Long-term Stroke and Mortality Risk in Nonagenarians Following Transcatheter Aortic Valve Insertion.

BACKGROUND: Limited data exist on the long-term outcomes of transcatheter aortic valve insertion (TAVI) in nonagenarian patients. The purpose of this study is to investigate the relationship between patient baseline comorbidity and frailty on the long-term outcome of the nonagenarian population. METHODS: Retrospective analysis of 187 consecutive nonagenarian patients who underwent TAVI from 2009 to 2020. Multivariable models were utilized to analyze the association between basleline patient and frailty variables and mortality, stroke, and repeat hospitalization. Long-term survival was compared to an age- and sex-matched US population. RESULTS: The median STS-predicted risk of mortality (STS-PROM) was 10% (IQR, 7-17%). Frailty was met in 72% of patients based on the five-meter walk test, 13% based on KCCQ-12 score, 12% based on KATZ activities of daily living, and 8% based on serum albumin levels. Procedure-related mortality occured in 3 (2%) patients and stroke in 8 (4%). The median duration of follow-up was 3.4 years. Outcomes included death in 150 (80%) patients, stroke in 15, and repeat hospitalization in 114. Multivariable analysis identified no association between any of the baseline patient variables with mortality, stroke, repeat hospitalization, or the combined outcomes (all P>0.05). One- and five-year survival rates in TAVI-treated nonagenarians were similar to age- and sex-matched controls (P=0.27). CONCLUSIONS: Long-term death or stroke is independent of STS-PROM and frailty risk variables in this nonagenarian patient population who received TAVI. Furthermore, survival is similar to age- and sex-matched controls.

Simultaneous Tricuspid Valve Repair at the Time of Mitral Valve Surgery: Determinants of Postoperative Pacemaker Implantation.

OBJECTIVE: Guidelines recommend tricuspid valve (TV) repair for patients with severe tricuspid valve regurgitation (TR) undergoing surgery for degenerative mitral valve (MV) disease, but management of ≤ moderate TR is controversial. This study examines the incidence and causes of bradyarrhythmias leading to PPM implantation. METHODS: Review of patients undergoing simultaneous TV repair and MV surgery for degenerative MV disease from 2001 to 2022 (N=404). Primary endpoint was the incidence of postoperative PPM implantation. Secondary endpoints included the incidence of high-degree AV block and overall survival. RESULTS: All patients underwent TV repair at the time of MV surgery; 332 (82%) underwent MV repair and 72 (18%) MV replacement. Tricuspid valve repair techniques included flexible band (n=258, 63.8%), DeVega annuloplasty (n=78, 19.3%), complete flexible ring (n=49, 12.1%), and incomplete rigid ring (n=19, 4.7%). The 30-day mortality was 0.5% (n=2). A total of 35 (8.7%) patients had a PPM implanted postoperatively, 26 (6.4%) for high-degree AV block. On multivariable analysis, only older age was associated with PPM implantation. Patients who received a PPM due to high-degree AV block had reduced overall survival (Figure, p=0.01). CONCLUSIONS: Need for permanent pacing following TV repair at the time of MV surgery is not uncommon, but there are few modifiable factors that might reduce this risk. Careful selection of patients with less-than-severe TR and surgical techniques may reduce PPM-related risks and complications.

Single-Center Prospective Study of Cross-Clamp vs Balloon Occlusion in Robotic Mitral Surgery.

BACKGROUND: Transthoracic aortic cross-clamp and endoaortic balloon occlusion have both been shown to have comparable safety profiles for aortic occlusion. Because most surgeons use only one technique, we sought to compare the outcomes when a homogeneous group of surgeons changed their occlusion technique from aortic cross-clamp to balloon occlusion. METHODS: We changed our technique from aortic cross-clamp to balloon occlusion in November 2022. This allowed us to conduct a prospective treatment comparison study in the same group of surgeons. Propensity score matching was used to match cases (balloon occlusion) 1:3 to controls (aortic cross-clamp) based on age, sex, body mass index, concomitant maze procedure, and tricuspid valve repair. RESULTS: Total of 411 patients underwent robotic mitral surgery from 2020 through 2023. Propensity score matching was used to match 56 balloon occlusion patients to 168 aortic cross-clamp patients. The 224 patients were a median age of 65 years (interquartile range, 55.6-70.0 years), and 119 (53%) were men. All valves were successfully repaired. Balloon occlusion had a shorter median cardiopulmonary bypass (CPB) time compared with aortic cross-clamp (84.0 vs 94.5 minutes, P = .006). Median cross-clamp time (64.0 vs 64.0 minutes, P = .483) and total surgery time (5.9 vs 6.1 hours, P = .495) did not differ between groups. There were no in-hospital deaths. There were 5 surgeons who performed various combinations of console and bedside roles. CPB, cross-clamp, and surgery durations were not significantly affected by the different surgeon combinations. CONCLUSIONS: Compared with aortic cross-clamp, balloon occlusion has similar perioperative and early postoperative outcomes. Additionally, it likely introduces a 10-minute reduction in total CPB time.

