = 0.18-0.56, p < 0.001) and T1PA (r2 = 0.40, r = 0.62, 95%CI = 0.45-0.74, p < 0.001). Achieving ideal L1PA ± 5° was associated with a decreased risk of rod fracture/pseudarthrosis on univariate and multivariate regression (OR = 0.33, 95%CI = 0.12-0.86, p = 0.024). No association between achieving ideal L1PA and patient-reported outcomes was observed. CONCLUSION: L1PA was modestly correlated with SVA and T1PA, and achieving ideal L1PA was associated with lower rates of rod fracture/pseudarthrosis. Future studies are warranted to better define the clinical implications of achieving a normal L1PA. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: III.

Revision Strategies for Cervical Disc Arthroplasty.

STUDY DESIGN: Narrative review. OBJECTIVE: To review indications and strategies for revision of cervical disc arthroplasty (CDA). SUMMARY OF BACKGROUND DATA: No data were generated as part of this review. METHODS: A narrative review of the literature was performed. RESULTS: No results were generated as part of this review. CONCLUSIONS: CDA is a proven, motion-sparing surgical option for the treatment of myelopathy or radiculopathy secondary to cervical degenerative disc disease. As is the case with any operation, a small percentage of CDA will require revision, which can be a technically demanding endeavor. Here we review available revision strategies and associated indications, a thorough understanding of which will aid the surgeon in finely tailoring their approach to varying presentations.

Artificial Intelligence to Preoperatively Predict Proximal Junction Kyphosis Following Adult Spinal Deformity Surgery: Soft Tissue Imaging May Be Necessary for Accurate Models.

STUDY DESIGN: Retrospective cohort. OBJECTIVE: In a cohort of patients undergoing adult spinal deformity (ASD) surgery, we used artificial intelligence to compare three models of preoperatively predicting radiographic proximal junction kyphosis (PJK) using: (1) traditional demographics and radiographic measurements, (2) raw preoperative scoliosis radiographs, and (3) raw preoperative thoracic magnetic resonance imaging (MRI). SUMMARY OF BACKGROUND DATA: Despite many proposed risk factors, PJK following ASD surgery remains difficult to predict. MATERIALS AND METHODS: A single-institution, retrospective cohort study was undertaken for patients undergoing ASD surgery from 2009 to 2021. PJK was defined as a sagittal Cobb angle of upper-instrumented vertebra (UIV) and UIV+2>10° and a postoperative change in UIV/UIV+2>10°. For model 1, a support vector machine was used to predict PJK within 2 years postoperatively using clinical and traditional sagittal/coronal radiographic variables and intended levels of instrumentation. Next, for model 2, a convolutional neural network (CNN) was trained on raw preoperative lateral and posterior-anterior scoliosis radiographs. Finally, for model 3, a CNN was trained on raw preoperative thoracic T1 MRIs. RESULTS: A total of 191 patients underwent ASD surgery with at least 2-year follow-up and 89 (46.6%) developed radiographic PJK within 2 years. Model 1: Using clinical variables and traditional radiographic measurements, the model achieved a sensitivity: 57.2% and a specificity: 56.3%. Model 2: a CNN with raw scoliosis x-rays predicted PJK with a sensitivity: 68.2% and specificity: 58.3%. Model 3: a CNN with raw thoracic MRIs predicted PJK with average sensitivity: 73.1% and specificity: 79.5%. Finally, an attention map outlined the imaging features used by model 3 elucidated that soft tissue features predominated all true positive PJK predictions. CONCLUSIONS: The use of raw MRIs in an artificial intelligence model improved the accuracy of PJK prediction compared with raw scoliosis radiographs and traditional clinical/radiographic measurements. The improved predictive accuracy using MRI may indicate that PJK is best predicted by soft tissue degeneration and muscle atrophy.

Clinical and radiographic outcomes following correction of idiopathic scoliosis in adolescence vs young adulthood.

