Validity, reliability and responsiveness of a French translation of the Western Ontario Osteoarthritis of the Shoulder index (WOOS).

INTRODUCTION: While several general questionnaires can be used to evaluate shoulder conditions, very few tools specifically evaluate the impact of shoulder osteoarthritis. The Western Ontario Osteoarthritis of the Shoulder index (WOOS) is a patient-reported outcome measure with excellent psychometric properties intended for patients suffering from shoulder osteoarthritis. Unfortunately, there is no validated French version of this questionnaire. OBJECTIVE: Produce a validated French version of the WOOS that is suitable for the Francophone populations of Europe and North America. MATERIAL AND METHODS: A validated protocol was used to create a French version of the WOOS (WOOS-Fr). Included were patients whose first language was French, who could read French and who had shoulder osteoarthritis destined for treatment (surgical treatment=arthroplasty). The WOOS-Fr was compared to the Disability of the Arm, Shoulder and Hand-French translation (F-QuickDASH-D/S) to assess its validity. Reliability and responsiveness were also analyzed. RESULTS: A French version of the WOOS (WOOS-Fr) was accepted by a multinational committee. The WOOS-Fr was validated in 71 French-speaking subjects. A strong positive correlation was found between the WOOS-Fr and the F-QuickDASH-D/S during the initial evaluation. The intra-class correlation (ICC) of the total WOOS-Fr score indicated good reliability between the initial WOOS and the 1-week WOOS (ICC: 0.84; 95% CI: [0.767; 0.896]; p-value: <0.001) in 57 patients. The responsiveness between the initial WOOS-Fr and at 1 year postoperative was high in the 36 operated patients (standardized mean response of 1.95). DISCUSSION: A French translation of the WOOS questionnaire was created and validated for use in French-speaking populations. This questionnaire will make it easier to evaluate the psychometric results of patients with shoulder osteoarthritis in Francophone countries. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: III; multicenter cohort study.

A systematic scoping review of the latest data on orthobiologics in the surgical treatment of non-union.

INTRODUCTION: Recent studies have shown a growing concern regarding the cost-effectiveness and the lack of supporting data for the biologic agents that are being increasingly used in the orthopedic field. Our aim was to conduct a systematic scoping review of recent publications (last five years) on the use of orthobiologics to treat fracture non-union and summarize the latest available data. PATIENTS AND METHODS: The inclusion criteria for this review were articles published in English, from 2016 to 2022, and focusing on the use of orthobiologics for the surgical treatment of non-union. Searches were conducted in March 2023 using Pubmed/MEDLINE and Embase. Studies on spinal fusion or gene therapy were excluded. Reviews, case reports with five cases or less, conference proceedings, preliminary reports, pediatric or non-human studies were excluded as well. RESULTS: The search found 1807 articles, 15 were eligible after PRISMA checklist and exclusions. The evidence was heterogenous and there was only one level II RCT. Recent data suggests that bone morphogenic protein (BMP-2) products could be effective for septic and aseptic tibial non-unions. However, the evidence was not conclusive regarding BMP-7, plasma rich platelets (PRP), stem cells or demineralized bone matrix (DBM). DISCUSSION: Every non-union case is different in terms of bone defect, biology, mechanical stability, surgical technique and host factors, which contributes to the conflicting reports on the efficacy of orthobiologics in the literature. We might never see a level 1, high powered and robust study defining the efficacy, safety profile and cost-effectiveness of such products. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: IV.

A novel fragment specific classification of complex olecranon fractures: 3-dimensional model design, radiological validation, and proposed surgical algorithm.

BACKGROUND: Current classifications for proximal ulna fracture patterns rely on qualitative data and cannot inform surgical planning. We propose a new classification system based on a biological and anatomical stress analysis. Our hypothesis is that fragment types in complex fractures can be predicted by the tendon and ligament attachments on the proximal ulna. METHODS: First, we completed a literature review to identify quantitative data on proximal ulna soft tissue attachments. On this basis, we created a 3-dimensional model of ulnar anatomy with SliceOMatic and Catia V5R20 software and determined likely locations for fragments and fracture lines. The second part of the study was a retrospective radiological study. A level-1 trauma radiological database was used to identify computed tomography scans of multifragmentary olecranon fractures from 2009 to 2021. These were reviewed and classified according to the "fragment specific" classification and compared to the Mayo and the Schatzker classifications. RESULTS: Twelve articles (134 elbows) met the inclusion criteria and 7 potential fracture fragments were identified. The radiological study included 67 preoperative computed tomography scans (mean 55 years). The fragments identified were the following: posterior (40%), intermediate (42%), tricipital (100%), supinator crest (25%), coronoid (18%), sublime tubercle (12%), and anteromedial facet (18%). Eighteen cases (27%) were classified as Schatzker D (comminutive) and 21 (31%) Mayo 2B (stable comminutive). Inter-rater correlation coefficient was 0.71 among 3 observers. CONCLUSION: This proposed classification system is anatomically based and considers the deforming forces from ligaments and tendons. Having a more comprehensive understanding of complex proximal ulna fractures would lead to more accurate fracture evaluation and surgical planning.