A Case Series of Minimally Invasive Robotic-Assisted Resection of Cardiac Papillary Fibroelastoma: The Mayo Clinic Experience.

Papillary fibroelastomas (PFEs) are small, slowly growing benign cardiac tumors with clinically significant risk of embolization. Surgical excision is the definitive treatment of symptomatic PFE and is conventionally performed through a median sternotomy. In this study, we report a series of 12 patients, who underwent robotic-assisted PFE removal at the Mayo Clinic. PFE involved the mitral valve, left atrium, and tricuspid valve. No major complications occurred after the procedure, and most patients were discharged 4 days after the surgery. On follow-up, 1 patient demonstrated pericarditis.

Navigating missing link: innovative cannulation for robotic mitral valve repair in the absence of inferior vena cava.

Cardiac surgeries often require the use of cardiopulmonary bypass to allow visualization and manipulation of tissues. Vascular anomalies may impose challenges with access configuration. A patient was evaluated for robot-assisted mitral valve repair and found to have an atretic inferior vena cava secondary due to chronic occlusion. The patient was cannulated arterially through the left common femoral artery, and two cannulation sites were applied for venous drainage: the right intrajugular vein and a second percutaneous access site directly into the right atrium through the chest wall. The procedure was completed without immediate complications, and the patient's perioperative course was unremarkable.

Does Minimally Invasive Mitral Valve Repair Mean Less Postoperative Pain?

BACKGROUND: Rapid recovery after minimally invasive mitral valve (MV) repair has been demonstrated in many studies, but the issue of postoperative pain has not been fully elucidated. We evaluated pain scores and medication use in patients undergoing MV repair by minimally invasive surgery (MIS) and open sternotomy (OS). METHODS: Between 2008 and 2019, 1332 patients underwent isolated MV repair by OS, and 913 underwent minimally invasive MV repair. After 1:1 propensity score matching, the study included 709 patients in each group. Opioid use was quantified as oral morphine equivalents in milligrams for each hospital day. The highest pain scores were collected from a visual analogue scale at 6-hour intervals. Predictive modeling was employed to compare pain medications and pain scores between the groups. RESULTS: The postoperative median length of stay was 3 (3-4) and 5 (4-5) days for the MIS and OS groups, respectively (P < .001). The predicted geometric mean oral morphine equivalents demonstrated lower opioid use for the MIS group compared with the OS group for the first 4 days. However, the predicted mean pain score was higher in the first 24 hours for the MIS group compared with the OS group (4.7 [4.5-4.8] vs 4.4 [4.3-4.5], respectively, on a visual analogue scale of 0 to 10). CONCLUSIONS: MV repair by MIS methods was associated with decreased opioid use but not with decreased postoperative pain scores. Possible explanations include the difference in incision site pain and subjective differences in postoperative pain expectations.

Malignant Left Ventricular Outflow Tract Obstruction: A Reason to Operate?

A 57-year-old man with high-grade synovial sarcoma was found to have cardiac involvement of his malignancy. Intracardiac tumor resulted in dynamic left ventricular outflow tract obstruction and severe mitral regurgitation. He underwent mitral valve replacement and had no cardiovascular symptoms at 1-year follow-up. (Level of Difficulty: Intermediate.).

Robotic vs. minimally invasive mitral valve repair: A 5-year comparison of surgical outcomes.