PURPOSE: The natural history of adolescent idiopathic scoliosis (AIS) has been well documented, but the impact of age at the time of surgical correction is relatively understudied. In this study, we matched patients undergoing surgical correction of adult idiopathic scoliosis (AdIS) with a cohort of AIS patients to compare: (1) coronal and sagittal radiographic correction, (2) operative variables, and (3) postoperative complications. METHODS: A single-institution scoliosis registry was queried for patients undergoing idiopathic scoliosis surgery from 2000-2017. INCLUSION CRITERIA: patients with idiopathic scoliosis, no previous spine surgery, and 2-year follow-up. AdIS patients were matched 1:2 with AIS patients based on Lenke classification and curve characteristics. Independent sample t-test and Chi-square test was used to analyze the data. RESULTS: 31 adults underwent surgical correction of idiopathic scoliosis and were matched with 62 adolescents. Mean age of adults was 26.2 ± 11.05, mean BMI was 25.6 ± 6.0, and 22 (71.0%) were female. Mean age of adolescents was 14.2 ± 1.8, mean BMI was 22.7 ± 5.7, and 41(66.7%) were female. AdIS had significantly less postoperative major Cobb correction (63.9% vs 71.3%, p = 0.006) and final major Cobb correction (60.6% vs 67.9%, p = 0.025). AdIS also had significantly greater postoperative T1PA (11.8 vs 5.8, p = 0.002). AdIS had longer operative times (p = 0.003), higher amounts of pRBCs transfused (p = 0.005), longer LOS (p = 0.016), more ICU requirement (p = 0.013), higher overall complications (p < 0.001), higher rate of pseudarthrosis (p = 0.026), and more neurologic complications (p = 0.013). CONCLUSION: Adult patients undergoing surgical correction of idiopathic scoliosis had significantly worse postoperative coronal and sagittal alignment when compared with adolescent patients. Adult patients also had higher rates of complications, longer operative times, and longer hospital stays. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: III.

Does Low-Grade Versus High-Grade Bilsky Score Influence Local Recurrence and Overall Survival in Metastatic Spine Tumor Surgery?

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES: Spinal cord compression caused by spinal tumors is measured using the epidural spinal cord compression scale, also known as the Bilsky score. Whether Bilsky score predicts short-/long-term outcomes remains unknown. The objectives were to determine the correlation of Bilsky score 0-1 vs 2-3 with regards to (1) preoperative presentation, (2) perioperative variables, and (3) long-term outcomes. METHODS: A single-center, retrospective evaluation of a cohort of patients undergoing metastatic spine surgery was performed between 01/2010 and 01/2021. Multivariable logistic/linear/Cox regression were performed controlling for age, body mass index, race, total decompressed levels, tumor size, other organ metastases, and postoperative radiotherapy/chemotherapy. RESULTS: Of 343 patients with extradural spinal metastasis, 92 (26.8%) were Bilsky 0-1 and 251 (73.2%) were Bilsky 2-3. Preoperatively, patients with Bilsky 2-3 lesions were older ( P = .008), presented more with sensory deficits ( P = .029), and had worse preoperative Karnofsky Performance Scale (KPS) ( P = .002). Perioperatively, Bilsky 2-3 patients had more decompressed levels ( P = .005) and transpedicular decompression ( P < .001), with similar operative time ( P = .071) and blood loss ( P = .502). Although not statistically significant, patients with Bilsky 2-3 had more intraoperative neuromonitoring changes ( P = .412). Although rates of complications ( P = .442) and neurological deficit ( P = .852) were similar between groups, patients with Bilsky 2-3 lesions had a longer length of stay ( P = .007) and were discharged home less frequently ( P < .001). No difference was found in 90-day readmissions ( P = .607) and reoperation ( P = .510) Long-term: LR ( P =.100) and time to LR (log-rank; P =0.532) were not significantly different between Bilsky 0-1 and Bilsky 2-3 lesions. However, patients with Bilsky 2-3 lesions had worse postoperative KPS ( P < .001), worse modified McCormick scale score ( P = .003), shorter overall survival (OS) (log-rank; P < .001), and worse survival at 1 year ( P = .012). Bilsky 2-3 lesions were associated with shorter OS on multivariable Cox regression (hazard ratio = 1.78, 95% CI = 1.27-2.49, P < .001), with no significant impact on time to LR (hazard ratio = 0.73, 95% CI = 0.37-1.44, P = .359). CONCLUSION: Bilsky 2-3 lesions were associated with longer length of stay, more nonhome discharge, worse postoperative KPS/modified McCormick scale score, shorter OS, and reduced survival at 1 year. Higher-grade Bilsky score lesions appear to be at a higher risk for worse outcomes. Efforts should be made to identify metastatic spine patients before they reach the point of severe spinal cord compression..