Validity, reliability and responsiveness of the French translation of the Patient-Rated Wrist Evaluation Questionnaire (PRWE).

INTRODUCTION: The patient-rated wrist evaluation questionnaire (PRWE) is a specific wrist questionnaire, developed in Canada that has been validated and proved reliable and sensitive. It assesses pain and function. Unfortunately, there was no validated French-language version. It is important that a translation should be methodologically rigorous, as both linguistic and cultural factors come into play. OBJECTIVE: To produce a French-language version of the PRWE, culturally adapted to the French-speaking populations of Europe and North America. MATERIALS AND METHODS: A validated protocol was used to produce a French-language version of the PRWE (PRWE-Fr) that would be culturally acceptable for the French-speaking populations of Europe and North America. Reliability and responsiveness analyses were performed and PRWE-Fr scores were compared to F-QuickDASH-D/S (French translation of short-form Disabilities of the Arm, Shoulder and Hand-Disability/Symptoms) scores to assess validity. RESULTS: A French-language version of the PRWE (PRWE-Fr) was accepted by a multinational committee, then validated in 65 French-speaking subjects, divided into 2 groups for analyses. A strong positive correlation was found between PRWE-Fr and F-QuickDASH-D/S scores. Comparison of results between two PRWE-Fr sessions at a 1-week interval found a very strong correlation (ρ=0.93; r2=0.868; p<0.001). The intraclass correlation coefficient for total PRWE-Fr score demonstrated excellent reliability (ICC: 0.93; 95% CI: [0.859; 0.969]; p<0.001). Responsiveness analysis revealed greater sensitivity to change than for the F-QuickDASH-D/S (standardized response mean [SRM], 1.14 versus 1.04 respectively). DISCUSSION: A French-language version of the PRWE was produced and validated for use in French-speaking populations. It should facilitate evaluation of results in French-speaking settings, collaboration in multinational studies and comparison between studies performed in different countries. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: II; Multicenter cohort study.

Corrective Open-wedge Valgus Proximal Humerus Lengthening Osteotomy. Technique and Case Series.

Symptomatic varus malunion after proximal humeral fractures is associated with weakness and painful limitation of shoulder range of motion. When there is conformity of the articular surface and no avascular necrosis, a head-preserving procedure is best indicated. Arthroscopic arthrolysis, subacromial decompression, and tuberoplasty have been described for the treatment of mild deformity. In cases with more severe deformity, corrective extracapsular lateral closing wedge valgus osteotomy has been reported as a reliable treatment option, in terms of both pain relief and improved function. While this procedure adequately restores rotator cuff tensioning, it is associated with a shortening of the lever arm to the deltoid muscle, secondary to a loss of humeral length. We describe our technique and results with a vascular-sparing, medial open-wedge osteotomy, using a structural allograft and lateral locking plate. In our opinion, this procedure is safe and effective, with the potential to improve functional outcomes in young and active patients.

The POSI study: gender differences in 94 cases of postoperative shoulder surgery infection: results of a 7-year retrospective multicenter study.