BACKGROUND: Minimally invasive mitral valve repair (MVr) is commonly performed. Data on the outcomes of robotic MVr versus nonrobotic minimally invasive MVr are lacking. We sought to compare the short-term and mid-term outcomes of robotic and nonrobotic MVr. METHODS: We reviewed all patients who underwent robotic MVr (n = 424) or nonrobotic MVr via right mini-thoracotomy (n = 86) at Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN, from January 2015 to February 2020. Data on baseline and operative characteristics, operative and long-term outcomes were analyzed. Patients were matched 1:1 using propensity scores. RESULTS: Sixty-nine matched pairs were included in the study. The median age was 59 years (interquartile range [IQR]: 54-69) and 75% (n = 103) were male. Baseline characteristics were similar after matching. Robotic and nonrobotic MVr had similar operative characteristics, except that robotic had longer cross-clamp times (57 [48-67] vs. 47 [37-58] min, p < .001) and more P2 resections (83% vs. 68%, p = .05) compared to nonrobotic MVr. There was no difference in operative outcomes between groups. Hospital stay was shorter after robotic MVr (4 [3-4] vs. 4 [4-6] days, p = .003). After a median follow-up of 3.3 years (IQR, 2.1-4.5), there was no mortality in either group, and there was no difference in freedom from mitral valve reoperations between robotic and nonrobotic MVr (5 years: 97.1% vs. 95.7%, p = .63). Follow-up echocardiogram analysis predicted excellent freedom from recurrent moderate-or-severe mitral regurgitation at 3 years after robotic and nonrobotic MVr (90% vs. 92%, p = .18, respectively). CONCLUSIONS: Both short-term and mid-term outcomes of robotic and nonrobotic minimally invasive mitral repair surgery are comparable.

Robotic Mitral Valve Repair: A Decade of Experience With Echocardiographic Follow-up.

BACKGROUND: Surgical approaches for mitral valve (MV) disease have evolved with the aim of developing minimally invasive techniques. Although the safety of robotic procedures has been documented, there are limited data on long-term echocardiographic follow-up. This review demonstrates outcomes of 11 years of robotic MV repair at a single, tertiary institution. METHODS: From 2008 to 2019, 843 patients underwent robotic MV repair at Mayo Clinic in Rochester, Minnesota. Repeated measures generalized least squares (GLS) modeling was used to assess the echocardiographic changes over time. RESULTS: The median age was 58 years (interquartile range, 50.8, 65.5 years), and 591 were male (70.1%). The mechanism of mitral regurgitation was posterior leaflet prolapse in 479 (56.8%) patients, bileaflet prolapse in 325 (38.6%), and anterior leaflet prolapse in 36 (4.3%). There were 3 early deaths (0.4%) and 24 early reoperations (2.8%). Echocardiographic follow-up demonstrated left ventricular end-systolic and end-diastolic dimensions, left atrial volume index, and pulmonary pressure all continuously improved up to 2 years postoperatively. Ejection fraction immediately declined postoperatively but then gradually improved to near normal over 2 years. Survival and freedom from reoperation at 10 years were 93% and 92.6%, respectively. When patients were surveyed after dismissal, 93.4% reported their activity level at or above their peers, and 93.3% reported no activity limitation from cardiac symptoms. CONCLUSIONS: Robotic MV repair is safe and effective with excellent long-term results, including echocardiographic data that demonstrated early improvement in cardiac chamber size and maintenance of postoperative cardiac function. Exceedingly low mortality rates and freedom from reoperation are comparable to those of the standard open repair.

Massive intrathoracic solitary fibrous tumor of the right hemithorax.

Solitary fibrous tumors of the pleura (SFTP) are rare mesenchymal tumors that arise from visceral or parietal tissue. Surgical resection of massive SFTP can be complicated by airway collapse, vascular compression/hemodynamic instability, and hemorrhage. Patients with SFTP may also present with metabolic derangements secondary to paraneoplastic processes. We present a case of successful removal of massive right-sided SFTP via clamshell sternotomy and discuss the perioperative considerations for which providers should be familiar.

Impact of Hematologic Malignancies on Outcome of Cardiac Surgery.

BACKGROUND: Previous studies suggest that patients with prior or current hematologic malignancy are at increased risk of intraoperative and postoperative complications when undergoing cardiac surgery. The aim of this review was to compare clinical outcomes of patients with a history of hematologic malignancy to those of similar patients with no known blood dyscrasia. METHODS: From January 1993 to June 2017, 37,839 patients underwent elective cardiac surgery at Mayo Clinic. We matched 612 patients (1.6%) with a history of hematologic malignancy to 612 controls, and compared operative details, early postoperative complications, and late survival. RESULTS: The median age of matched patients with hematologic malignancy was 71 years (interquartile range [IQR], 62 to 77) and 71 years (IQR, 62 to 77) for patients without cancer. Patients with prior diagnosis of malignancy had lower hemoglobin levels, 12.8 (IQR, 11.5 to 13.8) vs 13.5 (IQR, 12.2 to 14.6; P < .001), but similar platelet counts, 195 (IQR, 147 to 263) vs 203 (IQR, 170 to 245; P = .533). Patients with malignancy were at greater risk of receiving postoperative blood transfusions (47.4% vs 35.6%, P < .001). However, reoperations for postoperative bleeding (4.7% vs 3.3%, P = .253) and stroke (1.3% vs 1.3%, P > .999) were similar. Thirty-day mortality was 3.3% among patients with hematologic malignancy and 1.5% among matched controls (P = .061). Overall survival among patients with cancer was reduced (P < .0001). CONCLUSIONS: Although late survival is reduced in patients with hematologic malignancies, early outcomes are generally similar to those of matched controls. Therefore, surgery should not be withheld from patients with a diagnosis of hematologic malignancy who would benefit from cardiac procedures.