Is lower screw density associated with mechanical complications in adult spinal deformity surgery?

PURPOSE: To assess the impact of screw density on: (1) rod fracture/pseudarthrosis, (2) proximal/distal junctional kyphosis/failure (PJK/DJK/PJF), and (3) deformity correction judged by sagittal vertical axis (SVA) and T1-pelvic angle (T1PA). METHODS: A single-center, retrospective cohort study of patients undergoing adult spinal deformity (ASD) surgery from 2013 to 2017 was undertaken. Screw density was calculated by dividing the number of screws placed by the total instrumented levels. Screw density was then dichotomized at our calculated mean density to ≥ 1.65 and < 1.65. Outcomes consisted of mechanical complications and the amount of correction obtained. RESULTS: 145 patients underwent ASD surgery with 2-year follow-up. Mean screw density (range) was 1.6 ± 0.3 (1.00-2.00). The most common levels with missing screws were L2 (n = 59, 40.7%), L3 (n = 57, 39.3%) and L1 (n = 51, 35.2%), located mainly along the concavity in 113(80.0%) patients and apices in 98 (67.6%) patients. Rod fracture/pseudarthrosis: 23/32 (71.8%) patients with rod fracture and 35/46 (76.0%) with pseudarthrosis had missing screws within two levels of the rod fracture/pseudarthrosis. Logistic regression showed no significant association between screw density and rod fracture/pseudarthrosis. PJK/F: 15/47 (31.9%) patients with PJK and 9/30 (30.0%) with PJF had missing screws within three levels of the upper instrumented vertebra (UIV). Logistic regression showed no significant association between screws density and PJK/F. Correction obtained: linear regression failed to show any significant association between screw density and SVA or T1PA correction. CONCLUSION: These findings showed that no significant association was found between screw density and mechanical complications or the amount of correction obtained, though approximately 3 out of 4 patients with rod fracture/pseudarthrosis had missing screws at or within two levels of the pathology. The prevention of mechanical complications is likely multifactorial and subject to both patient's characteristics and surgical techniques. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: III.

Transforaminal Lumbar Interbody Fusion Versus Posterolateral Fusion Alone in the Treatment of Grade 1 Degenerative Spondylolisthesis.

BACKGROUND: Transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion (TLIF) and posterolateral fusion (PLF) alone are two operations performed to treat degenerative lumbar spondylolisthesis. To date, it is unclear which operation leads to better outcomes. OBJECTIVE: To compare TLIF vs PLF alone regarding long-term reoperation rates, complications, and patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs) in patients with degenerative grade 1 spondylolisthesis. METHODS: A retrospective cohort study using prospectively collected data between October 2010 and May 2021 was undertaken. Inclusion criteria were patients aged 18 years or older with grade 1 degenerative spondylolisthesis undergoing elective, single-level, open posterior lumbar decompression and instrumented fusion with ≥1-year follow-up. The primary exposure was presence of TLIF vs PLF without interbody fusion. The primary outcome was reoperation. Secondary outcomes included complications, readmission, discharge disposition, return to work, and PROMs at 3 and 12 months postoperatively, including Numeric Rating Scale-Back/Leg and Oswestry Disability Index. Minimum clinically important difference of PROMs was set at 30% improvement from baseline. RESULTS: Of 546 patients, 373 (68.3%) underwent TLIF and 173 underwent (31.7%) PLF. Median follow-up was 6.1 years (IQR = 3.6-9.0), with 339 (62.1%) >5-year follow-up. Multivariable logistic regression showed that patients undergoing TLIF had a lower odds of reoperation compared with PLF alone (odds ratio = 0.23, 95% CI = 0.54-0.99, P = .048). Among patients with >5-year follow-up, the same trend was seen (odds ratio = 0.15, 95% CI = 0.03-0.95, P = .045). No differences were observed in 90-day complications ( P = .487) and readmission rates ( P = .230) or minimum clinically important difference PROMs. CONCLUSION: In a retrospective cohort study from a prospectively maintained registry, patients with grade 1 degenerative spondylolisthesis undergoing TLIF had significantly lower long-term reoperation rates than those undergoing PLF.

How Much Blood Loss Is Appropriate for a 2- to 3-Level Posterior Lumbar Fusion?

