Determinants of radiological patterns and severity in immunocompromised adults with Metapneumovirus infection.

BACKGROUND: Human Metapneumovirus (HMPV) belongs to the Pneumoviridae family and is responsible for respiratory infections. Mild infections are well-recognized in children, while its precise impact in various categories of immunocompromised adults has not been well addressed. RESEARCH QUESTION: We retrospectively studied HMPV infections in immunocompromised adults followed in two large French university medical centers. STUDY DESIGN AND METHODS: We identified immunocompromised adults with positive HMPV Polymerase Chain Reaction (PCR) for 36 months and reviewed their medical charts. For lung transplant recipients (LTR), FEV1 was collected at baseline, during and after infection. Imaging was centralized and chest involvement was categorized by dominant CT patterns. We compared severe patients (requiring oxygen or ventilation) and non hypoxemic patients. RESULTS: Seventy-two patients were included, 27 were LTR, 25 had a hematological malignancy or were hematopoietic stem cell recipients, 20 had another immunocompromised status. Twenty patients (28%) presented a hypoxemic infection, requiring hospitalization and intensive care units transfers in 50/72 (69.4%) and 9/72 (12.5%) respectively, with only one death. Hypoxemia was less pronounced in LTRs (p = 0.014). Finally, age and dyspnea remained independent factors associated with hypoxemia (p < 0.005). The most frequent radiological patterns were bronchopneumonia (34.2%) and bronchiolitis (39.5% and 64.3% in the overall population and in LTRs respectively, p = 0.045). FEV1 improved in LTRs at one month and 85% had recovered their baseline FEV1 within 6 months. INTERPRETATIONS: In immunocompromised adults, HMPV infections required frequent hospitalizations and ICU transfers, while mortality is low. In LTRs, bronchiolitis pattern was predominant with short and long-term favorable outcome.

Azacitidine-venetoclax versus azacitidine salvage treatment for primary induction failure or first relapsed acute myeloid leukaemia patients.

OBJECTIVES: To compare the efficacy of venetoclax-azacitidine (VEN-AZA) with AZA in the real-life for patients with first relapsed or refractory acute myeloid leukaemia (R/R AML). METHODS: We retrospectively analysed R/R AML patients treated with VEN-AZA at the Institut Paoli Calmettes between September 2020 and February 2022. We compared them to a historical cohort of patients treated with AZA between 2010 and 2021. RESULTS: Thirty-five patients treated with VEN-AZA were compared with 140 patients treated with AZA. There were more favourable cytogenetics (25.7% vs. 8.6%; p = 0.01) and less FLT3-ITD mutated AML (8.8% vs. 25.5%; p = .049) in the VEN-AZA group. The overall 30-day mortality rate was 7.4% and the overall 90-day mortality was 20%, with no difference between the groups. The complete remission rate was 48.6% in the VEN-AZA group versus 15% (p < .0001). The composite complete response rate was 65.7% in the VEN-AZA group versus 23.6% (p < .0001). OS was 12.8 months in the VEN-AZA group versus 7.3 months (p = 0.059). Patients with primary refractory AML, poor-risk cytogenetics, prior hematopoietic stem-cell transplantation (HSCT) and FLT3-ITD mutated AML had lower response and survival rates. CONCLUSION: VEN-AZA was associated with a better response rate and a longer survival than AZA monotherapy in AML patients who relapsed after or were refractory to intensive chemotherapy.