BACKGROUND: Contrary to lower limb infection, POstoperative Shoulder surgery Infection (POSI) often involves Cutibacterium acnes. Our aim was to describe patient characteristics and pathogens retrieved in POSI to guide initial empiric antibiotic selection with suspected infection during revision. We also compared microorganisms in infection following trauma, arthroplasty (AP), and arthroscopy (AS). METHODS: A multicenter retrospective study from 2010 to 2016 reviewed laboratory databases and medical records to identify patients with a previous shoulder surgery and a confirmed shoulder infection. The following procedures were included: AP, AS, fracture fixation (FF), and another open surgery (OS). A confirmed shoulder infection was defined as 2 positive cultures or more of the same microorganism, or clear clinical infection with 1 positive culture or more. RESULTS: Among the 5 hospitals and 28 surgeons involved, 94 POSI cases were identified. Mean age was 59 years at index surgery (range: 22-91) with a majority of men (n = 70, 74%). Among POSI cases, AP was the most common index surgery (n = 41), followed by FF (n = 27), AS (n = 16), and OS (n = 10). The median time between index surgery and the first positive sample was 5 months and the mean was 23 months (minimum 6 days to maximum 27 years), illustrating a positively skewed distribution. Cutibacterium spp were identified in 64 patients (68%), including 59 C acnes patients (63%), which was the most frequent germ in all 4 surgical groups. In 86% of cases, C acnes was identified at the first revision. The other 2 most common germs were Staphylococcus epidermidis and Staphylococcus aureus, with 29% and 17%, respectively. Polymicrobial infection was present in 30% of patients. Gender analysis revealed that C acnes was twice as frequent in men (male = 52 of 70, female = 7 of 24; P < .001). S epidermidis was more prevalent in women (n = 11; 46%) compared with men (n = 16; 21%) (P = .032). C acnes infection was most frequent in arthroscopic surgery (n = 14; 70%, P = .049). S epidermidis was 3 times more prevalent in chronic than in acute cases. CONCLUSION: Empiric antimicrobial therapy following POSI, while waiting for culture results, should cover C acnes, S epidermidis, and S aureus. There is a significant gender difference regarding POSI culture results. C acnes is more frequent in men, but should still be covered in women as it was found in 29% of cases.

Phone Administration of the Western Ontario Shoulder Instability Index Is More Reliable Than Administration via Email.

BACKGROUND: The Western Ontario Shoulder Instability (WOSI) questionnaire is a 21-item questionnaire to evaluate quality of life in patients with shoulder instability. Completing the questionnaire is time-consuming because each item is evaluated on a visual analog scale. Telephone or email versions of the score are appealing alternatives to administering it during the standard in-person patient visit; however, their validity and reliability remain unknown. QUESTIONS/PURPOSES: (1) Does the numerical scale (NS) version of the WOSI correlate with the original WOSI and Quick-DASH? (2) Do telephone and email administration of the NS-WOSI have good reliability and consistency? (3) Compared with the original WOSI form, does the NS form lead to faster completion for patients and quicker data extraction for researchers? METHODS: Between 2014 and 2019, 50 patients with a documented history of shoulder dislocation with persistent symptomatic shoulder instability, whether anterior, posterior, or multidirectional; patients scheduled for surgery; and patients with traumatic or nontraumatic injuries were prospectively recruited from the outpatient clinic of two university hospitals acting as Level 1 trauma centers and sports traumatology tertiary referral centers. The median (IQR) age was 28 years (24 to 36), and 80% (40 of 50) were men. Most (52% [26 of 50]) patients had two to five lifetime shoulder dislocations. Validity of the NS-WOSI was assessed using the Pearson correlation coefficient during an in-person visit; the original WOSI questionnaire (or its previously validated French-language version), NS-WOSI, and Quick-DASH questionnaires were administered in a random order. After a minimum 7-day interval, 78% (39 of 50) of patients completed the phone interview, and 74% (37 of 50) of patients completed the email version of the NS-WOSI score to evaluate NS-WOSI's reliability using the intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC), which was interpreted as poor (< 0.5), moderate (0.50-0.75), strong (0.75-0.90), and very strong (> 0.90). The standard error of measurement (SEM) was used to evaluate variability around the true score, with a low value indicating a high reliability. The 95% minimal detectable change (MDC 95% ) was calculated to evaluate the minimal change in score that was not related to measurement errors. Lastly, the Cronbach alpha was used to assess internal consistency (intercorrelation strength), where a value > 0.70 was considered good. The time needed for the patient to complete the various versions and for researchers to extract data was recorded. RESULTS: The NS-WOSI score was very strongly correlated with the original WOSI score (r = 0.96 [95% confidence interval (CI) 0.93 to 0.98]; p < 0.001). Although telephone-acquired and email-acquired data for the NS-WOSI questionnaires were correlated with the NS-WOSI (telephone r = 0.91 [95% CI 0.83 to 0.95]; p < 0.001; email r = 0.84 [95% CI 0.71 to 0.91]; p < 0.001), the ICC was higher for telephone interviews (0.92 [95% CI 0.86 to 0.96] versus email 0.80 [95% CI 0.64 to 0.89]), indicating that although both had good reliability, the phone interview was more suitable. The phone interview was also preferable to email regarding SEM (3% [52 of 2100 points] versus 6% [132 of 2100 points]) and the MDC 95% (7% [144 of 2100 points] versus 17% [366 of 2100 points]). The 95% CI of the MDC acquired by email was superior to the reported minimum clinically important difference for the original WOSI (7% [152 of 2100 points]), meaning that an error of measurement could wrongly be interpreted as a clinically significant change in score. Internal consistency was deemed good, with a Cronbach alpha of 0.96 (95% CI 0.92 to 98) and 0.89 (95% CI 0.79 to 0.94) for NS-WOSI telephone and email, respectively. The time to complete the NS-WOSI was reduced compared with the original WOSI (221 ± 153 seconds versus 266 ± 146 seconds, mean difference -45 seconds [95% CI -72 to -12]; p = 0.009). Lastly, data extraction was faster (62 ± 15 seconds versus 209 ± 52 seconds, mean difference -147 seconds [95% CI -164 to -130]; p < 0.001) with the NS-WOSI than with the original WOSI. CONCLUSION: The NS-WOSI in person, by telephone, or by email is a valid, reliable, and timesaving alternative to the original WOSI questionnaire. However, the reliability of data acquisition by telephone interviews was superior to that of email. CLINICAL RELEVANCE: Given that there were no important differences in performance for the NS-WOSI, regardless of whether it was administered in person or by phone, we suggest that physicians use both interchangeably based on patient convenience. However, we do not recommend using the email version, especially for research purposes, since it was not as reliable when compared with in-person administration. The responsiveness of the modified NS-WOSI, as well as factors influencing response rates to phone interview, are questions that remain to be explored.