Open versus thoracoscopic thymectomy for juvenile myasthenia gravis.

BACKGROUND: Juvenile myasthenia gravis (JMG) is an antibody mediated autoimmune disorder that manifests as progressive voluntary muscle weakness and fatigue. In medically refractory cases, thymectomy has been shown to abrogate symptoms and reduce glucocorticoid dependence. While transcervical or transsternal incisions have been the traditional approach, adult trends now favor thoracoscopic thymectomy. Little data exist to support this approach in children. METHODS: A retrospective review of all patients younger than 20 years of age who underwent a thymectomy for JMG at two pediatric institutions between 2001 and 2018 was performed. Children were divided into either an open (transcervical or transsternal) or thoracoscopic group and baseline characteristics, perioperative, and postoperative outcomes were compared. RESULTS: Thirty-four thymectomies were performed during the 18-year study period; 18 via an open and 16 via a thoracoscopic approach. The operative time was shorter for open procedures compared thoracoscopic ones (108 ±â€¯49 and 145 ±â€¯43 min, respectively, p = 0.025). Thoracoscopic thymectomy was associated with less intraoperative blood loss (5.5 ±â€¯6.0 vs 55 ±â€¯67 ml, p = 0.007), decreased duration of postoperative intravenous narcotic use (5.0 ±â€¯1.5 vs 20 ±â€¯23 h, p = 0.018), and a shorter length of hospitalization (1.7 ±â€¯1.0 vs 2.7 ±â€¯1.1 days, p = 0.009). No perioperative complication occurred in either group. Clinical improvement was reported in 94% of children in both groups. CONCLUSIONS: Thoracoscopic thymectomy in children is a safe and effective surgical technique for the treatment of JMG. Increased acceptance of this minimally invasive approach by children, families, and referring neurologists may enable earlier surgical intervention. TYPE OF STUDY: Clinical research paper. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: III.

Deliberate Practice and the Emerging Roles of Simulation in Thoracic Surgery.

In the current era of duty hour limitations and societal focus on cardiothoracic surgical outcomes, simulation and deliberate practice have emerged as valuable supplemental training options. Evidence supporting acquisition of technical skill, clinical transferability, and patient safety within the realm of simulation is mounting. This article provides a focused synthesis of evidence regarding the usefulness of simulation-based training and deliberate practice as a whole and within the subspecialty of cardiothoracic surgery.

The Need for Multiple Bypass Grafts in Repair of Right Coronary Artery-to-Coronary Sinus Fistulas.

Coronary artery fistulas are rare anomalies with controversial management strategies. The two main treatment options are surgical repair and catheter embolization. This case report describes successful treatment of a complex right coronary artery-to-coronary sinus fistula by using a less conventional approach: multiple coronary artery bypass grafting.

Correlation of Objective Assessment Data With General Surgery Resident In-Training Evaluation Reports and Operative Volumes.