BACKGROUND: Despite the known association between higher estimated blood loss (EBL) and suboptimal outcomes, the threshold of EBL that negatively impacts outcomes following elective spine surgery remains unknown. In an open 2- and 3-level posterolateral lumbar fusion, we sought to find a threshold of surgeon-reported EBL associated with length of stay (LOS), 30-day complications, and patient-reported outcomes (PROs). METHODS: A single-center, retrospective cohort study was performed for 2- and 3-level open posterolateral lumbar fusions between October 2010 and April 2021. Surgeon-reported EBL (milliliters) was the primary independent variable for predicting LOS (days). Secondary outcomes included 30-day complications and PROs as the minimal clinically important difference (MCID). Multivariable regression and receiver operating characteristic curve with Youden's Index were calculated. RESULTS: 2-Level Fusion: A total of 557 patients underwent 2-level fusions. Multivariable regression found EBL to be a significant risk factor for prolonged LOS. A threshold of 375 mL was associated with LOS beyond postoperative day 2 (POD2) (area under the curve [AUC] = 0.64, 95% CI 0.58-0.70, P < 0.001). 3-Level Fusion: A total of 287 patients underwent 3-level fusions. Similarly, EBL was a significant risk factor for prolonged LOS, with a threshold of 675 mL to predict LOS beyond POD2 (AUC = 0.63, 95% CI 0.54-0.73, P = 0.012). EBL was associated with increased odds of 30-day complications, with a threshold of 538 mL (AUC = 0.63, 95% CI 0.51-0.76, P < 0.001). For both 2- and 3-level fusions, EBL was not significantly associated with MCID for any of the PROs. CONCLUSIONS: In patients undergoing open, posterolateral lumbar fusions, surgeon-reported EBL thresholds at 375 mL for 2-level fusions and 675 mL for 3-level fusions were moderately associated with LOS beyond POD2. In 3-level lumbar fusions, EBL above 538 mL showed a potential association with an increased odds of 30-day complications. CLINICAL RELEVANCE: Surgeons should improve their ability to manage blood loss and implement methods to keep EBL below the provided thresholds to decrease LOS and minimize the risk of complications.

Which Approach Leads to More Reoperations in Single-Level, Open, Posterior Lumbar Fusion: Transforaminal Lumbar Interbody Fusion or Posterolateral Fusion Alone?

BACKGROUND: Transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion (TLIF) and posterolateral fusion (PLF) without an interbody device are two common approaches for single-level, open posterior fusion. Presently, it is unknown whether one of these operations leads to better outcomes. We sought to compare reoperation, complication, and readmission rates between TLIF and PLF for patients undergoing elective single-level, open, posterior lumbar fusion. METHODS: A single-center, retrospective cohort study utilizing prospectively collected data was performed. Inclusion criteria were patients undergoing elective single-level, open, posterior lumbar decompression and fusion between October 2010 and April 2021 with at least 1-year follow-up. The two comparison groups were TLIF vs PLF alone without interbody. The primary outcome was need for reoperation at most recent follow-up. Secondary outcomes included 90-day complication and readmission rates. Univariate and multivariable logistic regression analyses were performed. RESULTS: A total of 850 patients were included, 591 (69.5%) of whom underwent TLIF and 259 (30.5%) of whom underwent PLF. Median follow-up was 6.1 years (interquartile range 3.7-8.9). No significant difference was found in overall reoperation rates (12.4% vs 13.9%, P = 0.534). When stratified by <5-year follow-up (n = 231 TLIF, n = 85 PLF; 37.2%) and ≥5-year follow-up (n = 360 TLIF, n = 174 PLF; 62.8%), no significant differences were seen in either cohort (<5 years: n = 24 TLIF vs n = 9 PLF, P = 0.959; 5+ years: n = 49 TLIF vs n = 27 PLF, P = 0.555). On multivariable logistic regression analysis, the presence of interbody fusion was not associated with reoperation (OR 2.26, 95% CI 0.66-7.74, P = 0.194). CLINICAL RELEVANCE: For patients undergoing elective single-level, open, posterior lumbar fusion without isthmic spondylolisthesis, no differences were seen in reoperation rates at long-term follow-up. Similar 90-day complication and readmission rates were seen. These results suggest that in degenerative lumbar spine disease without isthmic spondylolisthesis, TLIF and PLF achieved similar outcomes.