Relevance of Sleep Disturbances to Orthopaedic Surgery: A Current Concepts Narrative and Practical Review.

➤: Sleep disturbances can increase the risk of falls and motor vehicle accidents and may reduce bone density. ➤: Poor sleep can lead to worse outcomes after fracture, such as chronic pain and delayed recovery. ➤: Orthopaedic surgeons can play an important role in the screening of sleep disorders among their patients.

Greater trochanteric pain after primary total hip replacement, comparing the anterior and posterior approach: A secondary analysis of a randomized trial.

BACKGROUND: Greater trochanteric pain (GTP) after total hip replacement is a common cause of residual lateral hip pain, regardless of the approach used. The goal of our study was to evaluate GTP after a direct anterior approach (DAA) compared to a posterior approach (PA) as well as the clinical outcomes of both approaches and answer the following: 1) What is the incidence of trochanteric pain after primary THA with two different surgical approaches? 2) What is the functional outcome of patients with GTP? 3) What proportion of patients with GTP resort to peritrochanteric injections? HYPOTHESIS: Our hypothesis is that GTP is present with both approaches but satisfaction is lower with the PA. PATIENTS AND METHODS: A secondary analysis of a previously published clinical trial with 55 total hip arthroplasty patients randomized in one of two surgical approaches: 27 patients underwent the anterior modified Hueter approach, while the other group of 28 patients were operated using the posterior approach. Study outcomes were Modified Harris Hip Score (MHHS), satisfaction score, pain when lying on the affected side, and requiring an injection. Hip offset, femur lateralization and leg lengthening were measured before and after surgery. RESULTS: Forty-five patients were available for complete follow-up at a mean of 62 months (range: 48-74). The incidence of GTP was higher in the posterior approach [PA: 6/21 (29%) vs DAA 4/24 (17%)) (p=0.3). Patients operated through a PA experienced more pain [5/21 (24%) of patients; VAS=mean 5.3] when lying on their operated side, compared to DAA patients [2/24 (8%) of patients; VAS=mean 2) (p=0.2)]. However, MHHS, patient satisfaction with surgery, radiological assessment for hip offset, femur lateralization or leg lengthening, and injections required were similar for both approaches. Overall, satisfaction and functional outcome with surgery was significantly lower in GTP patients, regardless of the approach. CONCLUSIONS: GTP impacts patient satisfaction and functional outcome in total hip arthroplasty patients. PA patients reported more trochanteric pain than DAA patients, which affected their clinical outcome. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: III.

Collateral effects of targeting the nucleus pulposus via a transpedicular or transannular surgical route: a combined X-ray, MRI, and histological long-term descriptive study in sheep.