OBJECTIVE: Faculty evaluations, ABSITE scores, and operative case volumes often tell little about true resident performance. We developed an objective structured clinical examination called the Surgical X-Games (5 rooms, 15 minutes each, 12-15 tests total, different for each postgraduate [PGY] level). We hypothesized that performance in X-Games will prove more useful in identifying areas of strength or weakness among general surgery (GS) residents than faculty evaluations, ABSITE scores, or operative cases volumes. DESIGN: PGY 2 to 5 GS residents (n = 35) were tested in a semiannual X-Games assessment using multiple simulation tasks: laparoscopic skills, bowel anastomosis, CT/CXR analysis, chest tube placement, etc. over 1 academic year. Resident scores were compared to their ABSITE, in-training evaluation reports, and operating room case numbers. SETTING: Academic medical center. PARTICIPANTS: PGY-2, 3, 4, and 5 GS residents at Mayo Clinic in Rochester, MN. RESULTS: Results varied greatly within each class except for staff evaluations: in-training evaluation reports medians for PGY-2s were 5.3 (range: 5.0-6.0), PGY-3s 5.9 (5.5-6.3), PGY-4s 5.6 (5.0-6.0), and PGY-5s were 6.1 (5.6-6.9). Although ABSITE and operating room case volumes fluctated greatly with each PGY class, only X-Games scores (median: PGY-2 = 82, PGY-3 = 61, PGY-4 = 76, and PGY-5 = 60) correlated positively (p < 0.05) with operative case volume and negatively (p < 0.05) with staff evaluations. CONCLUSIONS: X-Games assessment generated wide differentiation of resident performance quickly, inexpensively, and objectively. Although "Minnesota-nice" surgical staff may feel all GS trainees are "above average," objective assessment tells us otherwise.

Sex Disparities After Induction Chemoradiotherapy and Esophagogastrectomy for Esophageal Cancer.

BACKGROUND: The impact of sex on the outcomes of treatment for locally advanced esophageal carcinoma is unclear. This study analyzed the impact of sex on response to neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy (nCRT), tumor recurrence, and survival. METHODS: From January 1990 through December 2013, female patients who received nCRT followed by esophagogastrectomy at 3 affiliated centers were compared with control male patients based on age, pretreatment clinical stage, histologic type, and surgical era. Only patients staged preoperatively with computed tomographic scans and endoscopic ultrasonography (EUS) were included. RESULTS: There were 366 patients (145 women and 221 men). The median female age was 64 years (range, 22-81 years), whereas male patients were 61 years (range, 33-82 years). The histologic type was adenocarcinoma in 105 (72%) women and 192 (87%) men, and it was squamous cell carcinoma in 40 (28%) women and 29 (13%) men (p = 0.005). Women were more likely to attain either a complete pathologic (CP) response or a nearly complete pathologic (NCP) response to induction therapy (84 [58%]) compared with men (103 [47%]; p = 0.034). Men had an 80% increased risk of recurrence (hazard ratio [HR], 1.80; 95% CI, 1.15-2.68; p = 0.008). There was no sex association with risk of death (p = 0.538). Irrespective of sex, a partial responder (relative to a complete or nearly complete responder) was 3 times more likely to have recurrence (HR, 2.96; 95% CI, 1.98-4.43; p < 0.001) and 2.5 times more likely to die (HR, 2.56; 95% CI, 1.88-3.48; p < 0.001). CONCLUSIONS: Female sex correlated with improved rates of achieving either a CP response or an NCP response after neoadjuvant chemotherapy and a smaller likelihood of experiencing tumor recurrence. Future efforts should be directed at understanding determinants of this sex disparity.

Basic Cardiac Surgery Skills on Sale for $22.50: An Aortic Anastomosis Simulation Curriculum.

BACKGROUND: Current resident and student duty-hour restrictions necessitate efficient training, which may be aided by simulation. Data on the utility of low-cost simulation in cardiothoracic surgery are scant. We evaluated the effect and value of a low-cost, low-fidelity aortic anastomosis simulation curriculum. METHODS: Twenty participants (11 medical students, 9 residents) completed an aortic anastomosis on a porcine heart as a pretest. Participants were then provided access to a 14-minute online video created by a cardiac surgeon and given a low-cost task trainer for self-directed practice. Five weeks later, participants performed another aortic anastomosis on a porcine heart as a posttest. Pretest and posttest performances were filmed, deidentified, and graded blindly and independently by two cardiac surgeons using a standardized assessment tool (perfect score, 110; passing score, 58 or higher). Participants were surveyed anonymously after the posttest. RESULTS: The mean (SD) aortic anastomosis performance score improved significantly from pretest (53.3 [25.3]) to posttest (83.6 [15.3]; p < 0.001). Pass rates also improved significantly (35% versus 95%, p < 0.001). Medical students' scores improved most (p = 0.01). All 20 participants reported improved confidence in performing the task, and 18 believed that the online video was essential to better performance. The cost of the curriculum totaled $22.50 per participant, with 6 hours of total staff time required for assessment. CONCLUSIONS: An aortic anastomosis training and simulation curriculum improves the skills of student and resident trainees with minimal expense and staff time commitment. Such a curriculum may be of great value to both cardiothoracic training programs and their trainees.