Unplanned Readmission Is Associated With Decreased Overall Survival and Performance After Metastatic Spine Surgery.

STUDY DESIGN: Retrospective case-control study. OBJECTIVE: In a cohort of patients undergoing metastatic spine surgery, we sought to: (1) identify risk factors associated with unplanned readmission, and (2) determine the impact of an unplanned readmission on long-term outcomes. SUMMARY OF BACKGROUND DATA: Factors affecting readmission after metastatic spine surgery remain relatively unexplored. MATERIALS AND METHODS: A single-center, retrospective, case-control study was undertaken of patients undergoing spine surgery for extradural metastatic disease between 02/2010 and 01/2021. The primary outcome was 3-month unplanned readmission. Preoperative, perioperative, and tumor-specific variables were collected. Multivariable Cox regression was performed, controlling for tumor size, other organ metastasis, and preoperative/postoperative radiotherapy/chemotherapy. RESULTS: A total of 357 patients underwent surgery for spinal metastases with a mean follow-up of 538.7±648.6 days. Unplanned readmission within 3 months of surgery occurred in 64/357 (21.9%) patients, 37 (57.8%) were medical, 27 (42.2%) surgical, and 21 (77.7%) were related to their spine surgery. No significant differences were found regarding demographics and preoperative variables, except for insurance, where most readmitted patients had private insurance compared with nonreadmitted patients ( P =0.021). No significant difference was found in preoperative radiotherapy/chemotherapy. Regarding perioperative exposure variables, readmitted patients had a higher rate of postoperative complications (68.8% vs. 24.2%, P <0.001) and worse postoperative Karnofsky Performance Score ( P =0.021) and Modified McCormick Scale ( P =0.015) at the time of first follow-up. On multivariate logistic regression, postoperative complications were associated with increased readmissions (odds ratio=1.38, 95% CI=1.25-1.52, P <0.001). Regarding the impact of unplanned readmission on long-term tumor control, unplanned readmission was associated with shorter time to local recurrence (log-rank; P =0.029) and reduced overall survival (OS) (log-rank; P <0.001). On multivariate Cox regression, other organ metastasis [hazard ratio (HR)=1.48, 95% CI=1.13-1.93, P =0.004] and 3-month readmission (HR=1.75, 95% CI=1.28-2.39, P <0.001) were associated with worsened OS, with no impact on LR. Postoperative chemotherapy was significantly associated with longer OS (HR=0.59, 95% CI=0.45-0.77, P <0.001). CONCLUSIONS: Postoperative complications were associated with unplanned readmission following metastatic spine surgery. Furthermore, 3-month unplanned readmission was associated with a shorter time to local recurrence and decreased OS. These results help surgeons understand the drivers of readmissions and the impact of readmissions on patient outcomes. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: 3.

How Much Blood Loss Is Too Much for a 1-Level Open Lumbar Fusion?

BACKGROUND: Despite the known association between increased estimated blood loss (EBL) and suboptimal perioperative outcomes, the exact threshold of EBL that impacts outcomes following elective spine surgery remains unknown. In a cohort of patients undergoing elective 1-level open posterior lumbar fusion, we sought to identify EBL thresholds associated with: (1) prolonged length of stay (LOS), (2) postoperative complications, and (3) patient-reported outcomes (PROs). METHODS: A retrospective, single-center study was performed of patients undergoing elective, 1-level open posterior lumbar fusion with and without interbody fusion between October 2010 and April 2021. The primary exposure variable was EBL. Primary outcomes included: (1) LOS, (2) 30-day complications, and (3) 3-month PROs. Minimum clinically important difference was set at 30% improvement from baseline. For purposes of receiver-operating characteristic curves, LOS was dichotomized as 1 vs ≥2 days. RESULTS: Of the 2028 patients undergoing posterior lumbar fusion surgery, 1183 underwent 1-level fusions, 763 (64.5%) with interbody fusion and 420 (35.5%) without. With interbody fusion: Median (interquartile range [IQR]) EBL was 350 mL (200-600), and median (IQR) LOS was 2 days (2-3). A positive linear association was found between EBL and LOS (P < 0.001) but not with PROs. EBL above 275 mL was associated with LOS beyond postoperative day 1 (POD1) (area under the curve [AUC] = 0.73, 95% CI 0.68-0.78, P < 0.001), with no significant association with overall complications or PROs. Without interbody fusion: Median EBL (IQR) was 300 mL (150-500), and median (IQR) LOS was 3 days (2-4). A positive linear association was found between EBL and LOS (P < 0.001) but not with PROs. EBL above 238 mL was associated with LOS beyond POD1 (AUC = 0.78, 95% CI 0.71-0.85, P < 0.001), with no impact on overall complications or PROs. CONCLUSIONS: In patients undergoing 1-level posterior lumbar fusion, EBL volumes greater than 275 and 238 mL in patients with and without interbody fusion, respectively, were associated with increased LOS beyond POD1. No effect was found regarding 30-day complications and 3-month PROs. Although EBL did not directly impact complications or PROs, surgeons may expect longer LOS when higher EBL is reported. CLINICAL RELEVANCE: EBL above 275 mL with an interbody and 238 mL without an interbody were associated with prolonged LOS beyond POD1 in 1-level open lumbar fusion.