PURPOSE: In the context of regenerative medicine strategies, based in particular on the injection of regenerative cells, biological factors, or biomaterials into the nucleus pulposus (NP), two main routes are used: the transpedicular approach (TPA) and the transannular approach (TAA). The purpose of our study was to compare the long-term consequences of the TPA and the TAA on intervertebral disc (IVD) health through a longitudinal follow-up in an ovine model. METHODS: The TPA and the TAA were performed on 12 IVDs from 3 sheep. Six discs were left untreated and used as controls. The route and injection feasibility, as well as the IVD environment integrity, were assessed by MRI (T2-weighted signal intensity), micro-CT scan, and histological analyses (Boos' scoring). The sheep were assessed at 1, 3, and 7 months. RESULTS: Both the TPA and the TAA allowed access to the NP. They both induced NP degeneration, as evidenced by a decrease in the T2wsi and an increase in the Boos' scores. The TPA led to persistent end-plate defects and herniation of NP tissue (Schmorl's node-like) after 7 months as well as the presence of osseous fragments in the NP. CONCLUSIONS: The TPA induced more severe lesions in IVDs and vertebrae compared to the TAA. The lesions induced by the TPA are reason to consider whether or not this route is optimal for studying IVD regenerative medicine approaches.

Outcomes of surgical fixation of greater tuberosity fractures: A systematic review.

BACKGROUND: Isolated greater tuberosity fractures account for up to a fifth of all proximal humeral fractures. There have been several retrospective cohort studies and case series reporting outcomes after treatment of this pathology. This study aims to report on the clinical outcomes of surgically treated isolated greater tuberosity fractures, as well as diagnostic workup and complications associated with fracture fixation. METHODS: A systematic review was performed under PRISMA guidelines to identify studies that reported the results or clinical outcomes of isolated greater tuberosity fracture. The searches were performed using MEDLINE through PubMed, the Elsevier Embase database, and the Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews. RESULTS: Sixteen studies met inclusion criteria comprising 345 patients and 345 shoulders. The mean age was 52.9 years and mean follow-up was 3.4 months. The mean postoperative American Shoulder and Elbow Surgeon Score, the most frequently utilized patient reported outcome measure across studies, was 90.1% of ideal maximum. All studies used standard shoulder radiographs in their initial workup and most commonly referred to a minimum of 5mm displacement as an indication for surgery. Fifty five percent of patients were treated using open fixation and 35.9 with arthroscopic fixation. Ninety three percent of patients were able to return to work. A total of fifty-two (15.1%) complications were reported in the included studies. CONCLUSIONS: The current literature describes overall satisfactory functional outcomes and minimal occupational morbidity following either open or arthroscopic fixation of isolated greater tuberosity fractures despite a notable rate of complications. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: IV, systematic review.

Deltopectoral vs. deltoid split approach for proximal HUmerus fracture fixation with locking plate: a prospective RAndomized study (HURA).

BACKGROUND: This study aimed to compare the functional and clinical outcomes between the deltoid split (DS) approach and the classic deltopectoral (DP) approach for locking plate fixation of proximal humerus fractures (PHF) in a prospective randomized multicenter study. METHODS: From 2007 to 2015, all patients with a PHF Neer II/III were invited to participate. Exclusion criteria were pre-existing pathology to the limb, patient refusing or too ill to undergo surgery, patient needing another type of treatment (nail, arthroplasty), and axillary nerve impairment. After consent, patients were randomized to one of the 2 treatments using the dark envelope method. Functional outcome was evaluated by validated questionnaires (12-Item Short Form Health Survey: version 2, Quick-DASH) with a minimum follow-up of 12 months. Complications were noted. RESULTS: A total of 85 patients (44 DS, 41 DP) were randomized (mean age of 62). Groups were equivalent in terms of age, gender, body mass index, severity of fracture, and preinjury scores. The mean follow-up was 26 months. All clinical outcome measures were in favor of the deltopectoral approach. Specifically, the Q-DASH and SF-12v2 were better in the DP group (12 vs. 26, P = .003 and 56 vs. 51, P = .049, respectively). There were more complications in DS patients, but they did not reach statistical significance. CONCLUSIONS: The primary hypothesis on the superiority of the deltoid split incision was rebutted. On the basis of our study, the DP approach seems to offer better function compared with the DS approach for fixation of Neer 2 and 3 PHF fractures fixed with a locking plate.

Factors affecting outcome of partial radial head fractures: A Retrospective Cohort Study.

