Impact on diabetes outcomes and team skills of integrating dietetic services into interprofessional education and teamwork in primary care.

OBJECTIVES: Diabetes is a complex disease requiring daily self-management of diet and activity, yet many patients do not receive recommended self-management education, medical nutrition therapy, or team-based care that includes registered dietitian nutritionists (RDNs). Such service deficits contribute to challenges in meeting combined diabetes care goals. We evaluated the impact of adding RDN-supervised dietetic interns to an established primary care interprofessional education/teamwork model on patients' clinical outcomes and health professions students' team skills. METHODS: Electronic health records were retrospectively analyzed to evaluate the impact of interprofessional care teams including dietetic practitioners on patient outcomes and compare these changes to outcomes achieved with the previous model without such participation. Pre-test/post-test surveys were used to evaluate health professions students' self-reported changes in team skills. RESULTS: Patient outcomes for glycemic control, systolic blood pressure, triglycerides, and depression improved significantly, and emergency department visits decreased by 79% after interprofessional care. Average hemoglobin A1c levels decreased from 11.6% to 8.3% (p < .001), an additional 1.1% reduction over previous results, following incorporation of dietetic practitioners. Students reported increased team skills after interprofessional care participation. DISCUSSION: Health professions and dietetic program faculty should collaborate to develop interprofessional best practice primary care models for patients with diabetes.

Geographic Variance in Maryland's Potentially Preventable Emergency Visits: Comparison of Explanatory Models.

The use of emergency departments (EDs) for potentially preventable visits is costly and inefficient. In Maryland, about 20%-30% of such visits are ambulatory care sensitive and thus potentially preventable. The uninsured are often perceived to account for a disproportionate share of such visits. This analysis aimed to (a) compare and explain the geographic variance in Maryland's potentially preventable ED visit (PPV) rates for the total and uninsured populations and (b) test the predictive value of regression models developed. Geographic hot spots of increased PPV rates were highly correlated for uninsured and total populations, but uninsured rates were more clustered in urban areas. Poisson and geographically weighted regression (GWR) models best fit the data and predicted 40%-52% and 46% of the variance in 2009 total and uninsured rates, respectively. Significant predictors of increased PPV rates were social determinants of health: lower per capita income and education levels, and higher percentage of female-headed households.

A statewide assessment of smoke-free policy in multiunit housing settings.

INTRODUCTION: The prevalence of smoke-free policies in multiunit housing (MUH) in South Dakota was examined. Owner beliefs about smoke-free policies were identified. METHODS: Stratified random sampling included 27 South Dakota counties classified as frontier, large rural, or urban. Data collection with MUH owners in selected counties employed a telephone survey with mailed backup. RESULTS: The owner response rate was 41.5% (324/780). A written smoke-free policy was reported by 175 (54.0%) owners, and 31 (10%) reported a verbal smoke-free policy. Owners in large rural counties (57.4%) had more written smoke-free policies than owners in urban (52.2%) and frontier (53.5%) counties. Only 8.5% of properties had policies covering both buildings and grounds. Owners without policies were more than twice as likely to manage U.S. Department of Housing and Urban Development subsidized units and were three times as likely to be current smokers. Owners without a smoke-free policy anticipated that a policy would decrease maintenance costs but increase turnover and vacancy rates. Nearly one-half (47.9%) of owners with no smoke-free policy had previously considered implementing a policy. Owners self-reported beliefs about smoke-free policies identified perceived benefits such as decreased maintenance and costs, improved tenant safety and health, and conscientious tenants. Perceived drawbacks included increased outdoor maintenance, enforcement problems, concerns about long-term tenants who smoke, and freedom/rights of smokers. CONCLUSIONS: This study provides a baseline assessment of smoke-free polices in MUH settings. Perceptions of owners without smoke-free policies focused on economic concerns that were inconsistent with reports from those owners with smoke-free policies.