Unplanned Readmission After Surgery for Cervical Spine Metastases.

OBJECTIVE: Patients undergoing surgery for cervical spine metastases are at risk for unplanned readmission due to comorbidities and chemotherapy/radiation. Our objectives were to: 1) report the incidence of unplanned readmission, 2) identify risk factors associated with unplanned readmission, and 3) determine the impact of an unplanned readmission on long-term outcomes. METHODS: A single-center, retrospective, case-control study was undertaken of patients undergoing cervical spine surgery for metastatic disease between 02/2010 and 01/2021. The primary outcome of interest was unplanned readmission within 6 months. Survival analysis was performed for overall survival (OS) and local recurrence (LR). RESULTS: A total of 61 patients underwent cervical spine surgery for metastatic disease with the following approaches: 11 (18.0%) anterior, 28 (45.9%) posterior, and 22 (36.1%) combined. Mean age was 60.9 ± 11.2 years and 38 (62.3%) were males. A total of 9/61 (14.8%) patients had an unplanned readmission, 3 for surgical reasons and 6 for medical reasons. No difference was found in demographics, preoperative Karnofsky Performance Scale (P = 0.992), motor strength (P = 0.477), or comorbidities (P = 0.213) between readmitted patients versus not. Readmitted patients had a higher rate of preoperative radiation (P = 0.009). No statistical differences were found in operative time (P = 0.893), estimated blood loss (P = 0.676), length of stay (P = 0.720), discharge disposition (P = 0.279), and operative approach (P = 0.450). Furthermore, no difference was found regarding complications (P = 0.463), postoperative Karnofsky Performance Scale (P = 0.535), and postoperative Modified McCormick Scale (P = 0.586). Lastly, unplanned readmissions were not associated with OS (log-rank; P = 0.094) or LR (log-rank; P = 0.110). CONCLUSIONS: In patients undergoing cervical spine metastasis surgery, readmission occurred in 15% of patients, 33% for surgical reasons, and 67% for medical reasons. Preoperative radiotherapy was associated with an increased rate of unplanned readmissions, yet readmission had no association with OS or LR.

The Ideal Threshold of Hemoglobin A1C in Diabetic Patients Undergoing Elective Lumbar Decompression Surgery.