BACKGROUND: The purpose of this study is to evaluate which factors will affect range of motion (ROM) and function in partial radial head fractures. The hypothesis is that conservative treatment yields better outcomes. MATERIALS AND METHODS: This retrospective comparative cohort study included 43 adult volunteers with partial radial head fracture, a minimum 1-year follow up, separated into a surgical and non-surgical group. Risk factors were: associated injury, heterotopic ossification, worker's compensation, and proximal radio ulnar joint (PRUJ) implication. Outcomes included radiographic ROM measurement, demographic data, and quality of life questionnaires (PREE, Q-DASH, MEPS). RESULTS: Mean follow up was 3.5 years (1-7 years). Thirty patients (70%) had associated injuries with decreased elbow extension (-11°, p=0.004) and total ROM (-14°, p=0.002) compared to the other group. Heterotopic ossification was associated with decreased elbow flexion (-9.00°, p=0.001) and fractures involved the PRUJ in 88% of patients. Only worker's compensation was associated with worse scores. There was no difference in terms of function and outcome between patients treated non-surgically or surgically. DISCUSSION: We found that associated injuries, worker's compensation and the presence of heterotopic ossification were the only factors correlated with a worse prognosis in this cohort of patients. Given these results, the authors reiterate the importance of being vigilant to associated injuries. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: IV, Retrospective study.

Arthroscopic treatment of elbow osteoarthritis.

Elbow osteoarthritis chiefly affects heavy manual labourers and athletes and may be primary or post-traumatic. Arthroscopic debridement for primary elbow osteoarthritis reliably produces pain relief, motion range gains, and good functional outcomes. Total elbow arthroplasty, in contrast, is considered a salvage option in this patient population, as activities must be restricted to protect the implant. Here, we describe the operative technique used for arthroscopic elbow release in 87 patients with symptomatic elbow osteoarthritis included prospectively at 6 centres in a study that was conducted for a French Arthroscopy Society symposium and whose findings are reported elsewhere. The technique involves exploration of the anterior and posterior compartments with resection of motion-limiting osteophytes; clearing of the fossae; foreign body extraction; and treatment of the posterior and anterior capsule and of the lateral inclines. The indications of ulnar nerve release, radial head excision, release of the posterior band of the medial collateral ligament (MCL), and/or fenestration as described by Outerbridge-Kashiwagi are discussed. After 6 months, 93.5% of patients were satisfied with the procedure. No serious neurological complications were recorded. Wound healing was impaired in 4 patients, of whom 3 responded to local care; the remaining patient required open debridement for surgical-site infection. Complex regional pain syndrome developed in 3 patients. Ulnar nerve transposition was required secondarily in 1 patient and another patient had persistent dysesthesia after ulnar nerve release. This minimally invasive technique provides good short-term outcomes in primary elbow osteoarthritis and is associated with a low complication rate.

Arthroscopic debridement for osteoarthritis of the elbow: Results and analysis of predictive factors.

INTRODUCTION: Osteoarthritis is the second most frequent cause of elbow stiffness, after trauma sequelae. Surgical treatment mainly consists of debridement. The main aim of the present study was to assess the efficacy of arthroscopic treatment of osteoarthritis of the elbow on Andrews-Carson score. Secondary objectives comprised assessment of the impact of associated procedures and of epidemiological factors on functional results. METHOD: A prospective multicenter study involving 8 centers, in a symposium held by the French Society of Arthroscopy (SFA), included patients treated by arthroscopy for primary or secondary osteoarthritis of the elbow between January 2017 and March 2018, with a minimum 6 months' follow-up. Clinical assessment was based on change in Andrews-Carson functional score (AC), specific to osteoarthritis of the elbow, and on other functional scores: QuickDash (QD), Patient-Rated Elbow Evaluation (PREE), Mayo Elbow Performance Score (MEPS) and Self-Evaluation Elbow (SEE). Progression in pain on visual analog scale (VAS) and range of motion (RoM) was also assessed. Initial imaging work-up comprised standard X-ray and CT arthrography; paraclinical follow-up was based on X-ray. The impact of the following procedures associated to arthroscopic debridement was analyzed: radial head resection, ulnar nerve release, humeral fenestration, lateral ramp release, and medial collateral ligament posterior bundle release. The functional impact of epidemiological factors (age, handedness, manual occupation, smoking, body-mass index, and work accident/occupational disease status) and radiographic factors (foreign bodies, joint impingement, osteophytes, and fossa filling) was also assessed. RESULTS: The series comprised 87 patients: 75 male (86.2%); mean age, 49 years (range, 18-73 years). Arthroscopic debridement significantly improved all functional scores at a minimum 6 months, and notably the specific AC score: 113.6±25.4 (40-180) versus 178.7±20.2 (110-200) (P<0.0001). Pain diminished significantly: 6.4±2.1 (0-10) versus 1.7±1.8 (0-8) (P<0.0001). RoM increased significantly: flexion/extension, 93.44±20.5° (5-130°) versus 124.2±13.8° (90-160°) (P<0.0001); pronation/supination, 147.6±25.6° (60-180°) versus 162.5±20.6° (100-180°) (P<0.0001). Strength (kg) increased in flexion (8.8±4.0 (4 to 20) versus 15.3±5.1 (3 to 32) (P<0.0008) and in grip [33.1±12.3 (10 to 58) versus 42.1±14.0 (2 to 68) (P<0.0001)]. Epidemiologically, males showed better recovery than females for both pain and strength. There was a significant positive impact of manual work on functional recovery, pain and also strength. There was a significant negative impact of work-accident/occupational disease on pain and strength. Regarding associated procedures, lateral ramp debridement improved AC score, with a gain of 75.4±25.3 points (-5 to 110) vs. 49.6±23.5 (10 to 100) (P<0.0001), and pain on VAS, with a fall of -5.6±2.1 points (-10 to -1) vs. -3.6±3.0 (-8.5 to 1) (P=0.0013). Ulnar nerve release, radial head resection and humeral fenestration had no positive impact. Preoperative foreign body was a factor for good prognosis. Cartilage wear, especially in the humeroulnar compartment, was associated with poorer functional results. DISCUSSION/CONCLUSION: Arthroscopic treatment of osteoarthritis of the elbow significantly improved clinical results at 6 months, with significant improvements in functional scores, pain, strength and range of motion. Gender, type of work and work-accident/occupational disease status influenced clinical results. Lateral ramp release is an often overlooked technical factor improving functional results. Radiologically, the best candidates are those presenting with a foreign body and no humeroulnar impingement. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: III, Prospective observational multicenter cohort study.

Teaching simulated arthroscopic Bankart repair: residents' assessment at the Annual Shoulder Course

Background: This study's aim was to evaluate the performance of senior orthopedic residents during simulated arthroscopic anterior stabilization (Bankart repair) before and after a national shoulder review course. Methods: Participants were assessed before and after the Annual Shoulder Review Course over a 3-day period, using a multiple-choice examination and surgery performance assessment. The surgical evaluation was completed by fellowship-trained surgeons using a standardized procedure checklist and a global rating scale. All Canadian senior orthopedic residents were invited to participate in the course. Results: The 57 participants showed improvement following the course. The written knowledge evaluation mean score increased, and all 3 surgical performance measurements improved: surgical task time improved from 4:40 min to 2:53 min (p < 0.001), surgical technique evaluation increased from 56% to 67% after the procedure checklist (p < 0.001), and anchor placement improved for all 3 aspects. Anchor entry point was the sole measure not to improve enough to reach statistical significance (p = 0.37). Conclusion: Our data support the inclusion of dry model surgical simulation as part of a surgical skills course for both training and assessment of orthopedic surgery residents.

Contexte: Le but de cette étude était d'évaluer le rendement des résidents seniors en orthopédie durant une simulation de stabilisation arthroscopique antérieure (intervention de Bankart) avant et après un cours de révision national sur l'articulation de l'épaule. Méthodes: Les participants ont été évalués avant et après l'Annual Shoulder Review Course sur une période de 3 jours, à l'aide d'un examen à choix multiples et d'une épreuve chirurgicale pratique. L'évaluation chirurgicale était effectuée par des chirurgiens spécialisés, à l'aide d'une liste de vérification normalisée des procédures et d'une échelle d'évaluation globale. Tous les résidents séniors canadiens en orthopédie étaient invités à participer au cours. Résultats: Les 57 participants ont montré une amélioration après le cours. Lesrésultats à l'examen écrit ont augmenté, tout comme ceux des 3 évaluations chirurgicales : le temps chirurgical a diminué, passant de 4:40 min à 2:53 min (p < 0,001), l'évaluation de la technique chirurgicale a augmenté de 56 % à 67 % selon la liste de vérification (p < 0,001) et le positionnement des ancres s'est aussi amélioré pour les 3 positionnements. Le point d'entrée des ancres a été la seule mesure à ne pas s'améliorer suffisamment pour atteindre une portée statistique (p = 0,37). Conclusion: Nos données appuient l'inclusion d'un modèle de simulation sec pour la formation et l'évaluation des résidents en chirurgie orthopédique.

Incidence and Risk Factors of Long-term Opioid Use in Elderly Trauma Patients.