STUDY DESIGN: Retrospective cohort study. OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the association of Hemoglobin A1C (HbA1c) with surgical site infection (SSI) and patient-reported outcomes (PROs), and to identify optimal HbA1c thresholds to minimize the risk of SSI and maximize PROs. SUMMARY OF BACKGROUND DATA: Diabetes mellitus has been associated with worsened outcomes following spine surgery. HbA1c, a surrogate of glycemic control, is an important assessment tool in diabetic patients. METHODS: A single-center, retrospective cohort study using prospectively collected data was undertaken. Diabetic patients undergoing elective lumbar decompression surgery between October 2010 and May 2021 were included. HbA1c, demographics, comorbidities, and perioperative data were collected. Primary outcomes included: 1) SSI, and 2) PROs, including the Numeric Rating Scale (NRS)-back/leg pain and Oswestry Disability Index (ODI). Secondary outcomes included: complications, readmissions, and reoperations within 90-days postoperatively. The minimum clinically important difference (MCID) was set at a 30% improvement from baseline PROs. RESULTS: Of 1819 patients who underwent lumbar decompression surgery, 368 patients had diabetes mellitus, and 177 had a documented preoperative HbA1c value. Of patients with available HbA1c values, the mean age was 62.5±12.3, the mean HbA1c value was 7.2±1.5%, and SSI occurred in 3 (1.7%) patients only, which prevented further analysis of SSI and HbA1c. A significant association was seen with a higher HbA1c and failure to achieve NRS-Back pain MCID30 [Odds ratio(OR)=0.53, 95% confidence interval(CI) 0.42-0.78; P =0.001] and ODI MCID30 (OR=0.58, 95%CI 0.44-0.77; P =0.001), but not NRS-Leg pain MCID30 (OR=1.29, 95%CI 0.86-1.93; P =0.208). ROC-curve analysis and Youden's index revealed an HbA1c threshold of 7.8 for NRS-Back pain MCID30 (AUC=0.65, P <0.001) and 7.5 for ODI MCID30 (AUC=0.65, P =0.001). CONCLUSIONS: In diabetic patients undergoing elective lumbar decompression surgery, HbA1c levels above 7.8 and 7.5 were associated with less improvement of NRS-Back and ODI scores at 12-months postoperatively, respectively. To optimize PROs, We recommend a preoperative HbA1c of 7.5 or below for diabetic patients undergoing elective lumbar decompression surgery.

The postoperative course of mechanical complications in adult spinal deformity surgery.

PURPOSE: (a) Describe the time course of each mechanical complication, and (b) compare radiographic measurements and preoperative patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs) among each mechanical complication type. METHODS: A single-institution case-control study was undertaken of patients undergoing adult spinal deformity (ASD) surgery from 2009-2017. Exposure variables included patient demographics, operative variables, radiographic measurements, and preoperative PROMs, including Oswestry Disability Index (ODI), Numeric Rating Scale Back/Leg-pain scores (NRS-Back/Leg), and EuroQol-5D (EQ-5D). The primary outcomes were occurrence of a mechanical complication and time to complication. Due to overlapping occurrence, rod fracture and pseudarthrosis were grouped into one composite category. RESULTS: 145 patients underwent ASD surgery and were followed for at least 2 years. 30/47 (63.8%) patients with proximal junctional kyphosis (PJK) required reoperation, whereas 27/31 (87.1%) patients with pseudarthrosis/rod fracture required reoperation (63.8% vs. 87.1%, Χ2 = -0.23, 95% CI -0.41, -0.05, p = 0.023). Cox regression showed no significant difference in time to reoperation between PJK and rod fracture/pseudarthrosis (HR = 0.97, 95% CI 0.85-1.11, p = 0.686). Distal junctional kyphosis (DJK) (N = 3; 2 reoperation) and implant failures (N = 4; 0 reoperations) were rare. Patients with PJK had significantly lower Hounsfield Units preoperatively compared to those with pseudarthrosis/rod fracture (138.2 ± 43.8 vs. 160.3 ± 41.0, mean difference (MD) = -22.1, 95% CI -41.8, -2.4, p = 0.028), more prior fusions (51.1% vs. 25.8%, Χ2 = 0.253, 95% CI 0.41, 0.46, p = 0.026), fewer instrumented vertebrae (9.2 ± 2.6 vs. 10.7 ± 2.5, MD = -1.5, 95% CI -2.7, -0.31, p = 0.013), and higher postoperative thoracic kyphosis (TK) (46.3 ± 12.7 vs. 34.9 ± 10.6, MD = 11.4, 95% CI 5.9, 16.9, p < 0.001). Higher postoperative C7 sagittal vertical axis (SVA) did not achieve a significant difference (80.7 ± 72.1 vs. 51.9 ± 57.3, MD = 28.8, 95% CI -1.9, 59.5, p = 0.066). No differences were seen in preoperative PROMs. CONCLUSION: Patients with pseudarthrosis/rod fracture had a higher reoperation rate compared to those with PJK with similar time to reoperation. Moreover, patients with PJK had higher postoperative TK, lower Hounsfield Units, more prior fusions, and fewer instrumented levels compared to those with pseudarthrosis/rod fracture. The results of this single-institution study suggest that even though mechanical complications are often analyzed as a single group, important differences may exist between them. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: III.