OBJECTIVE: Evaluate the incidence and risk factors of opioid use 1 year after injury in elderly trauma patients. BACKGROUND: The current epidemic of prescription opioid misuse and overdose observed in North America generally concerns young patients. Little is known on long-term opioid use among the elderly trauma population. METHODS: In a retrospective observational multicenter cohort study conducted on registry data, all patients 65 years and older admitted (hospital stay >2 days) for injury in 57 adult trauma centers in the province of Quebec (Canada) between 2004 and 2014 were included. We searched for filled opioid prescriptions in the year preceding the injury, up to 3 months and 1 year after the injury. RESULTS: In all, 39,833 patients were selected for analysis. Mean age was 79.3 years (±7.7), 69% were women, and 87% of the sample was opioid-naive. After the injury, 38% of the patients filled an opioid prescription within 3 months and 10.9% [95% confidence interval (CI) 10.6%-11.2%] filled an opioid prescription 1 year after trauma: 6.8% (95% CI 6.5%-7.1%) were opioid-naïve and 37.6% (95% CI 36.3%-38.9%) were opioid non-naive patients. Controlling for confounders, patients who filled 2 or more opioid prescriptions before the injury and those who filled an opioid prescription within 3 months after the injury were, respectively, 11.4 and 3 times more likely to use opioids 1 year after the injury compared with those who did not fill opioid prescriptions. CONCLUSIONS: These results highlight that elderly trauma patients are at risk of long-term opioid use, especially if they had preinjury or early postinjury opioid consumption.

The smartphone inclinometer: A new tool to determine elbow range of motion?

BACKGROUND: There are easily accessible tools on smartphones (APP) for measuring elbow range of motion (ROM). The purpose of this study is to evaluate the validity of a particular APP in determining elbow ROM in comparison with the commonly used goniometer (GON), surgeon estimation of range (EST) and measurement on X-ray (XR). METHODS: The study included 20 patients (40 elbows). Flexion, extension, pronation and supination were measured using three different methods: EST, GON and APP. Radiographic measurements were taken using the average humeral diaphysis axis and dorsal midthird of ulna in flexion and extension. RESULTS: The accuracy of the three different methods has been compared to GON using statistical analysis (ANOVA and paired samples test). There was no statistically significant difference for XR flexion measurement (mean of 2.8° ± 1.5°). The APP overestimated flexion (mean of 6.4° ± 1.0°), and EST underestimated it (mean of - 7.9° ± 1.1°). For extension, the mean difference was 2.8° ± 0.7° for EST and - 26.8° ± 3.1° for XR. The APP method did not significantly differ from GON. Supination accuracy was greater with EST (2.7° ± 1.7°) than with APP (5.9° ± 1.9°). There was no difference for pronation measurement with both EST and APP. CONCLUSIONS: This study is the first comparing four measurement techniques of elbow ROM. Our results showed that EST was only accurate for forearm rotation. The XR scored the best for flexion but is less reliable for extension. Surprisingly, compared to GON, APP did not correlate as we expected for flexion and supination, but the other methods were also inaccurate. We found APP to be very useful to measure complete arc of motion (difference between maximal flexion and maximal extension). LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: III, Retrospective review of a prospective cohort of elbow fracture patients: Diagnostic Study.

Preexisting Carpal and Carpometacarpal Osteoarthritis Has No Impact on Function after Distal Radius Fractures.

Background Functional outcomes of distal radius fractures vary widely regardless of treatment methods. Purpose This study aims to verify whether preexisting carpal and carpometacarpal (CMC) osteoarthritis (OA) will negatively impact wrist functional outcome in patients with distal radius fractures. Patients and Methods A retrospective case-control study was done using a prospective trauma database. Patients were matched 1:1 in two groups based on the presence of wrist or carpal arthritis (OA). The groups were matched for sex, follow-up, and treatment type. Patients were followed up for a minimum of 1 year and functional outcomes were assessed using validated scores. Results A total of 61 patients were included. Mean age was 63 years (range: 20-85) and average follow-up was 26 months. There were 31 patients in the OA+ group and 30 in the OA- group. Forty-one patients were treated surgically and 20 nonoperatively. None of the patients in the OA- developed OA during follow-up. Both groups were comparable for sex, residual deformity, and follow-up. There was no significant difference for the visual analog scale, Short Form-12, Quick Disability Arm Shoulder Hand, and Patient-rated Wrist Evaluation, or for radiographic outcomes. Conclusion Preexisting OA in the wrist or CMC does not seem to impact outcomes of distal radius fractures, regardless of treatment, age, or sex. Although this is a negative study, the results are important to help counsel patients with distal radius fractures. Further work must be done to identify other potential causes for negative outcomes. Level of Evidence Level III, prognostic study.